CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05005013Updated Jun 24, 2025Results posted

A Teleheath tDCS Approach to Decrease Cannabis Use

A Phase 2 interventional study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Sham - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Cannabis Use Disorder and Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-24.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the effect of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in decreasing distress and cannabis use. 46 participants with Relapse Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) and elevated distress (K10 score of 10-35) will be recruited.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cannabis Use Disorder
  • Multiple Sclerosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is close to the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,391 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Of its 227 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 191 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Ages 21-65 (inclusive)
  2. Seeking treatment to reduce or discontinue current cannabis use (smoke/vape/ingest)
  3. Current Cannabis Use Disorder per DSM-V (MINI for DSM-V)
  4. K10 score 10-35, inclusive (mild to high moderate distress)
  5. Definite MS diagnosis, relapsing remitting (RRMS) subtype
  6. PDDS score 0-7 (mild to moderate neurological disability, established to be able to complete procedures)
  7. All medications stable for ≥ 1 month prior to enrollment and throughout the trial
  8. Ability to understand the informed consent process and provide consent to participate in the study
  9. Stable and continuous access to internet service, email (WiFi "hotspot" to be provided if needed)
  10. Ability to use mobile devices
  11. Fluent in English language (due to outcomes validated in English versions only)
  12. WRAT-4 score ≥ 85

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. MS clinical relapse or use of high dose of steroids in the past month
  2. Patients under medical marijuana use prescribed by a clinician
  3. Alcohol, tobacco, or substance use disorder other than cannabis
  4. Primary neurologic, psychiatric or other medical disorder other than MS (entry MD screening)
  5. Currently meets DSM-V criteria for moderate or severe substance use disorder in the past 6 months for any psychoactive substance.
  6. Meets DSM-V criteria for current panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress syndrome, bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, dissociate disorders, and any other psychotic disorder or organic mental disorder
  7. Current suicidal ideation or deemed to be of potential risk of self-injury
  8. History of traumatic brain injury
  9. Seizure disorder or recent (\<5 years) seizure history
  10. Metal implants in the head or neck
  11. Enrolled in group or individual therapy for substance use disorder concurrent to intervention
  12. Any skin disorder or skin sensitive area near stimulation locations
  13. Pregnant or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active tDCS + Mindfulness

    Other: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) · Other: Mindfulness

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS + Mindfulness

    Other: Sham - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) · Other: Mindfulness

Interventions

  • OtherTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

    tDCS is noninvasive brain stimulation device that modulates brain activity by delivering a low-intensity electrical current (2.0 mA) through sponge electrodes placed on the scalp.

  • OtherSham - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

    The tDCS device is programmed to mimic active tDCS.

  • OtherMindfulness

    Participants will follow an audio track for guided mindfulness during the stimulation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score

    K10 is a 10-item questionnaire intended to yield a global measure of distress based on questions about anxiety and depressive symptoms that a person has experienced in the most recent 4 week period. Each question is given a score between 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). The total score ranges from 10 to 50. People with scores \< 20 are likely to be well, 20-24 are likely to have a mild mental disorder, 25-29 are likely to have moderate mental disorder, and \> 30 are likely to have a severe mental disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)

  2. Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)

    The PA subscale includes 10 items describing positive mood states (e.g., "enthusiastic," "interested," "proud"), each rated on a Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive affect, reflecting an individual's engagement, energy, and pleasurable involvement with the environment.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)

  3. Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)

    The NA subscale consists of 10 items representing negative mood states (e.g., "upset," "nervous," "hostile"), each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores reflect greater levels of negative affect, capturing distress and unpleasurable engagement with the environment.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)

  4. Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score

    MCQ is a standardized measure assessing marijuana craving. Each statement is scored on a 7 point likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree). Questions 1-7 measure compulsivity. Questions 8-11 measure emotionality. Questions 12-15 measure expectations. Questions 16-17 measure purposefulness. The total score is the average response score and ranges from 1-7; higher scored indicate greater levels of marijuana craving.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)

  5. Change in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score

    The version of CWS used in the study asks about symptoms experienced over the last 24 hours and consists of 19 statements. For each statement, its negative impact on normal daily activities is rated on a likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The total score ranges from 0 to 190; higher scores indicate that symptoms are having a larger negative impact on normal daily activities.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)

  6. Change in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use

    Self-reported measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)

  7. Change in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use

    Self-reported measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score

    K10 is a 10-item questionnaire intended to yield a global measure of distress based on questions about anxiety and depressive symptoms that a person has experienced in the most recent 4 week period. Each question is given a score between 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). The total score ranges from 10 to 50. People with scores \< 20 are likely to be well, 20-24 are likely to have a mild mental disorder, 25-29 are likely to have moderate mental disorder, and \> 30 are likely to have a severe mental disorder.

    Time frame: End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3

  2. Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)

    The PA subscale includes 10 items describing positive mood states (e.g., "enthusiastic," "interested," "proud"), each rated on a Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive affect, reflecting an individual's engagement, energy, and pleasurable involvement with the environment.

    Time frame: End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3

  3. Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)

    The NA subscale consists of 10 items representing negative mood states (e.g., "upset," "nervous," "hostile"), each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores reflect greater levels of negative affect, capturing distress and unpleasurable engagement with the environment.

    Time frame: End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3

  4. Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score

    MCQ is a standardized measure assessing marijuana craving. Each statement is scored on a 7 point likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree). Questions 1-7 measure compulsivity. Questions 8-11 measure emotionality. Questions 12-15 measure expectations. Questions 16-17 measure purposefulness. The total score is the average response score and ranges from 1-7; higher scored indicate greater levels of marijuana craving.

    Time frame: End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3

  5. Change in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score

    The version of CWS used in the study asks about symptoms experienced over the last 24 hours and consists of 19 statements. For each statement, its negative impact on normal daily activities is rated on a likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The total score ranges from 0 to 190; higher scores indicate that symptoms are having a larger negative impact on normal daily activities.

    Time frame: End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3

  6. Change in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use

    Self-reported measure.

    Time frame: End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3

  7. Change in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use

    Self-reported measure.

    Time frame: End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3

07

Results

Posted Jun 24, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Started3116
Completed2213
Not completed93
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject51
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up31
Withdrew: Ineligibility11

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score

K10 is a 10-item questionnaire intended to yield a global measure of distress based on questions about anxiety and depressive symptoms that a person has experienced in the most recent 4 week period. Each question is given a score between 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). The total score ranges from 10 to 50. People with scores \< 20 are likely to be well, 20-24 are likely to have a mild mental disorder, 25-29 are likely to have moderate mental disorder, and \> 30 are likely to have a severe mental disorder.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score6.4 ± 6.14.5 ± 4.2
PrimaryChange in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)

The PA subscale includes 10 items describing positive mood states (e.g., "enthusiastic," "interested," "proud"), each rated on a Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive affect, reflecting an individual's engagement, energy, and pleasurable involvement with the environment.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)-1.3 ± 8.31.53 ± 8.6
PrimaryChange in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)

The NA subscale consists of 10 items representing negative mood states (e.g., "upset," "nervous," "hostile"), each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores reflect greater levels of negative affect, capturing distress and unpleasurable engagement with the environment.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)-0.7 ± 5.23 ± 4.3
PrimaryChange in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score

MCQ is a standardized measure assessing marijuana craving. Each statement is scored on a 7 point likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree). Questions 1-7 measure compulsivity. Questions 8-11 measure emotionality. Questions 12-15 measure expectations. Questions 16-17 measure purposefulness. The total score is the average response score and ranges from 1-7; higher scored indicate greater levels of marijuana craving.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score0.27 ± 9.50.8 ± 9.7
PrimaryChange in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score

The version of CWS used in the study asks about symptoms experienced over the last 24 hours and consists of 19 statements. For each statement, its negative impact on normal daily activities is rated on a likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The total score ranges from 0 to 190; higher scores indicate that symptoms are having a larger negative impact on normal daily activities.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score27.1 ± 29.47 ± 17.7
PrimaryChange in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use

Self-reported measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)
Reported as:
Mean · Sessions per week
Change in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use
Sessions per weekActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use1.36 ± 2.70.54 ± 1.9
PrimaryChange in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use

Self-reported measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Intervention (Week 4)
Reported as:
Mean · Sessions per month
Change in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use
Sessions per monthActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use5.5 ± 9.13.33 ± 6.4
SecondaryChange in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score

K10 is a 10-item questionnaire intended to yield a global measure of distress based on questions about anxiety and depressive symptoms that a person has experienced in the most recent 4 week period. Each question is given a score between 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). The total score ranges from 10 to 50. People with scores \< 20 are likely to be well, 20-24 are likely to have a mild mental disorder, 25-29 are likely to have moderate mental disorder, and \> 30 are likely to have a severe mental disorder.

Time frame:
End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Score0.3 ± 4.31.33 ± 4.1
SecondaryChange in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)

The PA subscale includes 10 items describing positive mood states (e.g., "enthusiastic," "interested," "proud"), each rated on a Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive affect, reflecting an individual's engagement, energy, and pleasurable involvement with the environment.

Time frame:
End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Positive Affect (PANAS-PA)-1.2 ± 6.4-0.6 ± 5.1
SecondaryChange in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)

The NA subscale consists of 10 items representing negative mood states (e.g., "upset," "nervous," "hostile"), each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). The total score ranges from 5-50; higher scores reflect greater levels of negative affect, capturing distress and unpleasurable engagement with the environment.

Time frame:
End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Score - Negative Affect (PANAS-NA)2.6 ± 6.41 ± 4.7
SecondaryChange in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score

MCQ is a standardized measure assessing marijuana craving. Each statement is scored on a 7 point likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree). Questions 1-7 measure compulsivity. Questions 8-11 measure emotionality. Questions 12-15 measure expectations. Questions 16-17 measure purposefulness. The total score is the average response score and ranges from 1-7; higher scored indicate greater levels of marijuana craving.

Time frame:
End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ-17) Score2.66 ± 9.32.53 ± 9.6
SecondaryChange in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score

The version of CWS used in the study asks about symptoms experienced over the last 24 hours and consists of 19 statements. For each statement, its negative impact on normal daily activities is rated on a likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The total score ranges from 0 to 190; higher scores indicate that symptoms are having a larger negative impact on normal daily activities.

Time frame:
End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score
score on a scaleActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Cannabis Withdrawal Scale (CWS) Score8 ± 224.5 ± 29.4
SecondaryChange in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use

Self-reported measure.

Time frame:
End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · Sessions per week
Change in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use
Sessions per weekActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Number of Weekly Sessions of Cannabis Use0.23 ± 2.10.5 ± 2.5
SecondaryChange in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use

Self-reported measure.

Time frame:
End of Intervention (Week 4), Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · Sessions per month
Change in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use
Sessions per monthActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Change in Number of Monthly Sessions of Cannabis Use1.7 ± 7.42.6 ± 10.1

Adverse events

Collected over 4 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active tDCS + Mindfulness0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)
Sham tDCS + Mindfulness0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)1/13 (7.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventActive tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + Mindfulness
Minor skin irritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/221/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + MindfulnessTotal
Mean39 ± 1146.2 ± 8.845.7 ± 10.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + MindfulnessTotal
Female221335
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + MindfulnessTotal
Hispanic or Latino639
Not Hispanic or Latino16925
Unknown or Not Reported011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + MindfulnessTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American11516
White9615
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Active tDCS + MindfulnessSham tDCS + MindfulnessTotal
United States221335
08

Study locations

1 site
  • NYU Langone Health
    New York, New York 10017, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 17, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Oct 17, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05005013
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2021
Start date
Sep 13, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 14, 2024
Completion
May 22, 2024
Results posted
Jun 24, 2025
Last update
Jun 24, 2025

Study contacts

Leigh Charvet, PhD
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion