ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04983602EDPLUSUpdated Jul 27, 2022

Physiotherapy Led Community Intervention for Older Adults Discharged From the Emergency Department

An interventional study of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment arm and EDPLUS in Old Age; Debility and Health Services for the Aged, sponsored by University of Limerick. Completed at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-27.

Sponsored by University of Limerick · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ED PLUS Emergency Department Discharge Physiotherapy Led Community Service is a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial investigating the role of an integrated care intervention consisting of comprehensive geriatrics assessment in older adults in the emergency department and a physiotherapy-led community based intervention.

Read the detailed description

All patients who are aged 65 years and over will be screened using the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) Tool in the emergency department of a University Teaching Hospital. Those with a score of 2 or above in the ISAR and suitable for discharge home will be randomised. The first treatment arm will undergo geriatric medicine item directed Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) from admission to emergency department (ED). The non-treatment arm will under usual patient care. The second treatment arm will undergo geriatric medicine team directed CGA from admission to ED and a physiotherapy led community based 6 week intervention in the patient's home. A dedicated multidisciplinary team of geriatric medicine trainee, occupational therapist, physiotherapist and medical social worker will carry out the assessment. For those randomised to the second treatment arm, a physiotherapist will assess and carry out a 6 week interventions that arise from that assessment and liaise with the patients General Practitioner (GP), medical social worker and other health care professionals. The overall aims of ED PLUS are assess the feasibility of the 6 week physiotherapy led intervention. Feasibility will be determined by the following outcomes:

i) Recruitment rate

ii) Adherence rate

iii) Acceptability of the programme

iv) Retention

v) Incidents

The secondary aims are to improve function, reduce anxiety and depression, improve quality of life and prevent unnecessary ED admission.

02

Conditions studied

  • Old Age; Debility
  • Health Services for the Aged

Keywords

  • older adults
  • geriatric medicine
  • integrated care
  • emergency department
  • feasibility
03

In context

Frailty

1,229 studies on the registry are indexed under Frailty; 433 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 80 across 704 interventional studies indexed under Frailty.

Browse Frailty studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Limerick is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria for participants include:

  • Adults aged ≥65 years with undifferentiated medical complaints presenting to an ED.
  • Medically stable as deemed by the treating physician
  • Display a score of ≥2 on the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening tool.
  • Be community dwelling
  • Be discharged from the ED within 72 hours of index visit.

Exclusion criteria include:

  • Individuals under the age of 65 years.
  • Have a score of less than 2 on the ISAR.
  • Older adults who present with acute myocardial infarction, stroke or non-medical problems e.g. surgical or psychiatric issues.
  • Older adults who are medically unstable will be excluded.
  • If neither the patient nor carer can communicate in English sufficiently to complete consent or baseline assessment, they will be excluded.
  • Older adults who are admitted to hospital from the ED will be excluded.
  • Older adults who have a confirmed COVID 19 diagnosis or those with symptoms highly suggestive of COVID 19 will be excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual care Control group

    The usual care control group receives conventional care in the Emergency Department (ED) or Acute Medical Assessment Unit (AMAU)The comparison group will receive routine care as would be usual in the ED or AMAU. Currently there is no dedicated team to perform CGA in the ED and AMAU at UHL with ad hoc allied health assessment available only at the discretion of the referring ED doctor or medical team. This process will be continued during the study and will be documented. The participants in this group will under baseline data collection prior to randomisation and follow up.

  • Experimental
    Comprehensive Geriatric assessment arm

    The intervention will comprise initially of a detailed interdisciplinary assessment and intervention by one or more members of the dedicated geriatric team. The team (consisting of a geriatric specialist registrar, specialist geriatric nurse, senior pharmacist, senior physiotherapist, senior occupational therapist, and senior medical social worker) in both ED and AMAU will assess all participants in the intervention group and perform CGA. Potential participants will be approached regarding trial recruitment post ED triage thereby ensuring rapid assessment shortly after hospital arrival by the teams in both AMAU and in ED.

    Other: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment arm

  • Experimental
    EDPLUS arm

    The ED PLUS intervention will comprise initially of a detailed interdisciplinary assessment and intervention by one or more members of the dedicated geriatric team. The team in both ED and AMAU will assess all participants in the intervention group and perform CGA. Potential participants will be approached regarding trial recruitment post ED triage thereby ensuring rapid assessment shortly after hospital arrival by the teams in both AMAU and in ED. Additionally the participants in this arm will undergo a 6 week physiotherapy led intervention in the community involving 3 home visits and weekly telephone support. The intervention will involved assessment of the patients function in terms of strength, balance and mobility. Following assessment the intervention will be aimed at addressing deficits in the function of the participants, review of their medical management by a geriatrician trainee and focusing on self management of their own program.

    Other: EDPLUS

Interventions

  • OtherComprehensive Geriatric Assessment arm

    The intervention will involve a comprehensive geriatric assessment which will be provided by a geriatric doctor, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, social worker, pharmacist and specialist nurse.,

  • OtherEDPLUS

    EDPLUS involves a 6 week physiotherapy led community based intervention involving 3 home visits and weekly telephone support.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Decline

    Barthel Index is global measure of functional status with a score from 0-20. A score of 0 is completely dependent, 20 is fully independent.

    Time frame: 6 weeks post ED visit

  2. Functional Decline

    Barthel Index is global measure of functional status with a score from 0-20. A score of 0 is completely dependent, 20 is fully independent.

    Time frame: 6 months post ED visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Quality of Life

    Patient rated quality of life is determined by the Euro Quality of Life EQ5D. This scale is scored from 0 to 100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state with 100 being the best imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post ED visit and 6 months post ED visit

  2. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction is determined by the Patient Satisfaction Survey III Short Form (PSQ18). This is scored from 18 to 90, with 18 being the lowest level of satisfaction to 90 being the best score

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post ED visit and 6 months post ED visit

  3. Rate of ED representation

    A record of the patient coming back to the ED within 6 weeks and/or 6 months post ED index visit

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post ED visit and 6 months post ED visit

  4. Rate of Hospital readmission

    A record of the patient requiring admission to the hospital within 6 weeks and/or 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline,6 weeks post ED visit and 6 months post ED visit

  5. Mortality

    A record of the patient having died within 6 weeks or 6 months

    Time frame: 6 weeks post ED index visit or 6 months post ED index visit

  6. Patient Experience Times

    Exact time of admission or discharge form the ED will be collected at 6 weeks post ED index visit

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Number of visits to the family doctor or public health nurse

    Determined by self reported visits to family doctor or public health nurse. This will be a telephone consultation at 6 week and 6 months post ED index visit where patients will be asked if they have visited a family doctor or public health nurse in the previous 6 weeks at the 6 week telephone call, or 6 months at the 6 month telephone call

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 6 months post index ED visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Limerick
    Limerick, Ireland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Conneely M, Leahy S, O'Connor M, Corey G, Gabr A, Saleh A, Okpaje B, O' Shaughnessy I, Synnott A, McCarthy A, Holmes A, Robinson K, Ryan L, Griffin A, Barry L, Trepel D, Ryan D, Galvin R; Ageing Research Centre Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) Panel of older adults. A Physiotherapy-Led Transition to Home Intervention for Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge: A Pilot Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (ED PLUS). Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Oct 24;18:1769-1788. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S413961. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37901478 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual data will be stored on a data repository after the study analysis.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: The study protocol will be prepared for publication in an open access journal. The protocol will include the Statistical Analysis plan, detailed descriptions of interventions. It is likely to be published in September 2021

Access criteria: Supporting information will be available on peer review publications.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2021 to primary completion in Jun 2022, 9 months.

Of 477 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Frailty, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 40. This study's 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 484 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 23, 2021
First posted
Jul 30, 2021
StartActual
Sep 13, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jun 13, 2022
CompletionActual
Jun 13, 2022
Last update
Jul 27, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04983602
Lead sponsor
University of Limerick
Collaborators
University Hospital of Limerick
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2021
Start date
Sep 13, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 13, 2022
Completion
Jun 13, 2022
Last update
Jul 27, 2022

Study contacts

Rose Galvin, PhD
principal investigator · University of Limerick

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion