CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05175586CH-CaseUpdated Jan 13, 2022

Physiotherapeutic Case Studies in Frozen Shoulder Pathology

An interventional study of First data analysis and Second data analysis in Articular; Rigid, sponsored by GEMA LEÓN BRAVO. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 76 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-13.

Sponsored by GEMA LEÓN BRAVO · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2021, registered Oct 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 76 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The stiff shoulder presents symptoms such as pain, loss of mobility and strength, being more common the idiopathic origin associated to the female gender. The definitive diagnosis presents complications due to the number of etiologies that can cause it. Epidemiologically, it presents from 2 to 5% of medical incapacities in the working population. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous Neuromodulation together with Orthopedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) in comparison with Orthopedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) used in stiff shoulder.Design: Experimental clinical trial in 30 patients aged 21 to 76 years from a physiotherapy center divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=15) Percutaneous Neuromodulation + Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) Group 2 (n=15) Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan).

Read the detailed description

The stiff shoulder is a pathology characterized by a biomechanical restriction of the active and passive movement of the shoulder, showing clinical pictures of local inflammation with a notorious hyper vascularization that helps the clinical manifestations painful flexion, stiffness, limitation of external rotation, pain over the lower cervical area or near the insertion of the deltoid muscle and pain when supporting the affected limb with body weight.

Etiologically there are idiopathic and external factors that cause disorders such as osteoarthritis, chronic subacromial bursitis, or rotator cuff tendinopathy. Likewise, trauma is involved in a secondary way as well as diseases such as Parkinson's, diabetes, thyroid disorders among others. These clinical factors present two types of diagnosis: primary idiopathic stiff shoulder and extrinsic stiff shoulder secondary to trauma or surgery.

Among the physiotherapeutic treatments provided are joint mobilizations, therapeutic exercises, deep Cyriax massage, osteopathic techniques, cryotherapy (inflammatory phase), thermotherapy (chronic phase), electrotherapy for pain and ultrasound.

From the economic point of view, it presents from 2 to 5% of the medical incapacities in the working population, being this disease one of the first 20 sick leaves that reaches up to 12 months, generating high public hospital expenses and difficulties for the business area. Due to the above, many patients enter the operating room as a quick option to return to normality. However, this option does not seem to be the best for this disease, since the hypomobility of the movement increases gradually and chronically, caused by the fibrotic processes in the anterior face of the capsule, generating long-term inability for the external rotation of the joint.

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of Percutaneous Neuromodulation together with Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) compared to Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (Maitland and Mulligan) used in the stiff shoulder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Articular; Rigid

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stiff shoulder.
  • Neuromodulation.
  • Manual therapy.
  • Rotator cuff.
  • Physiotherapy.
03

In context

Bursitis

411 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 112 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 45 across 371 interventional studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with GEMA LEÓN BRAVO as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 76 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with difficulty in activities of daily living ABVD 35.
  • Patients with positive results in some of the physical examination tests.
  • Patients with a previous diagnosis by ultrasound imaging.
  • Patients with surgical intervention after 3 months of age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mental disorders or deficits.
  • Patients with needle phobia (belonephobia).
  • Patients with recent surgery before 3 months of age.
  • Patients with previous dislocation of the affected shoulder.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    15 patients in the experimental group of percutaneous neuromodulation together with orthopaedic manual therapy (Maitland and Mulligan)

    Diagnostic Test: First data analysis · Procedure: Second data analysis · Other: database

  • Active comparator
    Group 2

    15 patients in the experimental group of orthopaedic manual therapy (Maitland and Mulligan).

    Diagnostic Test: First data analysis · Procedure: Second data analysis · Other: database

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testFirst data analysis

    A series of questions were asked to a number of patients with diagnoses related to primary idiopathic stiff shoulder and/or extrinsic stiff shoulder secondary to trauma or surgery. These patients are part of the physiotherapy clinic receiving the research. This questionnaire answers basic questions for the structure of the study such as age and sex, physical behaviour during the week, endurance, athletic disability, reason for attending the clinic, exploratory motor tests, etc. Subsequently, physiotherapeutic tests related to the pathology within the research were performed consisting of joint range, percentage of shoulder disability and pain scale.

  • ProcedureSecond data analysis

    Three treatment sessions of Percutaneous Neuromodulation (PNM) and Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) (Maitland and Mulligan) (group 1) and three treatment sessions of Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) (Maitland and Mulligan) (group 2) were performed at a rate of two sessions per month for three months. These therapies were compared with the clinical examination performed prior to each new session to verify changes in joint range, percentage of shoulder disability, strength and pain scale.

  • Otherdatabase

    Age and sex were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The rest of the variables were expressed as mean, absolute and relative frequency. The chi-square test was used to analyse the differences between the examinations in terms of the time taken and the treatments used in the two groups. A confidence level of 95% was established, considering a value of p\<0.05 as statistically significant.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain scale (EVA)

    The values of pain levels during the examination are reflected as follows: 0= No pain 1-2= Little pain 3-4= Moderate pain 5-6= Severe pain 7-8= Very severe pain 9-10= Unbearable pain

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Rigid shoulder type

    Information on the type of stiff shoulder you have.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Daniels Scale

    Muscle function values during the scan are reflected as follows, with 0 being a negative value and 5 a positive value: 0= Muscle does not contract. 1. Muscle contracts, but there is no movement. 2. Muscle contracts and moves normally, but without resistance. 3. Muscle contracts and resists to a good degree. 4. Muscle contracts and resists to almost its full extent. 5. The muscle contracts and resists at full amplitude.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Joint range

    The values of joint range during the examination are reflected by means of the joint range scale which emphasizes specific degrees for elevation, external rotation and internal rotation.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants in each physical therapy application

    Three reviews were carried out corresponding to the three months of treatment. During these three months, participants received two sessions per week, for a total of 24 sessions: * Group 1 (n=15) received the percutaneous neuromodulation treatment together with orthopedic manual therapy (Maitland and Mulligan). * Group 2 (n=15) received orthopedic manual therapy treatment (Maitland and Mulligan) only.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gema León Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Clinic
    Córdoba, Andalucía 14011, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hiscock N, Bell S, Coghlan J. Pain, depression and the postoperative stiff shoulder. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 4;16:376. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0841-6. PubMed 26637238 ↗
  • Green HD, Jones A, Evans JP, Wood AR, Beaumont RN, Tyrrell J, Frayling TM, Smith C, Weedon MN. A genome-wide association study identifies 5 loci associated with frozen shoulder and implicates diabetes as a causal risk factor. PLoS Genet. 2021 Jun 10;17(6):e1009577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009577. eCollection 2021 Jun. PubMed 34111113 ↗
  • Pandey V, Madi S. Clinical Guidelines in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: An Update! Indian J Orthop. 2021 Feb 1;55(2):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00351-3. eCollection 2021 Apr. PubMed 33912325 ↗
  • Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL. Comparison of Treatments for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29581. PubMed 33326025 ↗
  • Akbar M, McLean M, Garcia-Melchor E, Crowe LA, McMillan P, Fazzi UG, Martin D, Arthur A, Reilly JH, McInnes IB, Millar NL. Fibroblast activation and inflammation in frozen shoulder. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 23;14(4):e0215301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215301. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31013287 ↗
  • Chan HBY, Pua PY, How CH. Physical therapy in the management of frozen shoulder. Singapore Med J. 2017 Dec;58(12):685-689. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017107. PubMed 29242941 ↗
  • Ryan V, Brown H, Minns Lowe CJ, Lewis JS. The pathophysiology associated with primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 15;17(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1190-9. PubMed 27527912 ↗
  • Jeong, JY, Shim, SB, Hong, JH, Im, W., Lee, SM y Yoo, JC (2020). Efecto del hombro congelado preoperatorio sobre los resultados clínicos después de la reparación artroscópica del manguito rotador. Revista ortopédica de medicina deportiva , 8 (7), 2325967120934449. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120934449
  • Cho, CH, Bae, KC y Kim, DH (2019). Estrategia de tratamiento para hombro congelado. Clínicas de cirugía ortopédica , 11 (3), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.3.249
  • Cui, J., Lu, W., He, Y., Jiang, L., Li, K., Zhu, W. y Wang, D. (2017). Biología molecular de la limitación inducida por el hombro congelado de los movimientos de la articulación del hombro. Revista de investigación en ciencias médicas: la revista oficial de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Isfahan , 22 , 61. https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1005_16
  • Vastamäki, H., Ristolainen, L. y Vastamäki, M. (2016). El rango de movimiento del hombro congelado diabético se recupera al nivel contralateral. Revista de investigación médica internacional , 44 (6), 1191-1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060516675112
  • Uppal, HS, Evans, JP y Smith, C. (2015). Hombro congelado: una revisión sistemática de las opciones terapéuticas. Revista mundial de ortopedia , 6 (2), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.263
  • Park, EW, Cho, JH, Cho, CH, Sung, DH y Kim, DH (2021). Comparación de evaluaciones ecográficas de hombro entre polimialgia reumática y hombro congelado en pacientes con dolor de hombro bilateral: un estudio retrospectivo comparativo. Revista de medicina personalizada ,
  • Dyer, BP, Burton, C., Rathod-Mistry, T., Blagojevic-Bucknall, M. y van der Windt, DA (2021). La diabetes como factor pronóstico en el hombro congelado: una revisión sistemática. Archivos de investigación en rehabilitación y traducción clínica , 3 (3), 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100141
  • Song, C., Song, C. y Li, C. (2021). Resultado de la manipulación bajo anestesia con o sin inyección de esteroides intraarticulares para el tratamiento del hombro congelado: un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Medicina , 100 (13), e23893. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023893

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The request for the data will be studied and considered upon prior and justified request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05175586
Lead sponsor
GEMA LEÓN BRAVO
Responsible party
GEMA LEÓN BRAVO (Principal Investigator, Clinica Gema Leon) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 4, 2022
Start date
Feb 3, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2021
Completion
Oct 7, 2021
Last update
Jan 13, 2022

Study contacts

Gema León Bravo, Physiotherap
principal investigator · Departamento de Enfermería, Farmacología y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, España
Jaime Rando Anaya, Physiotherap
study chair · Universidad de Córdoba

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion