ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05079477Updated Apr 4, 2024Results posted

Online Study of the Effects of Sugary Drink Warning Labels on Consumption

An interventional study of Exposure to sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels and Exposure to calorie information in Food Preferences, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-04.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
216
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to determine the degree to which sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) warning labels increase consumers' knowledge about the potential health harms of SSBs and reduce SSB purchases and consumption. 216 racially and ethnically diverse parents of children 6-11 years old will be recruited to buy snacks and beverages for four weeks via an online store that ships participants their purchases. Participants will be randomized to either 1) calorie labels (control); or 2) sugar graphic warning labels. The investigators hypothesize that sugar graphic warning labels displayed in an online store in weeks 2-4 will lead to the greatest reductions from week 1 across both primary outcomes compared to the control group that will only see calorie labels.

Read the detailed description

During this study, participants will shop in an online store created using Shopify for four weeks. In this within-participant design, the first week of shopping is baseline. Participants will then be randomized to different store interfaces for the remaining three weeks based on one of two warning label conditions: 1) calorie labels (control); or 2) sugar graphic warning labels. Participants will complete a brief survey at the start of the study to assess demographic information, information about parent and child beverage consumption, and their online shopping experiences. At the end they will complete another survey about their beverage consumption, their experience shopping in the store, whether they noticed and used the warning labels, and their ability to recall the warning label message. Participants will also be asked about their perceptions of a specific type of warning label in this final survey. Upon completion of the survey, participants will be shown a debriefing statement explaining the study purpose. After they read the information, they will be asked whether or not they consent to allow their data to be used in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Food Preferences

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • food labeling
  • child
  • sugar-sweetened beverages
  • eating
  • drinking
  • choice behavior
03

In context

Food Preferences

40 studies on the registry are indexed under Food Preferences; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 216 is above the median of 154 across 29 interventional studies indexed under Food Preferences.

Browse Food Preferences studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,664 studies on the registry; 236 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 107 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • a primary caregiver of a child 6-to-11 years old;
  • >=18 years old;
  • can read and speak English;
  • primary grocery shopper for their household;
  • have regular Internet access; and
  • report that the oldest of their children between 6 and 11 years old is consuming sugar sweetened beverages at least twelve times per month or approximately three times a week

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not a primary caregiver of a child 6-to-11 years old;
  • \<18 years old;
  • cannot read and/or speak English;
  • not the primary grocery shopper for their household;
  • does not have regular Internet access; and
  • does not report that the oldest of their children between 6 and 11 years old is consuming sugar sweetened beverages at least twelve times per month or approximately three times a week
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
216 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Calorie label

    Calorie label (control) will display a calories per package label on all beverages, not just sugary drinks. This is modeled after the American Beverage Association's current "Clear on Calories" labels. Additionally, all snack items will have a calories per serving label.

    Behavioral: Exposure to calorie information

  • Experimental
    Sugar graphic warning label

    All products in this arm will also have calorie labels. Beverages with added sugar will also have sugar graphic warning labels with the text: "WARNING: drinking beverages with added sugars contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay" along with graphics depicting the amount of sugar in the beverage.

    Behavioral: Exposure to sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels · Behavioral: Exposure to calorie information

Interventions

  • BehavioralExposure to sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels

    Graphic images of the amount of sugar (randomly assigned teaspoons, packets, or cubes) and text warning labels

  • BehavioralExposure to calorie information

    Calories for all beverages and foods

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Beverage Calories Purchased, Week 1

    Logged beverage calories/100mL purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100mL for beverages.

    Time frame: one week

  2. Beverage Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4

    Logged average beverage calories/100mL purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100mL for beverages.

    Time frame: three weeks

  3. Beverage Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1

    Beverage grams of added sugars/100mL purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100mL for beverages.

    Time frame: one week

  4. Beverage Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4

    Average beverage grams of added sugars/100mL purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100mL for beverages.

    Time frame: three weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Week 1

    Number of parents buying a sweetened beverage within each condition

    Time frame: one week

  2. Number Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Weeks 2-4

    Number of parents buying a sweetened beverage at any point during Weeks 2-4, within each condition

    Time frame: three weeks

  3. Snack Calories Purchased, Week 1

    Logged snack calories/100g purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100g for snacks.

    Time frame: one week

  4. Snack Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4

    Logged average snack calories/100g purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100g for snacks.

    Time frame: three weeks

  5. Snack Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1

    Snack grams of added sugars/100g purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100g for snacks.

    Time frame: one week

  6. Snack Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4

    Average snack grams of added sugars/100g purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100g for snacks.

    Time frame: three weeks

  7. Total Calories Purchased, Week 1

    Log of the summed beverage and snack calories purchased

    Time frame: one week

  8. Total Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4

    Log of the average summed beverage and snack calories purchased per week over Weeks 2-4

    Time frame: three weeks

  9. Total Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1

    Summed grams of beverage and snack added sugars purchased

    Time frame: one week

  10. Total Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4

    Average summed grams of beverage and snack added sugars purchased per week over Weeks 2-4

    Time frame: three weeks

  11. Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Baseline

    Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the child as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) parent self-report survey.

    Time frame: baseline

  12. Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Final

    Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the child as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) parent self-report survey.

    Time frame: Week 4

  13. Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Baseline

    Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the parent as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) self-report survey.

    Time frame: baseline

  14. Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Final

    Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the parent as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) self-report survey.

    Time frame: Week 4

  15. Noticing the Label

    Participants will respond "yes," "no," or "I don't know" to the item: "When you selected a beverage to purchase in the store, did you notice any labels on the beverages other than calorie information?"

    Time frame: Week 4

  16. Perceived Label Influence

    Participants will respond: "yes", "no," or "I did not notice any labels" in response to the question of whether the label influenced their purchase.

    Time frame: Week 4

  17. How Much do You Trust the Information on This Label

    "How much do you trust the information on this label?". Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater trust in the label.

    Time frame: Week 4

  18. Likelihood of Label Changing Thoughts

    "If this government warning label were on a beverage, how much would it change your thoughts about the healthiness of that beverage for your child?" Responses will be measured with a 5-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 5=A lot. Higher numbers indicate the label would be more likely to change perceptions of beverage healthiness.

    Time frame: Week 4

  19. Encourage You to Give Fewer Beverages to Your Child

    "If you saw this government warning label on a beverage, would the label encourage you to serve your child that beverage less often?" Responses will be measured with a 5-point Likert scale where 1=Definitely no and 5=Definitely yes. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving unhealthy beverages less often.

    Time frame: Week 4

  20. Negative Reactions to the Label

    Average negative emotional response to the label will be examined (said the warning label made them feel worried, fearful, guilty, or disgusted or grossed out). Responses will be measured with a 5-point Likert scale averaging across the 4 negative emotions where 1=Not at all and 5=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate more negative reactions.

    Time frame: Week 4

  21. Child Enjoyment of Water

    "How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

    Time frame: Week 4

  22. Child Enjoyment of Orange Juice

    "How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

    Time frame: Week 4

  23. Child Enjoyment of Soda

    "How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

    Time frame: Week 4

  24. Child Enjoyment of Sports Drink

    "How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

    Time frame: Week 4

  25. Likely to Serve or Buy Water

    "How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

    Time frame: Week 4

  26. Likely to Serve or Buy Orange Juice

    "How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

    Time frame: Week 4

  27. Likely to Serve or Buy Soda

    "How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

    Time frame: Week 4

  28. Likely to Serve or Buy Sports Drinks

    "How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

    Time frame: Week 4

  29. Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Water

    Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

    Time frame: Week 4

  30. Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Orange Juice

    Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

    Time frame: Week 4

  31. Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Soda

    Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

    Time frame: Week 4

  32. Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Sports Drinks

    Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

    Time frame: Week 4

  33. Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Water

    This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

    Time frame: Week 4

  34. Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Orange Juice

    This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

    Time frame: Week 4

  35. Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Soda

    This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

    Time frame: Week 4

  36. Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Sports Drinks

    This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

    Time frame: Week 4

  37. Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Water

    This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

    Time frame: Week 4

  38. Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Orange Juice

    This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

    Time frame: Week 4

  39. Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Soda

    This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

    Time frame: Week 4

  40. Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Sports Drinks

    This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

    Time frame: Week 4

07

Results

Posted Apr 4, 2024

Participant flow

Participants were recruited online from October 2021 to November 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Started108108
Completed9495
Not completed1413
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Ineligible based on baseline survey (eligible based on protocol: recruitment screener)1111
Withdrew: Ineligible because pilot participants. the protocol changed after running them.02

Outcome measures

PrimaryBeverage Calories Purchased, Week 1

Logged beverage calories/100mL purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100mL for beverages.

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Mean · Logged calories/100mL
Beverage Calories Purchased, Week 1
Logged calories/100mLCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Beverage Calories Purchased, Week 11.43 ± 0.621.40 ± 0.62
PrimaryBeverage Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4

Logged average beverage calories/100mL purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100mL for beverages.

Time frame:
three weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Logged calories/100mL
Beverage Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4
Logged calories/100mLCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Beverage Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-41.49 ± 0.501.43 ± 0.48
PrimaryBeverage Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1

Beverage grams of added sugars/100mL purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100mL for beverages.

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Mean · g/100mL
Beverage Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1
g/100mLCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Beverage Added Sugars Purchased, Week 18.95 ± 8.758.10 ± 8.43
PrimaryBeverage Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4

Average beverage grams of added sugars/100mL purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100mL for beverages.

Time frame:
three weeks
Reported as:
Mean · g/100mL
Beverage Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4
g/100mLCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Beverage Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-48.90 ± 8.076.99 ± 7.06
SecondaryNumber Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Week 1

Number of parents buying a sweetened beverage within each condition

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Week 1
ParticipantsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Number Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Week 16768
SecondaryNumber Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Weeks 2-4

Number of parents buying a sweetened beverage at any point during Weeks 2-4, within each condition

Time frame:
three weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Weeks 2-4
ParticipantsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Number Purchasing a Sweetened Beverage, Weeks 2-47773
SecondarySnack Calories Purchased, Week 1

Logged snack calories/100g purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100g for snacks.

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Mean · Logged calories/100g
Snack Calories Purchased, Week 1
Logged calories/100gCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Snack Calories Purchased, Week 12.89 ± 0.222.94 ± 0.22
SecondarySnack Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4

Logged average snack calories/100g purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, calorie amounts were standardized to calories/100g for snacks.

Time frame:
three weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Logged calories/100g
Snack Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4
Logged calories/100gCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Snack Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-42.94 ± 0.212.96 ± 0.20
SecondarySnack Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1

Snack grams of added sugars/100g purchased. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100g for snacks.

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Mean · g/100g
Snack Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1
g/100gCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Snack Added Sugars Purchased, Week 128.3 ± 28.031.2 ± 29.0
SecondarySnack Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4

Average snack grams of added sugars/100g purchased per week over Weeks 2-4. Number of servings per item and number of items per package varied by product; therefore, added sugar amounts were standardized to grams of added sugar/100g for snacks.

Time frame:
three weeks
Reported as:
Mean · g/100g
Snack Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4
g/100gCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Snack Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-438.3 ± 32.137.3 ± 26.0
SecondaryTotal Calories Purchased, Week 1

Log of the summed beverage and snack calories purchased

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Mean · Logged calories
Total Calories Purchased, Week 1
Logged caloriesCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Total Calories Purchased, Week 13.52 ± 0.263.55 ± 0.22
SecondaryTotal Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4

Log of the average summed beverage and snack calories purchased per week over Weeks 2-4

Time frame:
three weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Logged calories
Total Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-4
Logged caloriesCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Total Calories Purchased, Weeks 2-43.56 ± 0.223.55 ± 0.22
SecondaryTotal Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1

Summed grams of beverage and snack added sugars purchased

Time frame:
one week
Reported as:
Mean · Grams
Total Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1
GramsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Total Added Sugars Purchased, Week 1353 ± 300321 ± 260
SecondaryTotal Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4

Average summed grams of beverage and snack added sugars purchased per week over Weeks 2-4

Time frame:
three weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Grams
Total Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4
GramsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Total Added Sugars Purchased, Weeks 2-4378 ± 277327 ± 238
SecondaryVolume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Baseline

Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the child as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) parent self-report survey.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Median · Ounces
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Baseline
OuncesCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Baseline6.4 (0 to 192)7.2 (0 to 240)
SecondaryVolume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Final

Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the child as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) parent self-report survey.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Median · Ounces
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Final
OuncesCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Child, Final6.4 (0 to 156)7.2 (0 to 240)
SecondaryVolume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Baseline

Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the parent as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) self-report survey.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Median · Ounces
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Baseline
OuncesCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Baseline4 (0 to 200)6 (0 to 240)
SecondaryVolume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Final

Ounces of sweetened beverages (labeled in sugar condition) consumed per day in the last month by the parent as measured by the Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEV-Q) self-report survey.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Median · Ounces
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Final
OuncesCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Volume of Sweetened Beverages Consumed by Parent, Final3.4 (0 to 160)5.6 (0 to 240)
SecondaryNoticing the Label

Participants will respond "yes," "no," or "I don't know" to the item: "When you selected a beverage to purchase in the store, did you notice any labels on the beverages other than calorie information?"

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Noticing the Label
ParticipantsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Yes3462
No4822
Don't know1210
SecondaryPerceived Label Influence

Participants will respond: "yes", "no," or "I did not notice any labels" in response to the question of whether the label influenced their purchase.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Perceived Label Influence
ParticipantsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Yes1541
No1921
I did not notice any labels6032
SecondaryHow Much do You Trust the Information on This Label

"How much do you trust the information on this label?". Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater trust in the label.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
How Much do You Trust the Information on This Label
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
How Much do You Trust the Information on This Label5.4 ± 1.76.0 ± 1.3
SecondaryLikelihood of Label Changing Thoughts

"If this government warning label were on a beverage, how much would it change your thoughts about the healthiness of that beverage for your child?" Responses will be measured with a 5-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 5=A lot. Higher numbers indicate the label would be more likely to change perceptions of beverage healthiness.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Likelihood of Label Changing Thoughts
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Likelihood of Label Changing Thoughts3.7 ± 1.44.2 ± 1.0
SecondaryEncourage You to Give Fewer Beverages to Your Child

"If you saw this government warning label on a beverage, would the label encourage you to serve your child that beverage less often?" Responses will be measured with a 5-point Likert scale where 1=Definitely no and 5=Definitely yes. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving unhealthy beverages less often.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Encourage You to Give Fewer Beverages to Your Child
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Encourage You to Give Fewer Beverages to Your Child3.9 ± 1.24.3 ± 1.1
SecondaryNegative Reactions to the Label

Average negative emotional response to the label will be examined (said the warning label made them feel worried, fearful, guilty, or disgusted or grossed out). Responses will be measured with a 5-point Likert scale averaging across the 4 negative emotions where 1=Not at all and 5=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate more negative reactions.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Negative Reactions to the Label
score on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Negative Reactions to the Label2.4 ± 0.93.4 ± 0.9
SecondaryChild Enjoyment of Water

"How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Child Enjoyment of Water
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Child Enjoyment of Water5.1 ± 1.95.2 ± 2.0
SecondaryChild Enjoyment of Orange Juice

"How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Child Enjoyment of Orange Juice
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Child Enjoyment of Orange Juice5.3 ± 1.85.1 ± 1.8
SecondaryChild Enjoyment of Soda

"How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Child Enjoyment of Soda
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Child Enjoyment of Soda4.8 ± 2.54.4 ± 2.5
SecondaryChild Enjoyment of Sports Drink

"How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater enjoyment of the product.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Child Enjoyment of Sports Drink
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Child Enjoyment of Sports Drink4.6 ± 2.14.7 ± 2.3
SecondaryLikely to Serve or Buy Water

"How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Likely to Serve or Buy Water
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Likely to Serve or Buy Water4.0 ± 2.44.0 ± 2.5
SecondaryLikely to Serve or Buy Orange Juice

"How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Likely to Serve or Buy Orange Juice
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Likely to Serve or Buy Orange Juice4.1 ± 2.14.1 ± 2.1
SecondaryLikely to Serve or Buy Soda

"How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Likely to Serve or Buy Soda
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Likely to Serve or Buy Soda2.1 ± 1.62.1 ± 1.7
SecondaryLikely to Serve or Buy Sports Drinks

"How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" Responses will be measured with a 7-point Likert scale where 1=Not at all and 7=Extremely. Higher numbers indicate greater likelihood of serving or buying the product for their child.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Likely to Serve or Buy Sports Drinks
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Likely to Serve or Buy Sports Drinks2.6 ± 1.92.8 ± 1.8
SecondaryHealth Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Water

Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Water
score on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Water41.8 ± 5.740.3 ± 6.7
SecondaryHealth Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Orange Juice

Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Orange Juice
score on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Orange Juice28.7 ± 7.929.3 ± 7.4
SecondaryHealth Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Soda

Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Soda
score on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Soda13.4 ± 5.414.6 ± 5.9
SecondaryHealth Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Sports Drinks

Summed responses to the following 7 health perception questions, 6 of which are prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would…". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the summed index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. This index ranges 7 to 49.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Sports Drinks
score on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Health Beliefs and Risk Perceptions Index for Sports Drinks23.3 ± 6.823.1 ± 7.1
SecondaryEstimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Water

This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Median · teaspoons
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Water
teaspoonsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Water0 (0 to 10)0 (0 to 32)
SecondaryEstimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Orange Juice

This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Median · teaspoons
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Orange Juice
teaspoonsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Orange Juice4 (0 to 120)4 (0 to 60)
SecondaryEstimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Soda

This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Median · teaspoons
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Soda
teaspoonsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Soda10 (2 to 200)16 (0 to 120)
SecondaryEstimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Sports Drinks

This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants. Median teaspoons in each condition will be assessed

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Median · teaspoons
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Sports Drinks
teaspoonsCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Estimate of How Many Teaspoons of Added Sugar Are in Sports Drinks6 (0 to 60)8 (0 to 30)
SecondaryPerceived Amount of Added Sugar in Water

This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Water
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Water2.0 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.4
SecondaryPerceived Amount of Added Sugar in Orange Juice

This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Orange Juice
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Orange Juice2.5 ± 0.52.4 ± 0.5
SecondaryPerceived Amount of Added Sugar in Soda

This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Soda
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Soda3.0 ± 0.33.0 ± 0.2
SecondaryPerceived Amount of Added Sugar in Sports Drinks

This variable will be measured with a 3-point ordinal Likert scale with values: 1 = "too little for my child", 2 = "just right for my child" and 3 = "too much for my child". Higher scores indicate beverage is perceived as having too much added sugar.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Sports Drinks
units on a scaleCalorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning Label
Perceived Amount of Added Sugar in Sports Drinks2.7 ± 0.52.7 ± 0.5

Adverse events

Collected over 5 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Calorie Label0/108 (0%)0/108 (0%)0/108 (0%)
Sugar Graphic Warning Label0/108 (0%)0/108 (0%)0/108 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
Mean40 ± 740 ± 740 ± 7
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
Gender — Male8715
Gender — Female97101198
Gender — Non-binary / Gender non-conforming303
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
Hispanic or Latino7310
Not Hispanic or Latino101105206
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian303
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American384886
White5753110
More than one race8513
Unknown or Not Reported213
Education level
Education level(Participants)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
Less than high school123
High school graduate or received GED91221
Associates degree91524
Some college181331
College/University degree323264
Graduate or professional education393473
Number of children in household
Number of children in household(Participants)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
1 child291544
2 children485098
3 children172643
4 or more children141731
Number of adults in household
Number of adults in household(Participants)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
1 adult323264
2 adults6162123
3 or more adults151429
Marital status
Marital status(Participants)Calorie LabelSugar Graphic Warning LabelTotal
Married or living with partner7364137
Single (never married, divorced, widowed, separated)354479
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 24, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Mar 7, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — In the consenting process, participants agreed that de-identified data produced from this project may be distributed for future research studies without additional informed consent. Any de-identified data shared will be done so via PennBox, a secure method to transfer files.

Supporting information: Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: starting 6 months after publication

Access criteria: The PI will review requests to use de-identified study data.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05079477
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 15, 2021
Start date
Oct 6, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 17, 2023
Completion
Jan 17, 2023
Results posted
Apr 4, 2024
Last update
Apr 4, 2024

Study contacts

Christina A Roberto, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion