CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05133180Updated Jun 7, 2024Results posted

Safety and Efficacy Study on Cenegermin (Oxervate®) vs Vehicle in Severe Sjogren's Dry Eye Disease (PROTEGO-1 Study)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Oxervate and Vehicle in Dry Eye, sponsored by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. Completed at 10 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-07.

Sponsored by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary objectives

  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Schirmer I test (without anaesthesia) >10mm/5min at Week 4 by testing the superiority.
  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye questionnaire (SANDE) global score at Week 12 by testing the superiority.

Secondary objectives

  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Schirmer I test at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Cornea and conjunctiva vital staining with fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] scales) at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in SANDE scores at Week 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in worsening in symptom scores (SANDE) and/or NEI score at Week 4 by testing the superiority.
  • To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
Read the detailed description

This is a 4 week phase III, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled study to evaluate safety and efficacy of cenegermin ophthalmic solution at 20 mcg/mL solution versus vehicle, in patients with severe Sjogren's dry eye disease.

During the screening all procedures for inclusion and exclusion were performed. From the day of screening the patients stopped any kind of further treatment, except commercially available preservative free artificial tears provided by Sponsor.

At the end of the wash out period, patients meeting the entry criteria for this study were randomized 1:1 and treated for 4 weeks with either cenegermin ophthalmic solution 20 mcg/mL TID or vehicle TID.

During the 4 weeks of masked treatment only the administration of IMP was allowed.

During the follow up period, the patient could administer additional artificial tear eye drops, provided by Sponsor, only if strictly needed, and should document in the patient's diary the number of additional drops administered for each eye.

Patients were then followed up for efficacy and safety endpoints until week 16 and for safety endpoints until week 24.

The total duration of the study was 25 weeks including 1 week of screening.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye

Keywords

  • Sjorgen's dry eye
03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 192 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female aged ≥ 18 years
  2. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome or other autoimmune disease known to induce Sjögren's Dry Eye Disease (DED).
  3. Patients with severe Sjögren's dry eye disease characterized by the following clinical features:

    1. Corneal and/or conjunctival staining with fluorescein using National Eye Institute (NEI) grading system ≥3
    2. SANDE questionnaire >25 mm
    3. Schirmer test I (without anaesthesia) ≥2 ≤5mm/5min
  4. The same eye (eligible eye) must fulfill all the above criteria
  5. Patients diagnosed with severe Sjögren's dry eye disease at least 3 months before enrolment
  6. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score of ≥ 0.1 decimal units (20/200 Snellen value) in each eye at the time of study enrolment
  7. If a female of childbearing potential, have a negative urine pregnancy test and use a highly effective method to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the trial and 30 days after the study treatment period. Males of reproductive potential should use effective contraception during treatment and 30 days after the study treatment period.
  8. Only patients who satisfy all Informed Consent requirements may be included in the study. The patient and/or his/her legal representative must read, sign and date the Informed Consent document before any study-related procedures are performed. The Informed Consent Form signed by patients and/or legal representative must have been approved by the IRB/IEC for the current study
  9. Patients must have the ability and willingness to comply with study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to speak and understand the local language sufficiently to understand the nature of the study, to provide written informed consent, and to allow the completion of all study assessments
  2. Evidence of an active ocular infection, in either eye
  3. Presence of any other ocular disorder or condition requiring topical medication during the entire duration of study in either eye
  4. History of severe systemic allergy or of ocular allergy (including seasonal conjunctivitis) or chronic conjunctivitis and/or keratitis other than dry eye
  5. Intraocular inflammation defined as Tyndall score >0
  6. History of malignancy in the last 5 years
  7. Systemic disease not stabilized within 1 month before Screening Visit (e.g. diabetes with glycemia out of range, thyroid malfunction) or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study (e.g. current systemic infections) or with a condition incompatible with the frequent assessment required by the study
  8. Patient had a serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug or chemically related compounds or had a clinically significant allergy to drugs, foods, amide local anesthetics or other materials including commercial artificial tears (in the opinion of the investigator).
  9. Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they meet any one of the following conditions:

    1. are currently pregnant or,
    2. have a positive result at the urine pregnancy test (Baseline/Day 1) or,
    3. intend to become pregnant during the study treatment period or,
    4. are breast-feeding or,
    5. are not willing to use highly effective birth control measures

    During the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods

  10. Any concurrent medical condition, that in the judgment of the PI, might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound the interpretation of the study results, or endanger the patient's well-being
  11. Use of topical cyclosporine, or topical ophthalmic treatments of the same class, within 14 days of screening visit (day -8)
  12. Use of topical corticosteroids, lifitegrast, autologous serum tears in either eye during the study (previous use not an exclusion criteria but must be discontinued at the screening visit)
  13. Contact lenses, True Tear device, moisture goggles, sutureless amniotic membrane or punctum plug use during the study (previous use not an exclusion criteria but must be discontinued at the screening visit)
  14. History of drug addiction or alcohol abuse in the last 2 years
  15. Any prior ocular surgery (including refractive, palpebral and cataract surgery) if within 90 days before the screening visit
  16. Participation in a clinical trial with a new active substance during the past 3 months
  17. Participation in another clinical trial study at the same time as the present study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oxervate

    One drop of cenegermin 20 mcg/mL (rhNGF 20 mcg/mL) in the pharmaceutical form of ophthalmic sterile solution was instilled in both eyes three times daily (TID), every six hours.

    Drug: Oxervate

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle

    One drop of vehicle ophthalmic solution was instilled in both eyes TID (every six hours).

    Other: Vehicle

Interventions

  • DrugOxervate

    Oxervate®, an ophthalmic solution containing cenegermin 20 mcg/mL, which is a recombinant human Nerve Growth Factor (rhNGF); one drop of the test product will be instilled in both eyes three times daily (TID).

    Also known as: Cenegermin

  • OtherVehicle

    Vehicle will be instilled with the same scheme of the test product

    Also known as: Reference product

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) >10mm/5min at Week 4

    The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion. The rounded bend end of a sterile strip was inserted into the lower conjunctival sac over the temporal one-third of the lower eyelid margin. After 5 minutes had elapsed, the Schirmer's test strip was removed and the length of the tear absorption on the strip was measured (millimeters/5 minutes). The longer the wetted length, the healthier the status of the eye.

    Time frame: at week 4

  2. Change From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 12

    The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? The SANDE questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess the extent of patients' symptoms. In this questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right. The global SANDE score is calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. Both for total score and for frequency or severity scores, 0 is the best condition, 100 the worst condition. Please note that adjusted means are reported.

    Time frame: at week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Key Secondary Outcome: Number of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) > 10mm/5min at Week 8

    The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion. The rounded bend end of a sterile strip was inserted into the lower conjunctival sac over the temporal one-third of the lower eyelid margin. After 5 minutes had elapsed, the Schirmer's test strip was removed and the length of the tear absorption on the strip was measured (millimeters/5 minutes). The longer and the wetted length, the healthier the status of the eye.

    Time frame: at Week 8

  2. Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 12

    The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. Means are adjusted means.

    Time frame: At week 12

  3. Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 12

    The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. Means are adjusted means.

    Time frame: at Week 12

  4. Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 12 and at Week 4

    IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Dry eye Quality of Life, Dry eye Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Dry eye Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the first module: Quality of Life module (27 items) is composed by 3 dimensions: Dimension 1 - Impact on Daily Activities, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 1-6 multiplied by 20. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Emotional Impact: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 10-20 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 3 - Impact on Work: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 23-27 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated less impact on daily activities, on work and on emotions. No combination of dimensions scores is done.

    Time frame: At Weeks 12 and 4

  5. Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in "Treatment Satisfaction & Bother" Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 4

    IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the second module: Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother (8 items). This is composed by 2 dimensions: "Dim. 1" - Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 2-5 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Treatment-Related Bother / Inconvenience calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 6, 8-10 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a greater satisfaction in treatment effectiveness and less treatment-related bother. No combination of dimension scores is done.

    Time frame: at Weeks 12 and 4

  6. Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in "Symptom Bother Module" Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 4

    IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the third module: Symptom Bother (20 items). This is composed by 1 dimension: Dry Eye Symptom-Bother (range 0-100) The Symptom Bother score is calculated if at least 50% (10 items) of the 20 items within the dimension are completed, and non-missing; otherwise the score is set to missing. The Symptom Bother score is calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 1-20 multiplied by 25. The higher the score the greater the symptom bother.

    Time frame: at Weeks 12 and 4

  7. Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Cornea and Conjunctiva Vital Staining With Fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scales) at Weeks 4, 8, 12

    The examiner compared the overall appearance of the patient's corneal staining with a reference figure, simulating the pattern of staining encountered in dry eye disease. non attempt was made to count the dots or to assess the position or confluence of the dots. The examiner selected the appropriate grade that best represented the state of corneal staining intuitionally. The grading system recommended by NEI divides the cornea into five zones (central, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior) and for each zone, the severity of the corneal staining is graded on a scale from 0 to 3 based on a reference figure. Therefore the maximum score (worst outcome) was 15, and the minimum (best outcome) was 0.

    Time frame: At weeks 4, 8, 12

  8. Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

    TFBUT was measured by determining the time to tear break-up.The TFBUT test was performed after instillation of 5 μl of 2% preservative free sodium fluorescein solution into the lower conjunctival sac of each eye. This measurement was performed within 10 seconds maximum. The TFBUT was measured twice during the first minute of instillation of the fluorescein. If the 2 readings differed by more than 2 sec., a third reading was taken. The TFBUT value was the average of the 2 or 3 measurements. Generally, a TFBUT value of 10-35 sec was considered normal. A value of less than 10 seconds may indicate tear film instability.

    Time frame: At weeks 4, 8, 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) [Time Frame: Week 4, 8, 12 and 16].

    The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion. The rounded bend end of a sterile strip was inserted into the lower conjunctival sac over the temporal one-third of the lower eyelid margin. After 5 minutes had elapsed, the Schirmer's test strip was removed and the length of the tear absorption on the strip was measured (millimeters/5 minutes). The longer, the wetted length, the healthier the status of the eye.

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12 and 16

  10. Change From Baseline in Cornea and Conjunctiva Vital Staining With Fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scales) at Week 16

    The examiner compared the overall appearance of the patient's corneal staining with a reference figure, simulating the pattern of staining encountered in dry eye disease. non attempt was made to count the dots or to assess the position or confluence of the dots. The examiner selected the appropriate grade that best represented the state of corneal staining intuitionally. The grading system recommended by NEI divides the cornea into five zones (central, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior) and for each zone, the severity of the corneal staining is graded on a scale from 0 to 3 based on a reference figure. Therefore the maximum score (worst outcome) was 15, and the minimum (best outcome) was 0.

    Time frame: at Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 16

    TFBUT was measured by determining the time to tear break-up.The TFBUT test was performed after instillation of 5 μl of 2% preservative free sodium fluorescein solution into the lower conjunctival sac of each eye. This measurement was performed within 10 seconds maximum. The TFBUT was measured twice during the first minute of instillation of the fluorescein. If the 2 readings differed by more than 2 sec., a third reading was taken. The TFBUT value was the average of the 2 or 3 measurements. Generally, a TFBUT value of 10-35 sec was considered normal. A value of less than 10 seconds may indicate tear film instability.

    Time frame: at week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

    The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root.

    Time frame: at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

  13. Change From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

    The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root.

    Time frame: at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 8, Week 12 and Week 16

    The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root.

    Time frame: at Week 8, week 12 and week 16

  15. Number of Patients Who Experienced a Worsening in Symptoms Scores (SANDE) and/or NEI Score > = 50% at Week 4

    Symptoms Scores (SANDE) and/or NEI Score were punctually described in the previous outcome descriptions. For Sande score, the scale ranges from 0 to 100 for both severity and frequency, where 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Hence the higher the score, the worse the outcome. For NEI score, the maximum score (worst outcome) was 15, and the minimum (best outcome) was 0; hence the higher the score, the worse the outcome.

    Time frame: at week 4

  16. Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 8 and 16

    IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Dry eye Quality of Life, Dry eye Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Dry eye Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the first module: Quality of Life module (27 items) is composed by 3 dimensions: Dimension 1 - Impact on Daily Activities, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 1-6 multiplied by 20. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Emotional Impact: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 10-20 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 3 - Impact on Work: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 23-27 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated less impact on daily activities, on work and on emotions. No combination of dimensions scores is done.

    Time frame: At weeks 8 and 16

  17. Change From Baseline in "Symptom Bother Module" Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 8 and Week 16

    IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the third module: Symptom Bother (20 items). This is composed by 1 dimension: Dry Eye Symptom-Bother (range 0-100) The Symptom Bother score is calculated if at least 50% (10 items) of the 20 items within the dimension are completed, and non-missing; otherwise the score is set to missing. The Symptom Bother score is calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 1-20 multiplied by 25. The higher the score the greater the symptom bother.

    Time frame: at Week 8 and Week 16

  18. Change From Baseline in "Treatment Satisfaction & Bother" Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 8 and Week 16

    IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the second module: Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother (8 items). This is composed by 2 dimensions: Dim. 1 - Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 2-5 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Treatment-Related Bother / Inconvenience calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 6, 8-10 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a greater satisfaction in treatment effectiveness and less treatment-related bother. No combination of dimension scores is done.

    Time frame: at Week 8 and Week 16

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence and Frequency of TEAEs, Assessed Throughout the Study.

    TEAE=any AE started on or after the date of the first dose of study medication or started prior to first dose and worsened in severity after the first dose.

    Time frame: From Screening to Visit 7 (follow-up, week 24)

07

Results

Posted Jun 7, 2024

Participant flow

A total of 126 patients ≥ 18 years with severe Sjögren's DE were assessed for eligibility. The enrolled patients (n=104) were randomized 1:1 in the study as follows: 52 patients to cenegermin and 52 to vehicle. A total of 5 patients discontinued the study prematurely: 2 patients from cenegermin group and 3 from vehicle. Regarding treatment discontinuation, a total of 5 patients discontinued the treatment prematurely: 3 patients from cenegermin and 2 from vehicle.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOxervateVehicle
Started5252
Randomized but not treated01
Safety population (saf)5251
Full analysis set population (fas)5251
Per protocol population (pp)4647
Prematurely study discontinued23
Completed5049
Not completed23
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Documented disease progression01

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) >10mm/5min at Week 4

The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion. The rounded bend end of a sterile strip was inserted into the lower conjunctival sac over the temporal one-third of the lower eyelid margin. After 5 minutes had elapsed, the Schirmer's test strip was removed and the length of the tear absorption on the strip was measured (millimeters/5 minutes). The longer the wetted length, the healthier the status of the eye.

Time frame:
at week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) >10mm/5min at Week 4
ParticipantsOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Number of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) >10mm/5min at Week 4192
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 (P-value of treatment variable from logistic regression model on the number of patients reaching a value of Schirmer I test (without anaesthesia) \>10mm/5min) · Odds ratio (or): 16.946 · 95% CI 3.412 to 84.165
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 12

The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? The SANDE questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess the extent of patients' symptoms. In this questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right. The global SANDE score is calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. Both for total score and for frequency or severity scores, 0 is the best condition, 100 the worst condition. Please note that adjusted means are reported.

Time frame:
at week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 12
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Change From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 12-29.5 (-42.126 to -16.930)-25 (-37.009 to -12.926)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · ANCOVA · p = 0.322 (P-value of adjusted means difference between treatments from the ANCOVA model on change from baseline in the global SANDE score.) · Adjusted mean difference: -4.561 · 95% CI -13.581 to 4.459
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Number of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) > 10mm/5min at Week 8

The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion. The rounded bend end of a sterile strip was inserted into the lower conjunctival sac over the temporal one-third of the lower eyelid margin. After 5 minutes had elapsed, the Schirmer's test strip was removed and the length of the tear absorption on the strip was measured (millimeters/5 minutes). The longer and the wetted length, the healthier the status of the eye.

Time frame:
at Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Key Secondary Outcome: Number of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) > 10mm/5min at Week 8
ParticipantsOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Key Secondary Outcome: Number of Patients Reaching a Value of Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) > 10mm/5min at Week 8182
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 15.950 · 95% CI 3.091 to 82.310
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 12

The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. Means are adjusted means.

Time frame:
At week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 12
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 12-24.546 (-38.261 to -10.831)-21.793 (-34.944 to -8.643)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · ANCOVA regression model · p = 0.572 (P-value of adjusted means difference between treatments from the ANCOVA model on change from baseline in SANDE score for frequency at Week 12.) · Adjusted mean difference: -2.753 · 95% CI -12.303 to 6.798
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 12

The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. Means are adjusted means.

Time frame:
at Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 12
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 12-31.445 (-43.795 to -19.095)-26.713 (-38.538 to -14.887)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · ANCOVA regression model · p = 0.307 (P-value of adjusted means difference between treatments from the ANCOVA model on change from baseline in SANDE score for severity at Week 12.) · Adjusted mean difference: -4.732 · 95% CI -13.819 to 4.354
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 12 and at Week 4

IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Dry eye Quality of Life, Dry eye Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Dry eye Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the first module: Quality of Life module (27 items) is composed by 3 dimensions: Dimension 1 - Impact on Daily Activities, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 1-6 multiplied by 20. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Emotional Impact: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 10-20 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 3 - Impact on Work: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 23-27 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated less impact on daily activities, on work and on emotions. No combination of dimensions scores is done.

Time frame:
At Weeks 12 and 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 12 and at Week 4
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Impact on daily activities - week 1213.301 (6.267 to 20.335)9.223 (2.437 to 16.008)
Emotional impact due to dry eye - week 1216.069 (7.476 to 24.661)10.519 (2.185 to 18.853)
Impact on work due to dry eye - week 1218.619 (9.309 to 27.928)15.144 (6.371 to 23.916)
Impact on daily activities - week 411.524 (5.207 to 17.842)9.364 (3.354 to 15.374)
Emotional impact due to dry eye - week 414.385 (6.840 to 21.930)11.955 (4.732 to 19.177)
Impact on work due to dry eye - week 417.591 (8.213 to 26.969)14.291 (5.787 to 22.795)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.468 (P-value of Least Square (LS) means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Quality of Life Module (Daily Activities) at Week 4) · Least square mean difference: 2.160 · 95% CI -3.668 to 7.988
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.492 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Quality of Life Module (Emotional Impact) at Week 4.) · Least square mean difference: 2.431 · 95% CI -4.500 to 9.362
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.510 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Quality of Life Module (Impact on Work) at Week 4.) · Ls means difference: 3.300 · 95% CI -6.511 to 13.111
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.268 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Quality of Life Module (Daily Activities) at Week 12.) · Least square mean difference: 4.078 · 95% CI -3.142 to 11.299
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.227 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Quality of Life Module (Emotional Impact) at Week 12.) · Least square mean difference: 5.550 · 95% CI -3.462 to 14.562
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.501 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Quality of Life Module (Impact on Work) at Week 12.) · Least square mean difference: 3.475 · 95% CI -6.651 to 13.601
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in "Treatment Satisfaction & Bother" Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 4

IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the second module: Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother (8 items). This is composed by 2 dimensions: "Dim. 1" - Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 2-5 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Treatment-Related Bother / Inconvenience calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 6, 8-10 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a greater satisfaction in treatment effectiveness and less treatment-related bother. No combination of dimension scores is done.

Time frame:
at Weeks 12 and 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in "Treatment Satisfaction & Bother" Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 4
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness - week 1212.733 (1.180 to 24.285)16.938 (5.033 to 28.844)
Treatment- Related Bother / Inconvenience - week 126.482 (-0.877 to 13.842)4.239 (-2.942 to 11.420)
Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness - week 413.879 (2.071 to 25.686)14.428 (3.246 to 25.609)
Treatment- Related Bother / Inconvenience - week 49.505 (2.772 to 16.237)8.432 (1.840 to 15.025)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.924 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother module (Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness) at Week 4.) · Least square mean difference: -0.549 · 95% CI -11.820 to 10.723
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.745 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother module (Treatment- Related Bother / Inconvenience) at Week 4.) · Least square mean difference: 1.072 · 95% CI -5.398 to 7.542
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.467 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother module (Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness) at Week 12.) · Least square mean difference: -4.206 · 95% CI -15.530 to 7.118
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.564 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother module (Treatment- Related Bother / Inconvenience) at Week 12.) · Least square mean difference: 2.244 · 95% CI -5.387 to 9.874
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in "Symptom Bother Module" Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 4

IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the third module: Symptom Bother (20 items). This is composed by 1 dimension: Dry Eye Symptom-Bother (range 0-100) The Symptom Bother score is calculated if at least 50% (10 items) of the 20 items within the dimension are completed, and non-missing; otherwise the score is set to missing. The Symptom Bother score is calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 1-20 multiplied by 25. The higher the score the greater the symptom bother.

Time frame:
at Weeks 12 and 4
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in "Symptom Bother Module" Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 4
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
week 12-16.323 (-23.582 to -9.064)-7.533 (-14.574 to -0.493)
week 4-10.241 (-16.924 to -3.557)-9.435 (-15.876 to -2.995)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.802 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Symptom Bother Module at Week 4.) · Least square mean difference: -0.805 · 95% CI -7.086 to 5.476
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.019 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in IDEEL Symptom Bother Module at Week 12.) · Least square mean difference: -8.789 · 95% CI -16.160 to -1.418
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Cornea and Conjunctiva Vital Staining With Fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scales) at Weeks 4, 8, 12

The examiner compared the overall appearance of the patient's corneal staining with a reference figure, simulating the pattern of staining encountered in dry eye disease. non attempt was made to count the dots or to assess the position or confluence of the dots. The examiner selected the appropriate grade that best represented the state of corneal staining intuitionally. The grading system recommended by NEI divides the cornea into five zones (central, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior) and for each zone, the severity of the corneal staining is graded on a scale from 0 to 3 based on a reference figure. Therefore the maximum score (worst outcome) was 15, and the minimum (best outcome) was 0.

Time frame:
At weeks 4, 8, 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Cornea and Conjunctiva Vital Staining With Fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scales) at Weeks 4, 8, 12
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Week 4-4.107 (-5.723 to -2.490)-2.588 (-4.118 to -1.059)
Week 8-4.442 (-6.145 to -2.739)-2.668 (-4.298 to -1.038)
Week 12-3.714 (-5.522 to -1.905)-2.490 (-4.222 to -0.758)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.045 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in Cornea and conjunctiva vital staining with fluorescein NEI scale at Week 4.) · Least square mean difference: -1.518 · 95% CI -3.005 to -0.031
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.038 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in Cornea and conjunctiva vital staining with fluorescein NEI scale at Week 8.) · Least square mean difference: -1.773 · 95% CI -3.446 to -0.101
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.200 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in Cornea and conjunctiva vital staining with fluorescein NEI scale at Week 12) · Least square mean difference: -1.224 · 95% CI -3.096 to 0.649
SecondaryKey Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

TFBUT was measured by determining the time to tear break-up.The TFBUT test was performed after instillation of 5 μl of 2% preservative free sodium fluorescein solution into the lower conjunctival sac of each eye. This measurement was performed within 10 seconds maximum. The TFBUT was measured twice during the first minute of instillation of the fluorescein. If the 2 readings differed by more than 2 sec., a third reading was taken. The TFBUT value was the average of the 2 or 3 measurements. Generally, a TFBUT value of 10-35 sec was considered normal. A value of less than 10 seconds may indicate tear film instability.

Time frame:
At weeks 4, 8, 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · seconds
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
secondsOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Week 41.808 (0.437 to 3.178)0.167 (-1.144 to 1.479)
Week 82.010 (0.579 to 3.441)0.876 (-0.502 to 2.255)
Week 121.973 (0.588 to 3.358)0.613 (-0.715 to 1.941)
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.016 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in TFBUT at Week 4.) · Least square mean difference: 1.640 · 95% CI 0.300 to 2.980
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.129 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in TFBUT at Week 8.) · Least ssquare mean difference: 1.133 · 95% CI -0.329 to 2.596
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · MMRM · p = 0.050 (P-value of LS means difference between treatments from the MMRM on change from baseline in TFBUT at Week 12.) · Least square mean difference: 1.360 · 95% CI -0.002 to 2.722
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) [Time Frame: Week 4, 8, 12 and 16].

The Schirmer test type I (without anaesthesia) was performed to measure aqueous tear secretion. The rounded bend end of a sterile strip was inserted into the lower conjunctival sac over the temporal one-third of the lower eyelid margin. After 5 minutes had elapsed, the Schirmer's test strip was removed and the length of the tear absorption on the strip was measured (millimeters/5 minutes). The longer, the wetted length, the healthier the status of the eye.

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · millimeters
Change From Baseline in Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) [Time Frame: Week 4, 8, 12 and 16].
millimetersOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
week 45.4 ± 6.60.8 ± 2.7
week 84.9 ± 6.61.4 ± 2.9
week 123.8 ± 5.21.4 ± 4.1
week 163.6 ± 5.11.7 ± 4.8
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.001 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.009 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.020 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.022 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cornea and Conjunctiva Vital Staining With Fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scales) at Week 16

The examiner compared the overall appearance of the patient's corneal staining with a reference figure, simulating the pattern of staining encountered in dry eye disease. non attempt was made to count the dots or to assess the position or confluence of the dots. The examiner selected the appropriate grade that best represented the state of corneal staining intuitionally. The grading system recommended by NEI divides the cornea into five zones (central, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior) and for each zone, the severity of the corneal staining is graded on a scale from 0 to 3 based on a reference figure. Therefore the maximum score (worst outcome) was 15, and the minimum (best outcome) was 0.

Time frame:
at Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Cornea and Conjunctiva Vital Staining With Fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scales) at Week 16
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Change From Baseline in Cornea and Conjunctiva Vital Staining With Fluorescein (National Eye Institute [NEI] Scales) at Week 16-3.3 ± 4.6-2.7 ± 5.8
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.065 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 16

TFBUT was measured by determining the time to tear break-up.The TFBUT test was performed after instillation of 5 μl of 2% preservative free sodium fluorescein solution into the lower conjunctival sac of each eye. This measurement was performed within 10 seconds maximum. The TFBUT was measured twice during the first minute of instillation of the fluorescein. If the 2 readings differed by more than 2 sec., a third reading was taken. The TFBUT value was the average of the 2 or 3 measurements. Generally, a TFBUT value of 10-35 sec was considered normal. A value of less than 10 seconds may indicate tear film instability.

Time frame:
at week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · seconds
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 16
secondsOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 161.3 ± 3.10.4 ± 2.8
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.125 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root.

Time frame:
at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
week 8-26.0 ± 20.1-15.2 ± 22.1
week 12-20.4 ± 22.0-15.7 ± 26.7
week 16-15.2 ± 20.5-16.0 ± 25.2
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.005 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.116 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.864 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root.

Time frame:
at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms Questionnaire (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
week 8-27.1 ± 22.5-15.9 ± 24.4
week 12-17.9 ± 23.4-15.7 ± 28.2
week 16-12.5 ± 21.2-16.1 ± 25.6
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.011 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.316 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.685 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 8, Week 12 and Week 16

The SANDE questionnaire is comprised of two questions: 1) How often do your eyes feel dry and/or irritated? And 2) How severe you feel your symptoms of dryness and/or irritation are? This questionnaire uses a 100 mm horizontal line for each question to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness experienced by the patients. In the SANDE questionnaire, frequency of symptoms ranges from "rarely" (0) to "all of the time" (100) and the severity of symptoms ranges from "very mild" (0) to "very severe" (100). At each visit, patients were asked to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks made by the patients on the 100 mm horizontal lines were measured in mm from left to right and recorded. 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Global score from the SANDE questionnaire was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root.

Time frame:
at Week 8, week 12 and week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 8, Week 12 and Week 16
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
week 8-23.7 ± 20.8-14.4 ± 21.6
week 12-21.2 ± 23.5-15.7 ± 26.5
week 16-16.6 ± 23.6-16.1 ± 25.9
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.016 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.160 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.839 (p-value corresponds to a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Wilcoxon rank sum) test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
SecondaryNumber of Patients Who Experienced a Worsening in Symptoms Scores (SANDE) and/or NEI Score > = 50% at Week 4

Symptoms Scores (SANDE) and/or NEI Score were punctually described in the previous outcome descriptions. For Sande score, the scale ranges from 0 to 100 for both severity and frequency, where 0 was the best condition and 100 marked the worst condition. Hence the higher the score, the worse the outcome. For NEI score, the maximum score (worst outcome) was 15, and the minimum (best outcome) was 0; hence the higher the score, the worse the outcome.

Time frame:
at week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Who Experienced a Worsening in Symptoms Scores (SANDE) and/or NEI Score > = 50% at Week 4
ParticipantsOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Number of Patients Who Experienced a Worsening in Symptoms Scores (SANDE) and/or NEI Score > = 50% at Week 4411
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · Chi-squared · p = 0.0455
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 8 and 16

IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Dry eye Quality of Life, Dry eye Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Dry eye Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the first module: Quality of Life module (27 items) is composed by 3 dimensions: Dimension 1 - Impact on Daily Activities, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 1-6 multiplied by 20. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Emotional Impact: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 10-20 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 3 - Impact on Work: calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 23-27 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated less impact on daily activities, on work and on emotions. No combination of dimensions scores is done.

Time frame:
At weeks 8 and 16
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Weeks 8 and 16
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Impact on Daily Activities - week 814.6 ± 18.86.5 ± 23.2
Emotional Impact due to Dry Eye - week 818.4 ± 21.910.3 ± 22.9
Impact on Work due to Dry Eye - week 817.7 ± 25.79.5 ± 25.9
Impact on Daily Activities - week 1615.1 ± 20.89.7 ± 21.1
Emotional Impact due to Dry Eye - week 1619.0 ± 23.111.5 ± 23.3
Impact on Work due to Dry Eye - week 1620.9 ± 24.29.3 ± 26.7
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.060 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.079 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.251 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.203 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.114 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.112 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in "Symptom Bother Module" Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 8 and Week 16

IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the third module: Symptom Bother (20 items). This is composed by 1 dimension: Dry Eye Symptom-Bother (range 0-100) The Symptom Bother score is calculated if at least 50% (10 items) of the 20 items within the dimension are completed, and non-missing; otherwise the score is set to missing. The Symptom Bother score is calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 1-20 multiplied by 25. The higher the score the greater the symptom bother.

Time frame:
at Week 8 and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in "Symptom Bother Module" Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 8 and Week 16
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
week 8-19.5 ± 20.3-6.9 ± 19.2
week 16-18.6 ± 19.4-11.1 ± 22.3
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.002 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.076 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in "Treatment Satisfaction & Bother" Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 8 and Week 16

IDEEL is a 57-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of dry eye symptoms on everyday life. It is composed of 3 modules (Quality of Life, Treatment satisfaction \& Bother, Symptom Bother). This outcome is about the second module: Treatment Satisfaction \& Bother (8 items). This is composed by 2 dimensions: Dim. 1 - Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness, calculated by mean of the non-missing item scores 2-5 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Dim. 2 - Treatment-Related Bother / Inconvenience calculated as the mean of the non-missing item scores 6, 8-10 multiplied by 25. (range 0-100) Scores for each dimension of this module range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a greater satisfaction in treatment effectiveness and less treatment-related bother. No combination of dimension scores is done.

Time frame:
at Week 8 and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in "Treatment Satisfaction & Bother" Module Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 8 and Week 16
score on a scaleOxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)
Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness - week 817.7 ± 31.07.7 ± 36.4
Treatment- Related Bother / Inconvenience - week 816.6 ± 21.12.7 ± 28.1
Satisfaction with Treatment Effectiveness - week 1613.4 ± 28.71.2 ± 35.9
Treatment- Related Bother / Inconvenience - week 1613.3 ± 23.65.3 ± 27.3
Statistical analysis
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.160 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.009 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.076 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants)
  • Oxervate (FAS) vs Vehicle (FAS) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.128 (p-value corresponds to two sample (independent group) t-test of the comparisons between Cenegermin and Vehicle in all participants.)
Other pre-specifiedIncidence and Frequency of TEAEs, Assessed Throughout the Study.

TEAE=any AE started on or after the date of the first dose of study medication or started prior to first dose and worsened in severity after the first dose.

Time frame:
From Screening to Visit 7 (follow-up, week 24)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence and Frequency of TEAEs, Assessed Throughout the Study.
ParticipantsOxervate (SAF)Vehicle (SAF)
TEAE - Ophtalmic3513
TEAE - Non Ophtalmic169
Severe TEAE - Ophtamic51
Severe TEAE - Non Opthalmic21
Serious TEAE - Ophtalmic10
Serious TEAE - Non Ophtalmic21
non-serious TEAE3715
Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) - Ophtalmic348
Adverse Drug Reaction - Non Ophtalmic42
Serious ADR10
TEAE leading to IMP discontinuation21
TEAE leading to study discontinuation01
TEAE leading to death00

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from screening visit (Day -8) to follow up (Day 168+/- 7 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Oxervate (SAF)0/52 (0%)2/52 (3.8%)37/52 (71.2%)
Vehicle (SAF)0/51 (0%)1/51 (2%)15/51 (29.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOxervate (SAF)Vehicle (SAF)
ArthropathyMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/521/51
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders1/520/51
Pancreatitis acuteGastrointestinal disorders1/520/51
HypertransaminasaemiaHepatobiliary disorders1/520/51
BacteraemiaInfections and infestations1/520/51
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 81
Most frequent other events
EventOxervate (SAF)Vehicle (SAF)
Eye pain - MildEye disorders16/523/51
Eye pain - ModerateEye disorders7/522/51
Eyelid pain - MildEye disorders6/520/51
Eyelid pain - ModerateEye disorders5/520/51
Eye pruritus - MildEye disorders1/524/51
Foreign body sensation in eyes - ModerateEye disorders2/523/51
Eye pain - SevereEye disorders3/520/51
Eye irritation - ModerateEye disorders1/522/51
Eye pruritus - ModerateEye disorders0/522/51
Ocular hyperaemia - MildEye disorders1/522/51

Baseline characteristics

The Full Analysis Set (FAS) population included all patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of the investigational product.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Oxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years393473
>=65 years131730
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Oxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)Total
Mean55.3 ± 13.4758.7 ± 14.1057.0 ± 13.83
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Oxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)Total
Female504797
Male246
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Oxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian033
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White433982
More than one race112
Unknown or Not Reported8715
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Oxervate (FAS)Vehicle (FAS)Total
United States252853
Italy272350
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Lugene Eye Institute - Glendale Office
    Glendale, California 91204, United States
  • David Wirta, M.D. & Associates
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • The Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
  • Tufts University School of Medicine (TUSM) - New England Eye Center/Tufts Medical Center - Boston
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Houston Eye Associates HEA - Gramercy Location
    Houston, Tennessee 77025, United States
  • Toyos Clinic - Nashville
    Nashville, Tennessee 37215, United States
  • Virginia Eye Consultants (VEC) - Norfolk Office
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • AOU Gaspare Rodolico - Ospedale San Marco
    Catania, 95123, Italy
  • Università degli Studi di Milano - Ospedale San Giuseppe - UO Oculistica
    Milan, 20123, Italy
  • AOU Policlinico Umberto I - Dipartimento Organi di Senso - Clinica Oculistica
    Roma, 00161, Italy
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 26, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 14, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05133180
Lead sponsor
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2021
Start date
Jan 19, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 22, 2022
Completion
Dec 19, 2022
Results posted
Jun 7, 2024
Last update
Jun 7, 2024

Study contacts

Flavio Mantelli, MD
study director · Dompé Farmaceutici

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion