ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05056376Updated Nov 5, 2026Results posted

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Fully-Automated Digital vs. Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Programs

An interventional study of Digital Diabetes Prevention Program (dDPP) and Human Coach-based Diabetes Prevention Program (hDPP) in PreDiabetes, Hyperglycemia and Glucose, High Blood, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Nov 5, 2026Study documents postedPosted results revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
368
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of a fully automated digital diabetes prevention program to standard of care human coach-based diabetes prevention programs for promoting clinically meaningful lifestyle changes to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes in adults with prediabetes.

Read the detailed description

After being informed about the study and potential risk, all participants giving written informed consent will undergo screening to determine eligibility for study entry. At baseline visit (month 0). Participants who meet the eligibility requirements will be randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to human coach-based diabetes prevention program or digital diabetes prevention program. An equal number of participants will be randomly assigned to both groups (like flipping a coin).

If participants are randomly assigned to receive the human coach-based diabetes prevention program, the participants will be referred to a local Diabetes Prevention Program close to the participants' area. The Diabetes Prevention Program consists of 16 weekly sessions during months 1 to 6 and 6 sessions during months 7 to 12. These group sessions may be delivered in-person at the local program or remotely using video conferencing. During these sessions, participants will receive information about lifestyle change behaviors focusing on weight loss, physical activity, and nutrition from a trained lifestyle coach.

If participants are randomly assigned to receive the digital Diabetes Prevention Program, the participants will receive the Sweetch Digital Health Kit (Sweetch Health, Ltd.) in the mail within approximately 8-12 days of the participants' first study visit. The Sweetch digital health kit consists of a smartphone app and a digital body weight scale that is connected via Bluetooth to the app. The phone app also consists of brief Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lessons on type 2 diabetes prevention, which participants will be encouraged to complete.

There will be a total of 3 study visits (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months), each visit includes fingerstick hemoglobin A1C measurement, weight measurement, and completion of several questionnaires. Height will be measured at the first visit. Throughout the 12-month study, participants will be asked to wear a device on the participants' wrist to measure physical activity for 7 consecutive days following the first visit and once every month thereafter.

02

Conditions studied

  • PreDiabetes
  • Hyperglycemia
  • Glucose, High Blood
  • Overweight
  • Prediabetic State
  • Impaired Glucose Tolerance
  • Obesity
  • Weight Loss
  • Lifestyle, Healthy
  • Lifestyle Risk Reduction
  • Lifestyle, Sedentary

Keywords

  • Prediabetes
  • Diabetes Prevention Program
  • DPP
  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Physical Activity
  • Digital
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Weight
03

In context

Prediabetic State

918 studies on the registry are indexed under Prediabetic State; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 368 is above the median of 62 across 762 interventional studies indexed under Prediabetic State.

Browse Prediabetic State studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of signed and dated form.
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
  • Laboratory evidence of prediabetes, defined as any of the following lab results, in the past year:

    1. 5.7% to 6.4%
    2. Fasting glucose 100-125 mg/dL
    3. Plasma glucose of 140-199 mg/dL measured 2 hours after a 75 gm glucose load
  • (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (or≥23 kg/m2 for Asians).
  • Proficiency in reading English.
  • Smartphone user (Android Operating System (OS) 9.0 or iOS 13.3 or newer).
  • Plans to reside in recruitment area for the next 12 months (participant's zip code of residence is within \~45 miles of the study recruitment site.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical conditions that prevent adoption of moderate physical activity (per primary care clinician).
  • Aortic stenosis.
  • Unstable cardiac disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke in previous 6 months, currently participating in cardiac rehabilitation).
  • Has a pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), or other implanted electronic device.
  • Use of any glucose-lowering medications, weight loss medications, or any systemic within the previous 3 months.
  • Active of any type or diagnosed with or treated for cancer within the past 2 years. Individuals with basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated will be allowed to participate.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy in the next 12 months.
  • Anemia.
  • Receiving treatment for iron-deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, or folate d efficiency.
  • Hemoglobinopathy (HbS or HbC disease).
  • Blood transfusion in previous 4 months.
  • On dialysis or active organ transplant list.
  • Treated with erythropoietin.
  • Major psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia) or use of antipsychotic medications within the past 1 year.
  • Dementia or Alzheimer's disease.
  • Diagnosed with an eating disorder (anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, Pica, rumination disorder, other specified or unspecified feeding or eating disorder)
  • Diagnosed or self-reported alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Known allergy to steel.
  • Participation in another clinical trial related to lifestyle management or diabetes prevention.
  • Currently attending or attended a diabetes prevention program in the previous 2 years.
  • Unwilling to accept random assignments.
  • Had bariatric surgery within the 12 months prior randomization or is planning to undergo bariatric surgery during the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
368 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fully-Automated Digital Diabetes Prevention Program

    Participants will receive Sweetch Digital Diabetes Prevention Program consists of a smartphone app and bluetooth-enabled digital body weight scale that syncs with the app.

    Behavioral: Digital Diabetes Prevention Program (dDPP)

  • Active comparator
    Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program

    Participants will attend a total of 16 weekly sessions during months 1 to 6 and 6 sessions during months 7 to 12. These group sessions may be delivered in-person at the local program or remotely using video conferencing. During these sessions, participants will receive information about lifestyle change behaviors focusing on weight loss, physical activity, and nutrition from a trained lifestyle coach.

    Behavioral: Human Coach-based Diabetes Prevention Program (hDPP)

Interventions

  • BehavioralDigital Diabetes Prevention Program (dDPP)

    The Sweetch app is a hyper-personalized mobile digital coach that provides users with tailored recommendations to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors (150 minutes per week of physical activity, weight reduction, and healthy eating habits) to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. The Sweetch app uses self-tracking and multiple evidence-based persuasive eCoaching strategies. The Sweetch artificial intelligence algorithm delivers just-in-time support and/or adapt recommendations based on the user's response. For example, push notifications will be sent when the algorithm detects that the user is potentially available and able to act upon the recommendation, based on various parameters including location, previous response, calendar availability, and weather, etc.

  • BehavioralHuman Coach-based Diabetes Prevention Program (hDPP)

    The Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program will consist of a CDC recognized lifestyle change program. Participants will attend a total of 16 weekly sessions during months 1 to 6 and 6 sessions during months 7 to 12. These group sessions may be delivered in-person at the local program or remotely using video conferencing. During these sessions, participants will receive information about lifestyle change behaviors focusing on weight loss, physical activity, and nutrition from a trained lifestyle coach.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Achievement of CDC's Benchmark for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction as a Binary Outcome (Yes/no)

    The primary outcome was the CDC-defined diabetes risk reduction benchmark at 12 months (based on the 2021 standards), defined as at least one of the following: 1. Weight loss of ≥5%. 2. Weight loss of ≥4% combined with at least 150 weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA 3. An absolute decrease of ≥0.2 points in A1C (measured in %). The A1C endpoint was applicable only to participants with baseline A1C of 5.7% to 6.4%. Maintaining an A1C \<6.5% throughout the study was also a criterion for the primary outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute Weight Change

    Absolute weight change (kilograms) from baseline to 12 months

    Time frame: At 12 months

  2. Cost-effectiveness as Assessed by the Markov Model

    The investigators will compare the cost-effectiveness of the two interventions based on lifetime horizon by constructing a Markov model with model parameters populated from the trial results as well as other published literature. The model will estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between the two interventions.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Change in Hemoglobin A1C

    Change in HbA1C (percentage points) from baseline to 12 months (among participants with baseline HbA1C of 5.7% - 6.4% who completed the 12-month study visit).

    Time frame: At 12 months

  4. Percentage Change in Weight

    Percentage change in weight from baseline to 12 months

    Time frame: At 12 months

  5. Mean Weekly Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)

    Average minutes/week of physical activity assessed using blinded Actigraphy (monthly serial consecutive 7-days wear period). If the participant did not wear their monitor for at least 5 of their 7 assigned days, they were considered noncompliant. In this case, the participant was assigned 0 minutes for physical activity for that week.To obtain the average MVPA minutes per week across the study period, the total MVPA minutes per week from all valid wear periods were summed and divided by the number of available wear periods (maximum of 11 post-baseline visits). Specifically, activity intensity was classified as MVPA if the vector magnitude of accelerometer counts per minute was equal to or greater than 3941 (Montoye's cut point).

    Time frame: At 12 months

  6. Incidence of Diabetes-range A1C

    Number of individuals who had an AIC in the diabetes range (A1C ≥6.5%) at the 6-month or 12-month timepoint.

    Time frame: At either 6 or 12 months

  7. Acceptability as Assessed by the Diabetes Prevention Program Acceptability Scale (DPPAS)

    Acceptability of the assigned intervention was assessed at 12 months using the Diabetes Prevention Program Acceptability Scale (DPPAS), Score range from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate greater acceptability (better outcome).

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Correlation Between Self-reported and Measured Physical Activity

    To evaluate the correlation between self-reported PA data collected using different methods: * Data collected and reported by hDPPs * Self-reported PA data collected by study team obtained at 1-month intervals * Objectively measured PA data (Actigraphy) obtained at 1-month intervals

    Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

  9. Program Initiation Rate

    Program initiators were defined as participants who attended at least one in-person session (Human-DPP) or registered and used the Sweetch app (AI-DPP).

    Time frame: At 12 months

  10. Program Completion Rate

    Program completers attended ≥8 sessions in months 1-6 and spanned ≥9 months (Human-DPP), or engaged with the app for ≥8 weeks during months 1-6 with a span of ≥9 months between initiation and last engagement (AI-DPP).

    Time frame: At 12 months

07

Results

Posted Dec 17, 2025
Limitations and caveats
This study has limitations. It was unmasked, relied on surrogate outcomes, and DPP delivery may have varied by site. App updates and study visits outside standard DPP exposures may have influenced outcomes. Referrals were not from primary care, and missing data or assumptions about physical activity had minimal sensitivity impacts. COVID-19 altered DPP delivery, and results may not generalize to broader prediabetes populations due to the sample's high activity levels and education.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Started183185
Completed151149
Not completed3236

Outcome measures

PrimaryAchievement of CDC's Benchmark for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction as a Binary Outcome (Yes/no)

The primary outcome was the CDC-defined diabetes risk reduction benchmark at 12 months (based on the 2021 standards), defined as at least one of the following: 1. Weight loss of ≥5%. 2. Weight loss of ≥4% combined with at least 150 weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA 3. An absolute decrease of ≥0.2 points in A1C (measured in %). The A1C endpoint was applicable only to participants with baseline A1C of 5.7% to 6.4%. Maintaining an A1C \<6.5% throughout the study was also a criterion for the primary outcome.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Achievement of CDC's Benchmark for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction as a Binary Outcome (Yes/no)
ParticipantsArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Achievement of CDC's Benchmark for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction as a Binary Outcome (Yes/no)5859
Statistical analysis
  • Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP) vs Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP) · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.05
SecondaryAbsolute Weight Change

Absolute weight change (kilograms) from baseline to 12 months

Time frame:
At 12 months
Reported as:
Median · Kg
Absolute Weight Change
KgArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Absolute Weight Change-1.00 (-3.20 to 1.50)-1.30 (-4.30 to 1.10)
SecondaryCost-effectiveness as Assessed by the Markov Model

The investigators will compare the cost-effectiveness of the two interventions based on lifetime horizon by constructing a Markov model with model parameters populated from the trial results as well as other published literature. The model will estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between the two interventions.

Time frame:
12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange in Hemoglobin A1C

Change in HbA1C (percentage points) from baseline to 12 months (among participants with baseline HbA1C of 5.7% - 6.4% who completed the 12-month study visit).

Time frame:
At 12 months
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of Total Hemoglobin
Change in Hemoglobin A1C
Percentage of Total HemoglobinArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Change in Hemoglobin A1C0.0 (-0.2 to 0.1)-0.1 (-0.2 to 0.1)
SecondaryPercentage Change in Weight

Percentage change in weight from baseline to 12 months

Time frame:
At 12 months
Reported as:
Median · percentage change
Percentage Change in Weight
percentage changeArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Percentage Change in Weight-1.03 (-3.73 to 1.46)-1.43 (-4.03 to 1.14)
SecondaryMean Weekly Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)

Average minutes/week of physical activity assessed using blinded Actigraphy (monthly serial consecutive 7-days wear period). If the participant did not wear their monitor for at least 5 of their 7 assigned days, they were considered noncompliant. In this case, the participant was assigned 0 minutes for physical activity for that week.To obtain the average MVPA minutes per week across the study period, the total MVPA minutes per week from all valid wear periods were summed and divided by the number of available wear periods (maximum of 11 post-baseline visits). Specifically, activity intensity was classified as MVPA if the vector magnitude of accelerometer counts per minute was equal to or greater than 3941 (Montoye's cut point).

Time frame:
At 12 months
Reported as:
Median · Minutes per Week
Mean Weekly Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)
Minutes per WeekArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Mean Weekly Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)210.5 (134.5 to 344)174.4 (73.9 to 321.3)
SecondaryIncidence of Diabetes-range A1C

Number of individuals who had an AIC in the diabetes range (A1C ≥6.5%) at the 6-month or 12-month timepoint.

Time frame:
At either 6 or 12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Diabetes-range A1C
ParticipantsArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Incidence of Diabetes-range A1C87
SecondaryAcceptability as Assessed by the Diabetes Prevention Program Acceptability Scale (DPPAS)

Acceptability of the assigned intervention was assessed at 12 months using the Diabetes Prevention Program Acceptability Scale (DPPAS), Score range from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate greater acceptability (better outcome).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Acceptability as Assessed by the Diabetes Prevention Program Acceptability Scale (DPPAS)
score on a scaleArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Acceptability as Assessed by the Diabetes Prevention Program Acceptability Scale (DPPAS)3.12 (2.98 to 3.26)3.95 (3.81 to 4.09)
SecondaryCorrelation Between Self-reported and Measured Physical Activity

To evaluate the correlation between self-reported PA data collected using different methods: * Data collected and reported by hDPPs * Self-reported PA data collected by study team obtained at 1-month intervals * Objectively measured PA data (Actigraphy) obtained at 1-month intervals

Time frame:
6 months and 12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProgram Initiation Rate

Program initiators were defined as participants who attended at least one in-person session (Human-DPP) or registered and used the Sweetch app (AI-DPP).

Time frame:
At 12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Program Initiation Rate
ParticipantsArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Program Initiation Rate171153
SecondaryProgram Completion Rate

Program completers attended ≥8 sessions in months 1-6 and spanned ≥9 months (Human-DPP), or engaged with the app for ≥8 weeks during months 1-6 with a span of ≥9 months between initiation and last engagement (AI-DPP).

Time frame:
At 12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Program Completion Rate
ParticipantsArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
Program Completion Rate11793

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until the end of follow-up (12-month visit). Non-serious events are listed at a 0.5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)0/183 (0%)36/183 (19.7%)10/183 (5.5%)
Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)0/185 (0%)6/185 (3.2%)3/185 (1.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent serious events
EventArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
COVID-19Infections and infestations4/1831/185
Chest PainCardiac disorders3/1830/185
Breast malignant tumorsNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)2/1831/185
Flank painRenal and urinary disorders2/1830/185
Atrioventricular blockCardiac disorders1/1830/185
Fracture of ankleMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1830/185
AppendicitisGastrointestinal disorders1/1830/185
PhacoemulsificationEye disorders1/1830/185
Diabetes mellitusEndocrine disorders1/1830/185
OtalgiaEar and labyrinth disorders1/1830/185
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventArtificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/1831/185
ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1830/185
Foreign body in earInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1830/185
Radius fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1830/185
Generalized anxiety disorderPsychiatric disorders1/1830/185
MigraineNervous system disorders1/1830/185
Kidney stoneRenal and urinary disorders1/1830/185
OsteopeniaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1830/185
Neuropathy peripheralNervous system disorders1/1830/185
Plantar fasciitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1830/185

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
Median60.0 (51.0 to 68.0)57.0 (50.0 to 63.0)58.0 (50.0 to 65.0)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
Female121139260
Male6246108
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
Race — American Indian or Alaskan Native011
Race — Asian111627
Race — Black or African American5149100
Race — White or Caucasian114111225
Race — More than One Race358
Race — Other426
Race — Declined to Answer011
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
Ethnicity — Not Hispanic or Latino176167343
Ethnicity — Hispanic or Latino51520
Ethnicity — Declined to Answer112
Ethnicity — Unknown123
Marital Status
Marital Status(Participants)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
Married/Partnered120121241
Previously Married272653
Single/Other363874
Educational Attainment
Educational Attainment(Participants)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
High School or Less231942
Some College/Associate's Degree383674
Bachelor's Degree5355108
Graduate/Professional Degree6974143
Declined to Answer011
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(Kg/m^2)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
Median32.2 (28.2 to 35.9)32.5 (29.3 to 37.7)32.3 (28.5 to 37.1)
Dyslipidemia
Dyslipidemia(Participants)Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (AI-DPP)Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program (Human-DPP)Total
Count of participants8586171

10 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Reading Hospital - Tower Health
    Reading, Pennsylvania 19611, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lalani B, Eaton C, Zade D, Riekert K, Maruthur N, Dobs A, Mathioudakis N. Patient engagement, acceptability, and preference of artificial intelligence versus human coaching for diabetes prevention. NPJ Digit Med. 2026 Aug 3;9(1):849. doi: 10.1038/s41746-026-03063-w. PubMed 42982853 ↗
  • Lalani B, Siew G, Valdez Y, Shehadeh A, Zade D, Riekert K, Mathioudakis N; AI-DPP Study Group. User Engagement and Feature Preferences in an AI-Powered mHealth Intervention for Diabetes Prevention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2026 Sep 2;14:e92981. doi: 10.2196/92981. PubMed 42685343 ↗
  • Mathioudakis N, Lalani B, Abusamaan MS, Alderfer M, Alver D, Dobs A, Kane B, McGready J, Riekert K, Ringham B, Shehadeh A, Vandi F, Wanigatunga AA, Zade D, Maruthur NM; AI-DPP Study Group. An AI-Powered Lifestyle Intervention vs Human Coaching in the Diabetes Prevention Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Dec 16;334(23):2079-2089. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.19563. PubMed 41144242 ↗
  • Abusamaan MS, Ballreich J, Dobs A, Kane B, Maruthur N, McGready J, Riekert K, Wanigatunga AA, Alderfer M, Alver D, Lalani B, Ringham B, Vandi F, Zade D, Mathioudakis NN. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence vs. human coaching in diabetes prevention: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 May 16;25(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08177-8. PubMed 38755706 ↗

Related links

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The Data Coordinating Center (Johns Hopkins University) will prepare a de-identified database that is consistent with HIPAA requirements. The de-identified database will include all study research data and will be stored in a repository at Johns Hopkins University (archive.data.jhu.edu) at a time that will coincide with the online publication of the study primary endpoint paper. The repository will contain documentation designed to facilitate use of the database. The documentation prepared for the repository will include a list and timetable for secondary and exploratory papers planned by the study investigators. Access to the database will be restricted to qualified users. Qualified users will include those investigators who submit valid pre-specified hypotheses and certify that they will not use the data for commercial purposes.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: The study protocol will be submitted for publication within 1 year of the start of enrollment.

10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 38 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2025, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 378 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Prediabetic State, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 39. This study's 38 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 424 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 14, 2021
First posted
Sep 24, 2021
StartActual
Oct 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 16, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 16, 2024
Results first posted
Dec 17, 2025
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Results
Posted results revised
revised Nov 5, 2026
Documents
Publications
1 publication citing this study linked from PubMed, e.g. PubMed 42685343 ↗
Nov 5, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedAcceptability as Assessed by the 32-itemDiabetes Prevention Program Acceptability QuestionnaireScale (DPPAS)Time frame: 12 months
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Posted results revised
    Publications 1 publication citing this study linked from PubMed, e.g. PubMed 42685343 ↗
    Secondary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedAcceptability as Assessed by the 32-itemDiabetes Prevention Program Acceptability QuestionnaireScale (DPPAS)Time frame: 12 months
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05056376
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 24, 2021
Start date
Oct 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 16, 2024
Completion
Dec 16, 2024
Results posted
Dec 17, 2025
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD MHS
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion