ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05165095CALLIOPEUpdated May 31, 2024

Clinical Assessment of Essential Remote Monitoring Functions in Pacemakers

An observational study in Bradycardia and Remote Monitoring, sponsored by MicroPort CRM. Recruiting at 19 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-31.

Sponsored by MicroPort CRM (part of MicroPort Scientific Corporation) · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
206
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the clinical investigation is to document the safety and the performances of the remote monitoring functions of the ALIZEA, BOREA and CELEA pacemakers, i.e. the RAAT, the RVAT and the remote alerts.

Read the detailed description

All patients will be included just after implantation and will then be followed during 48 months after inclusion.

At each on-site or remote follow-up visit (1 to 3 months, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months), performances of the remote monitoring functions and the cardiac pacing system itself will be measured, and safety will be monitored during the whole clinical investigation duration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bradycardia
  • Remote Monitoring

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bradycardia

317 studies on the registry are indexed under Bradycardia; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 206 is below the median of 257 across 127 observational studies indexed under Bradycardia.

Browse Bradycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

MicroPort CRM is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

First submitted after MicroPort CRM became part of MicroPort Scientific Corporation.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients indicated (class I or II) for a dual chamber pacemaker (de novo implantation, device upgrade to dual chamber or device replacement), according to the most recent guidelines from the ESC.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient implanted according to the most recent guidelines from the ESC, for 20 days or less (de novo implantation, device upgrade to dual chamber or device replacement)
  2. Patient implanted with an ALIZEA, BOREA or CELEA dual chamber pacemaker from MicroPort CRM
  3. Patient implanted with any active or passive CE marked bipolar RA lead, and any active or passive CE marked bipolar RV lead
  4. Patient's pacemaker with the remote monitoring functions (i.e. the RAAT, the RVAT and the remote alerts) accepted by the patient and planned to be activated
  5. Patient reviewed, signed and dated the ICF

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with an elevated RV pacing threshold (strictly above 2.0 V for a pulse width of 0.5 ms or below)
  2. Patient with permanent AF
  3. Patient already enrolled in another clinical investigation that could confound the results of this clinical investigation (e.g., clinical investigations involving intra-cardiac device)
  4. Patient implanted despite a for cardiac pacing system implantation (i.e. patient implanted with a defibrillator, patient contraindicated for a single dose of 310 μg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate, patient implanted with a tricuspid replacement heart valve or with a significant tricuspid valve disease that may lead to future replacement heart valve surgery)
  5. Minor age patient (i.e. under 18 years of age)
  6. Incapacitated patient, under guardianship, kept in detention, refusing to cooperate or not able to understand the purpose of this clinical investigation
  7. Patient unavailable for the follow-up visits scheduled
  8. Non-menopausal women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
206 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DevicePacemaker implantation

    De novo implantation, device upgrade to dual chamber or device replacement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Right Atrial Autothreshold values at the inclusion and the M1-M3 visits

    Time frame: 1 to 3 months post-inclusion visit (M1-M3)

  2. In-clinic Right Ventricular pacing threshold values from Right Ventricular Autothreshold function at the inclusion and the M1-M3 visits

    Time frame: 1 to 3 months post-inclusion visit (M1-M3)

  3. Technical remote alerts documented at the M1-M3 visit

    Time frame: 1 to 3 months post-inclusion visit (M1-M3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Right Atrial Autothreshold values up to the M48 visit

    Time frame: 48 months post-inclusion visit (M48)

  2. In-clinic Right Ventricular pacing threshold values from Right Ventricular Autothreshold function up to the M48 visit

    Time frame: 48 months post-inclusion visit (M48)

  3. Technical remote alerts documented up to the M48 visit

    Time frame: 48 months post-inclusion visit (M48)

  4. Right Ventricular Autothreshold values up to the M48 visit

    Time frame: 48 months post-inclusion visit (M48)

  5. Safety of ALIZEA, BOREA and CELEA pacemaker and of SMARTVIEW CONNECT remote monitoring systems up to the M48 visit

    Time frame: 48 months post-inclusion visit (M48)

  6. Electrical performances (pacing thresholds, impedance & minimum sensed amplitude) of ALIZEA, BOREA and CELEA pacemaker systems up to the M48 visit

    Time frame: 48 months post-inclusion visit (M48)

  7. Usability of ALIZEA, BOREA and CELEA pacemaker and of SMARTVIEW CONNECT remote monitoring systems up to the M48 visit

    Time frame: 48 months post-inclusion visit (M48)

07

Study locations

18 of 19 sites recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Krems
    Krems, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Daniel Gerger · Contact
  • Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien
    Wien, Austria
    Recruiting
    • Marianne Gwechenberger · Contact
  • Clinique Saint Joseph
    Arlon, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Georges Mairesse · Contact
  • CHU Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, France
    Recruiting
    • Marc Strik · Contact
  • CH Chartres
    Le Coudray, France
    Recruiting
    • Hervé Gorka · Contact
  • CHU Hôpital de la Timone
    Marseille, France
    Recruiting
    • Jean-Claude Deharo · Contact
  • CHU Nantes
    Nantes, France
    Recruiting
    • Vincent Probst · Contact
  • Clinique Pasteur Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
    Recruiting
    • Romain Cassagneau · Contact
  • CH Valence
    Valence, France
    Recruiting
    • Alexandre Guignier · Contact
  • Cardiologicum Hamburg
    Hamburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Martin Bergmann · Contact
  • Cardiologicum Pirna
    Pirna, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Christoph Axthelm · Contact
  • Kardiologische Praxis Dr. Trautwein & Dr. Placke
    Rostock, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Jens Placke · Contact
  • Ziekenhuis VieCuri Venlo
    Venlo, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Ronald Hazeleger · Contact
  • Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca
    Amadora, Portugal
    Recruiting
    • Francisco Madeira · Contact
  • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide
    Ferrol, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Fernando Garcia López · Contact
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
    Majadahonda, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Ignacio Fernandez-Lozano · Contact
  • Basildon University Hospital
    Basildon, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
    • Neil Srinivasan · Contact
  • Kingston Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Simon Pearse · Contact
  • Southend University Hospital
    Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Neil Srinivasan · Contact
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05165095
Lead sponsor
MicroPort CRM
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 21, 2021
Start date
Mar 25, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2023
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 31, 2024

Study contacts

Antoine Guihard
Contact
antoine.guihard@crm.microport.com
+33 1 46 01 33 20

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion