ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05082467PROVE-AFUpdated Apr 24, 2026

Prolonged Cardiac ECG Patch Versus Conventional Holter For Detecting Atrial Fibrillation After Cerebral Ischemic Event

An observational study in Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Sarawak General Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.

Sponsored by Sarawak General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic yield of water-resistant, wireless 7-day cardiac ECG patch versus conventional 24-hour Holter recording in detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke workup.

Read the detailed description

This is a cohort study with a paired comparison between a cardiac ECG patch and conventional Holter system to detect atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack of undetermined etiology. An estimated total of 320 adult patients will be enrolled in this study. Each eligible patient will receive simultaneously a conventional 24h Holter monitoring and a 7d cardiac ECG patch monitoring.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary objective:

To determine the diagnostic yield of a cardiac ECG patch compared to conventional Holter monitor for detecting occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) within 24 hours in patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke work-up.

Secondary objective(s):

  • To determine efficacy of prolonged 7-day ambulatory ECG monitoring (using cardiac ECG patch) compared to conventional 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring (using conventional Holter) strategies in detecting paroxysmal AF.
  • To determine if a strategy of a prolonged 7-day ambulatory ECG monitoring results in a change in clinical practice, i.e., more patients are anticoagulated.
  • To assess the time to the first detection of AF within the first 7 days of monitoring.

Exploratory objective(s):

  • To identify predictors of occult AF based on clinical, neuroimaging, echocardiography, and ECG features.
  • To assess feasibility and cost-effectiveness of 7-day cardiac ECG patch monitoring for detecting occult paroxysmal AF.

SCREENING:

  • Written informed consent obtained from patient or guardian
  • Inclusion/Exclusion criteria.
  • Social demographics, Risk factors, Comorbidities, Admission Brain CT/MRI,Stroke status including date and time of index event, date and time of admission, admission modified Rankin scale/NIHSS Score [Data extracted from patient records].
  • 12-lead ECG, Transthoracic Echocardiogram

Eligible patients will be enrolled in the study and proceed with a baseline assessment.

BASELINE ASSESSMENT:

  • Concomitant medication, Oxfordshire classification of stroke and CHA2DS2VAS Score [Data extracted from patient records].
  • Anthropometric measurements and vital signs assessments
  • 24h Holter and 7d Cardiac ECG patch monitoring

FOLLOW UP VISITS:

Follow-up visits will occur at 3 months and 1 year for the efficacy and outcomes for the duration of the study. There will be a total of 2 visits.The investigator/study team will perform the following procedures at each visit where applicable:

  • Clinical examination (NIHSS Score assessment)
  • Review concomitant medications
  • AE/SAE assessment and monitoring
  • Outcomes assessment
  • Health outcome interview with EQ-5D Questionnaire
  • TOAST Classification (at 1 year follow up visit)
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Cardiac ECG Patch
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 320 is above the median of 152 across 1,968 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Sarawak General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients who are admitted with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke work-up will be included.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or (TIA) (WHO definition) of undetermined etiology made by neurologist within 7 days after the index event. The event must be either:

    • an ischemic stroke confirmed by neuroimaging; or
    • a TIA, defined as involving a focal unilateral motor deficit, speech/language deficit or hemianopia, with symptom duration \<24 hours (note: amaurosis fugax/ transient monocular blindness, pure sensory spells, isolated vertigo spells, etc. do not qualify for enrolment given the potential for misdiagnosis of such events).
  3. No AF detected in baseline 12-lead on admission.
  4. The following diagnostic test have already been completed as part of clinical routine post-stroke/TIA:

    • Brain imaging with CT or MRI,
    • Transthoracic echocardiography to congenital heart disease and endocarditis.
  5. Recurrent stroke/TIA is inclusionary as long as patient meets inclusion/exclusion criteria for study enrolment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Stroke of unknown time of symptom onset.
  2. Modified Rankin Scale ≥5 on index admission.
  3. Previous documented history of primary intracerebral bleeding.
  4. Previous documented history of AF or atrial flutter (a remote history of transient AF during perioperative period is not exclusionary).
  5. Skin allergies, conditions, or sensitivities to cardiac patch.
  6. Exclusively retinal stroke or retinal event.
  7. Pre-existing indication for anticoagulation (eg. History of mechanical heart valve replacement, deep vein thrombosis).
  8. Pre-existing for permanent anticoagulation (eg. hypocoagulable state).
  9. Echocardiographic findings of congenital heart disease and endocarditis.
  10. Indicated for pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD), CRT device, or an implantable hemodynamic monitoring system.
  11. Intravenous drug users (IVDUs).
  12. \< 1 year for reasons other than stroke (eg. cancer disease).
  13. Concomitant participation in other clinical trials involving medications.
  14. Pregnancy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Detection of newly diagnosed AF or atrial flutter within 24 hours of monitoring with cardiac ECG patch compared to conventional Holter.

    Detection of newly diagnosed AF or atrial flutter within 24 hours of monitoring with cardiac ECG patch compared to conventional Holter.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Detection of AF or atrial flutter within 7 days of monitoring.

    Detection of one or more episodes of AF or atrial flutter as assessed after 7 days of Holter monitoring.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Proportion of stroke patients anticoagulated during follow-up.

    Proportion of patients prescribed with OAC as assessed at 3 month follow-up.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Rate of stroke recurrent, major adverse bleeding events and detection of AF outside the study protocol.

    One year rate of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA, hemorrhagic stroke, major adverse bleeding events and detection of AF outside the study protocol.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Time to first detection of AF or atrial flutter.

    Time to first detection of AF or atrial flutter within 7 days of Holter monitoring.

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. Health Outcomes.

    Health outcome as evaluated by Eq-5D Questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Predictors of occult AF.

    To identify predictors of occult AF based on clinical, neuroimaging, echocardiography and Holter monitoring results.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The final decision is depending on the agreement among the co-investigators.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 79 months after the start.

Of 835 non-industry observational studies under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 92. This study's planned 79 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 897 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 85.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2021
First posted
Oct 19, 2021
StartActual
Jan 12, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Aug 22, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 22, 2027
Last update
Apr 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05082467
Lead sponsor
Sarawak General Hospital
Collaborators
Sarawak Heart Centre, Ministry of Health, Malaysia
Responsible party
Diana Hui Ping Foo (Principal Investigator, Sarawak General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2021
Start date
Jan 12, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 22, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 22, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2026

Study contacts

Diana Hui Ping Foo, MD
principal investigator · Sarawak General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion