CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05166317Updated Jan 14, 2022

Comparative Efficacy of Various Non-invasive Methods in Assessing Response to Beta-blockers as Secondary Prophylaxis for Acute Variceal Bleed.

An observational study in Acute Variceal Bleed, sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India. Status unknown at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-14.

Sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Portal hypertension (PH) is a common complication of chronic liver disease and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. One of the most serious complications of liver cirrhosis is esophageal varices (EV) bleeding. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for detecting portal hypertension and its complications. Furthermore, HVPG is the most reliable method for assessing the efficacy of treatment with nonselective -blockers (NSBB), which is the preferred therapy in patients with EV who are at high risk of bleeding (HRV) and as a secondary prophylaxis in the prevention of rebleed. However, the HVPG is an invasive method that is not widely used and necessitates specialized skills. For these reasons, clinical research over the last decade has been focused on identifying non-invasive tests (NITs) capable of evaluating the PH degree and its changes. The most investigated non-invasive tests are liver and splenic stiffness measurement. In advanced cirrhosis, the increase in portal pressure is less dependent on intrahepatic resistance to portal flow due to fibrosis progression and more dependent on extra-hepatic factors such as hyperdynamic circulation and splanchnic vasodilation hence correlation between LSM and PH decreases for HVPG values higher than 12 mmHg.

Read the detailed description

Aim:

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests in predicting response to NSBB for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleed at 6wks.

Primary objective:

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive modalities in correctly predicting response to beta-blockers as compared with HVPG in preventing variceal rebleed at 6 weeks.

Secondary objectives:

  • Assessment of severity of portal hypertension by non-invasive methods.
  • Correlation and Cut-off values for non-invasive methods in responders and non-responders.
  • AAR, APRI, FIB-4 index, CSPH risk score,fibrosis index, GPR, King's score, Lok score are other non- invasive tests.
  • Correlation between HVPG \&non invasive test, responder and non-responder.
  • Comparison ofhypersplenism(Splenic volume and area) and hematological parameters before and after treatment.
  • Diagnosis and response assessment by convolutional neural network- AI based model.
  • Prognostic implication of HVPG rebleed on EVL+beta-blockers.

Methodology:

  • Study population:All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS will be evaluated for inclusion
  • Study design: Prospective observational study. The study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology ILBS.
  • Study period: 1.5 years
  • Sample size: Assuming that Sn of 92%, α of 5%, Power 80, we need to have 186 patients. So we decided to enroll \~200 cases (Including 5% defaulter rate)

Intervention:

  • HVPG done at the baseline within 5days of acute variceal bleed and at 6weeks
  • Endoscopic variceal band ligation at 3rd week
  • NSBB started on day 6 which optimised according to heart rate and continued for 6 weeks.
  • Monitoring and assessment
  • Patients with acute variceal bleed after endovariceal band ligation will be undergoing HVPG, TE to measure splenic stiffness and baseline investigations such as complete blood count, liver and kidney function test, ultrasonography of the abdomen, contrast enhanced computerized tomography of abdomen. These investigations will be carried out within 5days. After 5 days NSBB is started and is optimsed to maximum dose according to heart rate and blood pressure. After 3 weeks EVL is done. After 6 weeks of NSBB, after 3weeks of secondary EVL;HVPG, TE to measure liver and splenic stiffness and other baseline investigations are done.

    • Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG):
  • Prior to the HVPG measurement, a venous access was performed under ultrasonography after local anesthesia. The Seldinger technique was used to insert a catheter into the right brachial vein or the right internal jugular vein. An occlusion balloon catheter of 6 F was guided in a branch of the hepatic veins, usually the median or right vein, under fluoroscopic control and continuous electrocardiographic and pressure monitoring.
  • After inflating the balloon at the catheter's tip (maximum diameter ranges from 8.5-11.5 mm), a venous check was performed to demonstrate complete vessel occlusion. The wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) was measured in this condition. Following that, the free hepatic vein pressure (FHVP) was measured after deflating the balloon at the catheter's tip. On a multi-channel recorder, a permanent trace was obtained. Pressures were also achieved in the inferior vena cava and the right atrium. According to the Baveno VI consensus, the HVPG-response was defined as a 20% or 12 mmHg reduction in HVPG after NSBB treatment.
  • HVPG= WHVP - FHVP (Normal is \<5mm of Hg)

    • Ultrasonography of the abdomen:
  • dilated portal vein (>13 mm): non-specific
  • biphasic or reverse flow in portal vein (late stage): pathognomonic
  • recanalization of paraumbilical vein: pathognomonic
  • portal-systemic collateral pathways (collateral vessels/varices)
  • splenomegaly
  • ascites
  • The damping index (showing changes in the doppler hepatic vein waveform) corresponds with hemodynamically significant portal hypertension and HVPG values (together with HVPG changes after treatment)
  • splenic arterial resistive index

    • Liver and splenic stiffness:
  • A 3.5-MHz ultrasound transducer probe is mounted on the axis of a vibrator in the FibroScan device. Mild amplitude, low-frequency (50 Hz) vibrations are transmitted to the liver tissue, causing an elastic shear wave to propagate through the underlying tissue.If the success rate was greater than 60% and the interquartile range (IQR) was greater than 30% of the median value, LS values were accepted.
  • Guidelines for measuring SS is same as LS. SS was performed on a supine patient with maximal abduction of the left arm, with the probe positioned in an intercostal space where the spleen was correctly visualized by US. Furthermore, in accordance with the FibroScan's technical features, patients with a splenic parenchymal thickness of >4 cm under the probe were excluded.

    • Radiomics:
  • Convolutional neural network - Deep learning using liver and splenic channels for assessment of portal hypertension.
  • STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
  • Continuous variables are expressed as the median and categorical data as numbers (percentages) (range). For group comparison, use the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and the 2 test for categorical variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to assess the linear relationship between noninvasive tests and HVPG (r). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves will be computed for each of the diagnostic parameters evaluated (age, transaminases, platelet count, spleen diameter, Plt/Spl, LS, SS, LSPS), as well as the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).For all tests, p≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analysis will be performed using SPSS .The analysis will be done with intention to treat and per protocol analysis if applicable.
  • Adverse effects:
    1. Major Sideeffects of Betablockers
  • Bradycardia,Heart block
  • Hyperglycaemia
  • Heart failure
  • Increase in airway resistance
  • Worsening lipid profile
  • Exacerbration of peripheral vascular disease

    1. HVPG related complications
  • Transient arrhythmias
  • Vagal reaction
  • Local access pain and bleeding
  • Stopping rule: Development of serious adverse effects leading to withdrawal of the drug or death from any cause.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Variceal Bleed

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hemorrhage

3,000 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 474 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 150 across 893 observational studies indexed under Hemorrhage.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India is the lead sponsor of 296 studies on the registry; 84 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS will be evaluated for inclusion

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical / radiological /histologic diagnosis of cirrhosis (Child A\&B)
  • Age >18 years
  • Advanced compensated liver disease of different etiology(Viral,metabolic,alcoholic)
  • Upper GI bleed
  • Valid consent
  • No history of NSBB use in last 6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 70 years
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Underlaying shunts
  • Spleen anteroposterior diameter \<4cm
  • Non cirrhotic portal hypertension
  • Only PHG, Ectopic varices
  • Heart rate \<50bpm, SBP\<100mm of Hg,Asthma, COPD, Aortic disease, atrioventricular block, Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Pregnancy
  • obese(BMI>30mm of Hg)
  • HIV
  • HCC / Other malignancy
  • Other Comorbidities: Chronic kidney disease [ CrCl\< 30] Cirrhosis : Child C Stroke Cardiac failure, Uncontrolled diabetes(HbA1c >9)
  • AST/ALT >5 times
  • Drug allergies
  • ACLF
  • Narrow intercoastal space
  • Failure to give informed consent from family members.
  • Patient enrolled in other clinical study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Liver Cirrhosis

    All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS.

    Other: This is an observational study

Interventions

  • OtherThis is an observational study

    This is an observational study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HVPG and its correlation with non-invasive methods.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of severity of portal hypertension by non-invasive methods.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Correlation and Cut-off values for non-invasive methods in responders and non-responders in relation to HVPG.

    Non invasive methods - LSM,SSM \& LSPS

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Correlation of Serological and radiological non invasive tests response in comparison with HVPG.

    AAR, APRI, FIB-4 index, CSPH risk score,fibrosis index, GPR, King's score, Lok score are other non- invasive tests.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Comparison of hypersplenism (Splenic volume and area) and hematological parameters before and after treatment.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Diagnosis and response assessment by convolutional neural network- AI based model.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Prognostic implication of HVPG rebleed on EVL+beta-blockers.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
    New Delhi, Delhi 110070, India
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05166317
Lead sponsor
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 21, 2021
Start date
Jan 10, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 10, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 10, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 14, 2022

Study contacts

Dr Akhil Deshmukh, MD
Contact
akhildeshmukh52@gmail.com
01146300000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion