ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07351526Updated Jan 20, 2026

Inpatient Post-Acute Rehabilitation For Patients in the Midwest: a Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical Characteristics and Process Outcomes

An observational study in Rehabilitation, Frailty and Complex Patients in Rehabilitation Phase, sponsored by University of Limerick. Recruiting at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-20.

Sponsored by University of Limerick · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rehabilitation improves health outcomes, reduces disability and improves quality of life. There is a significant and emerging body of international evidence to support the benefit and cost effectiveness of specialist rehabilitation services within a modern health service. The demand for rehabilitation services is growing with changes in populations and with the advances in health care and new interventions and technology.

Our overall aim is to explore the outcomes and clinical characteristics of adults who are admitted to a rehabilitation hospital in the Midwest region of Ireland during admission, at the time of their discharge and at 6 months.

Read the detailed description

Rehabilitation is a dynamic and critical component of the therapeutic continuum and one that is essential if patients are to regain or maintain their life roles, health status and quality of life after serious illness or injury.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends in its definition that priority is given to ensure access, for those in need, to appropriate, timely, affordable and high-quality rehabilitation interventions.

Life expectancy is improving and the population of older persons is growing with increased demand for specialist rehabilitation services. This population is at increased risk for functional decline and increased demand for healthcare services. With older adults accounting for up to 24% of all ED attendees and an anticipated rise in this number, this places increased strain on the healthcare system

The aim of this study is to establish the demographic and clinical characteristics of adults in the Midwest referred, assessed and treated in St Ita's Rehabilitation Hospital in the Mid- West of lreland.

This study will inform on resource requirements of our rehabilitation facilities to ensure that the complexity of the patients are matched by the resources provided. We will also explore the benefits of rehabilitation across a broad range of conditions and evaluate the outcomes for patients including patient reported measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rehabilitation
  • Frailty
  • Complex Patients in Rehabilitation Phase

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • rehabilitation
  • complexity
  • rehabilitation outcomes
03

In context

Frailty

1,284 studies on the registry are indexed under Frailty; 452 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 225 across 493 observational studies indexed under Frailty.

Browse Frailty studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Limerick is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All adults admitted to St Ita's Rehabilitation Hospital from February 2025 to February 2026 (inclusive) will be considered eligible for participation in the study, if they meet the inclusion criteria.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 and over and admitted to a relevant rehabilitation unit with capacity to provide consent for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women and patients who are deemed not to have capacity to consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of functional decline

    The number of participants who experience functional decline or do not as measured by the Barthel Index (BI). Functional decline is defined as a net decrease in the number of activities of daily living performed independently as measured by the self-reported BI. The sum of all of the 10 subscales of the BI ranges from 0-20 points where a higher score indicates increased independence.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Incidence of functional decline

    The number of participants who experience functional decline or do not as measured by the Barthel Index (BI). Functional decline is defined as a net decrease in the number of activities of daily living performed independently as measured by the self-reported BI. The sum of all of the 10 subscales of the BI ranges from 0-20 points where a higher score indicates increased independence.

    Time frame: From the date on inception into the study until the date of discharge from hospital, assessed up to 6 months

  3. Incidence of Functional Decline

    The number of participants who experience functional decline or do not as measured by the Barthel Index (BI). Functional decline is defined as a net decrease in the number of activities of daily living performed independently as measured by the self-reported BI. The sum of all of the 10 subscales of the BI ranges from 0-20 points where a higher score indicates increased independence.

    Time frame: 6 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Healthcare use

    Number of services that participants were in receipt of following discharge from rehabilitation services including; GP visits, unplanned Emergency Department attendance, Outpatient appointments.

    Time frame: 6 Months

  2. Polypharmacy level

    Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and potentially omitted medications (POM) using the STOP START criteria. The STOPP/START Screening tools are based on the STOPP/START Prescription criteria which consist of a set of inappropriate combinations of medicines and disease (STOPP) and a set of recommended treatments for given conditions (START). There are 80 STOPP and 34 START criteria and they are grouped by physiological system e.g. cardiovascular.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Polypharmacy level

    potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and potentially omitted medications (POM) using the STOP START criteria. The STOPP/START Screening tools are based on the STOPP/START Prescription criteria which consist of a set of inappropriate combinations of medicines and disease (STOPP) and a set of recommended treatments for given conditions (START). There are 80 STOPP and 34 START criteria and they are grouped by physiological system e.g. cardiovascular.

    Time frame: From the date on inception into the study until the date of discharge from hospital, assessed up to 6 months

  4. Polypharmacy level

    potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and potentially omitted medications (POM) using the STOP START criteria. The STOPP/START Screening tools are based on the STOPP/START Prescription criteria which consist of a set of inappropriate combinations of medicines and disease (STOPP) and a set of recommended treatments for given conditions (START). There are 80 STOPP and 34 START criteria and they are grouped by physiological system e.g. cardiovascular.

    Time frame: 6 Months

  5. Frailty

    Participants will be reviewed at time of discharge from rehabilitation services as to level of frailty using both the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) frailty screening tools. Both the clinical frailty scale and identification of seniors at risk were recorded at admission and again at discharge to evaluate change in frailty status over the hospital stay. The combination of tools will aim to enable examination of how initial risk screening interacts with frailty status to influence long-term functional trajectories. Higher scores on both the clinical frailty scale and identification of seniors at risk indicate higher levels of frailty and are often associated with worse outcomes. The clinical frailty scale is a 9 point rating scale (1-9) with 9 indicating the highest level of frailty (terminally ill), the identification of seniors at risk is a 6 item screening tool with a score of 2 or greater indicating increased risk of frailty.

    Time frame: From the date on inception into the study until the date of discharge from hospital, assessed up to 6 months

  6. Frailty

    Participants will be reviewed at time of discharge from rehabilitation services as to level of frailty using both the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) frailty screening tools. Both the Clinical frailty scale and Identification of seniors at risk were recorded at 6 month follow up to evaluate change in frailty status over the hospital stay. The combination of tools will aim to enable examination of how initial risk screening interacts with frailty status to influence long-term functional trajectories. Higher scores on both the clinical frailty scale and identification of seniors at risk indicate higher levels of frailty and are often associated with worse outcomes. The clinical frailty scale is a 9 point rating scale (1-9) with 9 indicating the highest level of frailty (terminally ill), the identification of seniors at risk is a 6 item screening tool with a score of 2 or greater indicating increased risk of frailty.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Quality of life (EuroQoL-5 dimension 5 level questionnaire)

    A questionnaire to evaluate participants health-related quality of life, assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Higher scores indicate higher perception of health related quality of life. Index score (0-1) with 1 being the best and visual analogue scores (0-100) with 100 being the highest rating of overall health.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Quality of life (EuroQoL-5 dimension 5 level questionnaire)

    A questionnaire to evaluate participants health-related quality of life, assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Higher scores indicate higher perception of health related quality of life. Index score (0-1) with 1 being the best and visual analogue scores (0-100) with 100 being the highest rating of overall health.

    Time frame: From the date on inception into the study until the date of discharge from hospital, assessed up to 6 months

  9. Quality of life (EuroQoL-5 dimension 5 level questionnaire)

    A questionnaire to evaluate participants health-related quality of life, assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Index score (0-1) with 1 being the best and visual analogue scores (0-100) with 100 being the highest rating of overall health.

    Time frame: 6 Months

  10. Nursing Home Admission

    Number of participants who were admitted to a nursing home or residential care facility following discharge from rehabilitation services.

    Time frame: 6 Months

  11. Mortality

    The number of participants who died following discharge from rehabilitation services.

    Time frame: 6 Months

  12. Falls

    Number of falls sustained post discharge from rehabilitation services.

    Time frame: 6 Months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • School of Allied Health, University of Limerick
    Limerick, Munster V94 T9PX, Ireland
    Recruiting
    • Rose Galvin Professor, PhD · Contactrose.galvin@ul.ie · +35361213081
    • Christina Hayes, PhD · Contactchristina.hayes@ul.ie · +35361213081
    • Orla Holmes, MB, Bch, BAO · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhang S, Lin D, Wright ME, Swallow N. Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Improves Function Independent of Comorbidities in Medically Complex Patients. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Jan 12;4(2):100178. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100178. eCollection 2022 Jun. PubMed 35756989 ↗
  • Wang H, Camicia M, DiVita M, Mix J, Niewczyk P. Early inpatient rehabilitation admission and stroke patient outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Feb;94(2):85-96; quiz 97-100. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000226. PubMed 25569470 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual patient data collected during this study may be shared with approved researchers for the purpose of future research projects. Any data shared will be fully anonymised prior to release, with all direct and indirect identifiers removed to ensure that no participant can be identified. Only anonymised datasets will be made available, and these will be shared securely and solely for ethically approved research purposes.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07351526
Lead sponsor
University of Limerick
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 20, 2026
Start date
Feb 22, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 22, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 22, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 20, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion