CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05172089DFUBiofilmUpdated Mar 18, 2026

Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) Biofilm Infection and Recurrence

An observational study in Chronic Wounds, Biofilm Infection and Trans-epidermal Water Loss (TEWL), sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
405
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This work is based on DFU patients, seeks to conduct a fully powered clinical study testing i) If DFU with a history of biofilm infection closes with deficient barrier function. ii) whether such functionally deficient wound closure, manifested as high TEWL, is associated with greater wound recurrence. The primary parent study will also address molecular mechanisms implicated in biofilm-induced loss of skin epithelial barrier integrity in DFU patients.

Read the detailed description

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are one of the most common reasons for hospitalization of diabetic patients and frequently results in amputation of lower limbs. Of the one million people who undergo non-traumatic leg amputations annually worldwide, 75% are performed on people who have type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The risk of death at 10 years for a diabetic with DFU is twice as high as the risk for a patient without a DFU. The rate of amputation in patients with DFU is 38.4%4. Infection is a common (>50%) complication of DFU. Emerging evidence underscores the significant risk that biofilm infection poses to the non-healing DFU. Biofilms are estimated to account for 60% of chronic wound infections. In the biofilm form, bacteria are in a dormant metabolic state. Thus, standard clinical techniques like the colony forming unit (CFU) assay to detect infection may not detect biofilm infection. Thus, biofilm infection may be viewed as a silent maleficent threat in wound care.

n the current standard of care (SoC), wound closure is defined (FDA) by wound area re-epithelialization without drainage. The investigators' pre-clinical large animal work demonstrates that wounds with a history of biofilm infection may meet above criteria, but the repaired wound-site skin is deficient in barrier function. This has led to the concept of functional wound closure wherein the current clinical definition of wound closure is supplemented with a functional parameter - restoration of skin barrier function as measured by low trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL).

This study rests pilot study showing that closed DFU with deficient barrier function are more likely to recur. Biofilm infection as assessed through scanning electron microscopy and wheat germ agglutin assay performed on debrided tissue causes faulty re-epithelialization, compromising skin barrier function at the closed wound site. This work is based on DFU patients, seeks to conduct a fully powered clinical study testing i) If DFU with a history of biofilm infection closes with deficient barrier function. ii) whether such functionally deficient wound closure, manifested as high TEWL, is associated with greater wound recurrence. The primary parent study will also address molecular mechanisms implicated in biofilm-induced loss of skin epithelial barrier integrity in DFU patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Wounds
  • Biofilm Infection
  • Trans-epidermal Water Loss (TEWL)
  • Diabetic Foot
  • Diabetic Foot Infection

Keywords

  • foot ulcer
  • diabetic foot
  • wound infection
  • diabetic foot ulcer
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 405 is above the median of 100 across 186 observational studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

clinically diagnosed Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) patients who are suspected to be infected will be recruited for this larger cohort of patients in the parent study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female, Age ≥ 18
  • Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including all study visits and study activities.
  • Patient with an open Diabetic Foot Ulcer
  • Adequate arterial blood flow as evidenced by at least one of the following (for wounds below the knee):
  • TcOM >30 mmHg
  • Ankle-brachial index at least ≥0.7
  • Toe pressure > 30 mmHg
  • TBI > 0.6 mmHg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are deemed unable to understand the procedures, risks, and benefits of the study.
  • Wounds closed or to be surgically closed by flap or graft coverage
  • Subjects with marked immunodeficiency (HIV/AIDS, or on immunosuppressive medications.
  • TcOM \< 30mmHg
  • Diabetics with a hemoglobin A1c > 15 within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Subject with autoimmune connective tissue disease
  • Ulcer size and location that does not allow the TEWL measurement per SOP
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Unable to comply with study procedures and/or complete study visits
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
405 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer study

    405 clinically diagnosed Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) patients who are suspected to be infected will be recruited . Wound swab for culture obtained. Baseline digital imaging of target wound(s). SF-12 Health survey, Visual Analogue Pain scale, Cardiff wound impact questionnaires. Wound site evaluation including TcOM/TBI/ankle brachial index (ABI) will be completed for subjects with wounds below the knee, if not already completed per standard of care within the previous 12 months. Hemoglobin A1c point of care testing will be drawn for diabetic subjects who do not have an A1c available within 90 days prior to enrollment; 3mm biopsy tissue or debrided tissue will be collected. Ideally, two tissue samples will be obtained; the subject's medical records will be reviewed and followed for up to 16 weeks or until their wound has closed, whichever comes first. The research staff will also call the patient or care facility as needed to check for wound closure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Biofilm infection abundance

    Test the incidence of wound biofilm infection at initial visit and test its association with deficient skin barrier function at the closed DFU-site

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. TEWL

    Trans epidermal water loss post closure and 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
    Recruiting
  • UPMC Wound Healing Services at UPMC Passavant
    Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066, United States
    • Chandan K Sen, Phd · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 19, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05172089
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), University of Arizona
Responsible party
Chandan Sen (Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 29, 2021
Start date
Apr 2, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 27, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 27, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Piya Das Ghatak, PhD, MS
Contact
piya.dasghatak@pitt.edu
4126240422
Shomita S Steiner, PhD, MS
Contact
SSTEINER@pitt.edu
463•236•8770
Chandan K Sen, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion