ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04529577HIS-PrEFUpdated Feb 28, 2025

His-bundle Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

An interventional study of His-bundle pacing in His Bundle Pacing and Heart Failure, Systolic, sponsored by Region Skane. Recruiting at 3 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-28.

Sponsored by Region Skane · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2020; still recruiting 5 years 11 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study compares standard right ventricle apical pacing with so called His-bundle pacing, for patients with slightly or moderately reduced ejection fraction and atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker therapy. The primary outcome is left ventricular ejection fraction measured after 6 months.

Read the detailed description

Patients with reduced systolic ejection fraction (40≤ ejection fraction ≤55%) and pacemaker indication due to high degree AV block are included. The study has a randomized double blinded crossover design. Patients are implanted with a standard right ventricle lead and right atrial lead (if indicated), and in addition a His-bundle lead. Randomization is performed as to which pacing modality is used during the first 6 months. After 6 months the pacing modality is changed. Patients are blinded and endpoint adjudicators, including echocardiography staff, are blinded. Device nurse and physician are not blinded.

Primary endpoint is difference in left ventricular ejection fraction after 6 months, paired comparisons are used and each patient is their own control. Secondary endpoints include complications and safety of the device/electrode, and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • His Bundle Pacing
  • Heart Failure, Systolic

Keywords

  • His bundle pacing
  • Conduction system pacing
  • Heart failure, systolic
  • Quality of life
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction
03

In context

Heart Failure, Systolic

230 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure, Systolic; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 165 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure, Systolic.

Browse Heart Failure, Systolic studies →

Lead sponsor

Region Skane is the lead sponsor of 386 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • AV block II or III with high expected pacing need
  • between 40% and 55% (inclusive)
  • Willing to participate and sign

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years old
  • Pregnant
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Cardiac sarcoidosis
  • Cardiac amyloidosis
  • Previous myocardial infarction within last 3 months
  • Ventricular septum defect or other other left ventricular corrective surgery
  • Congenital heart disease surgically corrected
  • Atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled rate (if not planned for AV node ablation)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    His-bundle pacing first

    Patients are allocated to receive His-bundle pacing for a period of 6 months. Then the patients will cross over to traditional right ventricular (RV) apical pacing for 6 months.

    Device: His-bundle pacing

  • Experimental
    RV apical pacing first

    Patients are allocated to receive traditional RV apical pacing for a period of 6 months. Then the patients will cross over to His-bundle pacing for 6 months.

    Device: His-bundle pacing

Interventions

  • DeviceHis-bundle pacing

    A standard pacing electrode (Medtronic 4076) will be placed in RV apex (or RV septum as a secondary option) and in the right atrial appendage (if indicated). A dedicated His-bundle pacemaker electrode (Medtronic 3830) will be placed in the region of His bundle, using a dedicated introducer sheath (Medtronic C304 or Medtronic C315). His-bundle potentials will be identified and His-bundle capture (non-selective or selective) will be ascertained using an electrophysiology recording system. Device programming will focus on providing physiological atrioventricular delay and safety RV pacing as backup.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ejection Fraction

    Absolute difference in left ventricular systolic ejection fraction (absolute percent)

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Percentage of device-related adverse events. Events will be classified as general, associated with His-bundle lead or associated with RV lead

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Left ventricular activation time

    Total left ventricular mechanical activation time (measured with tissue doppler echocardiography)

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. NT-ProBNP

    Difference in NT-ProBNP levels

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. QRS duration

    Difference in total QRS duration on ECG

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Left Ventricular Activation Time (LVAT)

    Maximum unipolar spike-to-peak-T-wave in V5-V6

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. 6 minute walk test

    Difference in six minute hall walk test (meters)

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Change in quality of life measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) mean score

    Difference in health related quality of life, measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, calculated as difference in mean from baseline to follow-up (calculated using the official scoring algorithm, where each sub scale is assigned a score between 0-100, higher score represents better health)

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Change in quality of life measured by the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Difference in health related quality of life, measured by the mean score of the EQ-5D (version 5L) questionnaire (totalt score ranging from 5-25 points, higher score represents more health related problems/disability)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 60 months after the start.

Of 52 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, Systolic, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 60 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 24, 2020
First posted
Aug 27, 2020
StartActual
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2025
Last update
Feb 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04529577
Lead sponsor
Region Skane
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2020
Start date
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 28, 2025

Study contacts

Maiwand Farouq, MD, PhD
Contact
maiwand.farouq@skane.se
+ 46 40 336415‬
Rasmus Borgquist, MD
Contact
rasmus.borgquist@med.lu.se
+46 46 171010
Rasmus Borgquist, MD PhD
principal investigator · Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Arrhythmia Section, Lund, Sweden

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion