CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05000281Updated Oct 6, 2021

Effect of NSAIDs on Union, Opioid Utilization and Pain Management for Tibia Fractures

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ibuprofen in Tibia Fracture, sponsored by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-06.

Sponsored by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed study is a two arm, pragmatic, randomized controlled multicenter Phase III noninferiority trial. 1,000 patients with tibia fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nail will be randomized into two treatment arms. The control arm will receive standard pain management and no NSAIDs. The treatment arm will receive standard pain management plus up to six weeks of NSAIDs (3 weeks of prescribed medication followed by 3 weeks of medication PRN).

Read the detailed description

The proposed study is a two arm, pragmatic, randomized controlled multicenter Phase III noninferiority trial. Patients with diaphyseal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nail will be randomized into two treatment arms. The control arm will receive standard pain management with no NSAIDs. The treatment arm will receive standard pain management plus up to six weeks of NSAIDs (3 weeks of prescribed medication followed by 3 weeks of medication PRN).

The hypothesis is that pain management using up to 6 weeks of NSAIDs will result in improved pain control and lower opioid consumption but demonstrate non-inferior levels of complications compared to standard of care pain management. The aim of the study is to:

Specific Aim: Evaluate the effect of standard pain management without NSAIDs (Group 1) vs. standard pain management plus up to 6 weeks of NSAIDs (Group 2) in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.

Primary Hypothesis: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management, patients treated with up to 6 weeks of NSAIDs will have noninferior rates of surgery for to promote union at one year.

Secondary Hypotheses: When compared to patients who received standard of care pain management without NSAIDs, patients treated with up to 6 weeks of NSAIDs will benefit from (1) reduced opioid utilization; (2) reduced levels of persistent pain; (3) reduced pain interference; (4) improved functional outcomes; (5) noninferior rates of analgesic treatment related side effects; and (6) noninferior rates of radiographic union.

Study design: At time of IM nailing surgery for acute diaphyseal tibia fracture, patients will be randomized to treatment or control group. Treatment patients will receive a standard of care pain regimen and oral ibuprofen 600 mg three times a day (tid) for up to six weeks (3 weeks of prescribed medication followed by 3 weeks of medication PRN). Control patients will receive a standard of care pain regimen prescribed by the treating physician and may not use NSAIDs. Patients in both arms will be permitted to receive 81mg of daily aspirin. Patient medication adherence will be documented via an electronic data collection interface through mobile or web-based application. Patients who do not have access to documenting adherence electronically will be given paper-based medication dairies by the research team.

Follow-Up: Clinical, functional, and radiographic follow-up will be conducted at typical standard of care intervals of 2-3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and one year.

Study duration: 3.75 years (18 month accrual, 24 month final follow-up, 3 month analysis and writing).

Sample size: 1,000 (500 per arm (2) arms)

Number of study sites: 14 sites (13 Civilian and 1 Military Treatment Facility)

Study population: The study population will consist of a relatively homogeneous group of 1,000 patients with orthopaedic trauma: patients with open or closed diaphyseal tibia fractures. Since military combat injuries are typically open, open fractures will be included in this study. However, since post-surgical pain after these injuries is not limited to the open fractures, and the practices of pain management should apply to both open and closed injuries, closed versions of these high energy injuries in the study population will also be included.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tibia Fracture

Keywords

  • NSAID
  • Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug
  • Pain Interference
  • Persistent Pain
  • Pain Control
  • Opioid Utilization
  • Nonunion Surgery
  • Fracture Healing
  • Orthopaedic trauma
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients with open (Grade I, II, of IIIa) or closed tibia fractures treated with a nail.
  • Patients 18-80 years old inclusive.
  • Patients able to be followed at a Major Extremity Trauma \& Rehabilitation (METRC) facility for at least 12 months following injury

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to provide informed consent
  • Patients who are current - intravenous drug user.
  • Patients with a history of allergy to the study drugs.
  • Patients unable to swallow oral medications or without functioning GI tract.
  • Patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeds or gastric perforation.
  • Patients with a history of stroke or heart attack.
  • Patients requiring an aspirin or NSAID regimen except for low dose aspirin, 81mg.
  • Patients with any bleeding disorders.
  • Patients with severe renal failure [glomerular filtration rate (GFR):\<30]. Patients with moderate renal failure [GFR: 30-59] may participate in the study at a modified dose.
  • Patients undergoing daily treatment with systemic glucocorticoids before surgery.
  • Patients likely to have severe problems maintaining follow-up, including patients diagnosed with a severe psychiatric conditions, patients who live too far outside the hospital's catchment area, patients who are incarcerated and patients who have unstable housing situations.
  • Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) \<15 at discharge.
  • Patients with a closed head injury that precludes NSAIDS.
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating at time of screening
  • Patients with a bone graft procedure planned for a future date at the time of initial definitive fixation surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NSAID

    Standard of care pain medication regimen with NSAIDs.

    Drug: Ibuprofen

  • No intervention
    No NSAIDs

    Standard of care pain medication regiment with no NSAIDs

Interventions

  • DrugIbuprofen

    600 mg Ibuprofen 3 times a day for up to six weeks.

    Also known as: Advil, Motrin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numbers of participants with nonunion (secondary surgery to promote union)

    Nonunion will be assessed by the presence of a secondary surgery to promote union after 3 months post definitive fixation surgery. Surgery operative notes and radiographs of each case will be independently reviewed by members of the METRC Central Adjudication Committee and if at least 2 members agree with the assessment of secondary surgery to promote union, no further review will be necessary. The METRC Central Adjudication Committee will convene to discuss the cases for which there is disagreement regarding nonunion assessment.

    Time frame: Between 3 months and 12 months after definitive fixation surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a widely used, 15-item measure of pain intensity and interference with daily life and will be assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months post definitive fixation surgery. It has been extensively validated in both English and Spanish, and also includes questions about pain treatments and the effectiveness of these treatments.46 The BPI pain intensity domain is compatible with the IMMPACT guidelines for assessing pain in clinical trials and the FDA Guidance for Industry on the use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, months

  2. Pain interference as assessed by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference

    One of the domains assessed by The Patient Report Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) includes Pain Interference. CATs present an advantage over traditional measures in that they target only the most relevant items to each patient and can thus be used to obtain precise measurements with 4-6 items, making assessment across multiple domains feasible. CATs can also extend the ceiling and floor of individual domains, potentially enhancing responsiveness.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, months

  3. Physical and Psychosocial functioning as assessed by Patient Report Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    Self -Reported Measures of Physical and Psychosocial Function will be assessed using the Patient Report Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) item banks, a product of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. CATs present an advantage over traditional measures in that they target only the most relevant items to each patient and can thus be used to obtain precise measurements with 4-6 items, making assessment across multiple domains feasible. In this study the following PROMIS domains will be used: Physical function, Depression, Anxiety, Pain Inference, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities and Psychosocial Illness Impact.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, months

  4. Radiographic union as assessed by the modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial Fractures (mRUST)

    Radiographic union will be based on the modified RUST(mRUST) score assessed between 3 months and 12 months after definitive fixation surgery. The four cortices of the tibia fracture will be assessed and given a score from 1-4, 1=not healed, 4=healed. The mRUST score is the sum of the 4 cortical scores (4-16) and a score of 13 or greater is considered a healed fracture. Radiographic examinations at 3, 6 and 12 months by an adjudication committee comprised of METRC investigators will be evaluated based on AP and lateral x-rays.

    Time frame: Between 3 months and 12 months after definitive fixation surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05000281
Lead sponsor
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2021
Start date
Sep 14, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2021

Study contacts

Tara Taylor Joseph, MPH
Contact
ttaylo56@jhu.edu
410-614-6081
Trisha Chaffee
Contact
tchaffe2@jhmi.edu

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion