ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05041244Updated Sep 13, 2021

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Wounds

An interventional study of Negative pressure wound therapy delivered through VAC and Standard of care in Diabetic Foot, sponsored by University of Mauritius. Completed at 1 site in Mauritius. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-13.

Sponsored by University of Mauritius · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2019, registered Aug 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (TNPW) is an established tool in the management of Diabetic foot ulcer in many countries. This treatment option is under utilized in the public sector of Mauritius. This study aims to determine the efficacy of TNPW through identification of biomarkers in the Mauritian setting compared with conventional treatment. Patient with DFU will be selected based on an eligible criteria and randomly assigned to intervention group or control group.

Primary Objective: To determine the efficacy of TNPW in the public sector in Mauritius Secondary Objectives: To compare healing times, prognostic factors skin biopsies based on biomarker, histological and genomic analysis A randomised controlled study is being proposed, where up to 100 participants will be recruited.

The wounds of participants in the intervention arm will be managed with 3 weeks of TNPW.

Read the detailed description

Study Description: Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (TNPW) is an established tool in the management of Diabetic foot ulcer in many countries. This treatment option is under utilized in the public sector of Mauritius. This study aims to determine the efficacy of TNPW through identification of biomarkers in the Mauritian setting compared with conventional treatment

Objectives:

Primary Objective: To determine the efficacy of TNPW in the public sector in Mauritius Secondary Objectives: To compare healing times, prognostic factors skin biopsies based on biomarker, histological and genomic analysis

Endpoints:

Primary Endpoint:

Incidence of complete wound closure at 7, 14 and 21 days Time for complete wound closure Side and depth of diabetic ulcer at 7, 14, 21 days Extent of granulation tissue (Epithelialisation) (7- 21 days)

Secondary Endpoints: Hospital stay, readmission, rate of amputation and rate of infections and adverse events Number of dressing changes

Study Population: 50 patients in each arm (interventional and control) Chronic diabetic ulcers, Wagner's 2-3 Male and female Diabetes Mellitus without renal and liver impairment Age 18- 74 years Stable patients with Diabetic foot ulcer A G Jeetoo Hospital, Port-Louis and Souillac District Hospital

Phase: 2 Description of Sites/Facilities Enrolling Participants: The study will take place at the above mentioned units Approval has been received by the Regional Health Director and Consultant in Charge and the Ministry of Health and Wellness for A G Jeetoo Hospital and Souillac District Hospital.

Patients will be recruited from the Diabetes Clinic or the General Surgery Department.

Patients with chronic diabetic ulcer fulfilling the eligibility criteria Description of Study Intervention: Patients will be randomized to Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (TNPW) arm and conventional treatment arm offered at the above named hospitals. TNPW devices will be used in patients in the intervention arm for 3 weeks.

TNPW is described as a medical procedure which involves application of a dressing to the wound. The dressing is attached to a vacuum device that provides sub-atmospheric pressures which help in the removal of exudates to promote the healing process. Dressings will be changed weekly.

Study Duration: 12 months Participant Duration: Each participant will be followed weekly during the procedure then 3 monthly to assess wound healing and enquire about need for further treatment including admissions and long term adverse effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Negative pressure wound therapy, diabetic foot ulcer
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 60 across 847 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Mauritius is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provision of signed and dated form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Male or female, aged 18 - 75 years
  4. In good general health as evidenced by medical history or diagnosed with diabetes mellitus or exhibiting signs of diabetic foot ulcers
  5. Patients suffering from diabetic foot ulcer last more than 3 weeks
  6. Patients with diabetes and presence of a foot wound for more than 3 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients under \<18 years or above 75 years
  2. Patients unable to provide consent
  3. Patients suffering from chronic kidney disease or liver impairment or other chronic conditions
  4. Patients on anticoagulants
  5. Patients with non diabetic ulcers
  6. Patients with severe peripheral vascular disease
  7. Patients having to negative pressure wound therapy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interventional arm

    NPWT will be delivered through devices (ActiVac and InfoVac) according to FDA protocol in conjunction with the polyurethane foams. Dressing changed will be on a weekly basis.

    Device: Negative pressure wound therapy delivered through VAC

  • Other
    Control

    Standard of care Participants will be given the standard care provided in specialist foot care clinics or in-patients.

    Device: Standard of care

Interventions

  • DeviceNegative pressure wound therapy delivered through VAC

    Initial cycle: Continuous first 48 hours Subsequent cycle: Consider intermittent DPC (5 min ON/2 mins OFF) for rest of the therapy Target Target Pressure: 50-175mmHg, to be titrated for more drainage Dressing change interval: every week; need for more frequent dressing need to be evaluated. More frequent change of adaptic can be considered. (Adaptic is a layer of thin dressing that will be in direct contact with the wound to reduce the risk of maceration and adherence to the dressing)

  • DeviceStandard of care

    Participants in the control arm will have their dressings changed as per the current standard of care. Effective management of DFU will depend on accurate diagnosis and assessment and appropriate debridement of non-viable tissues in patients from both arms Patients will be advised to continue off loading and any evidence of early infection should be promptly treated.

    Also known as: Hydrogel, foams, pad and other dressings

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound closure

    Any wound closure or % reduction in size

    Time frame: 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biomarkers

    The amount of granulation will be determined macroscopically and microscopically through histology. Biomarkers such IL6 TNF and CD31/33 will be analysed from tissue specimens

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  2. complete wound closure

    the incidence of complete closure will be determined and compared between the intervention group and the control group

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Adverse events

    Adverse events will include physical and psychological distress as well as infections and admissions to hospitals or recurrence of ulcer

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Mauritius
    Le Réduit, Moka 80837, Mauritius
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All IPD has been stored in digital format in anonymised way and might be shared with other researchers on request. The request will be considered by the members of the team.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2019 to primary completion in Mar 2021, 22 months.

Of 240 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Foot, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's 22 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 343 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 30, 2021
First posted
Sep 13, 2021
StartActual
May 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2021
Last update
Sep 13, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05041244
Lead sponsor
University of Mauritius
Collaborators
Ministry of Health and Wellness, Mauritius, Higher Education Commission, Mauritius, Acelity
Responsible party
Archana BHAW LUXIMON (Professor, University of Mauritius) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2021
Start date
May 1, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2021
Completion
Jul 1, 2021
Last update
Sep 13, 2021

Study contacts

Abha Jodheea-Jutton, MBBS MRCGP
principal investigator · University of Mauritius

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion