ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05009394Updated Jan 9, 2025

Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

An interventional study of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) in Residual Limb Pain, Amputation Neuroma and Phantom Limb Pain, sponsored by Prometei Pain Rehabilitation Center. Recruiting at 9 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-09.

Sponsored by Prometei Pain Rehabilitation Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT) which compares the effectiveness of three surgical techniques for alleviating residual limb pain (RLP), neuroma pain and phantom limb pain (PLP). The three surgical treatments are Targeted Muscles Reinnervation (TMR), Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI), and an active control (neuroma excision and muscle burying). Patients will be follow-up for 4 years.

Read the detailed description

Residual limb pain (RLP), neuroma pain, and phantom limb pain (PLP) can develop after the loss of a body part and fall within the umbrella term postamputation pain. However, the underlaying causes to postamputation pain are diverse and must be addressed accordingly. Surgical treatments for RLP have become a popular approach and have shown great potential for successful outcomes. The two surgical interventions, Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI), are globally used in pain management therapies.

This is a multi-centre, double-blind, superiority RCT which takes place at 9 hospitals in 7 countries:the Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden; the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute in Bologna, Italy; the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada; Worker Hospital in Santiago, Chile; the NHS Lothian, NHS Clyde \& Greater Glasgow, and NHS Grampian, UK; Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health in Melbourne, Australia; the Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, USA; the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; and within the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, USA. One hundred ten participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of three surgical treatments (TMR, RPNI, or control) in an equal allocation ratio (n = 37 per group). Each participant will be followed up short term (1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery) and long term (2 and 4 years post-surgery). After the 12-month follow-up, the study will be unblinded for the evaluator and the participants. If the participants are unsatisfied with the outcome of the treatment, they may request one of the other treatments. In such a case, a medical evaluation and further treatment options will be discussed in consultation with the clinical investigator at the site.

The study design is chosen to be able to follow RLP, neuroma pain and PLP intensity before and after surgical treatment as well as to investigate how pain develops up to four years post-surgery. The evaluation methods in the study are based on previously used methods in the literature for RLP-, neuroma- and PLP-related pain research. The questionnaires are previously used in clinical settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Residual Limb Pain
  • Amputation Neuroma
  • Phantom Limb Pain
  • Pain, Neuropathic
  • Pain, Nerve
03

In context

Phantom Limb

163 studies on the registry are indexed under Phantom Limb; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 30 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Phantom Limb.

Browse Phantom Limb studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Prometei Pain Rehabilitation Center as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The participant must have a major limb amputation.
  • The participant is ≥ 18 years old at the time of consent.
  • The participant must be in generally good health to undergo a surgical intervention, as per the clinical investigator's opinion.
  • Time since the last amputation must be over a year at the time of consent.
  • The participant must have an average residual limb pain score equal or greater than 4 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) after the baseline period.
  • If the participant has been prescribed pharmacological treatments for pain, there must be no variations in dosage (steady consumption) for at least 1 month before the screening visit.
  • If the participant has been prescribed non-pharmacological treatments for pain, such as spinal cord stimulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and mirror therapy, the treatment must have ended at least 1 month before the screening visit.
  • The participant must have a stable prosthetic fitting for at least a month before the screening visit.
  • The participant has a sufficient understanding of the language in which the assessments will be conducted, as per the clinical investigator's opinion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological or other conditions that affect nerve regeneration for the nerve to be treated.
  • Active infection in the residual limb.
  • Prior RPNI or TMR surgery of the nerve to be treated (with painful neuroma) to address postamputation pain.
  • Mental disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, paranoia, psychosis, etc.), reluctance, or language difficulties that result in difficulty understanding the meaning of study participation.
  • Ongoing participation in a clinical study that the clinical investigator deems detrimental to participation in this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR)

    The surgical procedure comprises three steps: preparation of the donor nerve, identification of a motor branch to the targeted muscle, and nerve coaptation. To prepare the donor nerve, the surgeon will identify the nerve with a painful neuroma and resect the neuroma up to healthy fascicles. Next, the surgeon will identify a motor branch to a nearby target muscle and will confirm muscle contraction using a hand-held nerve stimulator. The motor branch to the target muscle will be transected as close as possible to its entry point without tension. In the final step, the previous nerve stump from which the neuroma was resected will be transferred and coapted to the newly severed motor branch that innervates the target muscle and secured by 2-3 non-resorbable monofilament sutures. The surgery time is approximately 2-3 hours and it takes place in the hospital.

    Procedure: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR)

  • Active comparator
    Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI)

    The RPNI procedure involves construction of a residual peripheral nerve split into several nerve fascicles and implanted into free skeletal muscle grafts. First, the surgeon identifies the nerve with a painful neuroma and resect the neuroma up to healthy fascicles. Then, a longitudinal intraneural dissection will be performed exposing its fascicles. Next, autologous muscle grafts will be harvested from a healthy donor site, and the dissected nerve stumps will be placed parallel to the muscle fibers. The nerve stump will be secured to the muscle graft, thereafter the graft will be wrapped around the nerve stump and anchored in the folded graft, thus creating an RPNI. This will be repeated for each fascicle obtained from splitting the transected nerve. Lastly, the RPNIs will be placed in a protected area. The surgery time is approximately 2-3 hours and it takes place in the hospital.

    Procedure: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI)

  • Active comparator
    Standard neuroma treatment, neuroma excision, and muscle burying

    The standard neuroma treatment, also called neuroma transposition, includes excision of the terminal neuroma and burying the nerve into an adjacent deep muscle.The standard neuroma treatment entails the excision of the terminal neuroma and then implanting the nerve into an adjacent muscle. Firstly, the surgeon will identify the nerve with a painful neuroma and thereafter resect the neuroma up to healthy fascicles. Next, the surgeon will identify a nearby muscle which is not involved in joint motion and has limited output opportunities for the nerve. The nerve will then be channeled at least 1 cm inside the muscle without applying any tension to it and secured by 1-2 non-resorbable monofilament sutures. The identified nerve with the painful neuroma will not be treated with any additional therapy than the resection (e.g., diathermy, pharmacotherapy, crushing, etc.). The surgery time is approximately 1-2 hours and it takes place in the hospital.

    Procedure: Standard neuroma treatment, neuroma excision, and muscle burying

Interventions

  • ProcedureTargeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR)

    Surgical procedure used to rewire injured proximal nerves to motor nerves directly innervating an otherwise redundant target muscle.

  • ProcedureRegenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI)

    Surgical procedure where the the nerve is split into fascicles and wrapped in free muscle grafts.

  • ProcedureStandard neuroma treatment, neuroma excision, and muscle burying

    Surgical procedure where the neuroma is excised and the nerve stump is buried in an adjacent deep muscle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Residual limb pain intensity

    Difference in residual limb pain intensity will be measured by numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10), where 0 - no pain and 10 - worst imaginable pain, between baseline period and at the 12-month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-month post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neuroma pain intensity

    Difference in neuroma pain intensity will be measured by numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10), where 0 - no pain and 10 - worst imaginable pain, between baseline period and at the 12-month follow-up visit.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-month post-surgery

  2. Phantom limb pain intensity

    Difference in phantom limb pain intensity will be measured by numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10), where 0 - no pain and 10 - worst imaginable pain, between baseline period and at the 12-months follow-up visit.

    Time frame: Baseline to12-month post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Jason Ko, MD, PhD · Contactjason.ko@nm.org
    • Jason Ko, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Gregory Dumanian, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Ian Valerio, MD, PhD · ContactIVALERIO@mgh.harvard.edu
    • Ian Valerio, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Kyle Eberlin, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
  • University of Michigan Health System
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Paul Cederna, MD, PhD · Contactcederna@med.umich.edu
    • Paul Cederna, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Theodore Alexander Kung, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
  • Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health
    Melbourne, Australia
    Not yet recruiting
    • Michael Lo, MD, PhD · Contactmlo@bigpond.net.au
    • Michael Lo, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Michael Leung, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
  • University of Alberta Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta AB T6G 2B7, Canada
    Not yet recruiting
    • Adil Ladak, MD, PhD · Contactaladak@ualberta.ca
    • Adil Ladak, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Hollie Power, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Jacqueline Hebert, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
  • Worker Hospital
    Santiago, Chile
    Not yet recruiting
    • Juan Manuel Breyer, MD, PhD · Contactjmbreyer@hotmail.com
    • Juan Manuel Breyer, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute
    Bologna, Emilia-Romagna 40136, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Paolo Sassu, MD, PhD · Contactsassupaolo@gmail.com
    • Paolo Sassu, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Francesca Pedrini, MD · Sub investigator
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Mölndal, Västra Götaland 431 80, Sweden
    Not yet recruiting
    • Emily Pettersen, MSc · Contactemily-pettersen@outlook.com
    • Carina Reinholdt, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Hannes Granberg, MD · Sub investigator
  • NHS Lothian, NHS Clyde & Greater Glasgow, and NHS Grampian
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
    • Aidan Roche, MD, PhD · Contactaidan.roche@ed.ac.uk
    • Aidan Roche, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Andrew Hart, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Lorraine Harrington, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, Ko JH, Cheesborough JE, Souza JM, Ertl WJ, Tintle SM, Nanos GP, Valerio IL, Kuiken TA, Apkarian AV, Porter K, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):238-246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003088. PubMed 30371518 ↗
  • Souza JM, Cheesborough JE, Ko JH, Cho MS, Kuiken TA, Dumanian GA. Targeted muscle reinnervation: a novel approach to postamputation neuroma pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Oct;472(10):2984-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3528-7. PubMed 24562875 ↗
  • Woo SL, Kung TA, Brown DL, Leonard JA, Kelly BM, Cederna PS. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Dec 27;4(12):e1038. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001038. eCollection 2016 Dec. PubMed 28293490 ↗
  • Pettersen E, Sassu P, Reinholdt C, Dahm P, Rolfson O, Bjorkman A, Innocenti M, Pedrini FA, Breyer JM, Roche A, Hart A, Harrington L, Ladak A, Power H, Hebert J, Ortiz-Catalan M. Surgical treatments for postamputation pain: study protocol for an international, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2023 May 2;24(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07286-0. Erratum In: Trials. 2023 Oct 9;24(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07626-0. PubMed 37131180 ↗
  • Chang BL, Mondshine J, Attinger CE, Kleiber GM. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Pain and Ambulation Outcomes in Highly Comorbid Amputees. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Aug 1;148(2):376-386. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008153. PubMed 34398088 ↗
  • Bjorklund KA, Alexander J, Tulchin-Francis K, Yanes NS, Singh S, Valerio I, Klingele K, Scharschmidt T. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Limb Amputation to Avoid Neuroma and Phantom Limb Pain in Patients Treated at a Pediatric Hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Apr 13;11(4):e4944. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004944. eCollection 2023 Apr. PubMed 37063502 ↗
  • Kubiak CA, Kemp SWP, Cederna PS, Kung TA. Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces to Prevent Postamputation Pain. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):421e-430e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005922. PubMed 31461024 ↗
  • Valerio IL, Dumanian GA, Jordan SW, Mioton LM, Bowen JB, West JM, Porter K, Ko JH, Souza JM, Potter BK. Preemptive Treatment of Phantom and Residual Limb Pain with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 8. PubMed 30634038 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 36 months after the start.

Of 61 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Phantom Limb, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2021
First posted
Aug 17, 2021
StartActual
Jun 20, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 2029
Last update
Jan 9, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05009394
Lead sponsor
Prometei Pain Rehabilitation Center
Collaborators
Vastra Gotaland Region, Göteborg University, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago, NHS Lothian, NHS Greater Clyde and Glasgow, NHS Grampian, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, University of Michigan, Massachusetts General Hospital, Dandenong Hospital, University of Alberta
Responsible party
Max Ortiz Catalan (Professor, Prometei Pain Rehabilitation Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 17, 2021
Start date
Jun 20, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 9, 2025

Study contacts

Max Ortiz Catalan, PhD
Contact
maxortizc@outlook.com
+46708461065
Max Ortiz Catalan, PhD
principal investigator · Prometei Pain Rehabilitation Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion