ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05090683Updated Jan 29, 2025Results posted

Evaluation of a Mind-body Based Application for the Treatment of Chronic/Persistent Pain.

An interventional study of Mind-body mobile application in Chronic Pain, Migraine and Chronic Pain Syndrome, sponsored by University of the Fraser Valley. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-29.

Sponsored by University of the Fraser Valley · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
198
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We are investigating the effects of a mind-body based mobile application on the experience of chronic pain.

Participants meeting our criteria for chronic pain (confirmed via self-report) will complete an online baseline questionnaire. Eligible participants will be enrolled in the study and randomized into control (usual care, waitlisted) or intervention group (6-week mind-body based mobile application intervention). Randomization will be stratified by pain intensity and gender using computer-generated block randomization to create varying block sizes of 4 and 8. We will run the trial in multiple cohorts in series to obtain desired sample size.

All participants will complete online questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention at 6 weeks that measure pain intensity, interference with daily living, pain perceptions, mental health outcomes, and medication use. Participants will also complete weekly questionnaires on weeks 2 to 6 to gauge frequency of application usage (intervention) or other pain treatments (control). Participants in the intervention group will be asked to repeat the follow-up questionnaire at 12-weeks.

Read the detailed description

See protocol for more details. (submitted at time of registration)

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Migraine
  • Chronic Pain Syndrome

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • mind-body
  • mobile application
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,998 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 706 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 198 is above the median of 60 across 2,209 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of the Fraser Valley is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants aged 19 to 75 years with chronic pain.
  • chronic pain is defined as having non-malignant chronic or persistent pain for at least 6 months.
  • Participants must experience pain at least half the days in the last 6 months.
  • Pain can include bodily pain or head (migraine) pain.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals reporting a cognitive impairment that can interfere with completing questionnaires and using a mobile application.
  • Individuals reporting any of the following psychiatric illness: schizophrenia, dissociative or personality disorders, bipolar disorder.
  • Individuals reporting any of the following medical conditions: metastatic cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, scleroderma, polymyositis.
  • Individuals reporting substance use disorder (within the last 6 months).
  • Individuals that have previously used mind-body apps for the treatment of chronic pain.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
198 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mind-body mobile application

    Participants are asked to engage with a user-guided mobile application (app) that employs mind-based techniques that include: expressive writing, meditation, cognitive behavioural therapy, and pain education. The app also includes access to podcasts that focus on pain counselling and pain education.

    Behavioral: Mind-body mobile application

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants are asked to continue with usual care for pain treatments. They are asked not to start any new forms of treatment.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMind-body mobile application

    Self-directed; Study team will recommend daily use of mobile app for 6 weeks with a minimum of 4 times/week usage of mobile app for 6 weeks. Frequency will be monitored via weekly surveys.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)

    Primary outcome of Pain Severity: Single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = "no pain", 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine". Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). Primary outcome of Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = "does not interfere" to 10 = "completely interferes" for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on Average

    Single item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = "had no pain" to 5 = "very severe pain" Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

  2. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain Interference

    Measures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "very much" (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

  3. Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)

    Measures thoughts and perceptions of pain, 13 items, scored using 5-pt Likert scale 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "all the time". Scores are the sum of all items. min score = 0; max score = 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

  4. DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)

    Measures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = "did not apply to me at all" to 3 = "applied to me very much or most of the time". Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

  5. Quality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)

    Measures self-reported impact of health on daily life. The SF-12 is a brief version of the longer SF-36 and contains 12 items measured using a variety of Likert scales and dichotomous yes/no scales, with each item response assigned a numerical weight. PCS and MCS are component z-scores that are calculated using regression weights and constants for each (mental and physical) which have been derived from a U.S. population. Each item response choice category is coded as an indicator variable (scored 1 / 0). Indicator variables are weighted using regression coefficients from the US population for the MCS and PCS. The weighted scores across all items are then summed and are added to a constant (regression intercept) to obtain summary scores. Score ranges 0 to 100. Normalized score such that component scales have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. Higher scores indicate better

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

  6. Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)

    Measures self reported pain severity; Pain interference (over past 24 hours) Only measured in the intervention group (as wait-listed controls had accessed the mobile app and were released from the study). BPI Pain Severity: single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = "no pain", 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine". Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). BPI Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = "does not interfere" to 10 = "completely interferes" for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. PROMIS Pain Intensity Short Form

    Single item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = "had no pain" to 5 = "very severe pain" Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Medication Use

    Self-reported quantify of medication use (number of participant reporting regular usage). Note: this was a change from original plan for reporting. We have only reported frequencies of use (generally), and omitted details regarding dosage and number of pills as it was decided that this was beyond the scope of our team and trial. We also did not compare baseline to 6 weeks for the same reason.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  9. PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a

    Measures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "very much" (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)

    Measures thoughts and perceptions of pain, 13 items, scored using 5-pt Likert scale 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "all the time". Scores are the sum of all items. min score = 0; max score = 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  11. Quality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)

    Measures self-reported impact of health on daily life. The SF-12 is a brief version of the longer SF-36 and contains 12 items measured using a variety of Likert scales and dichotomous yes/no scales, with each item response assigned a numerical weight. PCS and MCS are component z-scores that are calculated using regression weights and constants for each (mental and physical) which have been derived from a U.S. population. Each item response choice category is coded as an indicator variable (scored 1 / 0). Indicator variables are weighted using regression coefficients from the US population for the MCS and PCS. The weighted scores across all items are then summed and are added to a constant (regression intercept) to obtain summary scores. Score ranges 0 to 100. Normalized score such that component scales have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  12. DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)

    Measures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = "did not apply to me at all" to 3 = "applied to me very much or most of the time". Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jan 29, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Note the data reported here are for complete cases (n = 171) and represent means from raw data (not estimated means). n = 73 intervention, n = 98 usual care (with missing data in secondary outcomes noted). Formal analysis presented in reports include intention to treat sample (n = 198) and estimated marginal means are reported elsewhere.

Participant flow

Three cohorts recruited in series for three study starts: Cohort 1: October 15 2021 Cohort 2: January 6 2022 Cohort 3: April 7 2022 Randomized on October 15, 2022 (1); January 6, 2022 (2); and April 7, 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
Started98100
Completed7398
Not completed252
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up102
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject150

Outcome measures

PrimaryBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)

Primary outcome of Pain Severity: Single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = "no pain", 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine". Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). Primary outcome of Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = "does not interfere" to 10 = "completely interferes" for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
BPI Average Pain Severity at baseline5.33 ± 1.475.35 ± 1.51
BPI Average Pain Severity at 6-weeks4.51 ± 1.745.16 ± 1.44
BPI Pain Interference at baseline5.97 ± 2.146.05 ± 2.26
BPI Pain interference at 6 weeks4.81 ± 2.325.49 ± 2.30
SecondaryPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on Average

Single item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = "had no pain" to 5 = "very severe pain" Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame:
baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on Average
units on a scaleMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
PROMIS Pain Intensity on average at baseline2.99 ± 0.593.22 ± 0.60
PROMIS Pain Intensity on average at 6-weeks2.81 ± 0.543.08 ± 0.61
SecondaryPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain Interference

Measures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "very much" (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame:
baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain Interference
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
Total PROMIS Pain Interference at baseline28.22 ± 7.3029.01 ± 7.46
Total PROMIS Pain Interference at 6-weeks16.71 ± 8.3619.63 ± 8.28
SecondaryPain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)

Measures thoughts and perceptions of pain, 13 items, scored using 5-pt Likert scale 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "all the time". Scores are the sum of all items. min score = 0; max score = 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame:
baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
Total PCS Scores at baseline22.55 ± 12.2223.13 ± 11.30
Total PCS Scores at 6-weeks15.92 ± 11.4820.38 ± 12.0
SecondaryDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)

Measures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = "did not apply to me at all" to 3 = "applied to me very much or most of the time". Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame:
baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
Total Depression Score at baseline14.57 ± 9.5214.52 ± 9.84
Total Depression Score at 6-weeks11.97 ± 9.0914.85 ± 10.75
Total Anxiety Score at baseline9.89 ± 7.858.92 ± 7.13
Total Anxiety Score at 6-weeks7.31 ± 7.739.46 ± 7.74
Total Stress Score at baseline16.54 ± 8.7815.35 ± 8.33
Total Stress Score at 6-weeks13.63 ± 8.1415.46 ± 8.63
SecondaryQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)

Measures self-reported impact of health on daily life. The SF-12 is a brief version of the longer SF-36 and contains 12 items measured using a variety of Likert scales and dichotomous yes/no scales, with each item response assigned a numerical weight. PCS and MCS are component z-scores that are calculated using regression weights and constants for each (mental and physical) which have been derived from a U.S. population. Each item response choice category is coded as an indicator variable (scored 1 / 0). Indicator variables are weighted using regression coefficients from the US population for the MCS and PCS. The weighted scores across all items are then summed and are added to a constant (regression intercept) to obtain summary scores. Score ranges 0 to 100. Normalized score such that component scales have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. Higher scores indicate better

Time frame:
baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
QOL Physical Component Score at baseline25.21 ± 11.0721.60 ± 9.58
QOL Physical Component Score at 6-weeks29.27 ± 11.3723.89 ± 11.36
QOL Mental Component Score at baseline47.83 ± 5.4749.18 ± 6.74
QOL Mental Component Score at 6-weeks49.22 ± 6.3950.05 ± 6.97
SecondaryBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)

Measures self reported pain severity; Pain interference (over past 24 hours) Only measured in the intervention group (as wait-listed controls had accessed the mobile app and were released from the study). BPI Pain Severity: single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = "no pain", 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine". Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). BPI Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = "does not interfere" to 10 = "completely interferes" for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile Application
BPI Pain intensity on average (24 hours)4.60 ± 1.70
Pain interference (24 hours)4.85 ± 2.49
SecondaryPROMIS Pain Intensity Short Form

Single item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = "had no pain" to 5 = "very severe pain" Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
PROMIS Pain Intensity Short Form
units on a scaleMind-body Mobile Application
PROMIS Pain Intensity Short Form2.74 ± 0.54
SecondaryMedication Use

Self-reported quantify of medication use (number of participant reporting regular usage). Note: this was a change from original plan for reporting. We have only reported frequencies of use (generally), and omitted details regarding dosage and number of pills as it was decided that this was beyond the scope of our team and trial. We also did not compare baseline to 6 weeks for the same reason.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Medication Use
participantsMind-body Mobile ApplicationControl
Non-opioid analgesics4859
Opioid analgesics1129
Anti-depressants (SSRI, SSNI, TCA)2027
Anti-convulsants1331
Anti-spasmodics89
Cannabanoids610
CNS depressants58
Other medicines related to pain95
SecondaryPROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a

Measures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "very much" (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile Application
PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a24.34 ± 7.54
SecondaryPain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)

Measures thoughts and perceptions of pain, 13 items, scored using 5-pt Likert scale 0 = "not at all" to 4 = "all the time". Scores are the sum of all items. min score = 0; max score = 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile Application
Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)16.46 ± 12.83
SecondaryQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)

Measures self-reported impact of health on daily life. The SF-12 is a brief version of the longer SF-36 and contains 12 items measured using a variety of Likert scales and dichotomous yes/no scales, with each item response assigned a numerical weight. PCS and MCS are component z-scores that are calculated using regression weights and constants for each (mental and physical) which have been derived from a U.S. population. Each item response choice category is coded as an indicator variable (scored 1 / 0). Indicator variables are weighted using regression coefficients from the US population for the MCS and PCS. The weighted scores across all items are then summed and are added to a constant (regression intercept) to obtain summary scores. Score ranges 0 to 100. Normalized score such that component scales have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile Application
Physical Component Score (SF12) at 12 weeks27.66 ± 10.34
Mental Component Score (SF12) at 12 weeks50.20 ± 7.63
SecondaryDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)

Measures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = "did not apply to me at all" to 3 = "applied to me very much or most of the time". Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)
score on a scaleMind-body Mobile Application
Depression6.32 ± 4.99
Anxiety4.20 ± 3.72
Stress7.58 ± 4.71

Adverse events

Collected over 6 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mind-body Mobile Application0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)
Control0/98 (0%)0/98 (0%)0/98 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

We report baseline characteristics for the full randomized sample (n = 198).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
Mean46.6 ± 13.346.9 ± 13.046.7 ± 13.1
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
Woman7884162
Man151429
Non-binary325
Prefer not to answer101
Missing101
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
Canada8690176
France101
United Kingdom202
Israel101
Jamaica101
Trinidad and Tobago101
United States4812
Greece011
Estonia011
Education
Education(Participants)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
High school or less131023
Trade or diploma303363
Bachelor degree or higher5355108
Household income
Household income(Participants)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
< $34 999292756
$35 000 to $49 99912315
$50 000 to $74 999162036
$75 000 to $99 999132033
> $100 000252651
Chose not to answer.347
Pain duration
Pain duration(years)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
Mean13.0 ± 11.014.2 ± 11.413.6 ± 11.2
Diagnoses
Diagnoses(Participants)Mind-body Mobile ApplicationControlTotal
Fibromyalgia192140
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis4610
Osteoarthritis6713
Migraine101323
No formal diagnosis6664130
Other (not including above conditions)11718

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of the Fraser Valley
    Chilliwack, British Columbia V2R0N3, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ashar YK, Gordon A, Schubiner H, Uipi C, Knight K, Anderson Z, Carlisle J, Polisky L, Geuter S, Flood TF, Kragel PA, Dimidjian S, Lumley MA, Wager TD. Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 1;79(1):13-23. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2669. PubMed 34586357 ↗
  • Pfeifer AC, Uddin R, Schroder-Pfeifer P, Holl F, Swoboda W, Schiltenwolf M. Mobile Application-Based Interventions for Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness. J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 5;9(11):3557. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113557. PubMed 33167300 ↗
  • Morone NE, Greco CM. Mind-body interventions for chronic pain in older adults: a structured review. Pain Med. 2007 May-Jun;8(4):359-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00312.x. PubMed 17610459 ↗
  • Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160. No abstract available. PubMed 25844555 ↗
  • Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WA. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;60(12):1234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Jun 6. PubMed 17998077 ↗
  • Schopflocher D, Taenzer P, Jovey R. The prevalence of chronic pain in Canada. Pain Res Manag. 2011 Nov-Dec;16(6):445-50. doi: 10.1155/2011/876306. PubMed 22184555 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. PubMed 28919117 ↗
  • Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. PubMed 8628042 ↗
  • Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581. PubMed 17592957 ↗
  • Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u. PubMed 7726811 ↗
  • Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38. PubMed 8080219 ↗
  • Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA, Hauptmann W, Jones J, O'Neill E. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med. 1997 Dec;20(6):589-605. doi: 10.1023/a:1025570508954. PubMed 9429990 ↗
  • Kean J, Monahan PO, Kroenke K, Wu J, Yu Z, Stump TE, Krebs EE. Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms, Brief Pain Inventory, PEG, and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale. Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):414-21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000497. PubMed 26807536 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 12, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05090683
Lead sponsor
University of the Fraser Valley
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2021
Start date
Oct 15, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2022
Completion
Jul 15, 2022
Results posted
Jan 29, 2025
Last update
Jan 29, 2025

Study contacts

Cynthia J Thomson, PhD
principal investigator · University of the Fraser Valley

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion