CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05167409Updated Sep 3, 2026Results posted

Study of Evorpacept (ALX148) With Cetuximab and Pembrolizumab for Refractory Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Evorpacept (ALX148) and Cetuximab in Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Terminated at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Accrual was terminated due to safety concerns
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This Phase 2 clinical study will evaluate evorpacept (ALX148) in combination with cetuximab and pembrolizumab for refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label, multi-center, single-arm phase II clinical trial (with safety run-in) evaluating the combination of evorpacept (ALX148), cetuximab, and pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer who have progressed on at least 2 lines of systemic therapy. A subset of patients will undergo study-related biopsies. There will be a safety run-in stage followed by a dose expansion stage. Patients in both stages will continue to receive study therapy until disease progression according to RECIST v1.1.

02

Conditions studied

  • Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • evorpacept (ALX148)
  • Cetuximab
  • Pembrolizumab
  • CRC
  • colorectal cancer
  • microsatellite stable
  • MSS
  • CD47
  • SIRPa
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

To be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria at screening (any assessments included in the Schedule of Events [Section 1.3] on Cycle 1 Day 1 must also continue to be met for the patient to remain eligible):

  1. Provision to sign and date the consent form.
  2. Able to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study in the Investigator's judgment.
  3. Age ≥ 18 years on the day of signing informed consent
  4. If in Cohort A, the patient must state willingness to undergo pre- and post-treatment biopsies. According to the Investigator's judgement, the planned biopsies should not expose the patient to substantially increased risk of complications.
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  6. Histologically confirmed unresectable metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

    • All primary tumor locations are allowed
    • Measurement of EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry is not required
  7. Progression on at least two prior lines of therapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

    • A patient who progressed on a single line of therapy including a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan for unresectable metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (e.g., FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOXIRI) is eligible.
    • Previous administration of anti-EGFR drugs does not impact eligibility, except as listed in Exclusion Criterion #15.
  8. Microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair status documented (only one of these criteria is needed, however if one criterion is met and one is not met then the patient is excluded)
  9. Measurable disease, according to RECIST v1.1. Previously irradiated lesions are not considered measurable unless progression has been documented in the lesion. Note that lesions intended to be biopsied should not be target lesions.
  10. Adequate hematologic and end organ function, defined by the following laboratory results:

    • ANC ≥ 1.5 × 109/L
    • Platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL without transfusion in the previous week
    • Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN); patients with known Gilbert's disease may have a bilirubin ≤ 3.0 ×ULN
    • AST, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 3 × ULN with the following exceptions:

      • Patients with documented liver metastases: AST and/or ALT ≤ 5 ×ULN
      • Patients with documented liver or bone metastases: ALP ≤ 5×ULN
    • Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min as calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula or measured using a 24-hour urine collection
    • International normalized ratio (INR) OR prothrombin time (PT) ≤1.5 × ULN unless participant is receiving anticoagulant therapy as long as INR or PT is within expected or therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants
    • Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≤1.5 × ULN unless participant is receiving anticoagulant therapy as long as aPTT is within expected or therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants
  11. QTcF interval of ≤480 msec (Based upon value from the screening ECG).
  12. Serum pregnancy test (for females of childbearing potential) negative at screening and at C1D1. A woman is considered fertile (woman of childbearing potential, "WOCBP") following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Women in the following categories are not considered WOCBP:

    • Premenarchal
    • Premenopauseal female with one of the following: documented hysterectomy, documented bilateral salpingectomy, documented bilateral oophorectomy (note: documentation can come from the site personnel's review of the participant's medical records, medical examination, or medical history interview)
    • Postmenopausal female. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. A high follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range may be used to confirm a postmenopausal state in women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). However, in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhea, confirmation with two FSH measurements in the postmenopausal range is required. Females on HRT and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the non-hormonal highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of postmenopausal status before study enrollment.

    Female participants of childbearing potential are eligible to participate if they agree to correctly use one of the following forms of highly effective method of contraception with a failure rate of \<1% per year when used consistently and correctly during the treatment period and for at least 180 days after the last study treatment. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception. Use should be consistent with local regulations regarding the use of contraceptive methods for participants of clinical studies. If locally required, in accordance with Clinical Trial Facilitation Group (CTFG) guidelines, acceptable hormonal contraceptives are limited to those which inhibit ovulation.

    • Progestogen- only contraceptive implant
    • Intrauterine hormone-releasing system
    • Intrauterine device (IUD)
    • Bilateral tubal occlusion
    • Vasectomized partner. A vasectomized partner is a highly effective contraception method provided that the partner is the sole male sexual partner of the WOCBP and the absence of sperm has been confirmed. If not, an additional highly effective method of contraception should be used.
    • Sexual abstinence. Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatment. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant.
    • Combined (estrogen- and progestogen- containing) hormonal contraception, including oral, intravaginal, transdermal, or injectable
    • Progestogen-only hormonal contraception, including oral or injectable
  13. For men: Male participants with female partners of childbearing potential are eligible to participate if they agree to one of the following during the treatment period and for at least 180 days after the last dose of study treatment as defined below. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception. Men must also agree to refrain from donating sperm following during the treatment period and for at least 180 days after the last dose of study treatment.

    • Be abstinent from penile-vaginal intercourse as their usual and preferred lifestyle (abstinent on a long term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent
    • Use a male condom plus partner use of a contraceptive method with a failure rate of \<1% per year as described in Inclusion Criteria #12 when having penile-vaginal intercourse with a woman of childbearing potential who is not currently pregnant.

      • Note: Men with a pregnant or breastfeeding partner must agree to remain abstinent from penile-vaginal intercourse or use a male condom during each episode of penile penetration.

Inclusion Criteria:

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

Cancer-related exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with known MSI-high status or known mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)
  2. Patients in whom both mismatch repair and microsatellite stability status are unknown
  3. Has known active CNS metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis. Participants with previously treated brain metastases may participate provided they are radiologically stable, i.e. without evidence of progression for at least 4 weeks by repeat imaging (note that the repeat imaging should be performed during study screening), clinically stable and without requirement of steroid treatment for at least 14 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1.
  4. Systemic anti-cancer therapy within 4 weeks of starting study treatment (6 weeks for mitomycin C or nitrosureas). If systemic anti-cancer therapy was given within 4 weeks, patient may be included if 5 times the elimination half-life of the drug has passed.
  5. Malignancies other than CRC within 3 years prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 with the exception of those with a negligible risk of metastasis or death (e.g., expected 5-year overall survival > 90%) treated with expected curative outcome (such as adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, localized prostate cancer treated surgically with curative intent, and ductal carcinoma in situ treated surgically with curative intent).
  6. Prior radiation therapy within 14 days prior to study Cycle 1 Day 1 and/or persistence of radiation-related adverse effects. Participants must have recovered from all radiation-related toxicities, not require corticosteroids, and not have had radiation pneumonitis. A 1-week washout is permitted for palliative radiation (≤2 weeks of radiotherapy) to non-CNS disease. However, palliative radiation therapy (as long as it does not involve target lesions) is permitted on the study.
  7. Prior allogeneic bone marrow transplantation or solid organ transplant for another malignancy in the past.
  8. Spinal cord compression not definitively treated with surgery and/or radiation.
  9. Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures.
  10. Uncontrolled tumor related pain. Patients who require narcotic pain medication during screening should be on a stable dose regimen for seven days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1.

    Exclusion criteria related to study medication:

  11. History of severe allergic, anaphylactic, or other hypersensitivity reactions to any of the study medications or their classes
  12. History of red meat allergy or history of tick bite (these may increase the risk of a cetuximab infusion reaction).
  13. Prior therapy with an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti PD L2 agent or with an agent directed to another stimulatory or co-inhibitory T-cell receptor (eg, CTLA-4, OX 40, CD137).
  14. Prior treatment with any anti-CD47 or anti-SIRPα drugs
  15. Left-sided (at or distal to the splenic flexure) RAS/BRAF WT mCRC who are EGFR inhibitor naïve.
  16. Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving systemic steroid therapy or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1.
  17. History of hemolytic transfusion reaction.
  18. History of non-infectious pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease that required steroids or has current pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease.
  19. Has an autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids, or immunosuppressive drugs. Replacement therapy (eg; thyroxine, insulin, physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency) is not considered a form of systemic treatment.
  20. History of autoimmune hemolytic anemia or autoimmune thrombocytopenia

    Exclusion criteria based on organ function or medical history:

  21. Any major surgery within 28 days prior to enrollment (does not include pre-treatment biopsy).
  22. The patient has clinically relevant coronary artery disease or history of myocardial infarction in the last 12 months or high risk of uncontrolled arrhythmia or uncontrolled cardiac insufficiency.
  23. The patient has uncontrolled or poorly-controlled hypertension (>180 mmHg systolic or > 130 mmHg diastolic).
  24. Life expectancy of \< 12 weeks.
  25. Has a history or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might confound the results of the study, interfere with the participant's participation for the full duration of the study, or is not in the best interest of the participant to participate, in the opinion of the treating investigator.
  26. Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial.
  27. Pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant during the study.
  28. AEs due to prior cancer therapies that have not returned to ≤Grade 1 or baseline. Participants with endocrine-related AEs Grade ≤2 that are now controlled with treatment/hormonal therapy are eligible.

    Exclusion criteria based on infectious diseases:

  29. Active infection requiring IV antibiotics at screening.
  30. Patients with active hepatitis B (chronic or acute). Active hepatitis B infection is defined as having a positive hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] test at screening. Patients with a cleared hepatitis B infection (as defined by the presence of hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc], absence of HBsAg, and negative HBV DNA) are eligible.
  31. Patients with active hepatitis C. Patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is negative for HCV RNA.
  32. Known HIV infection.
  33. Recent COVID-19 diagnosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic). To become eligible (following symptomatic infection), the patient must not have fever for 24 hours (without using medicine to reduce fever), other symptoms have improved, and at least 10 days have passed since onset of symptoms. To become eligible (following asymptomatic infection, ie positive test only), at least 10 days have passed since the positive test. In either case, a repeat COVID-19 test is not required. Likewise, a persistently positive test (if obtained) does not continue to exclude the patient should the other criteria be satisfied.
  34. Influenza vaccination should be given during influenza season. Patients must not receive live, attenuated influenza vaccine (e.g., FluMist®) within 30 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 or at any time during the study and for at least 5 months after the last dose of study drug.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Safety run-in evaluating evorpacept at 15 mg/kg weekly

    Doses: * Evorpacept (ALX148) dose level (DL) 1: 15 mg/kg weekly * Cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly * Pembrolizumab: 200 mg every 3 weeks

    Drug: Evorpacept (ALX148) · Drug: Cetuximab · Drug: Pembrolizumab

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Safety run-in evaluating evorpacept at 10 mg/kg weekly

    Doses: * Evorpacept (ALX148) dose level (DL) -1: 10 mg/kg weekly * Cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly * Pembrolizumab: 200 mg every 3 weeks

    Drug: Evorpacept (ALX148) · Drug: Cetuximab · Drug: Pembrolizumab

  • Experimental
    Stage 2: Expansion cohort using recommended dose (RD) of evorpacept

    Doses: * Evorpacept (ALX148) dose level (DL) 1: 15 mg/kg weekly * Cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly * Pembrolizumab: 200 mg every 3 weeks

    Drug: Evorpacept (ALX148) · Drug: Cetuximab · Drug: Pembrolizumab

Interventions

  • DrugEvorpacept (ALX148)

    IV QW

    Also known as: evorpacept

  • DrugCetuximab

    IV QW

    Also known as: Erbitux

  • DrugPembrolizumab

    IV Q3W

    Also known as: Keytruda

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    A patient is considered to be an objective responder if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as objective responders.

    Time frame: The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each individual patient. Per protocol, assessments will continue until disease progression. The latest assessment was performed at Cycle 21, Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent)

  2. Determine the Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept (ALX148) in Combination With Cetuximab and Pembrolizumab

    The recommended dose (RD) of evorpacept was determined by evaluating the totality of the first-cycle clinical data. Rules to determine the RD based on the number of patients experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) were defined in the protocol.

    Time frame: During the safety run-in, each patient must have completed at least the 1st cycle (3 weeks) of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    A patient is classified as 'Disease Controlled' if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1. DCR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as 'Disease Controlled'.

    Time frame: The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each individual patient. Per protocol, assessments will continue until disease progression. The latest assessment was performed at Cycle 21, Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent).

  2. Duration Of Response (DOR)

    DOR is defined as the length of time (months) from the 1st response (CR or PR per RECIST v1.1) until either the first observation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. Patients who did not experience PD or die are considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. This is a subgroup analysis, consisting of all patients who experienced response (CR or PR per RECIST v1.1)

    Time frame: From date of 1st response (CR or PR) until either progression (PD or death) or censoring date

  3. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Months-to-Progression is defined as the length of time (in months) from enrollment until either the first observation of progressive disease (PD) using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause. Patients who did not have PD or die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. PFS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient progressed or not (i.e. were censored), and the months-to-progression times for each patient.

    Time frame: For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-progression (as defined above)

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    Months-to-death is defined as the number of months from enrollment until death from any cause. Subjects who did not die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. OS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient died or not, and the months-to-death times for each patient.

    Time frame: For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-death time (as defined above)

Other outcomes

  1. ORR - Response-Evaluable Population

    A patient is considered to be an objective responder if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as objective responders.

    Time frame: The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each patient, until they experience disease progression. The latest timepoint an assessment was performed was at Cycle 21 Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent).

  2. DCR - Response-Evaluable Population

    A patient is classified as 'Disease Controlled' if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1. DCR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as 'Disease Controlled'.

    Time frame: The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each individual patient. Per protocol, assessments will continue until disease progression. The latest assessment was performed at Cycle 21, Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent).

  3. PFS - Response-Evaluable Population

    Months-to-Progression is defined as the length of time (in months) from enrollment until either the first observation of progressive disease (PD) using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause. Patients who did not have PD or die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. PFS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient progressed or not (i.e. were censored), and the months-to-progression times for each patient.

    Time frame: For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-progression (as defined above)

  4. OS - Response-Evaluable Population

    Months-to-death is defined as the number of months from enrollment until death from any cause. Subjects who did not die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. OS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient died or not, and the months-to-death times for each patient.

    Time frame: For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-death time (as defined above)

07

Results

Posted Jul 22, 2026
Limitations and caveats
These results must be interpreted with caution in the context of limited sample size due to early termination of study enrollment.

Participant flow

Pts with refractory MSS CRC were treated with triple therapy in a safety run-in (Stage 1) followed by expansion (Stage 2). Primary objectives were to determine recommended dose of evorpacept and objective response rate (vs historical control). Trial enrollment was terminated early due to safety concerns.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimental : Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental : Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Started934
Completed934
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)

A patient is considered to be an objective responder if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as objective responders.

Time frame:
The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each individual patient. Per protocol, assessments will continue until disease progression. The latest assessment was performed at Cycle 21, Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ParticipantsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Objective Response Rate (ORR)0 (0.002 to 0.302)01
PrimaryDetermine the Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept (ALX148) in Combination With Cetuximab and Pembrolizumab

The recommended dose (RD) of evorpacept was determined by evaluating the totality of the first-cycle clinical data. Rules to determine the RD based on the number of patients experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) were defined in the protocol.

Time frame:
During the safety run-in, each patient must have completed at least the 1st cycle (3 weeks) of treatment.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Determine the Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept (ALX148) in Combination With Cetuximab and Pembrolizumab
ParticipantsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Determine the Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept (ALX148) in Combination With Cetuximab and Pembrolizumab010
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)

A patient is classified as 'Disease Controlled' if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1. DCR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as 'Disease Controlled'.

Time frame:
The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each individual patient. Per protocol, assessments will continue until disease progression. The latest assessment was performed at Cycle 21, Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
ParticipantsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Disease Control Rate (DCR)0 (0.016 to 0.383)11
SecondaryDuration Of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the length of time (months) from the 1st response (CR or PR per RECIST v1.1) until either the first observation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. Patients who did not experience PD or die are considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. This is a subgroup analysis, consisting of all patients who experienced response (CR or PR per RECIST v1.1)

Time frame:
From date of 1st response (CR or PR) until either progression (PD or death) or censoring date
Reported as:
Number · Months
Duration Of Response (DOR)
MonthsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Duration Of Response (DOR)——13.2
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

Months-to-Progression is defined as the length of time (in months) from enrollment until either the first observation of progressive disease (PD) using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause. Patients who did not have PD or die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. PFS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient progressed or not (i.e. were censored), and the months-to-progression times for each patient.

Time frame:
For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-progression (as defined above)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
monthsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)2.3 (2.2 to NA)2.2 (1.2 to 2.6)2.8 (0.7 to NA)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

Months-to-death is defined as the number of months from enrollment until death from any cause. Subjects who did not die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. OS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient died or not, and the months-to-death times for each patient.

Time frame:
For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-death time (as defined above)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Overall Survival (OS)NA (4.7 to NA)7.2 (1.2 to NA)NA (0.7 to NA)
Other pre-specifiedORR - Response-Evaluable Population

A patient is considered to be an objective responder if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as objective responders.

Time frame:
The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each patient, until they experience disease progression. The latest timepoint an assessment was performed was at Cycle 21 Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
ORR - Response-Evaluable Population
ParticipantsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
ORR - Response-Evaluable Population001
Other pre-specifiedDCR - Response-Evaluable Population

A patient is classified as 'Disease Controlled' if their best overall response (BOR) of their follow-up tumor assessments was assessed to be complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1. DCR is defined as the proportion of patients who were classified as 'Disease Controlled'.

Time frame:
The duration of time during which tumor assessments were performed for each individual patient. Per protocol, assessments will continue until disease progression. The latest assessment was performed at Cycle 21, Day 15 (14.5 mo after informed consent).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DCR - Response-Evaluable Population
ParticipantsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
DCR - Response-Evaluable Population011
Other pre-specifiedPFS - Response-Evaluable Population

Months-to-Progression is defined as the length of time (in months) from enrollment until either the first observation of progressive disease (PD) using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause. Patients who did not have PD or die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. PFS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient progressed or not (i.e. were censored), and the months-to-progression times for each patient.

Time frame:
For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-progression (as defined above)
Reported as:
Median · months
PFS - Response-Evaluable Population
monthsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
PFS - Response-Evaluable Population2.3 (2.2 to NA)2.4 (1.4 to NA)2.9 (2.7 to NA)
Other pre-specifiedOS - Response-Evaluable Population

Months-to-death is defined as the number of months from enrollment until death from any cause. Subjects who did not die will be considered to be censored at the latest date they are confirmed to be alive, which is the most recent of their discontinuation date or latest follow-up date. OS is a survival analysis involving both the binary endpoint of whether or not each patient died or not, and the months-to-death times for each patient.

Time frame:
For each subject, from enrollment until the end of their months-to-death time (as defined above)
Reported as:
Median · months
OS - Response-Evaluable Population
monthsExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
OS - Response-Evaluable PopulationNA (4.7 to NA)16.9 (3.3 to NA)NA (NA to NA)

Adverse events

Collected over Study patients were assessed for the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) from the time they enrolled onto the trial until the most recent of their study discontinuation date or follow-up date, up to 24 months. The mean follow-up time was 10.3 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg Weekly1/3 (33.3%)2/3 (66.7%)3/3 (100%)
Experimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg Weekly6/9 (66.7%)5/9 (55.6%)9/9 (100%)
Experimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept1/4 (25%)4/4 (100%)4/4 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent serious events
EventExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Urinary Tract InfectionRenal and urinary disorders1/30/90/4
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/30/90/4
Creatinine IncreasedRenal and urinary disorders1/30/90/4
Hepatobiliary Disorder (choledocholithiasis)Hepatobiliary disorders0/30/91/4
Mucositis OralGastrointestinal disorders0/30/91/4
Prostate CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/30/91/4
Cytokine Release SyndromeImmune system disorders0/30/91/4
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/32/90/4
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders0/31/90/4
pneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/31/90/4
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 77
Most frequent other events
EventExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of Evorpacept
Blood bilirubin increasedHepatobiliary disorders2/30/90/4
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/31/91/4
HypokalemiaRenal and urinary disorders2/30/90/4
anorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/30/92/4
FatigueNervous system disorders1/32/92/4
feverImmune system disorders0/30/92/4
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/33/92/4
HypomagnesemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/31/92/4
Rash acneiformSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/33/92/4
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/32/90/4

Baseline characteristics

This report summarizes the analysis population, comprised of all subjects who received any study drug. 16 Patients were enrolled.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Experimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of EvorpaceptTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years37212
>=65 years0224
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Experimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of EvorpaceptTotal
Female0325
Male36211
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of EvorpaceptTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0011
White38213
More than one race0101
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 10 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 1: Safety run-in Evaluating Evorpacept at 15 mg/kg WeeklyExperimental: Stage 2: Expansion Cohort Using Recommended Dose (RD) of EvorpaceptTotal
Hispanic or Latino1001
Not Hispanic or Latino29415
Unknown or Not Reported0000
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • University of Arizona Cancer Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Rutgers Cancer insititute
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States
  • Inova Schar Cancer Institute
    Fairfax, Virginia 22031, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lentz RW, Lang J, Pitts TM, Blatchford P, Hu J, Jordan KR, Van Bokhoven A, Bagby SM, Dominguez ATA, Binns CA, Robinson HR, Balmaceda N, Baiyee E, Leal AD, Kim SS, Davis SL, Lieu CH, Wadlow RC, Spencer K, Scott AJ, Boland PM, Hochster HS, Messersmith WA. Phase II Clinical Trial and Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel CD47 Blockade Combination in Refractory Microsatellite-Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Nov 1;5(11):2039-2052. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0332. PubMed 41171165 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 16, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05167409
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
ALX Oncology Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Eli Lilly and Company, Criterium, Inc., Academic GI Cancer Consortium (AGICC)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2021
Start date
Jul 28, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2024
Completion
Oct 30, 2024
Results posted
Jul 22, 2026
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Wells Messersmith, MD
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion