ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06831565Updated Jul 7, 2026

Comparison of Blood Products Required Using Two Different ROTEM Cut-offs Before Invasive Procedures in Cirrhosis and Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) Patients With Severe Coagulopathy

An interventional study of ROTEM in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India. Recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
790
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 39 studies in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India — 17 open to participants now, 17 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure · Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India.

Planned enrollment
2nd of 28
790 · median 95
Started
2025
with 3 others
No phase
23 of 39
8 open now
Primary completion
2026-08
later than 8 of 16 live
Registered
30th of 39
by date

Among the 39 studies in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India, this one is the 2nd largest by planned enrollment of the 28 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2025, is one of 23 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 8 of the 16 other live ones, and was the 30th registered.

Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure; 62 are open to participants now.

Browse Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure studies →

Open to participants now

17 of the 39 studies in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

11 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 17 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 32 Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure studies recruiting now, 11 (34%) set no upper age limit and 15 (47%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 39 studies in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Coagulation system in cirrhotics patients is a fragile state , which is rebalanced hemostasis. Standard tests (INR/aPTT) stop measuring at first stage of coagulation ,when the clot first form. VETs measure the whole process such as ROTEM, TEG and comparing these two tests to assess for transfusion of blood products for invasive procedures. . ROTEM provides information both on anti coagulant and procoagulant status where as conventional tests provide only anti coagulant status Invasive procedures can be low risk or high risk or Non surgical vs surgical, Procedure related bleed occurs in 7% of patients with cirrhosis and associated with higher 28 day mortality. MELD, CTP ,AKI , SEPSIS increase the risk of procedure related bleed. Hence for invasive procedures investigator is using relaxing threshold for blood product transfusion in cirrhosis, ACLF patients. As use of ROTEM when compared to conventional tests reduces the need for blood transfusion. Investigator want to proceed with further relaxation of cutoff values of Coagulation parameters and use High cutoff vs low cut off for blood transfusion need.

Read the detailed description

Aim and Objective - To evaluate the efficacy and safety of relaxed threshold (compared to threshold) for blood product transfusion for invasive procedures in cirrhosis and ACLF patients.

Hypothesis - Relaxing the threshold ( as compared to conventional threshold ) for blood product transfusion will decrease the need for blood products without increase the bleeding complications for invasive procedures in cirrhosis and acute on chronic liver failure patients( ACLF)

Sample size with justification:

Assuming the prevalence rate is 50% (TUSHAR THESIS -yet to be published), that is need of transfusion of blood produtcs in standard cutoff and relaxed cutoff , as according to this study the need in relaxed cut off has been reduced,investigator assumed the need in High cut off group is reduced to 40%, with alpha-5%, power-80%, investigator need to enroll 417 in each group with defaulter of 10% , it decided to have cases that is 934 total Monitoring and assessment: All patients would undergo vital and baseline parameter screening before randomization. Based on randomization investigator will assess the need for transfusion , and complications post procedure , post transfusion if any for a duration of 1month.

Intervention: Patient after screening for all exclusion criteria will be randomized to procedure after or before transfusion of blood products and will be assessed the safety of procedure related bleed and need of intervention post procedure if any

03

Conditions studied

  • Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Cirrhosis and ACLF ( as per definition)
  2. Planned to undergo invasive procedures
  3. Severe Coagulopathy- >2.0 or \<30k or Fibrinogen\<100mg/dl .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ongoing bleeding
  2. Bleeding in past 48 hours before procedure
  3. Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy ( stopped \< 7 days before)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
790 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Low Cut Off

    EXTEM CT\>80sec, CL130\<50% FIBTEM- Mcf\>8

    Diagnostic Test: ROTEM

  • Experimental
    High Cut Off

    EXTEM CT\>100sec, CL130\<40% FIBTEM- Mcf\<6

    Diagnostic Test: ROTEM

  • No intervention
    On demand

    No pre procedure blood products transfusions will be given. Transfusions will be given after the procedure if any bleeding complications occur

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testROTEM

    ROTEM Tests

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with reduction in the amount of total components transfused in high cut off ROTEM compared to low cut off ROTEM in cirrhosis and ACLF patients.

    High Cutoff defined as need of low blood transfusion products (CT-\>100sec,MCF\<25,CLI30\<40%,MCF -FIB\<6mm) and Low Cut off defined as (CT -\>80sec, MCF\<35, CLI30\<50%,MCF-FIB\<6mm)

    Time frame: Day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess the impact of ROTEM on transfusion requirements.

    Impact of standard ROTEM on transfusion requirements that is proportion Of FFP, PLATELETS,CRYO, PCC, FIBRINOGEN before procedure in cirrhosis and ACLF patients.

    Time frame: Day 28

  2. Evaluate the incidence of bleeding events post procedure in Low cutoff.

    Time frame: Day 28

  3. Mortality related with procedural bleeding in both groups.

    Time frame: Day 28

  4. Proportion of the patient requiring procedural based treatment that is number of blood transfusions, angioembolization after post procedural bleed.

    Time frame: Day 28

  5. To compare the rate of transfusion reactions in relaxed ROTEM vs standard ROTEM in cirrhosis and ACLF.

    Time frame: Day 28

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2026, 17 months after the start.

Of 32 interventional studies with no phase under Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2025
First posted
Feb 18, 2025
StartActual
Mar 19, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2026
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06831565
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2025
Start date
Mar 19, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Sanda Kavitha, MD
Contact
sandakavitha1001@gmail.com
01146300000
Dr Manoj Kumar Sharma, DM
Contact
manojkumardm@gmail.com
01146300000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion