CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05069168Updated Jan 30, 2025

Predictors of Left Ventricular Systolic Function Recovery After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

An observational study in Left Ventricular Systolic Function, sponsored by Assiut University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-30.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
75
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Investigate the preprocedural predictors of left ventricular systolic function Recovery after TAVR

Read the detailed description

Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valve disease in the western world requiring intervention,Although Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) was considered as the first therapeutic method, approximately one-third of AS patients cannot undergo SAVR due to its' high risk or contraindication.

Since Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)was performed for the first time in 2002,TAVR has emerged as a growing prevalent treatment on severe symptomatic AS with the procedure initially performed on the inoperable patients with intermediate and high risks.

Recently, the Food and Drug Administration had approved it on low-risk symptomatic subjects.

AS has to be considered a disease of the left ventricle (LV) rather than purely affecting the aortic valve, Approximately one-third of patients with severe symptomatic AS have LV systolic dysfunction .

Recovery of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes after TAVR as shown by a lot of studies.

The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial demonstrated that recovery of LV function in patients with severe symptomatic AS and LV systolic dysfunction who underwent TAVR, occurs in 40% to 50% of patients .

Higher trans-aortic mean pressure gradient , less LV hypertrophy, Less LV fibrosis and absence of AF are predictors of recovery of LV function after TAVR .

However, there is still a scanty data about the predictors of LV function recovery after TAVR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Left Ventricular Systolic Function

Browse trials for

03

In context

Systolic Murmurs

146 studies on the registry are indexed under Systolic Murmurs; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is below the median of 200 across 53 observational studies indexed under Systolic Murmurs.

Browse Systolic Murmurs studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis eligible for TAVR with LV systolic function less than 50%

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis eligible for TAVR with LV systolic function less than 50%.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe Rheumatic or degenerative mitral regurgitation.
  • Previous Valve Replacement.
  • Previous myocardial infarction.
  • Previous Coronary Artery By Bass Graft (CABG)Surgery.
  • Post TAVR significant paravalvular leakage
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • LVEFrecovery

    patient who shows improvement of left ventricular systolic function

    Diagnostic Test: Echocardiography before and after TAVR

  • Non LVEF recovery

    patient who don't show improvement of left ventricular systolic function

    Diagnostic Test: Echocardiography before and after TAVR

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testEchocardiography before and after TAVR

    Evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis using :peak velocity ,peak and mean pressure gradient and aortic valve area by continuity equation.-Evaluation of left ventricular dimensions ,volumes and systolic function as assessed by ejection fraction (EF) by m-mode and biplane simpson's method at apical 4 and 2 chambers view Speckle tracking echocardiography(STE) Apical four-, three-, and two-chamber views were used to obtain longitudinal and circumferential strain before and follow-up after TAVR. cardiac CT :Routine full protocol before TAVR for evaluation and Detection and calculation of left ventricular fibrosis using extracellular volume. Coronary angiography:evaluate the presence of CAD and calculation of syntax score(SS)

    Also known as: cardiac computed tomography and coronary angiography

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. left ventricular systolic function recovery by ejection fraction

    absolute increase of ≥10% in EF compared with baseline

    Time frame: 30 days post TAVR

  2. left ventricular systolic function recovery by STE

    Myocardial recovery by STE is defined as a ≥20% relative increase in the magnitude of global longitudinal strain compared with baseline

    Time frame: 30 days post TAVR

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life assessment

    NIHA class .

    Time frame: 30days post TAVR

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medicine
    Assiut, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Passeri JJ, Elmariah S, Xu K, Inglessis I, Baker JN, Alu M, Kodali S, Leon MB, Svensson LG, Pibarot P, Fearon WF, Kirtane AJ, Vlahakes GJ, Palacios IF, Douglas PS; PARTNER Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and standard therapy in inoperable patients with aortic stenosis and low EF. Heart. 2015 Mar;101(6):463-71. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306737. Epub 2015 Jan 13. PubMed 25586156 ↗
  • Sato K, Kumar A, Jones BM, Mick SL, Krishnaswamy A, Grimm RA, Desai MY, Griffin BP, Rodriguez LL, Kapadia SR, Obuchowski NA, Popovic ZB. Reversibility of Cardiac Function Predicts Outcome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 11;6(7):e005798. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005798. PubMed 28698259 ↗
  • Han D, Tamarappoo B, Klein E, Tyler J, Chakravarty T, Otaki Y, Miller R, Eisenberg E, Park R, Singh S, Shiota T, Siegel R, Stegic J, Salseth T, Cheng W, Dey D, Thomson L, Berman D, Makkar R, Friedman J. Computed tomography angiography-derived extracellular volume fraction predicts early recovery of left ventricular systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan 22;22(2):179-185. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa310. PubMed 33324979 ↗
  • Jeong YJ, Ahn JM, Kang DY, Park H, Ko E, Kim HJ, Kim JB, Choo SJ, Lee SA, Park SJ, Kim DH, Park DW. Incidence, Predictors, and Prognostic Impact of Immediate Improvement in Left Ventricular Systolic Function After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2021 Aug 1;152:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.04.037. Epub 2021 Jun 11. PubMed 34127247 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05069168
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Anwar S Helen (Principle investigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 6, 2021
Start date
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 30, 2024
Last update
Jan 30, 2025

Study contacts

Hatem A Helmy
study director · Assiut University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion