ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05138757Updated Mar 9, 2026Results posted

Pinpoint Trial: Prebiotics IN Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Prebiotic and Placebo in Peanut Allergy, sponsored by University of Chicago. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-09.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to gather information on the safety and efficacy of using a prebiotic as an adjunctive therapy to peanut oral immunotherapy. The prebiotic is not an FDA approved drug or medication rather a fiber found at local grocery stores.

Read the detailed description

By doing this study, we hope to learn if using a dietary fiber called a "prebiotic" helps increase the number of children who can tolerate eating 1043mg of peanut protein (or about 3-4 peanuts) after going through oral immunotherapy (OIT) to peanut. We are also trying to determine if this fiber will reduce the side effects of OIT and if so, we would like to find out if the reason it is working is by changing the bacteria in the gut. Participation in this research will last about five years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy

Keywords

  • oral immunotherapy
  • fiber
  • Peanut
  • anaphylaxis
  • allergy
  • pediatrics
  • prebiotic
  • food allergy
  • microbiome
  • probiotic
03

In context

Peanut Hypersensitivity

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Peanut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 924 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.

Of its 103 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 4 to 17 (inclusive)
  • A convincing clinical history of peanut allergy
  • Immune markers consistent with peanut allergy

    • Serum IgE to peanut of >0.35 kUA/L and a skin prick test to peanut >8mm greater than the negative saline control -or-
    • Serum IgE to peanut of >5 kUA/L and a mean peanut wheal diameter on skin prick test 3 to 8mm greater than the negative saline control -or-
    • Serum IgE to peanut of >14 kUA/L and mean peanut wheal diameter on skin prick test 3mm greater than the negative saline control
  • Experience dose-limiting symptoms at or before 100mg challenge dose of peanut protein on screening double blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC)
  • Written from parent/guardian
  • Written assent from subjects above the age of 7

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • History of a chronic disease (other than asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis) that is at significant risk of becoming unstable or requiring a change in chronic therapeutic regimen

      • History of mast cell disease
      • History of recurrent idiopathic or virally induced urticaria, angioedema or anaphylaxis
      • Any history or presence of , cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease (other than asthma), , psychiatric illness, or gastrointestinal inflammatory conditions, including celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, eosinophilic esophagitis or other eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease
      • Current participation in any other interventional study
      • Subject who has undergone any type of oral immunotherapy
      • Severe asthma or uncontrolled mild to moderate asthma
      • Uncontrolled atopic dermatitis
      • Current use of oral medications
      • Use of >1 bursts of oral steroid medications in the past year
      • Inability to eat by mouth the fiber supplementation or placebo control and peanut flour for any reason
      • Use of any therapeutic antibody (biologic medication) or any immunomodulatory medication in the past 12 month (other than a short course of oral steroids)
      • Current use of any type of immunotherapy
      • Pregnancy or lactation
      • Allergy to potato or corn oat or cow's milk
      • Unwillingness to carry an epinephrine auto-injector
      • Unwillingness to comply with activity restrictions during OIT or any other study procedure
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group

    Subjects who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1. The treatment group will receive prebiotic therapy for 30 days, then subjects will start peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) in addition to the prebiotic. Subjects will continue through a prescribed course of POIT for approximately 180 days. After completion of POIT up-dosing, subjects will continue on maintenance POIT plus prebiotic therapy for an additional 180 days at which time they will undergo a DBPCFC. Subjects will then stop prebiotic therapy and continue on maintenance POIT in extended observation for approximately 4 years.

    Drug: Prebiotic

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Group

    Subjects who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1. The control group will receive placebo therapy for 30 days, then subjects will start peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) in addition to the placebo. Subjects will continue through a prescribed course of POIT for approximately 180 days. After completion of POIT up-dosing, subjects will continue on maintenance POIT plus placebo for an additional 180 days at which time they will undergo a DBPCFC. Subjects will then stop placebo and continue on maintenance POIT in extended observation for approximately 4 years.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • A prebiotic is a purified fiber of plant origin that has digestive health benefits by fostering the growth of beneficial microbes.

  • DrugPlacebo

    A placebo is a substance that has no therapeutic effects used as a control while testing new drugs.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Proportion of Subjects Mildly Symptomatic or Less at the 12 Month DBPCFC

    To determine the proportion of subjects who met the primary endpoint by tolerating at least 2044 mg cumulative peanut protein with no more than mild symptoms during the 12-month DBPCFC.

    Time frame: At the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Dose Related GI Side Effects During Oral Immunotherapy

    • To determine the proportion of subjects who experience dose related GI side effects during oral immunotherapy.

    Time frame: From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.

  2. The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Hypersensitivity Reactions (Other Than GI) During Oral Immunotherapy

    • To determine the proportion of subjects who experience hypersensitivity reactions (other than GI) during oral immunotherapy

    Time frame: From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.

Other outcomes

  1. Fecal Butyrate Concentration (mM)

    Fecal samples were collected at each study time point and analyzed for butyrate concentration using metabolomic profiling. Results are reported in millimolar (mM).

    Time frame: At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

  2. Change in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Levels

    • To determine if a change exists in peanut specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels

    Time frame: At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

  3. Change in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) Levels

    • To determine if a change exists in peanut specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels

    Time frame: At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

  4. Change in Peanut Skin Prick Test Mean Wheal Diameter

    • To determine if a change exists in peanut skin prick test mean wheal diameter

    Time frame: At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

  5. Change in Peanut Component Levels

    • To determine if a change exists in peanut component levels (peanut Ara h 2)

    Time frame: At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).

07

Results

Posted Mar 9, 2026
Limitations and caveats
The study enrolled a limited number of participants, which reduced statistical power and may have limited the ability to detect the effect of the intervention.

Participant flow

Subjects were screened and enrolled at the University of Chicago.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFiberPlacebo
Started911
Completed59
Not completed42
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject31
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Physician decision10

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Proportion of Subjects Mildly Symptomatic or Less at the 12 Month DBPCFC

To determine the proportion of subjects who met the primary endpoint by tolerating at least 2044 mg cumulative peanut protein with no more than mild symptoms during the 12-month DBPCFC.

Time frame:
At the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Proportion of Subjects Mildly Symptomatic or Less at the 12 Month DBPCFC
ParticipantsFiberPlacebo
The Proportion of Subjects Mildly Symptomatic or Less at the 12 Month DBPCFC44
Statistical analysis
  • Fiber vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00
SecondaryThe Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Dose Related GI Side Effects During Oral Immunotherapy

• To determine the proportion of subjects who experience dose related GI side effects during oral immunotherapy.

Time frame:
From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Dose Related GI Side Effects During Oral Immunotherapy
ParticipantsFiberPlacebo
The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Dose Related GI Side Effects During Oral Immunotherapy47
Statistical analysis
  • Fiber vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.65
SecondaryThe Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Hypersensitivity Reactions (Other Than GI) During Oral Immunotherapy

• To determine the proportion of subjects who experience hypersensitivity reactions (other than GI) during oral immunotherapy

Time frame:
From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Hypersensitivity Reactions (Other Than GI) During Oral Immunotherapy
ParticipantsFiberPlacebo
The Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Hypersensitivity Reactions (Other Than GI) During Oral Immunotherapy35
Statistical analysis
  • Fiber vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.66
Other pre-specifiedFecal Butyrate Concentration (mM)

Fecal samples were collected at each study time point and analyzed for butyrate concentration using metabolomic profiling. Results are reported in millimolar (mM).

Time frame:
At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).
Reported as:
Mean · mM
Fecal Butyrate Concentration (mM)
mMFiberPlacebo
Baseline18.45 ± 12.2521.02 ± 13.47
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)15.64 ± 12.3015.94 ± 9.98
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)20.80 ± 24.1518.55 ± 21.52
Change from baseline (week 4)-5.93 ± 17.67-6.37 ± 15.31
Change from baseline (week 16)-1.51 ± 21.42-3.31 ± 25.29
Other pre-specifiedChange in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Levels

• To determine if a change exists in peanut specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels

Time frame:
At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).
Reported as:
Mean · kUA/L
Change in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Levels
kUA/LFiberPlacebo
Baseline17.31 ± 18.9369.34 ± 41.58
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)25.21 ± 32.3173.55 ± 39.94
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)12.47 ± 18.9057.72 ± 38.17
Change from baseline (visit 4)7.89 ± 18.864.21 ± 17.03
Change from baseline (visit 16)-2.01 ± 3.12-10.85 ± 28.61
Other pre-specifiedChange in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) Levels

• To determine if a change exists in peanut specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels

Time frame:
At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).
Reported as:
Mean · kUA/L
Change in Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) Levels
kUA/LFiberPlacebo
Baseline0.41 ± 0.201.58 ± 1.98
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)0.57 ± 0.402.21 ± 3.33
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)2.20 ± 2.258.31 ± 8.78
Change from Baseline (Visit 4)0.09 ± 0.200.54 ± 1.30
Change from Baseline (Visit 16)1.84 ± 2.238.61 ± 8.81
Other pre-specifiedChange in Peanut Skin Prick Test Mean Wheal Diameter

• To determine if a change exists in peanut skin prick test mean wheal diameter

Time frame:
At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change in Peanut Skin Prick Test Mean Wheal Diameter
mmFiberPlacebo
Baseline15.00 ± 5.0716.73 ± 11.16
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)18.67 ± 18.8418.00 ± 14.12
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)5.20 ± 3.636.78 ± 3.70
Change from Baseline (Visit 4)3.67 ± 15.261.27 ± 16.20
Change from Baseline (Visit 16)-12.80 ± 3.27-11.89 ± 8.97
Statistical analysis
  • Fiber vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.45
Other pre-specifiedChange in Peanut Component Levels

• To determine if a change exists in peanut component levels (peanut Ara h 2)

Time frame:
At baseline; after 1 month of fiber/placebo; and at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (approximately 13 months after enrollment).
Reported as:
Mean · kUA/L
Change in Peanut Component Levels
kUA/LFiberPlacebo
Baseline12.91 ± 19.0159.43 ± 40.20
Visit 4 (After 1 month of fiber or placebo supplementation)22.62 ± 33.8666.61 ± 39.97
Visit 16 (At the exit double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge)13.99 ± 27.9745.41 ± 33.79
Change from Baseline (Visit 4)9.71 ± 26.817.18 ± 13.57
Change from Baseline (Visit 16)-0.17 ± 3.16-9.53 ± 18.74

Adverse events

Collected over From first study intervention through the final exit food challenge visit, up to 15 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fiber0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)6/9 (66.7%)
Placebo0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)8/11 (72.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventFiberPlacebo
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/94/11
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/94/11
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/93/11
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/93/11
Oropharyngeal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders2/93/11
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/93/11
FeverGeneral disorders2/93/11
Nasal congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/93/11
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations1/93/11
AngioedemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/92/11

Baseline characteristics

The baseline analysis population included all 20 enrolled participants. This population is identical to the participants assigned to the study arms in the Participant Flow.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)FiberPlaceboTotal
Age — 4-6 years167
Age — 7-9 years202
Age — 10-12 years134
Age — 13-15 years314
Age — 16-17 years213
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FiberPlaceboTotal
Female448
Male5712
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)FiberPlaceboTotal
Race — White6713
Race — Black or African American224
Race — Asian101
Race — More than one race022
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)FiberPlaceboTotal
United States91120
Peanut skin prick test wheal size
Peanut skin prick test wheal size(mm)FiberPlaceboTotal
Mean15.0 ± 5.0716.73 ± 11.1615.95 ± 8.78
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Comer Children's Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • University of Chicago- Department of Pediatrics
    Hyde Park, Illinois 60637, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gupta RS, Warren CM, Smith BM, et al. The Public Health Impact of Parent-Reported Childhood Food Allergies in the United States. Pediatrics. 2018:142(6):e20181235. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar;143(3):e20183835. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3835. No abstract available. PubMed 30819972 ↗
  • Primeau MN, Kagan R, Joseph L, Lim H, Dufresne C, Duffy C, Prhcal D, Clarke A. The psychological burden of peanut allergy as perceived by adults with peanut allergy and the parents of peanut-allergic children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000 Aug;30(8):1135-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00889.x. PubMed 10931121 ↗
  • Lieberman JA, Gupta RS, Knibb RC, Haselkorn T, Tilles S, Mack DP, Pouessel G. The global burden of illness of peanut allergy: A comprehensive literature review. Allergy. 2021 May;76(5):1367-1384. doi: 10.1111/all.14666. Epub 2021 Jan 16. PubMed 33216994 ↗
  • PALISADE Group of Clinical Investigators; Vickery BP, Vereda A, Casale TB, Beyer K, du Toit G, Hourihane JO, Jones SM, Shreffler WG, Marcantonio A, Zawadzki R, Sher L, Carr WW, Fineman S, Greos L, Rachid R, Ibanez MD, Tilles S, Assa'ad AH, Nilsson C, Rupp N, Welch MJ, Sussman G, Chinthrajah S, Blumchen K, Sher E, Spergel JM, Leickly FE, Zielen S, Wang J, Sanders GM, Wood RA, Cheema A, Bindslev-Jensen C, Leonard S, Kachru R, Johnston DT, Hampel FC Jr, Kim EH, Anagnostou A, Pongracic JA, Ben-Shoshan M, Sharma HP, Stillerman A, Windom HH, Yang WH, Muraro A, Zubeldia JM, Sharma V, Dorsey MJ, Chong HJ, Ohayon J, Bird JA, Carr TF, Siri D, Fernandez-Rivas M, Jeong DK, Fleischer DM, Lieberman JA, Dubois AEJ, Tsoumani M, Ciaccio CE, Portnoy JM, Mansfield LE, Fritz SB, Lanser BJ, Matz J, Oude Elberink HNG, Varshney P, Dilly SG, Adelman DC, Burks AW. AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856. Epub 2018 Nov 18. PubMed 30449234 ↗
  • Anagnostou K, Islam S, King Y, Foley L, Pasea L, Bond S, Palmer C, Deighton J, Ewan P, Clark A. Assessing the efficacy of oral immunotherapy for the desensitisation of peanut allergy in children (STOP II): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1297-1304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62301-6. Epub 2014 Jan 30. PubMed 24485709 ↗
  • Bird JA, Spergel JM, Jones SM, Rachid R, Assa'ad AH, Wang J, Leonard SA, Laubach SS, Kim EH, Vickery BP, Davis BP, Heimall J, Cianferoni A, MacGinnitie AJ, Crestani E, Burks AW; ARC001 Study Group. Efficacy and Safety of AR101 in Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results of ARC001, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):476-485.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PubMed 29092786 ↗
  • Anagnostou K, Clark A. The management of peanut allergy. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jan;100(1):68-72. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306152. Epub 2014 Aug 25. PubMed 25157179 ↗
  • Bunyavanich S, Berin MC. Food allergy and the microbiome: Current understandings and future directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Dec;144(6):1468-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.10.019. PubMed 31812181 ↗
  • Baxter NT, Schmidt AW, Venkataraman A, Kim KS, Waldron C, Schmidt TM. Dynamics of Human Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Response to Dietary Interventions with Three Fermentable Fibers. mBio. 2019 Jan 29;10(1):e02566-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02566-18. PubMed 30696735 ↗
  • Feehley T, Plunkett CH, Bao R, Choi Hong SM, Culleen E, Belda-Ferre P, Campbell E, Aitoro R, Nocerino R, Paparo L, Andrade J, Antonopoulos DA, Berni Canani R, Nagler CR. Healthy infants harbor intestinal bacteria that protect against food allergy. Nat Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):448-453. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0324-z. Epub 2019 Jan 14. PubMed 30643289 ↗
  • Tan J, McKenzie C, Vuillermin PJ, Goverse G, Vinuesa CG, Mebius RE, Macia L, Mackay CR. Dietary Fiber and Bacterial SCFA Enhance Oral Tolerance and Protect against Food Allergy through Diverse Cellular Pathways. Cell Rep. 2016 Jun 21;15(12):2809-24. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.047. PubMed 27332875 ↗
  • Lejk A, Mysliwiec M, Mysliwiec A. Effect of eating resistant starch on the development of overweight, obesity,and disorders of carbohydrate metabolism in children. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019;25(2):81-84. doi: 10.5114/pedm.2019.85818. PubMed 31343139 ↗
  • Montroy J, Berjawi R, Lalu MM, Podolsky E, Peixoto C, Sahin L, Stintzi A, Mack D, Fergusson DA. The effects of resistant starches on inflammatory bowel disease in preclinical and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01516-4. PubMed 33167889 ↗
  • Sanders LM, Dicklin MR, Palacios OM, Maki CE, Wilcox ML, Maki KC. Effects of potato resistant starch intake on insulin sensitivity, related metabolic markers and appetite ratings in men and women at risk for type 2 diabetes: a pilot cross-over randomised controlled trial. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2021 Feb;34(1):94-105. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12822. Epub 2020 Oct 29. PubMed 33119948 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2021 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 39 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2026, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 22, 2021
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
StartActual
Nov 30, 2021
Primary completionActual
Mar 12, 2025
CompletionActual
Mar 12, 2025
Results first posted
Mar 9, 2026
Last update
Mar 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05138757
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
Start date
Nov 30, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 12, 2025
Completion
Mar 12, 2025
Results posted
Mar 9, 2026
Last update
Mar 9, 2026

Study contacts

Christina E Ciaccio, MD
principal investigator · University of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Prebiotics

Start the discussion