An interventional study of Behavioral Activation and Treatment as Usual in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-12.
Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Depression is common after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may have wide-ranging consequences. Post-TBI depression may impede reintegration into the family and community and lead to lower quality of life and heightened suicide risk. It may also interfere with rehabilitation. Yet, current treatments for post-TBI depression are based largely on expert opinion rather than evidence from rigorous studies.
Behavioral activation (BA) is a promising intervention for post-TBI depression. It is a brief behavioral treatment that helps people define goals, create and execute plans to reach them, and engage in meaningful activities. BA has been tested in clinical trials since the 1970s and has been shown to reduce or prevent depression in populations with diverse medical conditions. However, BA has rarely been used or studied for treatment of depression in a TBI population.
The investigators will conduct a study of BA with at least 40 Veterans with TBI and depressive symptoms in VA outpatient rehabilitation care. One group of Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive BA plus usual care. The BA program consists of six sessions delivered over three months at the VA (or Veterans' homes, if preferred) by an occupational therapist (OT). A second group of Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive usual care. The investigators will assess the feasibility of delivering the BA intervention in the rehabilitation setting and its acceptability to Veterans and staff. The research team will also assess participant responses to BA in the outcomes of depressive symptoms, community reintegration, and quality of life. Study findings will be used to guide the development of a future study of BA in a larger sample of Veterans with post-TBI depression.
This study and future research may add a powerful clinical tool to rehabilitation services to lessen or prevent depression in Veterans with TBI. Reducing depression may in turn facilitate rehabilitation and enhance community reintegration, allowing Veterans to engage more fully in their families and communities.
Objectives: Nearly 400,000 Veterans have been diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI) since 2000, representing up to 22% of combat casualties. Depression is one of the most prevalent and serious of TBI sequelae. Post-TBI depression adversely affects rehabilitation, treatment adherence, community reintegration (CR), quality of life (QOL), social relationships, and caregiver burden. Yet, post-TBI depression remains under-assessed, undertreated, and under-studied. No clinical guidelines for post-TBI depression treatment exist, and current treatment is largely based on expert opinion rather than evidence from controlled clinical trials.
A promising therapeutic approach to post-TBI depression is Behavioral Activation (BA), a brief and pragmatic treatment rigorously tested since the 1970s in clinical trials for depression in diverse clinical populations. BA helps individuals set goals, create plans, and engage in activities that improve mood and maintain social connectedness - making it well-suited to treating depression in a TBI population that struggles to set goals and is prone to social isolation. BA can accommodate hallmark deficits of TBI such as deficits in memory, organization, planning, initiation, emotion regulation, and interpersonal functioning. It can be delivered by professionals routinely available in VA outpatient rehabilitation services (e.g., occupational therapists, nurses, psychologists, social workers) and, therefore, can be deployed in rehabilitation settings.
The proposed research will assess the feasibility of a BA protocol adapted for post-TBI depression in an outpatient VA rehabilitation setting. Specific study objectives are to: (1) assess BA's acceptability to Veterans and staff and other feasibility indices, (2) provide preliminary evidence of participant response in the outcomes of depressive symptoms, CR, and QOL at the 3-month follow-up interview, (3) develop the BA protocol and manual to be tested in a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the future, and (4) explore engagement in activity as the mechanism that underlies BA intervention effects on outcomes.
Research Design: This feasibility study includes a pilot randomized controlled trail to examine participant response.
Methodology: This feasibility study will enroll at least 40 male and female Veterans receiving care at a VAMC Rehabilitation Medicine Service and meeting study criteria for TBI and depression. Veterans will be randomly assigned to BA plus treatment as usual (TAU) or control (TAU). The BA program consists of six sessions delivered over 3 months at the VA (or the Veteran's home, as preferred by Veteran) by an occupational therapist (OT). All Veterans are interviewed at baseline before randomization and 3 months later by a blinded interviewer. Both interviews assess Veterans' depressive symptoms, CR, and QOL, using standardized instruments. Feasibility will be assessed in six domains: acceptability to Veterans and clinic staff; process (recruitment, refusal, and retention rates; study completion; eligibility criteria; and number of sessions attended); practicality (resources and constraints imposed by the setting); safety; participant comprehension of interviews and the intervention; and research burden (length of interviews, participant fatigue, and emotional distress). After the follow-up interview, phone interviews with BA participants and with clinic staff will be conducted to capture acceptability and their experience with BA. These qualitative and quantitative methods are designed to test the feasibility of a future RCT, identify the barriers and facilitators to implementation of BA in the rehabilitation setting, and describe Veterans' experiences with BA.
Impact/Significance: This study and line of research has the potential to advance knowledge by identifying a feasible and efficacious approach to preventing and/or mitigating depression among Veterans with TBI, a clinical population at high risk for depression and its sequelae. Findings will be used to inform the development of a future RCT powered to test BA's efficacy in a larger sample of Veterans with post-TBI depression.
1,775 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 448 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 56 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.
Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.
Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants in the BA group will receive BA treatment and treatment as usual. BA is a brief behavioral treatment that helps people define goals, create and execute plans to attain them, and engage in meaningful activities. The BA intervention will be delivered in 6 sessions over 3 months by Occupational Therapists trained in BA for post-TBI depression. BA sessions will be conducted in person in an office at the VA rehabilitation clinic, virtually by VA Video Connect, or in person in the home, depending on the veteran's preference.
Behavioral: Behavioral Activation · Other: Treatment as Usual
Participants in the Control group receive treatment as usual (TAU), which is usual care provided by the VA medical center.
Other: Treatment as Usual
BA is a brief behavioral treatment that helps people define goals, create and execute plans to attain them, and engage in meaningful activities. BA protocol components include: goal setting (especially for activities that promote social connectedness), creation of a plan (broken down into steps), strategies for implementation of steps, identification of potential barriers, tactics to overcome them, activity monitoring and scheduling, and emotion regulation strategies. The BA intervention will be delivered in 6 sessions over 3 months by Occupational Therapists trained in BA for post-TBI depression. BA sessions will be conducted in person in an office at the VA rehabilitation clinic, virtually by VA Video Connect, or in person in the home, depending on the veteran's preference.
Treatment as Usual refers to usual care provided by the VA medical center.
Depressive Symptom Scores on CES-D
Depressive symptoms will be measured by The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). CES-D is a well-established 20-item screening instrument that shows good psychometric properties in TBI populations. It will be administered at the Baseline interview and Follow-up interview (at 3 months). It uses a Likert-type scale from 0 to 3. The total score is the sum across all 20 items. Total scores may range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 3 - 4 months
Community Reintegration Scores on PART-O-17
The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective scale (PART-O-17) measures participation in the community in three domains: Productivity, Out and About, and Social Relations. In our study, scores were converted to z scores because more than one response format was used across items. When data are converted to Z scores, the sample mean is always 0. Scores (i.e., Z scores, not standard deviations) above 0 indicate better than average community participation, those below 0 indicate worse participation. Thus, higher scores of this scale indicate better participation.
Time frame: 3 - 4 months
Quality of Life in TBI Scores on QoL-TBI Instrument
Quality of life in TBI will be measured by The QoL-TBI instrument. This is a 37-item patient-centered measure that captures the individual's perception of his/her health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in cognition, self-care, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems. It will be administered at the Baseline interview and Follow-up interview (at 3 months). It uses a 5-point scale from "0 - Not at all" to "4- Very." Although the published description of this tool designates sums across all items as a summary score, we computed the mean of all items. The reason is that the use of a sum poses a problem whenever there are missing data, which produces a spuriously lower score for individuals with some missing responses. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: 3 - 4 months
Acceptability of the Intervention Rated by the Interventionist
Acceptability is measured by the Acceptance/Receipt Scale and is completed by the interventionist at the last intervention session. This is an 18-item tool with Likert scale response formats from 0 to 4. A mean score will be obtained and ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased acceptability.
Time frame: 3 - 4 months
Veteran Acceptability/Satisfaction With the Intervention
Acceptability/Satisfaction with the intervention will be measured with the Acceptability/Satisfaction Scale and is completed by the participants who received Behavioral Activation after the last intervention session when the qualitative interview is also conducted. This is a 12 item tool with a Likert scale response format from 0 to 4. A mean score will be obtained and ranges from 0 to 4. A higher score indicates increased acceptability/satisfaction.
Time frame: 3 - 4 months
Recruitment
Recruitment is considered part of the process domain of feasibility. Recruitment will be measured by the percentage of veterans eligible for the study among those screened and the percentage willing to participate among those screened. Among those screened, our criteria for recruitment is that 50% or more will be eligible for the study and that at least 30% will be willing to participate.
Time frame: 16 months
Retention
Retention is considered part of the process domain of feasibility and will be measured in two ways. Retention will be measured by the number of treatment sessions completed over the total number of sessions (6) for only those in the treatment group. The percentage who completed at least four treatment sessions will be the criterion for this. Among those who are enrolled in both groups, retention is measured by the percentage in each group who completed the Time 2 follow-up interview (which occurred 3 - 4 months after the baseline interview).
Time frame: 3 - 4 months for the number in each group that completed the Time 2 follow-up interview and up to 4 months for number in treatment group who completed at least four treatment sessions.
Treatment Fidelity
Treatment fidelity is considered part of the process domain of feasibility. This will be measured by the Treatment Fidelity Checklist, a 15-item tool with a 3-point scale with responses from 1 (poor) to 3 (excellent). The mean will be computed for the 15 items for each recorded interview. The percentage of the interviews that had a mean less than 2.0 will be computed and will be the measure of treatment fidelity. Our criterion is that no more than 15% of sessions observed or audiotaped will have a mean less than 2.0.
Time frame: 18 months
| Milestone | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 19 | 22 |
| Completed | 16 | 19 |
| Not completed | 3 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 2 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 1 |
Depressive symptoms will be measured by The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). CES-D is a well-established 20-item screening instrument that shows good psychometric properties in TBI populations. It will be administered at the Baseline interview and Follow-up interview (at 3 months). It uses a Likert-type scale from 0 to 3. The total score is the sum across all 20 items. Total scores may range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
| units on a scale | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Depressive Symptom Scores on CES-D | 30.06 ± 9.30 | 29.68 ± 11.70 |
The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective scale (PART-O-17) measures participation in the community in three domains: Productivity, Out and About, and Social Relations. In our study, scores were converted to z scores because more than one response format was used across items. When data are converted to Z scores, the sample mean is always 0. Scores (i.e., Z scores, not standard deviations) above 0 indicate better than average community participation, those below 0 indicate worse participation. Thus, higher scores of this scale indicate better participation.
| Z score | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Community Reintegration Scores on PART-O-17 | .13 ± .38 | -.11 ± .23 |
Quality of life in TBI will be measured by The QoL-TBI instrument. This is a 37-item patient-centered measure that captures the individual's perception of his/her health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in cognition, self-care, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems. It will be administered at the Baseline interview and Follow-up interview (at 3 months). It uses a 5-point scale from "0 - Not at all" to "4- Very." Although the published description of this tool designates sums across all items as a summary score, we computed the mean of all items. The reason is that the use of a sum poses a problem whenever there are missing data, which produces a spuriously lower score for individuals with some missing responses. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
| units on a scale | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life in TBI Scores on QoL-TBI Instrument | 2.05 ± .47 | 1.92 ± .40 |
Acceptability is measured by the Acceptance/Receipt Scale and is completed by the interventionist at the last intervention session. This is an 18-item tool with Likert scale response formats from 0 to 4. A mean score will be obtained and ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased acceptability.
| units on a scale | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group |
|---|---|
| Acceptability of the Intervention Rated by the Interventionist | 2.75 ± .36 |
Acceptability/Satisfaction with the intervention will be measured with the Acceptability/Satisfaction Scale and is completed by the participants who received Behavioral Activation after the last intervention session when the qualitative interview is also conducted. This is a 12 item tool with a Likert scale response format from 0 to 4. A mean score will be obtained and ranges from 0 to 4. A higher score indicates increased acceptability/satisfaction.
| units on a scale | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group |
|---|---|
| Veteran Acceptability/Satisfaction With the Intervention | 3.34 ± 1.59 |
Recruitment is considered part of the process domain of feasibility. Recruitment will be measured by the percentage of veterans eligible for the study among those screened and the percentage willing to participate among those screened. Among those screened, our criteria for recruitment is that 50% or more will be eligible for the study and that at least 30% will be willing to participate.
| Participants | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group |
|---|---|
| Not eligible | 6 |
| Consented | 46 |
| Refused to participate | 20 |
Retention is considered part of the process domain of feasibility and will be measured in two ways. Retention will be measured by the number of treatment sessions completed over the total number of sessions (6) for only those in the treatment group. The percentage who completed at least four treatment sessions will be the criterion for this. Among those who are enrolled in both groups, retention is measured by the percentage in each group who completed the Time 2 follow-up interview (which occurred 3 - 4 months after the baseline interview).
| Participants | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Retention - Number in each group that completed the Time 2 follow-up interview | 16 | 19 |
| Retention - Number in treatment group who completed at least four treatment sessions | 16 | 0 |
Treatment fidelity is considered part of the process domain of feasibility. This will be measured by the Treatment Fidelity Checklist, a 15-item tool with a 3-point scale with responses from 1 (poor) to 3 (excellent). The mean will be computed for the 15 items for each recorded interview. The percentage of the interviews that had a mean less than 2.0 will be computed and will be the measure of treatment fidelity. Our criterion is that no more than 15% of sessions observed or audiotaped will have a mean less than 2.0.
| number of transcripts with mean < 2.0 | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group |
|---|---|
| Treatment Fidelity | 5 |
Collected over Adverse event data were collected from the time of consent until the final study contact, up to 21 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | 0/19 (0%) | 1/19 (5.3%) | 7/19 (36.8%) |
| Treatment as Usual Control Group | 0/22 (0%) | 1/22 (4.5%) | 5/22 (22.7%) |
| Event | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Injuries from fall (fractured ribs, concussion, and difficulty with hip and ambulation)General disorders | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| Breathing difficulty, diagnosis of acute COPD exacerbation, hospitalizedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/19 | 1/22 |
| Event | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| COVID 19Infections and infestations | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| strained backMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| vertigo flareEar and labyrinth disorders | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| cut hand requiring 3 stitchesInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| migraineNervous system disorders | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| non-specific cold symptomsGeneral disorders | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| abnormal uterine bleedingReproductive system and breast disorders | 1/19 | 0/22 |
| back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/19 | 1/22 |
| puncture wound of foot (stepped on nail)Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/19 | 1/22 |
| acute coughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/19 | 1/22 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 47.16 ± 14.61 | 47.32 ± 11.11 | 47.24 ± 12.68 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Male | 17 | 18 | 35 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 16 | 21 | 37 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| White | 13 | 10 | 23 |
| More than one race | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 22 | 41 |
| Depressive Symptom Scores on CES-D(units on a scale) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 35.56 ± 6.45 | 31.58 ± 6.30 | 33.78 ± 6.60 |
| Community Reintegration Scores on PART-O-17(Z score) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | .07 ± .34 | -.03 ± .30 | -0.00 ± .33 |
| Quality of Life in TBI Scores on QoL-TBI Instrument(units on a scale) | Behavioral Activation (BA) Intervention Group | Treatment as Usual Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.90 ± .31 | 2.00 ± .40 | 1.94 ± .36 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Final data sets underlying all publications resulting from the research will be shared outside VA. A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be created and shared. A final dataset will be made available to the public upon receipt of a study-specific Data Use Agreement made in writing and following IRB and VA R\&D regulations. Data will be provided electronically and per VA regulations for transferring data.
Supporting information: Analytic code
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
VA Office of Research and Development