ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04989075OP-PEUpdated Jul 30, 2025

Oral Prophylactic Measures on the Occurrence of Pre-eclampsia (OP-PE)

An interventional study of Oral prophylactic intervention in Pregnancy Complications, sponsored by Claude Bernard University. Completed at 1 site in Senegal. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-30.

Primary conditionPre-EclampsiaRegistry: Pregnancy ComplicationsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pregnancy Complications — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Pre-Eclampsia
Why
  1. The study's title name Pre-Eclampsia, a narrower term within Pregnancy Complications.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Claude Bernard University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Pre-eclampsia (PE) remains a major source of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality especially in low- and middle-income settings. PE, a pregnancy-specific hypertensive disorder, characterized by the development of placental endothelial dysfunction resulting in, among the most common diagnostic features, concomitant hypertension and proteinuria that may evolve into organs with fluctuating clinical specificities. Current studies indicate that periodontal disorders during pregnancy and particularly periodontal pathogens may be related to the risk of PE. Standard oral hygiene methods, based mainly on the joint use of toothbrushes and interdental brushes, reduce periodontal inflammatory risk, modulate of the dysbiotic oral microbiome. The purpose of the present study is to compare the PE outcomes in high-risk pregnant women receiving oral prophylactic measures to a control group. One specific question is addressed as follows according to the PICO principles: In high-risk pregnant women (Population), does oral prophylactic measures (Intervention) have a beneficial effect on PE parameters (Outcome) compared to pregnant women without any specific oral prophylactic measures (Control)?

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Complications

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pre-eclampsia
  • pregnant
  • periodontal disease
  • interdental microbiota
03

In context

Pre-Eclampsia Reclassified

916 studies on the registry are indexed under Pre-Eclampsia; 243 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 330 is above the median of 110 across 480 interventional studies indexed under Pre-Eclampsia.

Browse Pre-Eclampsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Claude Bernard University is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Compared within Pre-Eclampsia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pregnancy Complications. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • pregnant woman
  • women from sub-Saharan Africa
  • aged from 18 to 40 years old
  • nullipares at the time of the obstetrical consultation
  • up to 12 weeks pregnant
  • acceptance of the terms and conditions of the study
  • signature of the form,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • fetal distress
  • congenital uterine and vaginal abnormalities
  • infectious or systemic diseases such as , tuberculosis, candidiasis, cancers, hemopathies
  • premature termination of pregnancy for medical reasons
  • diagnosis of periodontitis defined as interproximal CAL ≥1 mm at ≥2 non-adjacent teeth, or buccal/oral CAL ≥3 mm with probing depth >3 mm at ≥2 teeth, not attributable to non-periodontitis-related causes
  • history or treatment of PD
  • a course of dental or orthodontic treatment
  • absence of the 4 premolar-molar pairs
  • less than 20 natural teeth, excluding third molars
  • medication affecting the gum and/or oral mucosa
  • regularly using interdental brushes and/or dental floss and/or mouthwash
  • unable to answer questions or non-cooperative.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
330 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The control group will continue its usual oral hygiene practice.

  • Experimental
    Oral prophylactic intervention

    For the study group, the oral prophylactic intervention will consist of provision of specfic package including soft-bristled manual toothbrush, toothpaste, and a kit of calibrated interdental brushes (IDBs)(Curaprox CPS; Curaden) of sizes corresponding to the diameter of their interdental spaces. The participants will be instructed to brush their teeeth twice-daily and to realise a daily interdental brushing until delivery. The instructions for the use of the toothbrush and IDBs comprised verbal instructions supported by practical demonstration. The first use of the material will be conducted under the supervision of a qualified public health professor.

    Other: Oral prophylactic intervention

Interventions

  • OtherOral prophylactic intervention

    The oral prophylactic intervention will consist of the provision of specific package including a soft-bristled manual toothbrush, toothpaste, and a kit of calibrated interdental brushes (IDBs)(Curaprox CPS; Curaden) of sizes corresponding to the diameter of their interdental spaces. The participants will be instructed to brush their teeeth twice-daily and to realise a daily interdental brushing until delivery. The instructions for the use of the toothbrush and IDBs comprised verbal instructions supported by practical demonstration. The first use of the material will be conducted under the supervision of a qualified public health professor.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of pre-eclampsia from baseline during the pregnancy

    To determine if pregnant women suffer from pre-eclampsia, several indices are measured (diastolic or systolic pressure and proteinuria or urinary protein/creatinine ratio). The combination of the results of pressure and proteinuria permits to classify of a woman as suffering from pre-eclampsia if: 1. the diastolic pressure is higher than 90 mm Hg on two 4 hours intervals, or \> 110 mm Hg once, or systolic pressure \> 140 mm Hg on two 4 hours intervals, or \> 160 mm Hg once, after 20 weeks of gestation and, 2. the proteinuria measured is of 2+ or more, or \> 300mg/24 hours, or \> 500mg/L or urinary protein/creatinine ratio \> 0.034g/mmol.

    Time frame: 9 months of pregnancy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of pathogenic bacteria in the interdental microbiota during the pregnancy

    Quantitative PCR experiments will be performed and a quantitative analysis of the interdental microbiota will be made

    Time frame: 3, 4, 6 and 8 months of pregnancy

  2. Change of bleeding on probing during the pregnancy

    Quantification of the bleeding on probing of the teeth with a periodontal probe

    Time frame: 3, 4, 6 and 8 months of pregnancy

  3. Change of pocket probing depth of teeth during the pregnancy

    Quantification of the pocket probing depth of the teeth with a periodontal probe

    Time frame: 3, 4, 6 and 8 months of pregnancy

  4. Change of clinical attachment level of teeth during the pregnancy

    Quantification of the clinical attachment level of the teeth with a periodontal probe

    Time frame: 3, 4, 6 and 8 months of pregnancy

  5. Change of gingival index of teeth during the pregnancy

    Quantification of the gingival index

    Time frame: 3, 4, 6 and 8 months of pregnancy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital
    Dakar, Senegal
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gare J, Kanoute A, Meda N, Viennot S, Bourgeois D, Carrouel F. Periodontal Conditions and Pathogens Associated with Pre-Eclampsia: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;18(13):7194. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137194. PubMed 34281133 ↗
  • Carrouel F, Kanoute A, Faye D, Mazur M, Perrier H, Vitiello F, Ardan R, Clement C, Lan R, Bourgeois D. Impact of Interdental Brushing on Pregnancy-Associated Gingivitis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2026 Apr;53(4):539-549. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.70085. Epub 2026 Jan 20. PubMed 41558746 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 13 months.

Of 171 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pre-Eclampsia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43. This study's 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 176 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 19, 2021
First posted
Aug 4, 2021
StartActual
Mar 15, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 15, 2023
CompletionActual
Jul 25, 2023
Last update
Jul 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04989075
Lead sponsor
Claude Bernard University
Collaborators
Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal, University of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Responsible party
Carrouel Florence (Associate professor, Claude Bernard University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 4, 2021
Start date
Mar 15, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2023
Completion
Jul 25, 2023
Last update
Jul 30, 2025

Study contacts

Florence Carrouel, Dr
study director · P2S, UR4129, University of Lyon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion