CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04991233Updated Aug 5, 2021

The Treatment Effect of Endoscopic Evacuation Versus Suboccipital Craniotomy for Spontaneous Intracerebellar Hemorrhage.

An interventional study of Endoscopic surgery and Suboccipital craniotomy surgery in Posterior Fossa Hemorrhage, sponsored by Tang-Du Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-05.

Sponsored by Tang-Du Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the present study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two surgery evacuation methods (endoscopic surgery and suboccipital craniotomy) in the treatment of acute spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage (SCH). A multi-center randomized control trial will be conducted. Patients with an initial GCS score of 5-14 will be screened and enrolled in the first 24 hours after SCH.

Read the detailed description

Spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage (SCH) accounts for about 9-10% of all ICH cases, with a mortality rate of 20-50%. Suboccipital craniotomy was the traditional surgery method in the treatment of SCH. Minimally invasive techniques, including endoscopic evacuation and minimally invasive catheter (MIC) evacuation, have been used for the treatment of SCH) in recent years. However, credible evidence is still needed to validate the effects of these techniques. The treatment effect of endoscopic evacuation and MIC evacuation was compared in our previous study, results showed that the endoscopic evacuation significantly decreased the 6-month mortality of SCH patients. Thus endoscopic evacuation might be a safer and more effective option in the treatment of SCH. Therefore, in the current study, a multi-center randomized control trial will be conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic surgery and suboccipital craniotomy in the treatment of acute SCH. A multi-center randomized control trial will be conducted. Patients with an initial GCS score of 5-14 will be screened according to the selecting criteria. The enrolled patients will undertake the surgery within the first 24 hours after SCH. The primary outcome is the 30-day mortality rate. And the secondary outcomes including the 6-month mRS, the incidence of adverse events within 30-day, the hematoma clearance rate, the residual hematoma volume on postoperative day 1/3/7, and the perihematoma edema volume on postoperative day 1/3/7.

02

Conditions studied

  • Posterior Fossa Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Posterior Fossa Hemorrhage
  • Endoscopic Surgery
  • Suboccipital Craniotomy
  • Treatment Outcome
03

In context

Intracranial Hemorrhages

199 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Hemorrhages; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 190 is above the median of 100 across 105 interventional studies indexed under Intracranial Hemorrhages.

Browse Intracranial Hemorrhages studies →

Lead sponsor

Tang-Du Hospital is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 18-80 years old;
  2. Cerebellar hemorrhage was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) scans;
  3. The hematoma was > 3 cm in diameter or the hematoma volume was > 10ml or the hemorrhage is associated with brainstem compression or hydrocephalus;
  4. The randomization can be conducted within 24 hours;
  5. GCS score at randomization was 5-14;
  6. mRS was 0-1 before onset;
  7. The systolic pressure was controlled below 180 mmHg before randomization;
  8. Informed consent was obtained from the patient and his legal representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Coexistent intracranial bleeding from other sites;
  2. Brain herniation before randomization;
  3. Bleeding caused by other reasons such as aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, trauma, and tumor; hemorrhage secondary to large cerebral infarction, beta-amyloid degeneration disease, or coagulation dysfunction; coexistent aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, brain trauma, brain tumors, large area cerebral infarction, beta-amyloid degeneration disease, or serious blood coagulation disorders;
  4. A history of cerebral hemorrhage within 1 year;
  5. A history of intracranial surgery or hemorrhagic disease (intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural or epidural hemorrhage) within the last 30 days;
  6. Hemoglobin \< 100g/L, hematocrit \< 25%, platelet count \<100*10\^9/L;
  7. Warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and other anticoagulant drugs were given within one week before enrollment, and the INR was > 1.4;
  8. Aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and other antiplatelet drugs were given within one week before enrollment, and the inhibition rate of AA-dependent pathway > 50%,inhibition rate of ADP-dependent pathway > 30%;
  9. Long-term anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy is needed;
  10. A history of internal bleeding that is not completely controlled, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, genitourinary bleeding, respiratory bleeding;
  11. Myocardial infarction within 30 days;
  12. Patients with high risks of embolization (a history of mechanical heart valve implantation, left ventricular thrombosis, mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation, acute pericarditis, or subacute bacterial endocarditis); atrial fibrillation without mitral stenosis is acceptable;
  13. Severely impaired liver function (ALT > 3 times the normal upper limit, or AST > 3 times the normal upper limit); severely impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate \< 30ml/min/1.73m2);
  14. Hypertension could not be effectively controlled before randomization (systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg);
  15. Patients cannot complete the follow-up due to Alzheimer's disease or mental illness;
  16. Coexistent serious diseases of the respiratory, circulatory, digestive, urogenital, endocrine, immune, and blood systems that are likely to interfere with the results;
  17. Patients with current drug/alcohol abuse or dependence, or expected to have poor compliance and difficult to complete the follow-up;
  18. Allergic to the drugs or instruments used in surgery;
  19. Patients with surgery contraindications, or the other factors that may preclude implementation of the study protocol;
  20. Pregnant or lactating women;
  21. Life expectancy \< 12 months due to any advanced stage of disease;
  22. Patient is participating in other clinical trials;
  23. The legal guardian of the patient is unwilling to sign the written informed consent;
  24. Assessed unsuitable for inclusion by investigators.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
190 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Endoscopic surgery

    Endoscopic surgery group

    Procedure: Endoscopic surgery

  • Active comparator
    Suboccipital craniotomy surgery

    Suboccipital craniotomy surgery group

    Procedure: Suboccipital craniotomy surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic surgery

    The endoscopic surgery will be conducted to evacuate the hemorrhage within 24 hours after SCH.

  • ProcedureSuboccipital craniotomy surgery

    The suboccipital craniotomy surgery will be conducted to evacuate the hemorrhage within 24 hours after SCH.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality Rate

    The mortality rate in each group at 30 days after SCH.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after SCH

Secondary outcomes

  1. mRS Score

    The mortality rate in each group at 6 months after SCH.

    Time frame: Within 6 months after SCH

  2. Adverse Events

    The Incidence of adverse events within 30 days after SCH.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after SCH

  3. Residual Hematoma Volume

    The residual hematoma volume on postoperative day 1, day 3 and day 7.

    Time frame: Within 7 days after SCH

  4. Perihematoma Edema Volume

    The perihematoma edema volume on postoperative day 1, day 3 and day 7.

    Time frame: Within 7 days after SCH

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tandu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, China
    • Wei Guo, M.D Ph.D · Contact · 18729985168@163.com · 86-18729985168
    • Haixiao Liu, M.D · Contact · 56761311@qq.com · 86-15929315407
    • Yan Qu, M.D, Ph.D · Principal investigator
    • Wei Guo, M.D, Ph.D · Principal investigator
    • Haixiao Liu, M.D, Ph.D · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Li L, Liu H, Luo J, Tan Z, Gao J, Wang P, Jing W, Fan R, Zhang X, Guo H, Bai H, Cui W, Wu X, Qu Y, Guo W. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Catheter Evacuation for the Treatment of Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage. Transl Stroke Res. 2021 Feb;12(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00827-8. Epub 2020 Jul 4. PubMed 32623579 ↗
  • Heros RC. Cerebellar hemorrhage and infarction. Stroke. 1982 Jan-Feb;13(1):106-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.13.1.106. No abstract available. PubMed 7039001 ↗
  • Lui TN, Fairholm DJ, Shu TF, Chang CN, Lee ST, Chen HR. Surgical treatment of spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage. Surg Neurol. 1985 Jun;23(6):555-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90002-3. PubMed 3992454 ↗
  • Kirollos RW, Tyagi AK, Ross SA, van Hille PT, Marks PV. Management of spontaneous cerebellar hematomas: a prospective treatment protocol. Neurosurgery. 2001 Dec;49(6):1378-86; discussion 1386-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200112000-00015. PubMed 11846937 ↗
  • Datar S, Rabinstein AA. Cerebellar hemorrhage. Neurol Clin. 2014 Nov;32(4):993-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Sep 11. PubMed 25439293 ↗
  • Chang CY, Lin CY, Chen LC, Sun CH, Li TY, Tsai TH, Chang ST, Wu YT. The Predictor of Mortality within Six-Months in Patients with Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0132975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132975. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26186721 ↗
  • Da Pian R, Bazzan A, Pasqualin A. Surgical versus medical treatment of spontaneous posterior fossa haematomas: a cooperative study on 205 cases. Neurol Res. 1984 Sep;6(3):145-51. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1984.11739680. PubMed 6151139 ↗
  • van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Goffin J, Plets C. Controversies in the management of spontaneous cerebellar haemorrhage. A consecutive series of 49 cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;122(3-4):187-93. doi: 10.1007/BF01405527. PubMed 8372706 ↗
  • Firsching R, Huber M, Frowein RA. Cerebellar haemorrhage: management and prognosis. Neurosurg Rev. 1991;14(3):191-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00310656. PubMed 1944934 ↗
  • St Louis EK, Wijdicks EF, Li H, Atkinson JD. Predictors of poor outcome in patients with a spontaneous cerebellar hematoma. Can J Neurol Sci. 2000 Feb;27(1):32-6. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100051945. PubMed 10676585 ↗
  • Lee JH, Kim DW, Kang SD. Stereotactic burr hole aspiration surgery for spontaneous hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;14(3):170-4. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2012.14.3.170. Epub 2012 Sep 28. PubMed 23210043 ↗
  • Li L, Li Z, Li Y, Su R, Wang B, Gao L, Yang Y, Xu F, Zhang X, Tian Q, Zhang X, Guo Q, Chang T, Luo T, Qu Y. Surgical Evacuation of Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Suboccipital Craniotomy, Stereotactic Aspiration, and Thrombolysis and Endoscopic Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:e90-e98. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.170. Epub 2018 Jun 1. PubMed 29864571 ↗
  • Meschia JF, Bushnell C, Boden-Albala B, Braun LT, Bravata DM, Chaturvedi S, Creager MA, Eckel RH, Elkind MS, Fornage M, Goldstein LB, Greenberg SM, Horvath SE, Iadecola C, Jauch EC, Moore WS, Wilson JA; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Council on Hypertension. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3754-832. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000046. Epub 2014 Oct 28. PubMed 25355838 ↗
  • Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, Becker K, Bendok BR, Cushman M, Fung GL, Goldstein JN, Macdonald RL, Mitchell PH, Scott PA, Selim MH, Woo D; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000069. Epub 2015 May 28. PubMed 26022637 ↗
  • Steiner T, Al-Shahi Salman R, Beer R, Christensen H, Cordonnier C, Csiba L, Forsting M, Harnof S, Klijn CJ, Krieger D, Mendelow AD, Molina C, Montaner J, Overgaard K, Petersson J, Roine RO, Schmutzhard E, Schwerdtfeger K, Stapf C, Tatlisumak T, Thomas BM, Toni D, Unterberg A, Wagner M; European Stroke Organisation. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9(7):840-55. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12309. Epub 2014 Aug 24. PubMed 25156220 ↗
  • Mohadjer M, Eggert R, May J, Mayfrank L. CT-guided stereotactic fibrinolysis of spontaneous and hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage: long-term results. J Neurosurg. 1990 Aug;73(2):217-22. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.2.0217. PubMed 2195140 ↗
  • Kellner CP, Moore F, Arginteanu MS, Steinberger AA, Yao K, Scaggiante J, Mocco J, Gologorsky Y. Minimally Invasive Evacuation of Spontaneous Cerebellar Intracerebral Hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.145. Epub 2018 Oct 3. PubMed 30292039 ↗
  • Khattar NK, Fortuny EM, Wessell AP, John KD, Bak E, Adams SW, Meyer KS, Schirmer CM, Simard JM, Neimat JS, Ding D, James RF. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e35-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.164. Epub 2019 Apr 28. PubMed 31042595 ↗
  • Hackenberg KA, Unterberg AW, Jung CS, Bosel J, Schonenberger S, Zweckberger K. Does suboccipital decompression and evacuation of intraparenchymal hematoma improve neurological outcome in patients with spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;155:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 3. PubMed 28226284 ↗
  • Lee TH, Huang YH, Su TM, Chen CF, Lu CH, Lee HL, Tsai HP, Sung WW, Kwan AL. Predictive Factors of 2-Year Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 8;8(6):818. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060818. PubMed 31181777 ↗
  • Al Safatli D, Guenther A, McLean AL, Waschke A, Kalff R, Ewald C. Prediction of 30-day mortality in spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage. Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Nov 20;8:282. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_479_16. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29279799 ↗
  • Liu H, Wu X, Tan Z, Guo H, Bai H, Wang B, Cui W, Zheng L, Sun F, Zhang X, Fan R, Wang P, Jing W, Gao J, Guo W, Qu Y. Long-Term Effect of Endoscopic Evacuation for Large Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage With GCS Scores <== 8. Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 14;11:848. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00848. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32922354 ↗
  • Guo W, Liu H, Tan Z, Zhang X, Gao J, Zhang L, Guo H, Bai H, Cui W, Liu X, Wu X, Luo J, Qu Y. Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration, and craniotomy for treatment of basal ganglia hemorrhage. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):55-61. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014962. Epub 2019 Jul 12. PubMed 31300535 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04991233
Lead sponsor
Tang-Du Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2021
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 5, 2021

Study contacts

Wei Guo, M.D Ph.D
Contact
18729985168@163.com
86-18729985168
Haixiao Liu, M.D Ph.D
Contact
56761311@qq.com
86-15929315407
Yan Qu, M.D Ph.D
study chair · Tang-Du Hospital
Wei Guo, M.D Ph.D
study director · Tang-Du Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion