An observational study in Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Sarawak General Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.
Sponsored by Sarawak General Hospital · Observational
The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic yield of water-resistant, wireless 7-day cardiac ECG patch versus conventional 24-hour Holter recording in detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke workup.
This is a cohort study with a paired comparison between a cardiac ECG patch and conventional Holter system to detect atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack of undetermined etiology. An estimated total of 320 adult patients will be enrolled in this study. Each eligible patient will receive simultaneously a conventional 24h Holter monitoring and a 7d cardiac ECG patch monitoring.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary objective:
To determine the diagnostic yield of a cardiac ECG patch compared to conventional Holter monitor for detecting occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) within 24 hours in patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke work-up.
Secondary objective(s):
Exploratory objective(s):
SCREENING:
Eligible patients will be enrolled in the study and proceed with a baseline assessment.
BASELINE ASSESSMENT:
FOLLOW UP VISITS:
Follow-up visits will occur at 3 months and 1 year for the efficacy and outcomes for the duration of the study. There will be a total of 2 visits.The investigator/study team will perform the following procedures at each visit where applicable:
Adult patients who are admitted with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke work-up will be included.
Diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (WHO definition) of undetermined etiology made by neurologist within 7 days after the index event. The event must be either:
The following diagnostic test have already been completed as part of clinical routine post-stroke/TIA:
Exclusion Criteria:
Detection of newly diagnosed AF or atrial flutter within 24 hours of monitoring with cardiac ECG patch compared to conventional Holter.
Detection of newly diagnosed AF or atrial flutter within 24 hours of monitoring with cardiac ECG patch compared to conventional Holter.
Time frame: 24 hours
Detection of AF or atrial flutter within 7 days of monitoring.
Detection of one or more episodes of AF or atrial flutter as assessed after 7 days of Holter monitoring.
Time frame: 7 days
Proportion of stroke patients anticoagulated during follow-up.
Proportion of patients prescribed with OAC as assessed at 3 month follow-up.
Time frame: 3 months
Rate of stroke recurrent, major adverse bleeding events and detection of AF outside the study protocol.
One year rate of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA, hemorrhagic stroke, major adverse bleeding events and detection of AF outside the study protocol.
Time frame: 1 year
Time to first detection of AF or atrial flutter.
Time to first detection of AF or atrial flutter within 7 days of Holter monitoring.
Time frame: 7 days
Health Outcomes.
Health outcome as evaluated by Eq-5D Questionnaire.
Time frame: 1 year
Predictors of occult AF.
To identify predictors of occult AF based on clinical, neuroimaging, echocardiography and Holter monitoring results.
Time frame: 1 month
Plan to share: Undecided — The final decision is depending on the agreement among the co-investigators.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sarawak General Hospital