CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05053230IMPROVEUpdated Aug 26, 2026

A Study Evaluating the Integrative Medicine at Home (IM@HOME) Program in People With Cancer

An interventional study of IM@Home and Enhanced usual care in Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Tumor and Thoracic Tumor, sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Active, not recruiting at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
324
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overarching long-term goal of the Integrative Medicine for Patient-reported Outcomes Values and Experience (IMPROVE) research program is to evaluate whether integrating a virtual mind-body programming, Integrative Medicine at Home (IM@Home), will improve patient perceived values, outcomes, and experiences as they undergo systemic cancer treatment such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted agents, cytoreductive surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Head and Neck Tumor
  • Thoracic Tumor
  • Thoracic Cancer
  • Gynecologic Cancer
  • Gynecologic Tumor
  • Melanoma
  • Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • head and neck tumor
  • thoracic tumors
  • gynecological tumors
  • melanoma
  • 21-369
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • ovarian cancer
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 551 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 324 is above the median of 47 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 1,930 studies on the registry; 328 are open to participants now.

Of its 129 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (51%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years or older
  • Karnofsky score 60 or greater
  • Life expectancy greater than six months
  • English speaking

Additional Inclusion Criteria for Head and Neck, Thoracic, Gynecologic, Melanoma and Breast Baskets

  • Patients with a diagnosis of head and neck tumors, thoracic tumors, gynecological tumors, melanoma, breast cancer, or gynecologic cancer
  • Actively receiving systemic oncological treatment or radiotherapy, or within 4 weeks of radiotherapy completion or primary cytoreductive surgery
  • Worst fatigue over the last 7 days rated 4 or greater on (0-10 scale)

Additional Inclusion Criteria for First Remission Gynecologic Cancer Basket

  • Patients with a diagnosis or clinical suspicion of gynecologic malignancy who have completed definitive first line treatment (maintenance hormonal or targeted therapies are allowed)

Additional Inclusion Criteria for the Advanced Cancer Basket:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of Stage III or IV lung cancer; any stage pancreatic cancer, unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, unresectable liver cancer, unresectable ampullary or peri-ampullary cancer, or other stage IV gastrointestinal cancer; stage III or IV ovarian or fallopian tube cancers or other stage IV gynecologic cancer; stage IV breast cancer; stage III testicular cancer or any stage IV genitourinary cancer; stage IV sarcoma; stage IV melanoma; stage IV endocrine cancer; lymphoma, myeloma, or Leukemia
  • Actively receiving oncological treatment, radiotherapy or active surveillance

Additional Inclusion Criteria for the Cancer Survivor Basket:

  • Completed active cancer treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) (maintenance hormonal or targeted therapies are allowed).
  • Worst fatigue over the last 7 days rated 4 or greater on (0-10 scale)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment that would preclude response to study assessments or require the use of Legally Authorized Representatives
  • Unwilling to accept random assignment
  • Concurrently enroll onto ongoing competing trials of integrative medicine interventions with symptom/toxicity as primary outcome. Note, however, patient will be allowed to enroll on other therapeutic protocols
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
324 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IM@Home

    Participants with head and neck tumors, thoracic tumors, gynecological tumors, melanoma, breast cancer, or ovarian cancer

    Behavioral: IM@Home

  • Other
    Enhanced usual care

    Participants with head and neck tumors, thoracic tumors, gynecological tumors, melanoma, breast cancer, or ovarian cancer

    Behavioral: Enhanced usual care

Interventions

  • BehavioralIM@Home

    Participants in the IM@Home group will receive a 12-week virtual, synchronous, mind-body and fitness program. The Classes will be conducted via Zoom video conferencing platform. Patients will choose from a variety of weekly classes, occurring one to four times per week. An Integrative Medicine Service (IMS) clinical therapist (e.g., licensed dance therapist, certified yoga instructor, nurse specialist/physical trainer) with specific expertise in the oncology setting will lead each session. Activities range from more movement-based (fitness, yoga, dance therapy, or tai chi) to meditative-based classes (meditation, guided meditation, or music therapy). All clinicians will provide an overview of the session, 25 to 40 minutes of content, and five minutes for feedback and discussion. Each class lasts 30 to 45 minutes with optional audio or video participant participation and group chat.

  • BehavioralEnhanced usual care

    Patients in the enhanced usual care will receive usual care. In addition, once enrolling into the trial, they will be given a handout to encourage them to visit the MSK's multimedia page on the Integrative Medicine website to access pre-recorded, on-demand meditation audio or video recordings for meditation, guided imagery, and relaxation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Fatigue Severity from the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)

    Primary outcome will be measured by the average fatigue severity measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The BFI is a 9-item instrument designed to assess one construct of fatigue severity in cancer and non-cancer populations. Three items ask patients to rate the severity of their fatigue at its "worst," "usual," and "now" during normal waking hours, with 0 being "no fatigue" and 10 being "fatigue as bad as you can imagine." Six items assess the amount that fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the patient's life during the past 24 hours. The interference items are measured on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being "does not interfere" and 10 being "completely interferes."59 A composite fatigue severity score can be found by averaging the 9 item scores.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom intensity as measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)

    The ESAS is a brief self-report tool of symptom intensity, initially developed for patients with advanced cancer.61 It includes nine common symptoms of advanced cancer (pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, shortness of breath), with the option of adding a tenth patient-specific symptom. It is designed to capture multidimensional symptom profiles over time by obtaining repeated quantitative measurements of symptom intensity with minimal patient burden. The original ESAS used visual analogue scales (VAS) to rate symptom intensity. A subsequent revised version replaced the VAS with 11-point numerical rating scales.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Insomnia severity as measured by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

    The ISI has 7 items rated on a 5-point Likert response scale (e.g., 0 = no problem; 4 = very severe problem), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28 with higher scores representing more severe insomnia symptoms. The usual recall period is the "last month." The ISI authors suggest the following guidelines for interpreting the ISI total score: \< 8, no clinically significant insomnia; 8-14, subthreshold insomnia; 15-21, clinical insomnia (moderate severity); \> 21, clinical insomnia (severe). The ISI has demonstrated internal consistency, reliability, construct validity, specificity and sensitivity in a representative sample of 1670 cancer patients. The ISI has established minimally important change values to ensure that the change is not only statistically, but also clinically, meaningful to patients. A reduction of eight points has been deemed to be clinically significant improvement.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Effect of treatments on psychological distress as measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    HADS is a 14-item scale with 7 items measuring depression and 7 items measuring anxiety. Each item is answered by the patient on a four-point (0-3) response category, so possible scores range from 0-21 for anxiety and depression, with higher scores indicating higher symptomatology. Established cutoffs are: 0-7 not significant; 8-10 subclinical; and 11-21 clinically significant depression/anxiety. Factor analysis showed two distinct but correlated factors of anxiety and depression. The scale scores have been shown to be both reliable and valid.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Pain as measured by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Scale v1.2 - Global Health

    Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Scale v1.2 - Global Health is a brief instrument composed of 10 items that demonstrates adequate reliability and validity as a measure of health-related QOL in general and clinical populations. Patients are asked to respond to questions 1-8 and 10 on a scale of 1-5. Question 9 is on a 0-10 scale (average pain rating). The measure yields two scores, Physical Health and Mental Health, that will be used as secondary outcomes to evaluate the effect of our interventions on QOL. These scores will be calculated using item-level calibrations based on item response theory (IRT) scaling and then transformed to T-Scores, which are standardized such that 50 represents the mean for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better Physical and Mental Health.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Participants treatment outcome expectancy as measured by Mao Expectancy of Treatment Effects (METE)

    Mao Expectancy of Treatment Effects (METE): is a four-item instrument originally developed as the Acupuncture Expectancy Scale (AES) by Mao (PI) et al. Outcome expectancy has long been considered an important predictor of treatment outcomes and has gained increasing recognition in clinical trials. It has demonstrated reliability (Cronbach's α of 0.82) and validity and is positively correlated with patient self-reported efficacy and satisfaction. The score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater expectancy. We will use this measure to explore whether expectancy predicts treatment outcomes and may impact the observed differences between groups.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Satisfaction of intervention

    Satisfaction will be measured through a five-point Likert scale assessing overall approval and recommendations for improvement. Trevino et al. (2020) demonstrated high engagement and satisfaction with IMS remotely delivered mind-body services, including fitness, meditation, yoga.77 Furthermore, qualitative interviews will be conducted using thematic content analysis to determine program satisfaction and triangulate quantitative data.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Recommendation of Intervention to Others

    Willingness to recommend the intervention will be measured by a one-item assessment. Participants will be asked their willingness to recommend the intervention to a friend, family member, or fellow cancer patient/survivor.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Number of Treatment Disruptions

    Record on treatment disruption will be extracted from MSK EMR via DataLine. This includes records on dose reduction, dose delay, and treatment discontinuation. Participants will also self-report and comment on treatment disruption in log. Dose reduction is defined as any dosage decrease or adjustment relative to dosage at the start of intended systemic regimen. Dose delay is defined as any delay or temporary stoppage in administration of systemic regimen relative to the intended schedule. Treatment discontinuation is defined as permanent discontinuation of the intended systemic regimen that does not include treatment completion during intervention. The treatment variables will be abstracted by the clinical research coordinators and adjudicated with guidance from the collaborating medical oncologists in the specific services.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Number of Unplanned medical visits

    Record on unplanned medical visits to the urgent care, emergency room, and hospitalization will be patient-reported and extracted from MSK EMR via DataLine. For each unplanned medical visit, CPT code, ICD-10 code, chief complaints, and the length of stay will be collected. Unplanned medical visit data will also be tracked at partner hospitals in collaboration with ambulatory care. Participants will also self-report and comment on unplanned medical visits in log.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Participant Attendance to IM@Home Sessions

    Participants will self-report attendance in a weekly log of the number and type of classes attended. Once randomized, participants will be instructed to record their attendance in the mind-body classes throughout the week. A log will be sent out through the MSK Engage, where participants can fill out their attendance at the end of each week.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge (Limited Protocol Activities)
    Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth (Limited Protocol Activities)
    Middletown, New Jersey 07748, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen (Limited Protocol Activities)
    Montvale, New Jersey 07645, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center @ Suffolk - Commack (Limited Protocol Activities)
    Commack, New York 11725, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester (Limited Protocol Activities)
    Harrison, New York 10604, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau (Limited Protocol Activities)
    Uniondale, New York 11553, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bryl KL, Silverwood S, Desai K, Schobert K, Li X, Chimonas S, Mao JJ, Gillespie EF. Benefits and Challenges of a Digital Exercise and Mind-Body Program During Active Cancer Treatment: Qualitative Study of Patients' Perceptions. JMIR Cancer. 2026 Jan 16;12:e80075. doi: 10.2196/80075. PubMed 41543884 ↗
  • Mao JJ, Bryl K, Gillespie EF, Green A, Hung TKW, Baser R, Panageas K, Postow MA, Daly B. Randomized clinical trial of a digital integrative medicine intervention among patients undergoing active cancer treatment. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 14;8(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01387-z. PubMed 39809874 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center supports the international committee of medical journal editors (ICMJE) and the ethical obligation of responsible sharing of data from clinical trials. The protocol summary, a statistical summary, and informed consent form will be made available on clinicaltrials.gov when required as a condition of Federal awards, other agreements supporting the research and/or as otherwise required. Requests for deidentified individual participant data can be made beginning 12 months after publication and for up to 36 months post publication. Deidentified individual participant data reported in the manuscript will be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement and may only be used for approved proposals. Requests may be made to: crdatashare@mskcc.org.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05053230
Lead sponsor
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2021
Start date
Sep 20, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Study contacts

Karolina Bryl, PhD
principal investigator · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion