ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05056220Updated Feb 3, 2026

Personalized Long-term Human Albumin Treatment in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis and Ascites

A Phase 3 interventional study of Human albumin and sodium chloride in Decompensated Cirrhosis and Ascites, sponsored by Aleksander Krag. Recruiting at 12 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-03.

Sponsored by Aleksander Krag · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical biomarker validation trial is to test the effect of a predictive biomarker panel to human albumin infusions in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • If the predictive biomarker panel can identify patients who are likely to benefit from regular human albumin infusions
  • If the predictive biomarker panel can lower the number-needed-to-treat of regular human albumin infusions in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites

The predictive biomarker panel will stratify patients into either a high- or low-expected effect of human albumin infusions. Hereafter are participants randomized into treatment arms.

Participants in the active treatment arm will receive regular human albumin infusions during a course of 6 months. Infusions will occur every 10th day for the duration of the study.

Researchers will compare 20% human albumin infusions with regular 0.9% sodium chloride to identify the effects on the number of liver-related events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Decompensated Cirrhosis and Ascites

Browse trials for

03

In context

Ascites

247 studies on the registry are indexed under Ascites; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 240 is above the median of 54 across 179 interventional studies indexed under Ascites.

Browse Ascites studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Aleksander Krag as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Decompensated liver cirrhosis defined as score 7-12
  • Clinical and/or ultrasound evidenced ascites
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • At least five days since resolution of a decompensation event or any condition requiring hospitalisation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute or subacute liver failure without underlying cirrhosis
  • Patients with cirrhosis who develop decompensation in the postoperative period following partial hepatectomy
  • ascites as defined by the International Ascites Club
  • Existing TIPS inserted \<6 months ago
  • Portal vein thrombosis without signs of cavernous transformation or recanalization
  • Severe alcoholic hepatitis (Glasgow Alcoholic Hepatitis Score > 11)
  • Hepatic encephalopathy grade III-IV
  • Current, planned or previous treatment with direct antiviral agents for virus (HCV) in the last six months for human albumin infusion (pulmonary oedema, etc.)
  • Evidence of current except for non-melanocytic skin cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma within Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-0 or BCLC-A
  • Presence or history of severe extra-hepatic diseases (e.g.,chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis, severe heart disease ( > II); severe chronic pulmonary disease (GOLD Score ≥ C), severe neurological and psychiatric disorders, pulmonary arterial hypertension)
  • positive or other condition associated with and/or requiring
  • Previous liver or other transplantation
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding
  • Patients who decline to participate, patients who cannot provide prior written due to other causes than hepatic encephalopathy or patients with hepatic encephalopathy who cannot provide prior written informed consent and when there is documented evidence that the patient has no legal surrogate decision maker or sufficient ability to provide delayed informed consent
  • Physician's denial (investigator considers that the patient will not adhere to the study protocol scheduled, e.g. in case of heavy drinking)
  • Participation in another study within 3 months prior to screening
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    High expected effect: Human Albumin 20% + Standard Medical Treatment

    Participants stratified to a high expected effect of human albumin and randomized to active treatment with 20% Human Albumin infusions.

    Drug: Human albumin

  • Placebo comparator
    High expected effect: Saline (NaCl 0.9%) + Standard Medical Treatment

    Participants stratified to a high expected effect of human albumin and randomized to placebo treatment with 0.9% NaCl (saline) infusions.

    Drug: sodium chloride

  • Active comparator
    Low expected effect: Human Albumin 20% + Standard Medical Treatment

    Participants stratified to a low expected effect of human albumin and randomized to active treatment with 20% Human Albumin infusions.

    Drug: Human albumin

  • Placebo comparator
    Low expected effect: Saline (NaCl 0.9%) + Standard Medical Treatment

    Participants stratified to a low expected effect of human albumin and randomized to placebo treatment with 0.9% NaCl (saline) infusions.

    Drug: sodium chloride

Interventions

  • 20% Human Albumin infusions (every 10th day +/- 4 days) with dosing according to the participants bodyweight (1.5 grams of albumin per kg bodyweight with a maximum of 100 grams)

  • Drugsodium chloride

    0.9% NaCl infusions (every 10th day +/- 4 days) with dosing according to the corresponding volume used of 20% Human Albumin (1.5 grams of albumin per kg bodyweight with a maximum of 100 grams)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative number of liver-related clinical outcomes

    Cumulative number of liver-related clinical outcomes (variceal bleeding, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, infection requiring hospitalization, acute kidney injury and overt hepatic encephalopathy) and TIPS (insertion or revision) with death and liver transplantation as counting and censoring events

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. 6-months survival

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. The number of episodes of acute-on-chronic liver failures

    Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is defined according to the CLIF-C ACLF definition.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of organ failures

    Where an organ failure is defined according to the CLIF-C ACLF definition.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Time-to-first liver-related clinical outcome

    A liver-related clinical outcome is defined as variceal bleeding, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, infection requiring hospitalization, acute kidney injury (\>=1B), overt hepatic encephalopathy, TIPS insertion, liver transplantation or death. Time to any of these outcomes are defined as the time from trial inclusion until 1) the date of diagnosis of any of the complications, 2) the date of the procedure (TIPS or liver transplantation) or date of death.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Change in SF-36

    Quality of life for participants, as measured by Short Form 36 (SF-36), ranging from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 equal to maximum disability and score of 100 no disability.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Change in CLDQ

    Quality of life for participants, as measured by the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), consisting of 29 items within 7 domains. Response on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (most impairment) to 7 (least impairment). Total score by adding score for each item and divide by number of items (29).

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Change in EQ-5D-5L

    Quality of life for participants, as measured by the EuroQoL-5 Domain, 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L). Consist of 5 domains with 5 levels where the lowest level (1) is the worst imaginable health and highest level (5) is the best imaginable health.

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Time to first hospital admission (in days)

    Time frame: 180 days

  9. Number of hospital admissions

    Time frame: 180 days

  10. Days spent on hospitalization (in days)

    Time frame: 180 days

  11. Number of intensive care unit admissions

    Time frame: 180 days

  12. Length of intensive care unit admissions (in days)

    Time frame: 180 days

  13. Number of large volume paracentesis

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. Analysis of the cost/effectiveness ratio

    Analyzed by an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculation

    Time frame: 6 months

  15. Health economic evaluation

    Analyzed by the change in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) relative to the ICER.

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Changes in serum albumin levels

    Measured from baseline and throughout the trial in grams per litre (g/L)

    Time frame: 6 months

  17. Number of treatment-related adverse events

    Adverse events which are deemed related to the trial intervention

    Time frame: 6 months

  18. Number of treatment-related serious adverse events

    Adverse events which are deemed related to the trial intervention

    Time frame: 6 months

  19. Signatures associated with a poor prognosis as defined by the Microb-Predict biomarker

    Change in concentration of the panel of predictive circulating metabolites compared to metabolite levels in other body fluid compartments (blood, urin, stool and saliva)

    Time frame: 6 months

  20. Incidence of refractory ascites

    Time frame: 6 months

  21. Incidence of variceal bleeding

    Time frame: 6 months

  22. Incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

    Time frame: 6 months

  23. Incidence of infection requiring hospitalization

    Time frame: 6 months

  24. Incidence of acute kidney injury >= 1B

    According to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition ranging from stage 1A to 3 where a higher stage is worse.

    Time frame: 6 months

  25. Incidence of hepatorenal syndrome acute kidney injury

    Time frame: 6 months

  26. Incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy

    Time frame: 6 months

  27. Incidence of liver transplantation

    Time frame: 6 months

  28. Incidence of TIPS insertion or revision

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

12 of 12 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Torp N, Israelsen M, Coenraad M, Papp M, Shawcross D, Korenjak M, Angeli P, Laleman W, Juanola A, Gines P, Trebicka J, Krag A; MICROB-PREDICT Consortium. Personalised human albumin in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: design and rationale for the ALB-TRIAL - a randomised clinical biomarker validation trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 14;14(2):e079309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079309. PubMed 38355195 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 31 months after the start.

Of 13 phase 3 interventional studies under Ascites, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 49. This study's planned 31 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2021
First posted
Sep 24, 2021
StartActual
Feb 26, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 2026
Last update
Feb 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05056220
Lead sponsor
Aleksander Krag
Collaborators
EASL - CLIF Consortium
Responsible party
Aleksander Krag (Professor, Odense University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2021
Start date
Feb 26, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 3, 2026

Study contacts

Aleksander Krag, Professor
Contact
albtrial@rsyd.dk
+4566113333
Jonel Trebicka, Professor
Contact
Aleksander Krag, Professor
principal investigator · Odense University Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion