CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05126693Updated Jul 31, 2025Results posted

Short Term Follow-up of a Botulinum Toxin Intervention in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Botulinum Toxin treatment combined with a post-BoNT intensive physical therapy period guided by individualized treatment goals. in Spastic Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-31.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2020, registered Aug 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
4 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates the effect of integrated Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT) treatment on morphologic muscle and tendon properties, spasticity, joint stiffness, joint range of motion, muscle strength, gait and gross motor function. The integrated BoNT treatment combines BoNT-injections with serial casting and intensive physical therapy, as previously described by Molenaers et al. The current study will include 30 children who are clinically scheduled for BoNT treatment in the medial gastrocnemius and/or the semitendinosus muscle in the intervention group and 30 children in a control group who will receive usual care within a time span of 3 months.

Read the detailed description

Aim:

This study investigates the effect of integrated Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT) treatment on morphologic muscle and tendon properties (muscle length and muscle volume, assessed with a 3D ultrasound measurement), spasticity and joint stiffness (measured with an instrumented spasticity assessment), joint range of motion (measured through goniometry), muscle strength (measured using dynamometry), gait (assessed through 3D gait analysis) and gross motor function (assessed using clinical test batteries). The aim is twofold: (1) determine whether integrated BoNT treatment of the medial gastrocnemius and the semitendinosus muscle(s) leads to changes in the morphologic muscle and tendon properties of the medial gastrocnemius and the semitendinosus muscle(s), the ankle and knee range of motion, spasticity, stiffness, muscle strength and gait, and (2) determine the correlation between baseline morphologic muscle and tendon properties and the changes in the primary outcome parameters (spasticity and stiffness) following the BoNT-treatment.

Design:

The current study has a non-randomized controlled design. Because BoNT is proven an effective treatment to reduce spasticity and improve gross motor function, it cannot be clinically justified to allocate children to a non-treatment group, if a new BoNT treatment is required. Delayed BoNT treatment could rapidly increase musculoskeletal impairments. It is therefore considered unethical to temporarily withdraw BoNT treatment from patients. To compensate the lack of randomization accurate matching of groups is required. Children will be matched on diagnosis (uni/bilateral CP), GMFCS level, age and spasticity level.

BoNT-treatment:

All children in the intervention group will receive BoNT injections in the medial gastrocnemius and/or the semitendinosus muscle(s) (other muscles may also be treated as part of multilevel treatment). As part of the standard integrated treatment approach of the CP Reference Centre of the University Hospitals Leuven, the injections are followed by a period of bilateral stretching casts if indicated (below the knee walking casts and removable knee extension casts when necessary) and all children will receive intensive physical therapy and application of orthotic management following BoNT injections. The follow-up period for the current study is 8-10 weeks. During this intensive physical therapy post-BoNT, the children in the intervention group will work on individualized treatment goals. These goals will be defined based on the baseline measurements during a multidisciplinary discussion with the treating physician, which is scheduled prior to the BoNT treatment. The fulfillment of these patient-specific goals will be evaluated by the Goal Attainment Score (GAS). During the follow-up period, the treating physical therapist will be interviewed on a two-weekly basis to verify whether and to what extend the therapy is focused on the personal treatment goals. Assessments of morphologic muscle and tendon properties, spasticity, stiffness, joint range of motion, muscle strength, and gait of the participants will be performed before the BoNT injections, and 8-10 weeks after the injection. This period of 8-10 weeks follow-up post BoNT injections was found to be appropriate, since the potential effect of BoNT on gross motor function is expected to be optimal after 6-10 weeks.

Study groups:

The study will include patients who are diagnosed with spastic CP, aged between 4 and 11 years and with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I-III. The intervention and control group will be group-matched based on diagnosis (uni/lateral CP), GMFCS level, age and spasticity level.

Overall exclusion criteria were: BoNT injections less than 6 months before inclusion, a treatment history that includes previous selective dorsal rhizotomy treatment or a bony surgery less than 2 years before inclusion, and limited cooperation that would prevent a proper assessment. For all enrolled children, intensive rehabilitation post BoNT injections had to be foreseen as the standard care. For the intervention group, 30 children with a clinical indication for BoNT injections in the medial gastrocnemius and/or semitendinosus muscle(s) will be recruited, while for the control group, 30 children without an indication for a specific intervention in the next 3 months will be recruited.

For the intervention group, the baseline measures will be followed by the BoNT injections combined with casting and goal-oriented physical therapy (as described above), and the follow-up assessments will be planned 8-10 weeks post BoNT injections. Baseline and follow-up assessments for the intervention groups include 3D ultrasound, the instrumented spasticity measurement, functional strength tests, and 3D gait analysis.

The children in the control group will also be assessed twice with an interval of 8-10 weeks. During the 8-10 weeks, they will continue their usual care or normal routine treatment, i.e. regular physiotherapy and orthotic devices. Baseline and follow-up assessments for the control group include 3D ultrasound, the instrumented spasticity measurement and functional strength tests.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Spastic Cerebral Palsy
  • Botulinum Toxin
  • muscle morphology
  • Range of motion
  • Stiffness
  • Spasticity
  • Intensive physical therapy
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,853 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 435 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is above the median of 33 across 1,368 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 928 studies on the registry; 261 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy
  • Aged 4-11 years
  • GMFCS levels I-III (GMFCS = Gross Motor Function Classification Score, expressing the overall functional level of impairment)
  • Sufficient cooperation to comprehend and complete the test procedure
  • Additional exclusion criterion for the intervention group specifically: Indication for BoNT injections

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-ambulatory
  • Botulinum toxin A injections six months prior to enrollment
  • Lower limb surgery two years prior to enrollment
  • Previous selective dorsal rhizotomy
  • Presence of ataxia or dystonia
  • Cognitive problems that impede measurements
  • Severe co-morbidities (severe epilepsy, non-correctable visual impairment, autism spectrum disorders, mental problems that prevent comprehensiveness of the tasks)
  • Hospitalization after the BoNT treatment for intensive physical therapy
  • Intrathecal baclofen pump
  • For the control group: new intervention planned within 3 months
  • Additional exclusion criterion for the control group specifically: new intervention planned within 3 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    The children in the intervention group will receive BoNT injections in the medial gastrocnemius and/or the semitendinosus muscle(s). As part of the standard treatment approach of the CP Reference Centre of the University Hospitals Leuven, the injections are followed by a period of bilateral stretching casts if indicated (below the knee walking casts and removable knee extension casts when necessary) and all children will receive intensive physical therapy and application of ankle foot orthoses following BoNT injections. The follow-up period for the current study is 8-10 weeks. During this intensive physical therapy period post-BoNT, the children in the intervention group will work on individualized treatment goals, which will be defined based on the baseline measurements during a multidisciplinary discussion with the treating physician (that is scheduled prior to the BoNT injections).

    Other: Botulinum Toxin treatment combined with a post-BoNT intensive physical therapy period guided by individualized treatment goals.

  • No intervention
    Control group

    This group will continue their usual care or normal routine treatment, i.e. physiotherapy and orthotic management during a period of 8-10 weeks.

Interventions

  • OtherBotulinum Toxin treatment combined with a post-BoNT intensive physical therapy period guided by individualized treatment goals.

    BoNT treatment combined with a follow-up period of intensive physical therapy of 8-10 weeks. During this intensive physical therapy post BoNT injections, the children in the intervention group will work on individualized treatment goals, which will be defined based on the baseline measurements during a multidisciplinary discussion with the treating physician (planned prior to the BoNT injections).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Normalized Muscle Volume of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

    Estimation of the muscle belly volume by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography normalized to the product of body weight and height

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.

  2. Change in Echogenicity Intensity of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

    Estimation of the echogenicity intensity of the whole muscle volume by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography. Echogenicity is expressed in arbitrary units ranging from 0 to 255. Higher values indicate lighter images, which indirectly suggests the presence of more non-contractile muscle tissue.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.

  3. Absolute Muscle Volume Growth Rate of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

    Estimation of the absolute muscle volume growth rate, calculated by: (muscle volume (mL)post-muscle volume pre)/(age (months)post-age (months)pre)

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.

  4. Change in Kinematic Parameters

    Estimation of the kinematic parameters throughout the whole gait cycle by three-dimensional gait analysis.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  5. Change in Gait Profile Score (Degrees)

    The Gait Profile Score (GPS) is a summary measure derived from three-dimensional gait analysis that quantifies the overall deviation of a patient's gait kinematics from a normative (typically developing) reference dataset. It is calculated as the root mean square difference between the patient's joint angle trajectories of the lower limb and the corresponding mean trajectories of typically developing individuals across a gait cycle. The GPS is expressed in degrees and is based on nine key kinematic variables: pelvic tilt, obliquity, rotation; hip flexion, abduction, rotation; knee flexion; ankle dorsiflexion; and foot progression angle, typically for both left and right sides. It provides a global index of gait abnormality, where lower scores indicate gait patterns closer to normal, and higher scores reflect greater kinematic deviation.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  6. Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Cadence".

    Estimation of the cadence by three-dimensional gait analysis.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  7. Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Walking Velocity".

    Estimation of the walking velocity by three-dimensional gait analysis.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  8. Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Stride Length".

    Estimation of the stride length by three-dimensional gait analysis.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  9. Change in Spasticity of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Medial Hamstrings

    Muscle activity of the medial gastrocnemius and the medial hamstrings as recorded by surface electromyography (millivolts) during a passive stretch at high velocity of the plantar flexors and the hamstrings.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Normalized Muscle Tendon Unit Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius

    Estimation of the muscle tendon unit length by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography, expressed as a percentage of total leg length.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.

  2. Change in Normalized Muscle Belly Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

    Estimation of the muscle belly length by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography, expressed as a percentage of total leg length.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.

  3. Change in Normalized Tendon Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius

    Estimation of the tendon length by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography, expressed as a percentage of total leg length.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.

  4. Normalized Muscle Volume Growth Rates of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

    Estimation of the normalized muscle volume growth rates, calculated by (Normalized muscle volume (mL/kg\*m)post-Normalized muscle volume pre (mL/kg\*m))/(age (months)post-age (months)pre)

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.

  5. Change in the Kinematic Parameter "Ankle Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"

    Estimation of ankle range of motion in sagittal plane during stance phase by three-dimensional gait analysis.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  6. Change in the Kinematic Parameter "Knee Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"

    Estimation of knee range of motion in sagittal plane during stance phase by three-dimensional gait analysis.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  7. Change in Muscle Activation of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Medial Hamstrings (i.e. the Change During the High-velocity Stretch).

    Calculated by subtracting the muscle activation during a low-velocity stretch. Muscle activity of the medial gastrocnemius and Medial Hamstrings is recorded by surface electromyography (millivolts) during a passive stretch of the plantar flexors and of the hamstrings.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

  8. Change of Range of Motion in the Ankle and Knee Joint

    Evaluation by goniometry expressed in degrees. For the ankle plantar flexion range of motion with the knee extended, for the hamstrings unilateral popliteal angle.

    Time frame: Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections

07

Results

Posted Jul 31, 2025

Participant flow

Pre-BoNT/ Pre-3DfUS
Participant flow — Pre-BoNT/ Pre-3DfUS
MilestoneIntervention GroupControl Group
Started3130
Completed2520
Not completed610
Withdrew: Bad 3dga data20
Withdrew: No 3dga40
Withdrew: Insufficient matching010
8-10w Post-BoNT/ 8-10w Post-3DfUS
Participant flow — 8-10w Post-BoNT/ 8-10w Post-3DfUS
MilestoneIntervention GroupControl Group
Started2520
Completed2520
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Normalized Muscle Volume of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

Estimation of the muscle belly volume by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography normalized to the product of body weight and height

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · ml/kg*m
Change in Normalized Muscle Volume of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus
ml/kg*mIntervention GroupControl Group
Medial Gastrocnemius-0.08 (-0.16 to 0.04)0.00 (-0.09 to 0.06)
Semitendinosus-0.09 (-0.16 to 0.01)-0.01 (-0.07 to 0.04)
PrimaryChange in Echogenicity Intensity of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

Estimation of the echogenicity intensity of the whole muscle volume by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography. Echogenicity is expressed in arbitrary units ranging from 0 to 255. Higher values indicate lighter images, which indirectly suggests the presence of more non-contractile muscle tissue.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · Arbitrary units ranging from 0 to 255
Change in Echogenicity Intensity of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus
Arbitrary units ranging from 0 to 255Intervention GroupControl Group
Medial Gastrocnemius2.74 (-5.63 to 11.11)-0.08 (-3.77 to 9.33)
Semitendinosus6.58 (-8.27 to 16.61)5.20 (-6.90 to 11.90)
PrimaryAbsolute Muscle Volume Growth Rate of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

Estimation of the absolute muscle volume growth rate, calculated by: (muscle volume (mL)post-muscle volume pre)/(age (months)post-age (months)pre)

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · ml/month
Absolute Muscle Volume Growth Rate of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus
ml/monthIntervention GroupControl Group
Medial Gastrocnemius0.00 (-1.34 to 0.97)0.17 (-0.23 to 0.87)
Semitendinosus-0.49 (-1.45 to 0.58)0.02 (-0.39 to 0.48)
PrimaryChange in Kinematic Parameters

Estimation of the kinematic parameters throughout the whole gait cycle by three-dimensional gait analysis.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Degrees
Change in Kinematic Parameters
DegreesIntervention GroupControl Group
Ankle Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane-1.74 (-9.04 to 3.07)—
Ankle Angle in Sagittal Plane at Initial Contact3.56 (0.47 to 6.36)—
Maximal Ankle Angle in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase3.99 (-0.32 to 9.99)—
Maximal Ankle Angle in Sagittal Plane During Swing Phase5.34 (1.16 to 9.70)—
Knee Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane1.94 (-3.79 to 8.84)—
Knee Angle in Sagittal Plane at Initial Contact-1.69 (-9.19 to 1.84)—
Minimal Knee Angle in Sagittal Plane During Stance-2.44 (-7.61 to 2.23)—
PrimaryChange in Gait Profile Score (Degrees)

The Gait Profile Score (GPS) is a summary measure derived from three-dimensional gait analysis that quantifies the overall deviation of a patient's gait kinematics from a normative (typically developing) reference dataset. It is calculated as the root mean square difference between the patient's joint angle trajectories of the lower limb and the corresponding mean trajectories of typically developing individuals across a gait cycle. The GPS is expressed in degrees and is based on nine key kinematic variables: pelvic tilt, obliquity, rotation; hip flexion, abduction, rotation; knee flexion; ankle dorsiflexion; and foot progression angle, typically for both left and right sides. It provides a global index of gait abnormality, where lower scores indicate gait patterns closer to normal, and higher scores reflect greater kinematic deviation.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Degrees
Change in Gait Profile Score (Degrees)
DegreesIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in Gait Profile Score (Degrees)-1.76 (-2.51 to -0.15)—
PrimaryChange in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Cadence".

Estimation of the cadence by three-dimensional gait analysis.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Number of steps/second
Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Cadence".
Number of steps/secondIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Cadence".-0.05 (-0.28 to 0.10)—
PrimaryChange in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Walking Velocity".

Estimation of the walking velocity by three-dimensional gait analysis.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Meter/second
Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Walking Velocity".
Meter/secondIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Walking Velocity".0.01 (-0.10 to 0.10)—
PrimaryChange in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Stride Length".

Estimation of the stride length by three-dimensional gait analysis.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Meters
Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Stride Length".
MetersIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in the Spatial-temporal Parameter "Stride Length".0.02 (-0.03 to 0.08)—
PrimaryChange in Spasticity of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Medial Hamstrings

Muscle activity of the medial gastrocnemius and the medial hamstrings as recorded by surface electromyography (millivolts) during a passive stretch at high velocity of the plantar flexors and the hamstrings.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · µV
Change in Spasticity of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Medial Hamstrings
µVIntervention GroupControl Group
Medial Gastrocnemius-4.73 (-15.74 to 1.31)—
Medial Hamstrings-2.82 (-7.64 to 0.21)—
SecondaryChange in Normalized Muscle Tendon Unit Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius

Estimation of the muscle tendon unit length by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography, expressed as a percentage of total leg length.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · a percentage of total leg length
Change in Normalized Muscle Tendon Unit Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius
a percentage of total leg lengthIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in Normalized Muscle Tendon Unit Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius0.88 (-0.22 to 1.59)-0.35 (-0.86 to 0.52)
SecondaryChange in Normalized Muscle Belly Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

Estimation of the muscle belly length by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography, expressed as a percentage of total leg length.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · a percentage of total leg length
Change in Normalized Muscle Belly Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus
a percentage of total leg lengthIntervention GroupControl Group
Medial Gastrocnemius0.44 (0.03 to 1.25)-0.13 (-0.92 to 0.71)
Semitendinosus-0.32 (-0.90 to 1.47)-0.22 (-0.74 to 0.83)
SecondaryChange in Normalized Tendon Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius

Estimation of the tendon length by three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography, expressed as a percentage of total leg length.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · a percentage of total leg length
Change in Normalized Tendon Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius
a percentage of total leg lengthIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in Normalized Tendon Length of the Medial Gastrocnemius-0.03 (-0.88 to 1.17)-0.26 (-0.55 to 0.24)
SecondaryNormalized Muscle Volume Growth Rates of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus

Estimation of the normalized muscle volume growth rates, calculated by (Normalized muscle volume (mL/kg\*m)post-Normalized muscle volume pre (mL/kg\*m))/(age (months)post-age (months)pre)

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · ml/kg*m/month
Normalized Muscle Volume Growth Rates of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Distal Compartment of the Semitendinosus
ml/kg*m/monthIntervention GroupControl Group
Medial Gastrocnemius-0.02 (-0.07 to 0.03)0.01 (-0.04 to 0.02)
Semitendinosus-0.02 (-0.08 to 0.01)-0.00 (-0.03 to 0.02)
SecondaryChange in the Kinematic Parameter "Ankle Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"

Estimation of ankle range of motion in sagittal plane during stance phase by three-dimensional gait analysis.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Degrees
Change in the Kinematic Parameter "Ankle Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"
DegreesIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in the Kinematic Parameter "Ankle Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"0.31 (-4.38 to 3.74)—
SecondaryChange in the Kinematic Parameter "Knee Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"

Estimation of knee range of motion in sagittal plane during stance phase by three-dimensional gait analysis.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Degrees
Change in the Kinematic Parameter "Knee Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"
DegreesIntervention GroupControl Group
Change in the Kinematic Parameter "Knee Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane During Stance Phase"3.68 (-0.43 to 6.91)—
SecondaryChange in Muscle Activation of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Medial Hamstrings (i.e. the Change During the High-velocity Stretch).

Calculated by subtracting the muscle activation during a low-velocity stretch. Muscle activity of the medial gastrocnemius and Medial Hamstrings is recorded by surface electromyography (millivolts) during a passive stretch of the plantar flexors and of the hamstrings.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · µV
Change in Muscle Activation of the Medial Gastrocnemius and the Medial Hamstrings (i.e. the Change During the High-velocity Stretch).
µVIntervention GroupControl Group
Medial Gastrocnemius-2.64 (-8.06 to 2.48)—
Medial Hamstrings-3.13 (-5.78 to 0.87)—
SecondaryChange of Range of Motion in the Ankle and Knee Joint

Evaluation by goniometry expressed in degrees. For the ankle plantar flexion range of motion with the knee extended, for the hamstrings unilateral popliteal angle.

Time frame:
Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections
Reported as:
Median · Degrees
Change of Range of Motion in the Ankle and Knee Joint
DegreesIntervention GroupControl Group
Plantar flexors0.0 (0.00 to 5.0)—
Hamstrings0.0 (-0.5 to 1.3)—

Adverse events

Collected over Between baseline and 8-10 weeks after the BoNT injections for the intervention group, and between baseline and 8-10 weeks later for the control group.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Group0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Control Group0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
<=18 years252045
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Median6.4 (4.6 to 8.5)7.6 (6.2 to 9.4)7.1 (5.9 to 9.1)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Female12416
Male131629
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Belgium252045
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bar-On L, Aertbelien E, Molenaers G, Van Campenhout A, Vandendoorent B, Nieuwenhuys A, Jaspers E, Hunaerts C, Desloovere K. Instrumented assessment of the effect of Botulinum Toxin-A in the medial hamstrings in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2014 Jan;39(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Jun 20. PubMed 23791154 ↗
  • Bar-On L, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K, Aertbelien E, Huenaerts C, Vandendoorent B, Nieuwenhuys A, Molenaers G. Is an instrumented spasticity assessment an improvement over clinical spasticity scales in assessing and predicting the response to integrated botulinum toxin type a treatment in children with cerebral palsy? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 27. PubMed 23994052 ↗
  • Franki I, Bar-On L, Molenaers G, Van Campenhout A, Craenen K, Desloovere K, Feys H, Pauwels P, De Cat J, Ortibus E. Tone Reduction and Physical Therapy: Strengthening Partners in Treatment of Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Neuropediatrics. 2020 Apr;51(2):89-104. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400987. Epub 2019 Nov 27. PubMed 31777043 ↗
  • Franki I, Desloovere K, De Cat J, Feys H, Molenaers G, Calders P, Vanderstraeten G, Himpens E, Van Broeck C. The evidence-base for basic physical therapy techniques targeting lower limb function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a conceptual framework. J Rehabil Med. 2012 May;44(5):385-95. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0983. PubMed 22549646 ↗
  • Molenaers G, Fagard K, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K. Botulinum toxin A treatment of the lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop. 2013 Nov;7(5):383-7. doi: 10.1007/s11832-013-0511-x. Epub 2013 Aug 28. PubMed 24432099 ↗
  • Peeters N, Van Campenhout A, Hanssen B, Cenni F, Schless SH, Van den Broeck C, Desloovere K, Bar-On L. Joint and Muscle Assessments of the Separate Effects of Botulinum NeuroToxin-A and Lower-Leg Casting in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 21;11:210. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00210. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32373040 ↗
  • Cenni F, Monari D, Desloovere K, Aertbelien E, Schless SH, Bruyninckx H. The reliability and validity of a clinical 3D freehand ultrasound system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Nov;136:179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 6. PubMed 27686714 ↗
  • Bar-On L, Aertbelien E, Wambacq H, Severijns D, Lambrecht K, Dan B, Huenaerts C, Bruyninckx H, Janssens L, Van Gestel L, Jaspers E, Molenaers G, Desloovere K. A clinical measurement to quantify spasticity in children with cerebral palsy by integration of multidimensional signals. Gait Posture. 2013 May;38(1):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 4. PubMed 23218728 ↗
  • Molenaers, G., Desloovere, K., Eyssen, M., Decaf, J., Jonkers, I., & Cock, P. De. (1999). Botulinum toxin type A treatment of cerebral palsy: an integrated approach. European Journal of Neurology, 6, s51-s57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.1999.tb00035.x
  • Peeters N, Papageorgiou E, Hanssen B, De Beukelaer N, Staut L, Degelaen M, Van den Broeck C, Calders P, Feys H, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K. The Short-Term Impact of Botulinum Neurotoxin-A on Muscle Morphology and Gait in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Toxins (Basel). 2022 Sep 29;14(10):676. doi: 10.3390/toxins14100676. PubMed 36287944 ↗
  • Peeters N, Hanssen B, Bar-On L, De Groote F, De Beukelaer N, Coremans M, Van den Broeck C, Dan B, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K. Associations between muscle morphology and spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2023 May;44:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 10. PubMed 36706682 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 10, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05126693
Lead sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
KU Leuven
Responsible party
Kaat Desloovere (Prof. Dr., Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 19, 2021
Start date
Aug 3, 2020
Primary completion
May 10, 2022
Completion
May 10, 2022
Results posted
Jul 31, 2025
Last update
Jul 31, 2025

Study contacts

Kaat Desloovere, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · UZ Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion