CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05030467REDUCE-BPUpdated Jun 6, 2025Results posted

Leveraging Electronic Health Record (EHR) Tools to Reduce Health Disparities for Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension

An interventional study of REDUCE-BP Intervention in Hypertension and Blood Pressure, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-06.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49,210
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial targeting primary care providers will be conducted to evaluate the impact of a multicomponent electronic health record (EHR) intervention on hypertension management. Given the cluster trial design, randomization will be conducted at the site level, and in the intervention sites, all eligible providers will receive the intervention. The intervention consists of enhancing tools already available to primary care providers in the EHR system, including developing and implementing provider disparities dashboards, enhancing electronic decision support, and simplifying self-monitoring orders and communication materials. The intervention aims to improve blood pressure control and reduce health disparities in racial and ethnic minorities. Findings from this trial will provide important insight into whether a multicomponent intervention targeting providers and leveraging health information technology can reduce health disparities.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this project is to improve existing decision support for hypertension control and to reduce disparities in treatment, consistent with Advocate-specific professional guidelines and quality metrics. To achieve this, a cluster randomized trial will be conducted and evaluated to determine whether health IT tools targeted to providers improve blood pressure control for patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

The primary hypothesis is that a health IT intervention will improve systolic blood pressure (primary outcome), concordance with hypertension guidelines (secondary outcome), diastolic blood pressure (secondary outcome), treatment intensification (secondary outcome), controlled blood pressure (secondary outcome) and systolic blood pressure disparities (secondary outcome) compared with usual care.

Participating clinics will be randomly assigned to one of 2 arms: (a) Arm 1: multicomponent, intervention and (b) Arm 2: usual care (i.e. no intervention). Providers and in each arm will receive the same intervention for up to 24 months after randomization, which will demonstrate the relative effectiveness of each approach as well as its long-term impact on clinical outcomes. Primary care providers in the intervention clinics will receive electronic decision support tools to guide their care of eligible patients. Providers in usual care clinics will receive usual care at Advocate Aurora Health (AAH). Patients will not receive any intervention or outreach independent of their provider or care team. EHR data will be used to implement the EHR tools, identify study subjects, track study progress, and evaluate the effect of the interventions. Patients will only be included in the analysis and will not be directly enrolled or contacted by investigators; we expect at least 2000 patients to be included in the analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension
  • Blood Pressure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hypertension

6,689 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 964 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49,210 is above the median of 90 across 4,994 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

24 practices will be randomized to either Intervention or Control. We will include in the analysis patients who meet the following Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical Group Medical Home Population: 1 visit with Primary Care Physician (PCP) in past 2 years (rolling 24 months) and Patient has a medical group PCP as their EPIC General PCP
  2. Current age 18-85 years
  3. Hypertension diagnosis on EPIC Problem list OR at least 2 visits (office/telehealth/telephonic) with an encounter diagnosis of hypertension on different dates, with any during the last 24 months (rolling dates) performing provider
  4. Latest outpatient/ambulatory (exclude urgent care) systolic blood pressure ≥140 or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 (12 months rolling) (lowest measure if more than one taken at the same time)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not meeting the inclusion criteria above will not be included in the analysis of the study. No other exclusion criteria will be used.

Among these eligible patients, patients included in the primary analysis will be those that had an in-person visit at one of the trial clinics.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49,210 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Arm

    Providers within the clinics randomized to the intervention arm will receive a variety of EHR-based tools for eligible patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

    Behavioral: REDUCE-BP Intervention

  • No intervention
    Control Arm

    Providers within the clinics randomized to usual care will receive no EHR tools, except those currently available in clinical practice.

Interventions

  • BehavioralREDUCE-BP Intervention

    Pre-visit: Providers in the intervention arm will receive dashboards which will highlight racial/ethnic differences in rates of achieving blood pressure control within their patient panel. The dashboard will also provide individual-level information for patients with poorly controlled blood pressure. During visit: Providers will receive clinical decision support within relevant patients' charts that highlight the patient's under-treated blood pressure and potential impacts of social needs. Providers will have the opportunity to provide enhanced patient education materials, which can be automatically ordered within the clinical decision support. Post-visit: Patient-subjects' access to the online patient portal will be streamlined by the inclusion of information about the patient portal in the patients' after-visit summary. Providers will also be able to referral patients automatically to nurse BP visits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

    Change in systolic blood pressure from identification to the end of the 12-month follow-up, using values in the EHR from ambulatory care encounters

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Well-controlled Blood Pressure

    Percentage of patients with well-controlled blood pressure (\<140/90mmHg) in the 12-month follow-up period, using values in the EHR from ambulatory care encounters

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Percentage of Patients With Intensification of Medication

    Percentage of patients with intensification of medication in the 12-month follow-up period, defined by addition of therapy or increasing dose.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Percentage of Patients With Guideline-concordant Medications

    Percentage of patients with guideline-concordant medications ordered in the follow-up period

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Change in diastolic blood pressure from identification to 12-month follow-up, measured using values in the EHR

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Systolic Blood Pressure Differences

    Change in the gap in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between Black and White patients and Hispanic/Latino and Non-Hispanic/Latino patients from identification to the end of the 12-month follow-up, measured using values in the EHR from ambulatory care encounters

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention ArmControl Arm
Started2474724463
Completed2474724463
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change in systolic blood pressure from identification to the end of the 12-month follow-up, using values in the EHR from ambulatory care encounters

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
mmHgIntervention ArmControl Arm
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure-11.0 ± 19.2-11.0 ± 19.1
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm vs Control Arm · Mean difference (final values): -0.04 · 95% CI -0.39 to 0.31
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Well-controlled Blood Pressure

Percentage of patients with well-controlled blood pressure (\<140/90mmHg) in the 12-month follow-up period, using values in the EHR from ambulatory care encounters

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With Well-controlled Blood Pressure
ParticipantsIntervention ArmControl Arm
Percentage of Patients With Well-controlled Blood Pressure1691016441
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm vs Control Arm · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.011 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.02 · 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Intensification of Medication

Percentage of patients with intensification of medication in the 12-month follow-up period, defined by addition of therapy or increasing dose.

Time frame:
12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Guideline-concordant Medications

Percentage of patients with guideline-concordant medications ordered in the follow-up period

Time frame:
12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change in diastolic blood pressure from identification to 12-month follow-up, measured using values in the EHR

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
mmHgIntervention ArmControl Arm
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure-4.4 ± 10.8-4.3 ± 10.9
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm vs Control Arm · Regression, Linear · p = 0.383 · Mean difference (final values): -0.12 · 95% CI -0.38 to 0.15
SecondarySystolic Blood Pressure Differences

Change in the gap in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between Black and White patients and Hispanic/Latino and Non-Hispanic/Latino patients from identification to the end of the 12-month follow-up, measured using values in the EHR from ambulatory care encounters

Time frame:
12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0.01% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Arm3/24,747 (0%)24/24,747 (0.1%)17/24,747 (0.1%)
Control Arm - Not Collected for the Adverse Event Reporting———
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIntervention ArmControl Arm - Not Collected for the Adverse Event Reporting
Unrelated SAEBlood and lymphatic system disorders24/24747—
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIntervention ArmControl Arm - Not Collected for the Adverse Event Reporting
Unrelated AEBlood and lymphatic system disorders17/24747—

Baseline characteristics

This is the number of patients who met eligibility criteria.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intervention ArmControl ArmTotal
Mean64.6 ± 12.564.7 ± 12.564.6 ± 12.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention ArmControl ArmTotal
Female149771414329120
Male97701032020090
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention ArmControl ArmTotal
Hispanic or Latino292219294851
Not Hispanic or Latino210792189042969
Unknown or Not Reported7466441390
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention ArmControl ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native162213375
Asian109314582551
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander173127300
Black or African American139971080324800
White82911113719428
More than one race126127253
Unknown or Not Reported9055981503
Baseline systolic blood pressure
Baseline systolic blood pressure(mmHg)Intervention ArmControl ArmTotal
Mean145.4 ± 14.3145.3 ± 14.3145.4 ± 14.3
Baseline diastolic blood pressure
Baseline diastolic blood pressure(mmHg)Intervention ArmControl ArmTotal
Mean80.4 ± 10.880.6 ± 10.780.5 ± 10.8
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Advocate Health Care
    Chicago, Illinois 60515, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 4, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05030467
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Responsible party
Niteesh K. Choudhry, MD, PhD (Professor of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 1, 2021
Start date
May 3, 2022
Primary completion
May 3, 2024
Completion
Jun 1, 2024
Results posted
Jun 6, 2025
Last update
Jun 6, 2025

Study contacts

Niteesh K Choudhry, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion