ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05056506Updated Aug 16, 2023

EPLBD With Limited EST vs. EPLBD for Choledocholithiasis

An interventional study of EPLBD and ELPBD+ESD in Choledocholithiasis, sponsored by Jianfeng Yang. Recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-16.

Sponsored by Jianfeng Yang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2023, 3 years ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for choledocholithiasis is known to be comparable to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) especially in cases of small stones. With larger stones (> 10 mm), EPBD with conventional balloon, which have a diameter of 6-8 mm, was reported as less effective for extraction of stones, requiring additional mechanical lithotripsy (ML). The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of limited EST plus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EST-EPBD) with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large choledocholithiasis.

Read the detailed description

ERCP is the best option to remove bile duct stones. It can be done by either endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD). Large bile duct stones appear to be more difficult to remove with conventional methods, such as EST and EPBD. Therefore, extraction of large bile duct stones may require mechanical lithotripsy (ML) as an adjunctive procedure. The primary complication of ML is basket and stone impaction, which can lead to complications such as pancreatitis and cholangitis. Some recent studies have reported the efficacy of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) alone or combined with limited EST, establishing it as a safe treatment for the removal of large bile duct stones. The investigators conducted the present study to compare the therapeutic outcome and complications between EPLBD alone and limited EST plus EPLBD for the treatment of large bile duct stones.

02

Conditions studied

  • Choledocholithiasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
  • Complication
  • Safety
  • Choledocholithiasis
03

In context

Choledocholithiasis

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Choledocholithiasis; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 168 is above the median of 100 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Choledocholithiasis.

Browse Choledocholithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jianfeng Yang as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • large bile duct stones (≥10 mm)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • refusal of written
  • Patients with benign or malignant biliary stricture
  • to ERCP exist
  • Complicated with acute pancreatitis or acute cholangitis
  • Coagulation dysfunction,thrombocytopenia
  • prior EST or EPBD
  • Patients after gastrointestinal reconstruction
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
168 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation group

    Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation to extract bile duct stones

    Procedure: EPLBD

  • Experimental
    Endoscopic papillary Large balloon dilation combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy group

    Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy to extract bile duct stones

    Procedure: ELPBD+ESD

Interventions

  • ProcedureEPLBD

    Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for Choledocholithiasis

  • ProcedureELPBD+ESD

    Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for Choledocholithiasis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of complications

    The incidence of complications

    Time frame: within 1 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. The success rate of 1st session treatment

    The success rate of 1st session treatment

    Time frame: within 1 months after the procedure

  2. The rate of mechanical lithotripsy

    The rate of mechanical lithotripsy

    Time frame: within 1 months after the procedure

  3. Total ercp times

    Total ercp numbers

    Time frame: within 1 months after the procedure

  4. Overall successful stone removal rate

    Overall successful stone removal rate

    Time frame: within 1 months after the procedure

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hwang JC, Kim JH, Lim SG, Kim SS, Shin SJ, Lee KM, Yoo BM. Endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for the treatment of large bile duct stones. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 17;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-15. PubMed 23324454 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 16, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05056506
Lead sponsor
Jianfeng Yang
Collaborators
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital Tongji University
Responsible party
Jianfeng Yang (Professor, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 16, 2023

Study contacts

Jianfeng Yang, Doctor
Contact
yjf-1976@163.com
086-13454132186
Lei Lu
Contact
zacharylu@126.com
086-13758268293
Xiaofeng Zhang
principal investigator · Zhejiang University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion