ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05163574Updated Aug 1, 2023

Induction of Sustained Unresponsiveness to Peanuts Using High- and Low-dose Peanut Oral Immunotherapy

An interventional study of High dose OIT and Low dose OIT in Peanut Allergy, sponsored by Medical University of Warsaw. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-01.

Sponsored by Medical University of Warsaw · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2022; still recruiting 4 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a continuation of a clinical trial NCT044155930 comparing the efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) with low or high doses of peanut protein (150 or 300 mg, respectively) and will involve patients who have accomplished their per-protocol participation in that trial.

The aim of current study is to assess a sustained unresponsiveness (SU) to allergen protein after at least 8 months of previously assigned high- or low-dose peanut OIT, followed by 4-week-allergen avoidance, and verified by an open oral food challenge (OOFC).

Read the detailed description

Oral immunotherapy is considered the most effective food allergy treatment. There are two main goals of food immunotherapy: achievement of desensitisation and sustained unresponsiveness. Desensitization is a temporary state of clinical non-reactivity which requires regular intake of allergen, whereas sustained unresponsiveness is defined as lack of clinical reaction to a food allergen after discontinuing OIT for a specific period of time.

The study is a continuation of a clinical trial NCT044155930, which was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) with low or high doses of peanut protein (150 or 300 mg, respectively) in children with a confirmed diagnosis of peanut allergy. The participants of current study will be recruited from patients who have accomplished their per-protocol participation in previous trial.

Patients will receive the same maintenance dose of peanut allergen, which was used in previous trial (150 or 300 mg, respectively), for at least 8 months (32 weeks +/-2 weeks). Then, OIT will be discontinued for 4 weeks with strict peanut avoidance. After this period, an open oral food challenge (OOFC) will be performed to assess the achievement of sustained unresponsiveness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy

Keywords

  • peanut
  • food allergy
  • sustained unresponsiveness
  • children
03

In context

Peanut Hypersensitivity

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 50 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Peanut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw is the lead sponsor of 326 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients who have accomplished their per-protocol participation in trial NCT044155930.
  • signed by parent/legal guardian and patient aged>16 years old
  • patient's/caregiver's cooperation with researcher

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe asthma
  • uncontrolled mild/moderate asthma: forced expiratory volume at one second ()\<80% (under 5 percentile), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FEV)\<75% (under 5 percentile), hospitalization due to asthma exacerbation within last 12 months
  • current oral/sublingual/subcutaneous immunotherapy with another allergen
  • eosinophilic esophagitis
  • allergic reaction of 4th or higher grade according to the World Allergy Organisation Systemic Allergic Reaction Grading System during immunotherapy
  • a history of severe recurrent anaphylaxis episodes
  • chronic diseases requiring continous treatment, including heart disease, epilepsy, metabolic disease, diabetes
  • medication:

    • oral, daily therapy exceeding 1 month within the last 12 months
    • at least two courses of oral steroid therapy (at least 7 days) within the last 12 months
    • oral steroid therapy longer than 7 days within the last 3 months
    • biological treatment
    • the need to constantly take antihistamines
    • therapy with b-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel inhibitors
  • pregnancy
  • no consent to participate in the study
  • lack of patient cooperation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High dose

    20 patients

    Dietary Supplement: High dose OIT

  • Active comparator
    Low dose

    20 patients

    Dietary Supplement: Low dose OIT

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementHigh dose OIT

    Patients will receive daily a high dose of peanut flour (300 mg peanut protein) mixed with well-tolerated fruit mousse.

  • Dietary supplementLow dose OIT

    Patients will receive daily a low dose of peanut flour (150 mg peanut protein) mixed with well-tolerated fruit mousse.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sustained unresponsiveness to a peanut protein after discontinuing oral immunotherapy for 4 weeks.

    The share of participants who tolerate a single dose of 150 mg or 300 mg of peanut protein (depending on the maintenance dose) at oral food challenge.

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after starting maintenance phase

  2. The highest tolerated dose of peanut protein after discontinuing oral immunotherapy for 4 weeks.

    Sustained unresponsiveness assessed as the highest tolerated dose of peanut protein at oral food challenge.

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after starting maintenance phase

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Number and severity of adverse events during OIT treatment and at OOFC will be assessed and compared between both groups.

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after starting maintenance phase

  2. Occurence of eosinophilic esophagitis.

    Number and severity of eosinophilic esophagitis symptoms following OIT treatment assessed and compared between both groups.

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after starting maintenance phase

  3. Laboratory data

    Change in serum levels of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to peanut components and peanut-specific immunoglobulin G4 (sIgE4) levels at different time points: at the start and at the end of oral immunotherapy, and after 4 weeks of allergen avoidance, assessed for each individual and compared between groups.

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after starting maintenance phase

  4. Skin prick test (SPT)

    Change in peanut skin prick test wheal in different time points: at the start, and at the end of oral immunotherapy, and after 4 weeks of allergen avoidance, assessed for each individual and compared between groups.

    Time frame: Up to 9 months after starting maintenance phase

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Pediatric Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw
    Warsaw, Poland
    Recruiting
    • Wioletta Zagórska, PhD, MD · Contactwiola.zagorska@gmail.com
    • Magdalena Chojnowska-Wójtowicz, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Burks AW, Sampson HA, Plaut M, Lack G, Akdis CA. Treatment for food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;141(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.004. PubMed 29307409 ↗
  • Nagakura KI, Yanagida N, Sato S, Nishino M, Asaumi T, Ogura K, Ebisawa M. Low-dose oral immunotherapy for children with anaphylactic peanut allergy in Japan. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Aug;29(5):512-518. doi: 10.1111/pai.12898. Epub 2018 May 10. PubMed 29603410 ↗
  • PALISADE Group of Clinical Investigators; Vickery BP, Vereda A, Casale TB, Beyer K, du Toit G, Hourihane JO, Jones SM, Shreffler WG, Marcantonio A, Zawadzki R, Sher L, Carr WW, Fineman S, Greos L, Rachid R, Ibanez MD, Tilles S, Assa'ad AH, Nilsson C, Rupp N, Welch MJ, Sussman G, Chinthrajah S, Blumchen K, Sher E, Spergel JM, Leickly FE, Zielen S, Wang J, Sanders GM, Wood RA, Cheema A, Bindslev-Jensen C, Leonard S, Kachru R, Johnston DT, Hampel FC Jr, Kim EH, Anagnostou A, Pongracic JA, Ben-Shoshan M, Sharma HP, Stillerman A, Windom HH, Yang WH, Muraro A, Zubeldia JM, Sharma V, Dorsey MJ, Chong HJ, Ohayon J, Bird JA, Carr TF, Siri D, Fernandez-Rivas M, Jeong DK, Fleischer DM, Lieberman JA, Dubois AEJ, Tsoumani M, Ciaccio CE, Portnoy JM, Mansfield LE, Fritz SB, Lanser BJ, Matz J, Oude Elberink HNG, Varshney P, Dilly SG, Adelman DC, Burks AW. AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856. Epub 2018 Nov 18. PubMed 30449234 ↗
  • Patrawala M, Shih J, Lee G, Vickery B. Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: a Current Perspective. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020 Apr 20;20(5):14. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-00908-6. PubMed 32314071 ↗
  • Rodriguez Del Rio P, Escudero C, Sanchez-Garcia S, Ibanez MD, Vickery BP. Evaluating primary end points in peanut immunotherapy clinical trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Feb;143(2):494-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.09.035. Epub 2018 Oct 24. PubMed 30367908 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05163574
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 20, 2021
Start date
Feb 5, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 1, 2023

Study contacts

Magdalena Chojnowska-Wójtowicz, MD
Contact
magdalena.chojnowska@uckwum.pl
22-317-9431
Katarzyna Grzela, MD, PhD
Contact
katarzyna.grzela@wum.edu.pl
22-317-9431
Katarzyna Grzela, MD, PhD
study chair · Medical University of Warsaw

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion