ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05050253SOSPeritonitisUpdated Jan 11, 2024

Lavage With Super-Oxidized Solution for Secondary Peritonitis

An interventional study of Super-oxidized solution (SOS) and Ringer's solution in Peritonitis, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-11.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2023; still recruiting 3 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Secondary peritonitis is a frequent abdominal emergency that is still associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate due to surgical site infections (SSI) and sepsis. Early surgical source control is crucial to avoid sepsis and worse outcomes. The current randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of peritoneal lavage with super-oxidized solution (SOS) on SSI and mortality in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for secondary peritonitis. The investigators hypothesize that peritoneal lavage with SOS reduces the incidence of SSI and mortality in this patient population.

Read the detailed description

Secondary peritonitis is a frequent abdominal emergency that is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, especially surgical site infections (SSI). If not treated promptly and efficiently, secondary peritonitis may progress from a contained abdominal infection to systemic disease, i.e., sepsis and eventually septic shock. Early surgical source control is crucial to avoid sepsis and worse outcomes. Super-oxidized solution (SOS) has been shown to have a strong antimicrobial activity while being safe for medical use in humans.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will investigate the effect of peritoneal lavage with SOS vs. the current standard solution (Ringer) on SSI and mortality in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery (EAS) for secondary peritonitis. The hypothesis of this study is that peritoneal lavage with SOS during EAS will reduce the incidence of SSI and mortality.

Patients scheduled for open EAS with secondary peritonitis due to suspected hollow-viscus perforation, anastomotic insufficiency, or abdominal abscess, including patients with the named abdominal emergencies as a complication after elective surgery, will be assessed for eligibility. All patients included will be treated according to the current standard of care for secondary peritonitis. This includes the insertion of intravenous lines, start of antibiotic therapy, infusion of crystalloid solutions, monitoring of vital signs, and EAS.

Randomization will take place during EAS after the surgical procedure including regular peritoneal lavage have been performed. If a hollow-viscus perforation, anastomotic insufficiency, or an abdominal abscess is encountered intraoperatively, patients will be randomized and undergo additional peritoneal lavage with either SOS (SOS group) or Ringer's solution (control group).

In the SOS group, the abdominal cavity will be irrigated with 2 liters of SOS (Micodacyn60®), followed by aspiration of the product and abdominal closure. In the control group, the abdominal cavity will be irrigated with two liters of Ringer's solution, followed by aspiration of the solution and abdominal closure. The only difference in treatment between the two groups will be the additional peritoneal lavage with SOS or Ringer's solution at the end of the procedure. After surgery, there will be no difference in the management of the SOS and control group.

The primary outcome of this RCT will be the incidence of SSI and mortality as a composite outcome at 30 days postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes will be in-hospital and 30-day mortality, surgical site infections within 30 days, the time to occurrence of the primary outcome, sepsis as defined by the Sepsis-3 guidelines at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days postoperatively, septic shock as defined by the Sepsis-3 guidelines at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days postoperatively, organ dysfunction over time (14 days, as measured by SOFA and/or qSOFA scores), biomarkers of inflammation over time (14 days, including C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and body temperature), postoperative fascial dehiscence at 30 days postoperatively, intestinal fistula at 30 days postoperatively, re-intervention for postoperative complications within 30 days postoperatively, days to first postoperative bowel movement, and total hospital and Intensive Care Unit length of stay.

Data will be collected during the hospital stay and a the follow-up visit 30 days postoperatively. Data assessors will be blinded for the study procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peritonitis

Keywords

  • Secondary peritonitis
  • Emergency abdominal surgery
  • Super-oxidized solution
  • Surgical site infection
  • Mortality
03

In context

Peritonitis

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 79 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Secondary peritonitis due to suspected hollow viscus perforation, anastomotic insufficiency, and/or abdominal abscess (including patients with the named abdominal emergencies as a complication after elective surgery)
  • Scheduled emergency abdominal surgery by laparotomy with peritoneal lavage
  • Age over 18 years
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy (will be ruled out using beta-hCG testing in women of )
  • Patients with primary or tertiary peritonitis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SOS group

    Peritoneal lavage with super-oxidized solution (SOS)

    Device: Super-oxidized solution (SOS)

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Peritoneal lavage with Ringer's solution

    Device: Ringer's solution

Interventions

  • DeviceSuper-oxidized solution (SOS)

    Peritoneal lavage with super-oxidized solution in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for secondary peritonitis.

  • DeviceRinger's solution

    Peritoneal lavage with Ringer's solution in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for secondary peritonitis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite endpoint of surgical site infection and mortality

    The primary composite endpoint will be the proportion of patients who have a surgical site infection or die within 30 days postoperatively.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. In-hospital mortality

    Time frame: Hospital stay, expected to be up to two weeks

  2. 30-day mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Surgical site infection

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Time to primary outcome

    Time to occurrence of surgical site infection or death

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Sepsis

    Sepsis as defined by the Sepsis-3 guidelines at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days postoperatively

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Septic shock

    Septic shock as defined by the Sepsis-3 guidelines at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days postoperatively

    Time frame: 7 days

  7. Organ dysfunction based on SOFA score

    Organ dysfunction over time, i.e., 14 days postoperatively, as measured by the SOFA score

    Time frame: 14 days

  8. Organ dysfunction based on qSOFA score

    Organ dysfunction over time, i.e., 14 days postoperatively, as measured by the quick SOFA (qSOFA) score

    Time frame: 14 days

  9. C-reactive protein

    C-reactive protein over time, i.e., 14 days postoperatively

    Time frame: 14 days

  10. White blood count

    White blood count over time, i.e., 14 days postoperatively

    Time frame: 14 days

  11. Body temperature

    Body temperature over time, i.e., 14 days postoperatively

    Time frame: 14 days

  12. Postoperative fascial dehiscence

    Time frame: 30 days

  13. Postoperative intestinal fistula

    Time frame: 30 days

  14. Reintervention for postoperative complications

    Time frame: 30 days

  15. Time to first postoperative bowel movement

    Time frame: 30 days

  16. Total hospital length of stay

    Time frame: Hospital stay, expected to be up to two weeks

  17. Intensive care unit length of stay

    Time frame: Intensive care unit stay, expected to be up to one week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2025, 25 months after the start.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Peritonitis, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 25 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2021
First posted
Sep 20, 2021
StartActual
Mar 21, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 2025
Last update
Jan 11, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05050253
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 20, 2021
Start date
Mar 21, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 11, 2024

Study contacts

Tobias Haltmeier, MD
Contact
tobias.haltmeier@insel.ch
+41 31 664 03 04
Tobias Haltmeier, MD
principal investigator · Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion