CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05155501PARTIALUpdated Apr 22, 2026

Clinical Trial of Approaches to Prostate Cancer Surgery

An interventional study of Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) and Pelvic fascia-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PFS-RP) in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Recruiting at 9 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare cancer control and health-related quality of life following pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy versus standard radical prostatectomy.

The investigators hypothesize that pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy will have similar cancer control (primary outcome) and sexual function outcomes; and significantly better urinary function, penile shortening/deformity and inguinal hernia risks as compared to radical prostatectomy.

Read the detailed description

Traditional radical prostatectomy is the most popular treatment for clinically significant prostate cancer, however significant risks including urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, penile shortening, penile curvature/ deformation (Peyronie's disease), and inguinal hernia, are common. Pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy is a new surgical technique that may preserve fascial support structures, arterial supply to the penis, and nerves that are severed and resected during conventional radical prostatectomy.

This study will enroll adult men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Subjects will be randomized to receive either radical prostatectomy or pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy. Investigators will compare cancer control and health-related quality of life outcomes through patient questionnaires and medical record review.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • radical prostatectomy
  • nerve sparing
  • Retzius sparing
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 58 across 4,822 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 867 studies on the registry; 160 are open to participants now.

Of its 119 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male sex
  • Age ≥40 years or ≤80 years
  • Scheduled for radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer
  • Able to read and speak English or Spanish
  • Willingness to sign informed consent and adhere to the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior major pelvic surgery or radiotherapy
  • Suspicion of N1 disease (i.e., any lymph node greater than 1cm in maximal diameter)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP)

    The conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is the gold standard approach to prostate cancer surgery.

    Procedure: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP)

  • Experimental
    Pelvic fascia-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PFS-RP)

    A novel, posterior approach to radical prostatectomy that preserves the dorsal vascular complex, nerves and fascial support structures that overlie the anterior prostate. These structures are disrupted and removed during conventional radical prostatectomy.

    Procedure: Pelvic fascia-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PFS-RP)

Interventions

  • ProcedureRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP)

    The conventional approach to prostate cancer surgery

  • ProcedurePelvic fascia-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PFS-RP)

    A novel, posterior approach to radical prostatectomy that preserves the dorsal vascular complex, nerves and fascial support structures that overlie the anterior prostate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical Margin Status as assessed by surgical pathology results

    Presence of cancer cells at the prostate margin is standardized as a positive surgical margin through professional guideline consensus.

    Time frame: 1 week post-surgery

  2. Biochemical Recurrence as assessed by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

    Prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels are obtained from standard of care blood tests, and PSA values are measured in ng/mL. In accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, investigators will capture PSA persistence as failure of PSA to fall to undetectable levels, and PSA recurrence as an undetectable PSA after surgery with a subsequent detectable PSA that increases on 2 or more determinations.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  3. Biochemical Recurrence as assessed by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

    Prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels are obtained from standard of care blood tests, and PSA values are measured in ng/mL.

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

  4. Biochemical Recurrence as assessed by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

    Prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels are obtained from standard of care blood tests, and PSA values are measured in ng/mL.

    Time frame: 24 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgery-Related Adverse Events as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

    The questionnaire will include 20 items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), survey items pertinent to short-stay cancer surgery. The questionnaire will assess patient-reported complications and adverse events, such as constipation, nausea and vomiting, fever, chills, fatigue, pain, shortness of breath, swelling and bruising, redness and discharge at the surgical incision site, anxiety, and flatulence (ileus). It will also assess patient contacts with physicians and admittance to urgent care or the emergency room.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days following surgery

  2. Change in Urinary and Sexual Function, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP)

    The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) is a 7-item questionnaire assessing two health-related quality of life domains: urinary and sexual function. All questions refer to patients' health and symptoms in the last four weeks. Each domain is scored out of 12 points, with higher scores indicating more complications. In total, the EPIC-CP score is the final sum of the two domains, with higher scores indicating more issues related to overall prostate cancer quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery

  3. Change in Patient-Reported Penile Shortening and Sexual Function, as measured by a 5-item questionnaire

    This is a 5-item questionnaire, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), that has face validity for assessing penile shortening, self-esteem, and erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Question 1 assesses patients' perceived penile length post-surgery, compared to penile length at 30 years of age. It consists of two possible responses: Yes or No. Questions 2 and 3 assesses patients' ability to obtain and quality of spontaneous morning erections and sexual activity-related erections. It consists of five possible responses: ranging from "No erections" to "Erections always sufficient". Question 4 is a visual digital scale assessing patients' present quality of life. It is scored on a scale of 1-7, with higher scores indicating high quality of life. Question 5 is a visual digital scale assessing patients' present self-esteem. It is scored on a scale of 1-7, with higher scores indicating high self-esteem.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery

  4. Change in patient-Reported Penile Curvature/Deformity (Peyronie's Disease), as measured by a 3-item questionnaire

    This is a validated, 3-item questionnaire assessing presence of Peyronie's disease. The penile deformity items were validated by blinded clinical examination with 100% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. Question 1 assesses penile hardening/plaques in the flaccid state. Question 2 assesses penile curvature in the erect state. Question 3 assesses pain associated with erection. Each question consists of two possible responses: Yes or No.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery

  5. Patient-reported Decision Regret, as measured by a 5-item questionnaire

    This is a 5-item questionnaire assessing treatment regret that was developed and validated in men with prostate cancer. Each item is scored on a 5 point scale ranging from "Strongly Agree" to "Strongly Disagree". Responses are converted to a score ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating more regret.

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

  6. Patient-reported Decision Regret, as measured by a 5-item questionnaire

    This is a 5-item questionnaire assessing treatment regret that was developed and validated in men with prostate cancer.

    Time frame: 24 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

9 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
    • Radhika Nagalla, PharmD · Contact · rnagalla@coh.org · 847-502-0334
    • Clayton Lau, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Georgetown University
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20007, United States
    Recruiting
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
    Recruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    • Rana Harb, MS · Contact · rharb1@jhmi.edu · 410-502-5500
    • Mohamad E Allaf, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
    Recruiting
  • NewYork-Presbyterian Queens
    Flushing, New York 11355, United States
    Recruiting
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
    • Melissa McCarter · Contact · mccartem@mskcc.org
    • Behfar Ehdaie, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
    New York, New York 10065, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stangl-Kremser J, Kowalczyk K, Schaeffer EM, Allaf M, Scherr D, Yang X, Matoso A, Azumi N, Robinson B, Vickers A, Hu JC. Study protocol for a prospective, multi-centered randomized controlled trial comparing pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy with conventional robotic-assisted prostatectomy: The PARTIAL trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 May;128:107168. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107168. Epub 2023 Apr 2. PubMed 37015291 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05155501
Lead sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2021
Start date
May 15, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

May Ting, MBS
Contact
mat7051@med.cornell.edu
732-757-2448
Xiaohong Jing, PhD
Contact
xij2004@med.cornell.edu
212-746-4739
Jim C Hu, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion