ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05091710Updated Nov 5, 2026Results posted

Haiti Community Health Workers (CHW) Adaptation

An interventional study of HF follow up care and HF Standard of Care (SOC) in Heart Failure, sponsored by Boston Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Haiti. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Boston Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Nov 5, 2026Results postedStudy documents posted+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evidence-based interventions to improve linkage and outcomes for heart failure (HF) patients requires input from stakeholders: patients, community health workers (CHWs), healthcare staff, and health system administrators.

In this research the investigators will assess a CHW intervention designed to improve linkage to care for HF patients. This intervention was systematically adapted for use in rural Haiti in a prior study using the Assessment, Decisions, Administration, Production, Topical Experts, Integration, Training staff, Testing (ADAPT-ITT) framework. The ADAPT-ITT framework provides 8 sequential phases to adapt interventions and programs to new target audiences. It has been applied successfully to the adaptation of several interventions for HIV among under-resourced communities leading to randomized clinical trials. With the first 6 steps of the ADAPT-ITT framework completed in a prior study, this protocol outlines the training and testing of the adapted CHW intervention.

In addition to assessing the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of the adapted intervention through participants' feedback, the investigators will assess its efficacy in improving HF outcomes. The proposed intervention is targeted at both the patient domain - through improved peer support - and health system domain - by improving health system navigation.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will train six CHWs in a linkage-to-care intervention. The clinical trial will involve testing of the intervention on 30 HF patients. In a prior study, the ADAPT-ITT framework was used to adapt a CHW-based intervention for post-discharge HF patients in Haiti. This study represents the last two phases of the ADAPT-ITT framework: Training and Testing.

The study population will include adult HF patients (> 18 years of age), hospitalized for more than 48 hours, discharged from Hôpital-Universitaire de Mirebalais (HUM), without a prior clinic visit, living in Mirebalais Commune. Patients will be recruited for study participation shortly before discharge. A comparison group of 30 HF patients will be recruited and will not participate in the follow up care intervention. Those patients will be retrospectively identified from the medical record. The comparison group and will not receive any intervention.

The intervention will include study visits in the form of home visits and phone calls performed by CHWs during which they will remind patients about upcoming visits, ensure patient has sufficient medications, review medication schedule and provide education as needed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Community health worker (CHW)
  • ADAPT-ITT
  • Haiti
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is close to the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 323 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Of its 34 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 28 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for patient participant:

  • Adult HF patients
  • Hospitalized >48 hours at Hôpital-Universitaire de Mirebalais (HUM)
  • Anticipated discharge from HUM within 1-3 days
  • Living in Mirebalais Commune, Haiti Inclusion criteria for historical patient reference group
  • Adult HF patients
  • Hospitalized >48 hours at HUM
  • Discharged from HUM within the 12 months preceding the intervention
  • Living in Mirebalais Commune

Exclusion Criteria for patient participant and historical patient reference group:

  • None

Inclusion Criteria for CHW

  • Adult
  • Provide inpatient or outpatient care to HF patients
  • Working in in Mirebalais

Exclusion Criteria for CHW

  • None

Inclusion criteria for healthcare staff (provider/administrator)

  • Hospital leadership involved in supervision of clinical care programs (i.e. Chief Executive Officer, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Nursing Officer, etc.)
  • Leaders of the Community Health Department - including the nurse Director of Community Health, and Community Health Worker Supervisors.
  • Healthcare providers at HUM involved in the care of patients with heart failure (i.e. internal medicine physicians, inpatient hospital nurses, outpatient clinic physicians, outpatient clinic nurses, etc.)

Exclusion criteria for healthcare staff (provider/administrator)

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Follow up care program for HF patients

    Discharged HF patients in rural Haiti will be receive a follow-up care program delivered by trained community health workers (CHWs).

    Other: HF follow up care

  • Other
    Standard of care

    Historical reference group who received standard of care for HF identified prior to CHW training.

    Other: HF Standard of Care (SOC)

Interventions

  • OtherHF follow up care

    The intervention will consist of follow up phone calls and visits during which the CHWs will remind patients about upcoming visits, ensure patient has sufficient medications, review medication schedule and provide education as needed.

  • OtherHF Standard of Care (SOC)

    SOC after discharge for HF is to notify patients of a follow-up visit at the hospital/clinic - about 7 days after discharge and provide patients about 30 days of medications at discharge. If a patient does not return for a follow-up appointment, there are no systems to track this missed visit, or to trigger active attempts to contact patients. For patients who come back to their scheduled 7-day visit, there is generally a 14-day visit followed by a 28-day visit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Number of Participants Who Reported the HF Follow up Program by CHWs Was Acceptable

    Acceptability of the HF follow up program to patients will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale response to the question "Did you find it acceptable to have a CHW visit your home within 5 days of hospital discharge?" 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=ok, 4=good, 5=great. Acceptable was defined as the visit being good or great.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. The Number of Participants Who Reported That the HF Follow up Program Appropriate

    Appropriateness of HF follow up program to patients will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale response to the question "Did you find it appropriate to be assigned a community health worker when you left the hospital?" where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3= ok, 4=good, 5= great. Appropriate was defined as good or great.

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. The Number of Participants Who Consent to Participate in the HF Follow up Program

    The number of participants who consent to participate in the HF follow up program out of the total number of eligible participants.

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. Completed Items in the Home Visit Checklist

    Mean percent of home visit items from a checklist completed for all participants. The higher the percentage, the greater the fidelity of the program.

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Number of Participants Who Completed a Scheduled Visit

    Number of participants who completed a scheduled visit within 30 days of hospital discharge.

    Time frame: 90 days

  6. Number of Participants With All Home Visit Checklist Items Completed

    Number of participants with all home visit checklist items completed.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Linkage of HF Patients

    Number of patients that complete 30 day follow up visit

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Results

Posted Nov 5, 2026

Participant flow

6 CHWs were enrolled and trained to deliver the intervention to the patients with HF. The CHWs then conducted a home visit and delivered education to patients in their homes. Some baseline Characteristics were not collected for CHWs.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsCommunity Health WorkersStandard of Care
Started30636
Completed29636
Not completed100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Number of Participants Who Reported the HF Follow up Program by CHWs Was Acceptable

Acceptability of the HF follow up program to patients will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale response to the question "Did you find it acceptable to have a CHW visit your home within 5 days of hospital discharge?" 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=ok, 4=good, 5=great. Acceptable was defined as the visit being good or great.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of Participants Who Reported the HF Follow up Program by CHWs Was Acceptable
ParticipantsFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsStandard of Care
The Number of Participants Who Reported the HF Follow up Program by CHWs Was Acceptable24—
PrimaryThe Number of Participants Who Reported That the HF Follow up Program Appropriate

Appropriateness of HF follow up program to patients will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale response to the question "Did you find it appropriate to be assigned a community health worker when you left the hospital?" where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3= ok, 4=good, 5= great. Appropriate was defined as good or great.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of Participants Who Reported That the HF Follow up Program Appropriate
ParticipantsFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsStandard of Care
The Number of Participants Who Reported That the HF Follow up Program Appropriate22—
PrimaryThe Number of Participants Who Consent to Participate in the HF Follow up Program

The number of participants who consent to participate in the HF follow up program out of the total number of eligible participants.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of Participants Who Consent to Participate in the HF Follow up Program
ParticipantsFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsStandard of Care
The Number of Participants Who Consent to Participate in the HF Follow up Program29—
PrimaryCompleted Items in the Home Visit Checklist

Mean percent of home visit items from a checklist completed for all participants. The higher the percentage, the greater the fidelity of the program.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Mean · percent of checklist items completed
Completed Items in the Home Visit Checklist
percent of checklist items completedFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsStandard of Care
Completed Items in the Home Visit Checklist90.7 ± 11.7—
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Completed a Scheduled Visit

Number of participants who completed a scheduled visit within 30 days of hospital discharge.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Completed a Scheduled Visit
ParticipantsFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsStandard of Care
Number of Participants Who Completed a Scheduled Visit21—
PrimaryNumber of Participants With All Home Visit Checklist Items Completed

Number of participants with all home visit checklist items completed.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All Home Visit Checklist Items Completed
ParticipantsFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsStandard of Care
Number of Participants With All Home Visit Checklist Items Completed5—
SecondaryLinkage of HF Patients

Number of patients that complete 30 day follow up visit

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Linkage of HF Patients
ParticipantsFollow up Care Program for HF PatientsStandard of Care
Linkage of HF Patients209

Adverse events

Collected over 90 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Follow up Care Program for HF Patients0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Standard of Care0/36 (0%)0/36 (0%)0/36 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Follow up Care Program for HF PatientsCommunity Health WorkersStandard of CareTotal
Mean52.7 ± 17.1—50.6 ± 20.851.6 ± 19.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Follow up Care Program for HF PatientsCommunity Health WorkersStandard of CareTotal
Female15—1732
Male15—1934
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Follow up Care Program for HF PatientsCommunity Health WorkersStandard of CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino3063672
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Follow up Care Program for HF PatientsCommunity Health WorkersStandard of CareTotal
Black3063672
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Follow up Care Program for HF PatientsCommunity Health WorkersStandard of CareTotal
Haiti3063666
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Zanmi Lasante/Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais
    Mirebalais, Haiti
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Results
Results posted
posted Nov 5, 2026
Enrollment
30→72
Nov 5, 2026
Primary outcomes
3 edited, 3 added, 9 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedAppropriatenessThe Number of Participants Who Reported the HF followFollow up program toProgram by CHWs Was AcceptableTime frame: 12 months → 90 days
  • EditedFidelityThe Number of Participants Who Reported That the HF followFollow up programProgram AppropriateTime frame: 90 days
  • EditedPercentNumber of visits with all home visit checklist items completedParticipants With All Home Visit Checklist Items CompletedTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedThe Number of Participants Who Consent to Participate in the HF Follow up ProgramTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedCompleted Items in the Home Visit ChecklistTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedNumber of Participants Who Completed a Scheduled VisitTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedAcceptability of HF follow up program to patientsTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedAcceptability of HF follow up program to Community Health Workers (CHWs)Time frame: 12 months
  • RemovedAcceptability of HF follow up program to nurses/doctorsTime frame: 12 months
  • RemovedAppropriateness of HF follow up program to patientsTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedAppropriateness of HF follow up program to nurses/doctorsTime frame: 12 months
  • RemovedFeasibility of HF follow up program to patientsTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedFeasibility of HF follow up program to CHWsTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedHF follow up program intervention components deliveredTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedCompletion of scheduled visitsTime frame: 90 days
Nov 5, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 edited, 6 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedLinkage of HF patientsPatientsTime frame: 30 days
  • RemovedRetention of HF patientsTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedHospital readmission rateTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedPatient symptoms based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationTime frame: 90 days
  • RemovedPatient quality of life assessed European Quality of Life 5D (EuroQol 5D)Time frame: 30 days, 90 days
  • RemovedSymptoms and quality of life based on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)Time frame: 30 days, 90 days
  • RemovedMortality rate in HF patientsTime frame: 90 days
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Results posted
    Enrollment 30→72
    Primary outcomes 3 edited, 3 added, 9 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedAppropriatenessThe Number of Participants Who Reported the HF followFollow up program toProgram by CHWs Was AcceptableTime frame: 12 months → 90 days
    • EditedFidelityThe Number of Participants Who Reported That the HF followFollow up programProgram AppropriateTime frame: 90 days
    • EditedPercentNumber of visits with all home visit checklist items completedParticipants With All Home Visit Checklist Items CompletedTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedThe Number of Participants Who Consent to Participate in the HF Follow up ProgramTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedCompleted Items in the Home Visit ChecklistTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedNumber of Participants Who Completed a Scheduled VisitTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedAcceptability of HF follow up program to patientsTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedAcceptability of HF follow up program to Community Health Workers (CHWs)Time frame: 12 months
    • RemovedAcceptability of HF follow up program to nurses/doctorsTime frame: 12 months
    • RemovedAppropriateness of HF follow up program to patientsTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedAppropriateness of HF follow up program to nurses/doctorsTime frame: 12 months
    • RemovedFeasibility of HF follow up program to patientsTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedFeasibility of HF follow up program to CHWsTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedHF follow up program intervention components deliveredTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedCompletion of scheduled visitsTime frame: 90 days
    Secondary outcomes 1 edited, 6 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedLinkage of HF patientsPatientsTime frame: 30 days
    • RemovedRetention of HF patientsTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedHospital readmission rateTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedPatient symptoms based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationTime frame: 90 days
    • RemovedPatient quality of life assessed European Quality of Life 5D (EuroQol 5D)Time frame: 30 days, 90 days
    • RemovedSymptoms and quality of life based on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)Time frame: 30 days, 90 days
    • RemovedMortality rate in HF patientsTime frame: 90 days
    + 2 other changes: verification date and description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05091710
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2021
Start date
Feb 23, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2025
Completion
Aug 31, 2025
Results posted
Nov 5, 2026
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Gene F Kwan, MD MPH
principal investigator · Boston Medical Center, Cardiovascular Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion