CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05167383VRH4LUpdated Jan 18, 2022

Virtual Reality to Reduce Labor Pain

An interventional study of VRH (Virtual Reality Hypnosis) and Standard care in Labor Pain, Virtual Reality and Hypnosis, sponsored by Clinique Saint-Jean, Bruxelles. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-18.

Sponsored by Clinique Saint-Jean, Bruxelles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2021, registered Nov 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Background and Goal of Study Labor pain remains an area where different analgesia options are looked for, more specifically non-pharmacological remedies are popular. Hypnosis and virtual reality (VR) have been studied with encouraging results. However, until now, the combination of VR and hypnosis (VRH) has not been assessed during labor, although it has shown promising results in other acute pain areas. The VRH4L study will evaluate the efficacy of Virtual Reality Hypnosis (VRH) in reducing pain during labor. Hypnosis is delivered as a standardized therapeutic intervention through virtual reality, using a digital sedation software (AQUA ®, Oncomfort SA).

For this prospective, interventional parallel group, monocentric randomized controlled trial full term women who were planned for an induction of labor at the St-Jean Hospital in Brussels from March to May 2021 were included. Women with complicated pregnancies and patients with contraindications to VR were excluded.

Patients were randomized in two arms. In the VRH group the patients received a 30-minute session of virtual reality hypnosis when in active labor and had access to standard care. Patients in the control group received only standard care.

Primary outcome was the difference in post intervention pain score between the two arms. Secondary outcomes were the difference in pain score 30 minutes after the intervention, vital signs correlated to pain, satisfaction of the experience, interaction with the midwife and prevalence of side effects. Data was analyzed using the student's T test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Labor Pain
  • Virtual Reality
  • Hypnosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • non-pharmacological analgesia
03

In context

Labor Pain

396 studies on the registry are indexed under Labor Pain; 66 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 100 across 326 interventional studies indexed under Labor Pain.

Browse Labor Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinique Saint-Jean, Bruxelles is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: ≥ 18 and ≤ 45 years
  2. Pregnant with term gestation
  3. Willing to adhere to the rules linked to the use of the VRH headset: turning off mobile phone, visit bathroom in advance, no new visitors and no interference of the partner other than when the woman would ask him so
  4. Provision of written informed consent
  5. Induced labor

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Complicated pregnancy ( HELLP,...)
  2. Scheduled caesarian delivery
  3. Receipt of epidural analgesia or opioid painkillers before start active labor phase
  4. Low auditory acuity that precludes use of the device
  5. Low visual acuity that precludes use of the device
  6. Head or face wounds precluding use of the device
  7. Schizophrenia
  8. Epilepsy
  9. Dizziness
  10. Non-proficiency in French and/or Dutch (research language)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention VR group

    . In the VRH group the patients received a 30-minute session of virtual reality hypnosis when in active labor and had access to standard care.

    Device: VRH (Virtual Reality Hypnosis) · Behavioral: Standard care

  • Placebo comparator
    Standard treatment

    Patients in the control group received only standard care.

    Behavioral: Standard care

Interventions

  • DeviceVRH (Virtual Reality Hypnosis)

    Hypnosis is delivered as a standardized therapeutic intervention through virtual reality, using a digital sedation software (AQUA ®, Onfomfort SA).

  • BehavioralStandard care

    The standard treatment (ST) for labor pain as used in our hospital contains massage, aquatherapy and postural exercises. This is always available for any woman in labor.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post interventional pain scores

    Primary outcome was the difference in post intervention pain score between the two arms. Difference in Numerical Rating Scale (0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain) pain scores after the intervention between the VRH and Standard care group.

    Time frame: T1(before intervention) and T3 (directly after intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain 30 minutes after intervention

    Measure of Numerical Rating Scale (0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain) after 30 minutes

    Time frame: T4 (30 min after intervention)

  2. Maternal heart rate

    Measured heart rate during and after intervention as an absolute value.

    Time frame: T1(before intervention) , T2 (During intervention), T3 (directly after intervention) and T4 (30 min after intervention)

  3. Nausea

    Nausea and vomiting scores (0-3, 0 = no nausea, 3= nausea and vomiting))

    Time frame: T1(before intervention) , T3 (directly after intervention) and T4 (30 min after intervention)

  4. Satisfaction of the mother

    Likert scale (-2,0,2) .-2 is very dissatisfied, 1= dissatisfied, 0= not satisfied, nor dissatisfied, 1= satisfied and 2 is very satisfied

    Time frame: T6 (day 1 postpartum)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinique Saint-Jean
    Brussel, 1000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 23, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Nov 20, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Publication of abstract (Poster on the ESA 2021) and Study Report (Paper in the Acta Belgica, end of 2021)

Supporting information: Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05167383
Lead sponsor
Clinique Saint-Jean, Bruxelles
Responsible party
Dr. Arnaud Bosteels (Medical doctor, Clinique Saint-Jean, Bruxelles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 22, 2021
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
May 30, 2021
Completion
May 30, 2021
Last update
Jan 18, 2022

Study contacts

Louise Piccart, Dr.
study chair · Resident Anesthesiologie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion