ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05103202Updated Jun 30, 2022

Efficacy and Safety of 10-Week or Shorter vs 12-Week or Longer Injection Intervals of Botulinum Toxin

An observational study in Cervical Dystonia, Blepharospasm and Limb Dystonia, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-30.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
105
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our hypothesis is that botulinum toxin injections (with onabotulinum toxin, incobotulinum toxin, and abobotulinum toxin) given at 10-week or shorter intervals for the indication of treatment of muscle spasms associated with neurological disorders are associated with equal safety and effectiveness as those given at 12-week or longer intervals. We also hypothesize that for those patients who would prefer a shorter inter-injection interval, but for whom their insurance carrier has prevented this, have worse health-related quality of life compared to patients who receive injections at a 10-week or shorter interval. We aim to investigate this hypothesis by collecting demographic and injection data and patient survey responses.

Read the detailed description

Our project has the following aims:

Aim 1: to determine if any difference exists in safety or efficacy between patients receiving injections of botulinum toxin at 10-week or shorter intervals as compared to patients receiving injections at 12-week or longer intervals.

Aim 2: to determine if patients who have expressed a preference for injections at 10 week or shorter intervals but whose insurance carriers have mandated a 12-week interval have worse health related quality of life as compared to patients who are receiving injections at 10-week or shorter intervals.

This project consists of two analyses, each designed to accomplish aims 1 and 2. For both aims, we will invite consecutive patients who meet entry criteria to participate who are followed in the botulinum toxin injection clinics of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center movement disorders faculty. Participants who consent to data collection by participating in an email-administered survey of quality of life will have their medical records reviewed by an investigator for abstraction of clinical data (to include dose, injection site, injection interval, side effects, demographics, and diagnoses). Additionally, patients will fill out two or more survey instruments on the date of their enrollment visit following their botulinum toxin injection visit. The survey instruments completed will be 1) the SF-36 health questionnaire and 2) a disease-specific HRQoL survey chosen to be applicable to the specific condition for which that subject is receiving botulinum toxin injections. Patients receiving injections for multiple conditions will receive surveys for each condition for which they are receiving treatment. The disease specific scales to be used selectively depending on the patient's specific condition include:

  • Blepharospasm disability index
  • Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24)
  • Arm dystonia disability scale (ADDS)
  • Hemifacial spasm scale (HSF-7)
  • Oromandibular dystonia questionnaire (OMDQ-25)
  • Spasticity scale (SQoL-6D)

For analysis, patients will be segregated into two groups (10-week or shorter inter-injection interval and 12 week or longer inter-injection interval) on the basis of time elapsed between the most recent botulinum toxin treatments. Clinical and survey data will be analyzed to determine if differences exist between the two groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Dystonia
  • Blepharospasm
  • Limb Dystonia
  • Hemifacial Spasm
  • Spasticity, Muscle
  • Fragments of Torsion Dystonia
03

In context

Torticollis

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Torticollis; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 48 across 43 observational studies indexed under Torticollis.

Browse Torticollis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients will be recruited consecutively on presentation for treatment of muscle spasm due to neurological disease with botulinum toxin to the UT Southwestern Movement Disorders clinic by one of the investigators.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Aim 1:

  1. Patient provides responses to an internet based survey which includes consent to participate
  2. Patient has been diagnosed with one or more of the conditions for which a HRQoL scale exists and will be employed in this study
  3. Patient has received at least 2 prior injections with botulinum toxin for that condition by one of the study investigators
  4. Both of the two most recent intervals between injections are either a) 10-weeks or less or b) 12-weeks or more

Aim 2:

  1. Patient provides responses to an internet based survey which includes consent to participate
  2. Patient has been diagnosed with one or more of the conditions for which a HRQoL scale exists and will be employed in this study
  3. Patient has received at least 2 prior injections with botulinum toxin for that condition by one of the study investigators
  4. Both of the two most recent intervals between injections are either a) 10-weeks or less or b) 12-weeks or more
  5. If receiving injections at 12-weeks or more, notes must have previously indicated that patient needs an injection interval of 10-weeks or less
  6. If receiving injections at 12-weeks or more, the reason must be that the insurance carrier covering that patient's medical costs refused to allow a 10-week or less injection frequency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

For both Aims 1 and 2:

  1. Patient is unwilling to consent to study procedures (refuses to fill out surveys)
  2. Patient has variable injection frequencies such that the two most recent injections do not both meet criteria of being 10-weeks or less in frequency or 12-weeks or more in frequency
  3. Patient has a diagnosis of and is being treated for a condition for which a HRQoL scale does not exist
  4. Patient has insufficient chart documentation to characterize demographics, diagnosis, toxin selected, dose used, and injection frequency employed
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • 10 weeks or less

    Patients receiving botulinum toxin injections at a frequency of 10 weeks or less

  • 12 weeks or more

    Patients receiving botulinum toxin injections at a frequency of 12 weeks or more

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life measured by Short Form 36 (SF-36)

    SF-36 HRQoL score as collected by a patient-completed survey (measured from 0 to 100 with a scoring system where 100 is best quality of life)

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

  2. Safety of injection

    Side effects recorded qualitatively and graded by severity (0 to 4 numerical subjective grade where 4 is most severe) by the injecting physician and attributed by that physician to the most recent injection

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blepharospasm disability index survey (BSDI)

    Patient-completed survey BSDI- Disease specific quality of life score measured from 0 to 4 calculated as a mean of applicable items with 4 representing worst quality of life

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

  2. Cervicocranial dystonia questionnaire (CDQ24)

    Patient-completed survey CDQ24- Disease specific quality of life score measured from 0 to 100 with 100 representing worst quality of life

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

  3. Arm Dystonia Disability Scale (ADDS)

    Patient-completed survey ADDS- Disease specific quality of life score measured from 0 to 100% with 0% representing worst quality of life

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

  4. Hemifacial Spasm Scale (HFS7)

    Patient-completed survey HFS7- Disease specific quality of life score (measured from 0 to 4 where 4 is the most severe effect on quality of life)

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

  5. Oromandibular dystonia questionnaire (OMDQ-25)

    Patient-completed survey OMDQ-25- Disease specific quality of life score (measured from 0 to 100 with 100 representing worst quality of life)

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

  6. Spasticity Quality of Life scale (SQoL-6D)

    Patient-completed survey SQoL-6D- Disease specific quality of life score (measured from 0 to 100 with 100 representing best quality of life)

    Time frame: single measure at 1 day of enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Simpson DM, Hallett M, Ashman EJ, Comella CL, Green MW, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ, Gloss D, Potrebic S, Jankovic J, Karp BP, Naumann M, So YT, Yablon SA. Practice guideline update summary: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2016 May 10;86(19):1818-26. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002560. Epub 2016 Apr 18. PubMed 27164716 ↗
  • Tan EK, Fook-Chong S, Lum SY, Thumboo J. Validation of a short disease specific quality of life scale for hemifacial spasm: correlation with SF-36. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;76(12):1707-10. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.065656. PubMed 16291898 ↗
  • Wissel J. Towards flexible and tailored botulinum neurotoxin dosing regimens for focal dystonia and spasticity - Insights from recent studies. Toxicon. 2018 Jun 1;147:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 31. PubMed 29407165 ↗
  • Truong DD, Gollomp SM, Jankovic J, LeWitt PA, Marx M, Hanschmann A, Fernandez HH; Xeomin US Blepharospasm Study Group. Sustained efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin((R))) injections in blepharospasm. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013 Sep;120(9):1345-53. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-0998-9. Epub 2013 Feb 23. PubMed 23435927 ↗
  • Evidente VG, Truong D, Jankovic J, Comella CL, Grafe S, Hanschmann A. IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(R)) injected for blepharospasm or cervical dystonia according to patient needs is well tolerated. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Nov 15;346(1-2):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 10. PubMed 25186131 ↗
  • Greene P, Fahn S, Diamond B. Development of resistance to botulinum toxin type A in patients with torticollis. Mov Disord. 1994 Mar;9(2):213-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.870090216. PubMed 8196686 ↗
  • Jankovic J, Vuong KD, Ahsan J. Comparison of efficacy and immunogenicity of original versus current botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia. Neurology. 2003 Apr 8;60(7):1186-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000055087.96356.bb. PubMed 12682332 ↗
  • Ruta D, Garratt A, Abdalla M, Buckingham K, Russell I. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. A valid measure of health status.. BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):448-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.448-b. No abstract available. PubMed 8374477 ↗
  • Jankovic J, Kenney C, Grafe S, Goertelmeyer R, Comes G. Relationship between various clinical outcome assessments in patients with blepharospasm. Mov Disord. 2009 Feb 15;24(3):407-13. doi: 10.1002/mds.22368. PubMed 19053054 ↗
  • Muller J, Wissel J, Kemmler G, Voller B, Bodner T, Schneider A, Wenning GK, Poewe W. Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24): development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 May;75(5):749-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.013441. PubMed 15090572 ↗
  • Peterson DA, Berque P, Jabusch HC, Altenmuller E, Frucht SJ. Rating scales for musician's dystonia: the state of the art. Neurology. 2013 Aug 6;81(6):589-98. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829e6f72. Epub 2013 Jul 24. PubMed 23884039 ↗
  • Fahn, S., Assessment of the primary dystonias, in Quantification of Neurologic Deficit, M. TL, Editor. 1989, Butterworths: Oxford. p. 241-270.
  • Merz RI, Deakin J, Hawthorne MR. Oromandibular dystonia questionnaire (OMDQ-25): a valid and reliable instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Oct;35(5):390-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02194.x. PubMed 21108749 ↗
  • Turner-Stokes L, Ashford S, Jacinto J, Maisonobe P, Balcaitiene J, Fheodoroff K. Impact of integrated upper limb spasticity management including botulinum toxin A on patient-centred goal attainment: rationale and protocol for an international prospective, longitudinal cohort study (ULIS-III). BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 17;6(6):e011157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011157. PubMed 27315835 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 30, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05103202
Responsible party
Richard Dewey (Professor of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2021
Start date
Nov 4, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 7, 2022
Completion
Jun 14, 2022
Last update
Jun 30, 2022

Study contacts

Richard B Dewey, Jr., MD
principal investigator · UT Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion