CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05131282Updated Nov 25, 2024

Maternal Serum Markers Predicting Preeclampsia At Early Gestations

An observational study in Pre-eclampsia and Preterm Birth, sponsored by HBI Solutions Inc.. Completed at 6 sites in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-25.

Sponsored by HBI Solutions Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
18,000
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to assess the effectiveness of a maternal blood test as a prognostic tool for predicting early pregnancy risk of preeclampsia (PE).

We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for PE risk prediction. Our PE predictor is a standalone blood test designed for early gestation screening to identify pregnancies at risk. This test measures concentrations of four proteins between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of gestation.

Based on the levels of these analytes, the test generates a risk score to classify patients as either low or high risk for PE.

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale:

Preeclampsia (PE) is a severe medical condition that affects 2-4% of pregnant women globally and is characterized by high blood pressure along with organ damage, particularly to the liver and kidneys. It is one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection and preventative management of PE, including the use of low-dose aspirin, are essential for safeguarding the health of both the mother and the developing fetus. The British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) use risk factor-based guidelines to identify women at high risk for PE. These guidelines treat each risk factor independently, leading to additive detection rates but low overall sensitivity. NICE guidelines detect only 40% of preterm PE and 35% of all PE cases with an 11% false positive rate, while ACOG detects just 5% of preterm and 2% of term PE. ACOG recommends low-dose aspirin only for women with a history of preeclampsia in multiple pregnancies or preterm delivery before 34 weeks, covering just 0.3% of all pregnancies, 5% of preterm PE, and 2% of term PE. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) PE test is utilized in several studies for screening and assessing the risk of developing PE during the first trimester. This test measures biochemical markers, such as pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF), in maternal blood to calculate individual risk scores. However, its limitations have highlighted the need for more effective and reliable alternatives. Performance varies across clinical sites, with sensitivity reported as low as 39-40%, and its positive predictive value (PPV) is relatively low, typically around 10-20%. This results in a significant number of false positives and negatives, which can lead to unnecessary anxiety for pregnant women and may result in missed diagnoses for those at risk. Furthermore, the FMF test requires specialized equipment and techniques, such as ultrasound for measuring the uterine artery pulsatility index (UAPI), making it less accessible in resource-limited settings and inaccuracy due to variance from different operators. These constraints limit its widespread use, underscoring the urgent need for improved blood tests to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce false results.

Clinical significance and potential impact of the test:

Advancements in medical research and technology are paving the way for more effective blood tests to improve pre-eclampsia care management. By integrating additional biomarkers and employing cutting-edge diagnostic tools such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, we aim to enhance the precision and reliability of preeclampsia predictions. Our current research showcases the use of four blood serum protein markers to assess the risk of pre-eclampsia in women during early gestation (11-13 weeks), well before clinical symptoms arise.

To further validate the prediction and diagnosis performance of the novel preeclampsia test, we will enroll patients and initiate a large, multi-center observational clinical trial, including four diverse Asia cohorts, to test whether this standalone solution could bypass the need for complex maternal assessments.

Objectives and primary hypothesis of the study:

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive performance of the test for preterm preeclampsia (PE), specifically assessing its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Additionally, the study aims to examine the test's predictive performance for overall PE, using the same performance metrics. We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for identifying pregnancies at risk for PE.

TRIAL DESIGN:

This trial is a multicenter observational study conducted in real-world clinical settings.

OUTCOMES:

The primary outcome is the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy, following the America College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2019) criteria. This diagnosis will be based on a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on multiple occasions after 20 weeks of gestation, alongside proteinuria (dipstick urinalysis ≥ 1+ or a protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol [0.3 mg/mg]) or other signs of maternal organ dysfunction. PE will be categorized by gestational age at delivery as early-onset (\<34 weeks), preterm (\<37 weeks), or term (≥37 weeks).

02

Conditions studied

  • Pre-eclampsia
  • Preterm Birth

Keywords

  • pre-eclampsia
  • maternal serum marker
  • preterm pre-eclampsia
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18,000 is above the median of 112 across 777 observational studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

HBI Solutions Inc. is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

A multiple-site prospective cohort of women who developed PE (i.e. the PE group) and women who had normal pregnancy (i.e. the Normal group) will be recruited. Maternal serum samples were collected between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA. The two group of women are matched by age, BMI, pregnant history, and other clinical information.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Female participants aged 18 to 40 years.
  2. Gestational age between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit, as confirmed by ultrasound.
  3. Control group: Pregnancies with no risk factors for preterm delivery, preeclampsia, or fetal growth restriction, selected during routine prenatal care between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA.
  4. Informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Multiple pregnancies.
  2. Pregestational diabetes.
  3. Chronic hypertension.
  4. Systemic diseases (e.g., chronic kidney disease, autoimmune disorders).
  5. Any maternal or fetal condition necessitating pregnancy termination.
  6. Known major fetal anomalies or fetal demise.
  7. Active vaginal bleeding.
  8. Serious medical illnesses (e.g., renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory insufficiency).
  9. Asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids.
  10. Use of anti-platelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
  11. Active hepatitis.
  12. Lack of informed consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
18,000 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • PE group

    Women with a confirmative diagnosis of PE

    Diagnostic Test: Blood test of PE risk

  • Normal pregnancy group

    Normal pregnant women

    Diagnostic Test: Blood test of PE risk · Diagnostic Test: Blood test of Preterm PE risk

  • Preterm PE group

    Women with a confirmative diagnosis of Preterm PE

    Diagnostic Test: Blood test of Preterm PE risk

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testBlood test of PE risk

    A blood test is applied to women between 11weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing PE

  • Diagnostic testBlood test of Preterm PE risk

    A blood test is applied to women between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing Preterm PE

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. diagnosis of PE during pregnancy

    The primary outcome is the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy, following the America College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2019) criteria. This diagnosis will be based on a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on multiple occasions after 20 weeks of gestation, alongside proteinuria (dipstick urinalysis ≥ 1+ or a protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol \[0.3 mg/mg\]) or other signs of maternal organ dysfunction. PE will be categorized by gestational age at delivery as early-onset (\<34 weeks), preterm (\<37 weeks), or term (≥37 weeks).

    Time frame: an average of up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV

    This study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of the test for preterm preeclampsia (PE) and all PE, specifically assessing its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

    Time frame: an average of up to 1 year

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • the Eighth Affiliated Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
    Zhengzhou, Henan, China
  • Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
    Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
    Jinan, Shandong, China
  • Women's Hospital, of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05131282
Lead sponsor
HBI Solutions Inc.
Collaborators
Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Women's Hospital, of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Responsible party
Jianmin Niu (Professor, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 23, 2021
Start date
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2024
Last update
Nov 25, 2024

Study contacts

Jianmin Niu, Master
principal investigator · Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion