CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07625969Updated Jul 7, 2026

Using Single and Combined Nudge Strategies to Promote Healthier Beverage Intake Among College Students

An interventional study of choice architecture and choice architecture in Obesity and Food Selection, sponsored by Nanjing Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Nanjing Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study was to examine whether three nudging strategies influence beverage consumption behavior among Chinese university students. These interventions included health warning messages, hedonic labeling, and a combination of health warning and hedonic labeling. A between-subjects experimental design with a single factor was employed to assess the effects of these strategies on students' choices between sugar-sweetened and sugar-free beverages, thereby evaluating their effectiveness in promoting healthier beverage selections.

Read the detailed description

As the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and chronic diseases continues to escalate, excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has emerged as a growing public health concern globally. One approach to reducing beverage intake while conserving resources is the utilization of nudge strategies. Nudge strategies, characterized by their low cost and ease of implementation, facilitate individuals in making more accurate and beneficial choices in a predictable manner, through subtle interventions that do not prohibit any options or significantly alter incentives. This study will be conducted in a classroom setting, where participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: a no-nudge control group, a health warning group, a hedonic labeling group, and a combined health warning plus hedonic labeling group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Food Selection
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • college students
  • willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

none

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    In this group, no nudge interventions were implemented, only data were collected.

  • Experimental
    choice architecture (health warning Information)

    The platform presented information outlining the potential health risks associated with excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.

    Behavioral: choice architecture

  • Experimental
    choice architecture (hedonic label Information)

    Students are exposed to hedonic information about sugar-free beverages on the Wenjuanxing platform to "nudge" students towards healthier choices

    Behavioral: choice architecture

  • Experimental
    choice architecture (hedonic label Information+health warning Information)

    Students receive both health-risk messages about sugary drinks and hedonic information about sugar-free beverages on the Wenjuanxing platform, combining two nudging strategies to promote healthier choices.

    Behavioral: choice architecture

Interventions

  • Behavioralchoice architecture

    Showing the various harms that can come from long-term excessive consumption of sugary beverages on the platform.

  • Behavioralchoice architecture

    The platform shows the hedonic information about sugar-free beverages.

  • Behavioralchoice architecture

    The platform shows both hedonic information about sugar-free beverages and information on the various harms of long-term excessive sugary beverage consumption.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion (or likelihood) of selecting sugar-free beverages

    The probability of choosing a sugar-free beverage (binary outcome: sugar-sweetened = 0, sugar-free = 1) across five menu-selection tasks.

    Time frame: day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participants' Perceived Intrusiveness of Nudges

    A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater perceived intrusiveness.

    Time frame: day 1

  2. Participants' Support for Nudges

    A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater support for the nudging strategy

    Time frame: day 1

  3. Participants' Perceived effectiveness of Nudges

    A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater perceived effectiveness.

    Time frame: day 1

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Nanjing Medical University
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07625969
Lead sponsor
Nanjing Medical University
Responsible party
Yuan He (Professor, Nanjing Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Start date
Jul 2, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Yuan He
Contact
heyuan@njmu.edu.cn
18651625286

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion