ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05048706Updated Mar 24, 2025

SP TLF Versus Ho:YAG Laser

An observational study in Urinary Calculi, sponsored by University of Rochester. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-24.

Sponsored by University of Rochester · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
62
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators aim to compare the performance of the Super Pulse Thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) with that of the standard Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser. The investigators hypothesize that the electronically-modulated laser diodes, of the TFL offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters leading to more efficient (4 times more) and effective stone dusting resulting in production of finer dust particles obviating the need for postoperative ureteric stenting which remains a major source of patient discomfort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Calculi

Browse trials for

03

In context

Urinary Calculi

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Calculi; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is below the median of 200 across 31 observational studies indexed under Urinary Calculi.

Browse Urinary Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester is the lead sponsor of 729 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects eligible for this study will be identified via eRecord in the Urology Department (routine access) of patients who were diagnosed with upper urinary tract calculi who underwent surgery utilizing either high powered Ho:YAG or TL-SPL lasers.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is scheduled to undergo mini-PCNL and/or RIRS surgery at the University of Rochester Medical Center for the management of upper urinary tract calculi (i.e. kidney and proximal ureter)
  • Stones located in the kidney and proximal ureter
  • Stones measuring 10-30mm
  • Ability to give
  • Any racial or ethnic origin
  • Age 18 years and older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active kidney infection
  • Patients with prior stenting
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with solitary kidney
  • Patients with ureteral tumor or stricture
  • Inability to give
  • Not age 18 and older
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Super Pulse Thulium fiber Laser

    Device: Laser lithotripsy (SP TLF)

  • Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet Laser

    Device: Laser lithotripsy (Ho:YAG)

Interventions

  • DeviceLaser lithotripsy (SP TLF)

    Laser lithotripsy of urinary calculi using the Super Pulse Thulium fiber laser (SP TLF)

  • DeviceLaser lithotripsy (Ho:YAG)

    Laser lithotripsy of urinary calculi using the standard Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the efficiency of SP TFL in dusting stones

    We plan to assess the direct impact of SP TFL to efficiently dust 10-30mm stones in the upper urinary tract . Metrics include time needed to ablate the stone i.e. ablation speed (stone volume mm3/sec)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Mean ablation energy needed to ablate stone volume

    We plan to assess the direct impact of SP TFL to effectively dust 10-30mm stones in the upper urinary tract . Metrics include ablation energy needed to ablate the stone volume (Stone volume mm3/Joules)

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of stones cleared.

    We plan to assess the direct impact of SP TFL to produce finer quality dust following disregarding of 10-30mm stones in the upper urinary tract that can spontaneously pass without the need for stenting . Metrics will be stone clearance on postoperative CT scans

    Time frame: 9 months

  2. Number of participants reporting complications.

    We plan to assess the direct impact of SP TFL to safely dust 10-30mm stones in the upper urinary tract . Metrics collected will include review of medical record for the presence of complications (e.g. infection, sepsis, obstruction etc.) for 3 months postoperative related to laser lithotripsy.

    Time frame: 9 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of Rochester
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No IPD will be shared with other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in Jan 2024, 31 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2021
First posted
Sep 17, 2021
StartActual
May 10, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2024
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2024
Last update
Mar 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05048706
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 17, 2021
Start date
May 10, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2024
Completion
Jan 1, 2024
Last update
Mar 24, 2025

Study contacts

Ahmed Ghazi, MD
principal investigator · Associate Professor

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion