ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05175469MPO-MDS-ValidUpdated Mar 13, 2024

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Peripheral Blood Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase Expression for Ruling Out Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Protocol for a Diagnostic Accuracy Study

An observational study in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Recruiting at 8 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-13.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal bone marrow neoplasms characterized by dysplasia and ineffective hematopoiesis leading to peripheral blood cytopenias, with an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. The conventional diagnostic work-up of MDS relies on cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow, which may be complemented by conventional cytogenetic, flow cytometry, and molecular analysis by next generation sequencing techniques.

Suspicion of MDS is the commonest reason for bone marrow aspirate in older patients with unexplained peripheral blood cytopenias. Yet many patients are exposed to unnecessary bone marrow aspiration-related discomfort and harms, because of the limited prevalence of disease among subjects referred for suspected MDS. In this context, a valid and reliable assay based on peripheral blood sample that accurately discriminates MDS from other cytopenia etiologies without requiring invasive bone marrow aspiration is warranted.

The accuracy of peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression quantified by flow cytometric analysis for the diagnosis of MDS is supported by three primary studies totaling 211 individuals. An intra-individual robust coefficient of variation (RCV) value for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression lower than 30.0% accurately ruled out MDS, with both sensitivity and negative predictive value point estimates of 100%, in consecutive patients with suspected disease. This biomarker might obviate the need for cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate for up to 35% of patients referred for suspected MDS. Although promising, these preliminary results require replication in an independent external validation sample.

The broad aim of the multicenter MPO-MDS-Valid study project is to prospectively validate the diagnostic accuracy of intra-individual RCV for peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression quantified by flow cytometric analysis among consecutive patients referred for suspected MDS.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of the MPO-MDS-Valid study is to estimate the discriminative accuracy (i.e., area under the ROC curve point estimate along with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of the intra-individual RCV for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood for the diagnosis of MDS in consecutive patients.

The secondary objectives are:

  1. To estimate the negative predictive value of the intra-individual RCV for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood (with a prespecified threshold of 30.0%) for ruling out MDS in consecutive patients.
  2. To estimate the prevalence of alternate diagnoses established by bone marrow cytomorphology among true negative patients (i.e., patients with intra-individual RCV value lower than 30.0% and for whom MDS was ruled out by the reference method).

Study design: The MPO-MDS-Valid study project is a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of an index test by comparison with a reference standard in unselected consecutive patients. An institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest III) reviewed and approved the study protocol and the information form, prior to study initiation. No specific intervention is assigned to participants. All diagnostic testing, procedures, and medication ordering are performed at the discretion of attending physicians. The index test result will have no impact on patient management.

Screening: All consecutive patients referred for suspicion of MDS to the immuno-hematology lab at the study sites will be screened for eligibility. A lab physician will review inclusion and exclusion criteria, using computerized medical and laboratory records.

Recruitment: Participants will be included in the study once all the screening activities have been conducted and only if the patient meets all inclusion and none exclusion criteria. The consent for flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood sample and data collection through chart review will be sought under a regime of "non-opposition" (opt-out): after appropriate written information is delivered, data will be collected except in case of opposition from the patient. All patients included in the study will be assigned a unique patient identification number. This number will be used to identify the patient throughout the study.

Index test: Flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood will be blinded to the reference standard. Myeloperoxidase expression in the peripheral blood neutrophil population within an individual subject will be expressed as RCV. The intra-individual RCV is calculated as the robust standard deviation divided by the median. The robust standard deviation is a function of the deviation of individual data points to the median of the study population. Intra-individual RCV is expressed as percentage and reflects the variability in myeloperoxidase expression in the peripheral blood neutrophil population within an individual subject.

Reference standard: At each study site, cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate will be performed by experienced hematopathologists blinded to the index test.

Morphologic assessment may be complemented by bone marrow flow cytometric score, karyotype, and molecular profiling, where relevant. The reference criteria for MDS are 1) the presence of ≥10% dysplastic cells in any hematopoietic lineage on bone marrow aspirate, and 2) the exclusion of acute myeloid leukemia (defined by the presence of ≥20% bone marrow blasts). Consistent with WHO classification, MDS subcategorization will be based on the degree of dysplasia (unilineage versus multilineage), blast percentages, presence of ring sideroblasts, and cytogenetic analysis (del(5q)).

The reference criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) diagnosis are 1) the presence of persistent peripheral blood monocytosis ≥1 x109/L, and 2) monocyte accounting for more than 10% of the white blood cell differential count. Idiopathic cytopenia of uncertain significance (ICUS) will be defined by unexplained mild persistent cytopenia for 4 to 6 months and the failure to establish the diagnosis of MDS according to reference criteria.

Patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is confirmed by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS.

Patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is ruled out by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS. This latter subgroup will include patients with ICUS, as defined in accordance with published guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

  • Myelodysplastic syndromes
  • Diagnostic accuracy study
  • Flow cytometry analysis
  • Myeloperoxidase
  • Peripheral blood sample
  • Additional relevant MeSH terms: Preleukemia, Syndrome, Disease, Pathologic Processes
03

In context

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

1,997 studies on the registry are indexed under Myelodysplastic Syndromes; 324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 150 across 214 observational studies indexed under Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Browse Myelodysplastic Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 837 studies on the registry; 207 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult, Older Adult

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age at enrollment ≥18 years
  • Referral for suspicion of myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Indication for bone marrow examination
  • ≥1 peripheral blood cytopenia defined by concentration \<12 g/dL for female and \<13g/dL for male patients, count \<150 x109/L, \<1.8 x109/L
  • Inpatient or outpatient care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • History of or active documented MDS or CMML
  • Enrollment in intensive or critical care unit
  • Incarcerated or individuals protected by French regulation (Article L1121.5 and following, Code de la Santé Publique)
  • Not affiliated with social security system
  • Previous enrollment in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testFlow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression

    Performance of flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood samples will be blinded to the reference standard. Peripheral blood samples will be collected in 5 ml (EDTA) anticoagulant plastic tubes and processed on the same day of collection. Blood samples will be incubated with a panel of antibodies conjugated to fluorochromes, according to the manufacturers' recommendations. At least 10,000 cell events will be acquired on a 3-laser, 8/12-color flow cytometer and analyzed using flow cytometry software. Myeloperoxidase expression in the peripheral blood neutrophil population within an individual subject will be expressed as intra-individual robust coefficient of variation (RCV).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

    The area under the ROC curve point estimate along with 95% confidence interval will quantify the accuracy of the index test (i.e., intra-individual RCV for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood) for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The reference diagnosis will be established by cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate performed by independent experienced hematopathologists blinded to the index test results. Morphologic assessment may be complemented by bone marrow flow cytometric score, karyotype, and molecular profiling, where relevant.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Negative predictive value

    The negative predictive value point estimate along with 95% confidence interval for the index test (i.e., intra-individual robust coefficient of variation with a prespecified threshold of 30.0%) will be computed by comparison with the reference standard for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Prevalence of alternate diagnoses for true negative cases

    Prevalence point estimate (along with 95% confidence interval) of alternate diagnosis established by bone marrow examination for unconfirmed suspicions of myelodysplastic syndromes with intra-individual RCV\< 30.0% for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

7 of 8 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Richard VEYRAT-MASSON · Contact
  • Grenoble_Alpes UniversityHospital
    Grenoble, 38043, France
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Lyon Sud, HCL
    Lyon, 69310, France
    Recruiting
    • Delphine MANZONI · Contact
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes
    Marseille, 13009, France
    Recruiting
    • Anne-Catherine LHOUMEAU · Contact
  • University Hospital Saint-Eloi
    Montpellier, 34090, France
    Recruiting
    • Caroline BRET · Contact
  • Chu Nantes
    Nantes, 44093, France
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital NICE
    Nice, 06202, France
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital, Saint-Étienne
    Saint-Étienne, 42055, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The principal investigator will respond directly to data requests by providing a de-identified data set. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published articles (i.e., main text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be supplied.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning 24 months after publication of the main findings of the final dataset. No end date.

Access criteria: De-identified data will be available for individual participant data meta-analysis purpose. Researchers should submit a methodologically sound proposal that complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Proposals should be directed to TRaskovalova@chu-grenoble.fr. Data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05175469
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 3, 2022
Start date
Mar 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2024

Study contacts

Tatiana RASKOVALOVA
Contact
traskovalova@chu-grenoble.fr
04 76 76 63 34
Tatiana RASKOVALOVA
principal investigator · University Hospital, Grenoble

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion