ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05004818Updated Aug 13, 2021

Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation as a Novel Treatment for Seasickness

An interventional study of GVS stimulation coupled with inverse phase rotatory chair stimulation at sinusoidal harmonic acceleration protocol and Sham procedure in Motion Sickness, Seasickness and Habituation, sponsored by Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force. Completed. Open to male participants aged 19 Years to 44 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-13.

Sponsored by Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2016, registered Aug 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 44 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

subjects with severe seasickness, who failed to habituate to sea conditions after at least six month of active sailing, were enrolled to the single-blind randomized control study. The intervention group was treated with rotatory chair stimulation at sinusoidal harmonic acceleration protocol coupled with galvanic vestibular stimulation to the mastoid processes. This unique procedure was hypothesized to promote habituation to seasickness. The control group underwent a sham procedure. All study participants filled out seasickness questionnaires at set time points following the intervention and underwent repeated step testing to determine their vestibular time constant. The number of anti-motion sickness clinic visits and scopolamine prescriptions was also recorded in the three months period following the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Motion Sickness
  • Seasickness
  • Habituation
  • Vestibular Time Constant

Keywords

  • Motion Sickness
  • Seasickness
  • Galvanic vestibular stimulation
  • Rotatory chair
  • Vestibular time constant
03

In context

Motion Sickness

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Motion Sickness; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 59 across 44 interventional studies indexed under Motion Sickness.

Browse Motion Sickness studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 44 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • maximum score of 7 on the Wiker seasickness questionnaire in moderate sea conditions, with wave height of 0 - 1.5 m
  • All had been sailing regularly for at least six months before enrolling in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of hearing loss
  • otoscopic findings of ear pathology
  • an implanted electrode
  • a finding of vestibulopathy on otoneurologic examination
  • withdrawal by any subject of his .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    sham procedure

    Participants with severe motion sickness were sited in the the rotatory chair with the videonystagmography recorder masking their eyes, while two galvanic vestibular stimulation electrodes were connected to the mastoid processes. No active stimulus was given.

    Procedure: Sham procedure

  • Experimental
    GVS stimulation coupled with inverse phase rotatory chair stimulation

    Participants with severe motion sickness were sited in the the rotatory chair with the videonystagmography recorder masking their eyes, while two galvanic vestibular stimulation electrodes were connected to the mastoid processes. The rotatory chair was activated in sinusoidal harmonic acceleration protocol in inverse phase to galvanic vestibular stimulation.

    Procedure: GVS stimulation coupled with inverse phase rotatory chair stimulation at sinusoidal harmonic acceleration protocol

Interventions

  • ProcedureGVS stimulation coupled with inverse phase rotatory chair stimulation at sinusoidal harmonic acceleration protocol

    GVS stimulation coupled with inverse phase rotatory chair stimulation at sinusoidal harmonic acceleration protocol

  • ProcedureSham procedure

    Participants with severe motion sickness were sited in the the rotatory chair with the videonystagmography recorder masking their eyes, while two galvanic vestibular stimulation electrodes were connected to the mastoid processes. No active stimulus was given.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vestibular time constant

    Vestibular time constant was measured using repeated rotatory chair stimulation in step protocol.

    Time frame: Until one month following the intervention

  2. Seasickness severity

    Seasickness severity as determined by Wiker questionnaire at set time frames following the intervention

    Time frame: Until one month following the intervention

  3. scopolamine drug prescription

    scopolamine drug prescriptions were calculated for each participant and compared between the two groups

    Time frame: Until three months following the intervention

  4. Anti-motion sickness clinic visits

    Anti-motion sickness clinic visits were calculated for each participant and compared between the two groups

    Time frame: Until three months following the intervention

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gutkovich YE, Lagami D, Jamison A, Fonar Y, Tal D. Galvanic vestibular stimulation as a novel treatment for seasickness. Exp Brain Res. 2022 Feb;240(2):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06263-w. Epub 2021 Nov 15. PubMed 34782915 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2018, 17 months.

Of 15 interventional studies with no phase under Motion Sickness, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 29. This study's 17 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 11, 2021
First posted
Aug 13, 2021
StartActual
Aug 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2018
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2019
Last update
Aug 13, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05004818
Lead sponsor
Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2021
Start date
Aug 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2018
Completion
Jul 1, 2019
Last update
Aug 13, 2021

Study contacts

Dror Tal, PhD
principal investigator · The Israel Naval Medical Institute, IDF Medical Corps, Haifa, Israel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion