An interventional study of In-Home Technology System and Limited In-Home Technology in Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by University of California, Berkeley. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-25.
Sponsored by University of California, Berkeley · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
This study aims to develop, evaluate, and commercialize an in-home supportive technology that is designed to alleviate anxiety, burden, and loneliness in spousal and familial caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment in rural homes.
This study aims to develop, refine, evaluate, and commercialize a hardware/software system designed to integrate in-home sensors and devices, Internet-of-Things technologies (i.e., devices that can be controlled and communicated with via the internet), and social networking to create a more safe and supportive home environment for caregivers and people who have Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment. The system monitors troublesome behaviors in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (e.g., wandering), and targets mechanisms (e.g., worry, social isolation) thought to link behavioral symptoms in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment with adverse caregiver outcomes (declines in health and well-being). The system is designed to minimize demands on caregivers' limited time and energy and to provide a platform for data collection that can be used by researchers and care professionals.
Hypotheses:
3,678 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 872 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 70 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.
Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →University of California, Berkeley is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The full system \[(a) 1 advanced gateway with a dual-SIM cellular connection to communicate/control the equipment; (b) 5 indoor motion sensors; (c) 3 door/cabinet entry sensors; (d) 1 water leak sensor; (e) 1 "call for help" button; (f) 2 motion-activated LED night lights; (g) 2 Vayyar fall detection and sleep quality sensors\] will be self-installed by 60 rural caregivers in their homes. Monitoring of sensors, provision of warnings, messaging, and social networking features will be activated remotely for those participants who have been randomly assigned to this arm. Participation will extend over a 6 month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 3 times (at the time of installation and every 3 months thereafter).
Device: In-Home Technology System
The full system \[(a) 1 advanced gateway with a dual-SIM cellular connection to communicate/control the equipment; (b) 5 indoor motion sensors; (c) 3 door/cabinet entry sensors; (d) 1 water leak sensor; (e) 1 "call for help" button; (f) 2 motion-activated LED night lights; (g) 2 Vayyar fall detection and sleep quality sensors\] will be self-installed by 60 rural caregivers in their homes. Only monitoring of the water leak sensor and associated warnings will be activated remotely for those participants who have been randomly assigned to this arm.
Device: Limited In-Home Technology
Intelligent bots monitor the in-home sensors, learn typical patterns, and provide caregivers with text messages and alerts via cell phone when worrisome behaviors occur. Caregivers are able to: (a) select services (e.g., warnings for falls, wandering, late night activity); (b) access daily reports (summaries of daily activities that can also be shared with health care providers); and (c) obtain support (e.g. Caregiver Support Groups that connect caregivers with knowledgeable experts and other caregivers, Caregiver Events that provide virtual meetings about relevant topics, and Trusted Circle task management to distribute the caregiving work load).
Intelligent bots monitor the in-home water leak sensor and provide caregivers with text messages and alerts via cell phone when worrisome conditions occur.
3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
Time frame: 3 months after baseline
6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, \& Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Time frame: 3 months after baseline
6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, \& Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, \& Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
Time frame: 3 months after baseline
6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, \& Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, \& Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
Time frame: 3 months after baseline
6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, \& Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
| Milestone | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 8 | 7 |
| Completed | 6 | 4 |
| Not completed | 2 | 3 |
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | 17.71 ± 14.17 | 18.6 ± 12.7 |
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | 10.33 ± 6.22 | 19.75 ± 10.24 |
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, \& Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form | 20.14 ± 12.29 | 24.2 ± 11.78 |
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, \& Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form | 19.5 ± 9.48 | 24 ± 10.92 |
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, \& Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) | 6.14 ± 6.04 | 7.8 ± 5.26 |
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, \& Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) | 7.83 ± 9.13 | 9 ± 4.4 |
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, \& Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale | 20.14 ± 10.85 | 18.4 ± 7.23 |
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, \& Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
| units on a scale | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale | 22.33 ± 9.03 | 15.5 ± 8.35 |
Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Home Technology System | 0/8 (0%) | 0/8 (0%) | 0/8 (0%) |
| Limited In-Home Technology System | 1/7 (14.3%) | 0/7 (0%) | 0/7 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 71 ± 6.14 | 72.14 ± 11.96 | 71.6 ± 8.97 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| Male | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| White (non-Hispanic/Latino) | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory(units on a scale) | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 5.5 ± 6.59 | 10.57 ± 7.14 | 7.87 ± 7.11 |
| Zarit Burden Inventory(units on a scale) | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 20.13 ± 14.08 | 20.71 ± 8.32 | 20.4 ± 11.36 |
| Satisfaction with Life(units on a scale) | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 19.5 ± 10.58 | 20.71 ± 6.95 | 20.07 ± 8.78 |
| Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(units on a scale) | In-Home Technology System | Limited In-Home Technology System | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 16.13 ± 13.89 | 17.71 ± 10.84 | 16.87 ± 12.14 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Because health and other protected data are involved, we need to consult with our institutional review board and other collaborators concerning which data can be shared.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of California, Berkeley