CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04965376TIFFSUpdated Sep 13, 2023

A Trial Comparing Glenohumeral Joint Steroid Injection Versus Suprascapular Nerve Block in Patients With Frozen Shoulder

A Phase 4 interventional study of Glenohumeral joint steroid injection and Suprascapular nerve block steroid injection in Frozen Shoulder, sponsored by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-13.

Sponsored by Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2024, 2 years 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Aug 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to determine if there is any difference in terms of pain relief in patients with frozen shoulder, when given a steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block compared to a glenohumeral joint intra-articular injection.

The investigators hypothesis is that there is a significant difference in terms of pain relief at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year between a steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block compared to a glenohumeral joint intra-articular injection.

Participants who attend the orthopaedic clinic and are diagnosed with unilateral frozen shoulder and who are suitable to be treated with a steroid injection will be identified. If the participant consents to having a steroid injection, he/she will then be invited to participate in the trial where they will have an injection either into the glenohumeral joint (ball and socket joint of the shoulder) or as a suprascapular nerve block (injection adjacent to a nerve over the shoulder blade) under ultrasound guidance. Participants will then be followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months after their injection and asked to complete a set of questionnaires assessing pain, function and movement. The results of the groups will then be compared to see if one treatment is superior to the other.

Read the detailed description

This is a single centre, parallel, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. The trial is expected to take a total of 3 years with 12-18 months for patient recruitment, 12 months for follow up and 6-12 months for data collection, analysis and publication.

The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences in terms of pain relief at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year between a steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block compared to a glenohumeral joint intra-articular injection.

Adult patients diagnosed with unilateral frozen shoulder who are suitable to be treated with a steroid injection will receive a verbal explanation of the study by a suitably qualified member of the research team alongside an information leaflet. Eligible, consented participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio by the selection of sealed, opaque envelopes with one of the two injection types documented inside. Participants will be free to withdraw from the study at any time without prejudice. The injection types include an ultrasound guided steroid injection into the glenohumeral joint (10mls of 1% lidocaine with 40mg depo-medrone) or an ultrasound guided steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block at the spinoglenoid notch adjacent to the nerve as it traverses under the spinoglenoid ligament (10mls of 1% lidocaine with 40mg depo-medrone. Following both injections, participants are taken through a protocol of physiotherapy for their frozen shoulder over the subsequent 3 months. Participants will be seen back in the outpatient clinic 3 months after their injection to review their progress and collect follow-up data. Further follow-up data will be collected by the completion of questionnaires via post at 6 months and 12 months after the injection. The primary outcome measure of this study is the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at 3 months post-injection. Secondary end points include Oxford Shoulder Score at 6 months and 1 year, pain using the Pain Numeric Rating Scale at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year, Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year and EQ-5D-5L at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.

Baseline demographic and clinical variables will be reported using summary statistics. In terms of the primary outcome, the change in total Oxford Shoulder Score from baseline to 3 months post-injection will be compared between the two groups using either the Independent Samples t-Test or Mann-Whitney U Test, with the final choice depending on an exploration of the data. The same approach will be adopted for secondary outcomes. All analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle.

02

Conditions studied

  • Frozen Shoulder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bursitis

411 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 112 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 45 across 371 interventional studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • Patient diagnosed with unilateral frozen shoulder (Diagnosis of frozen shoulder will be based on clinical examination (restriction of passive external rotation in the affected shoulder > 50% compared to opposite site), in the presence of normal plain radiographs (antero-posterior and axillary projections) (other than calcific tendinopathy))

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Lacking capacity/unable to give valid consent for participation
  • Full thickness rotator cuff tear diagnosed on either Ultrasound scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Unable to complete follow up
  • Unable to speak or read English
  • Allergy to corticosteroid or local anaesthetic
  • Simultaneous bilateral frozen shoulder.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Glenohumeral joint injection

    Ultrasound guided steroid injection into the glenohumeral joint (10mls of 1% lidocaine with 40mg depo-medrone)

    Procedure: Glenohumeral joint steroid injection

  • Active comparator
    Suprascapular nerve block

    Ultrasound guided steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block at the spinoglenoid notch adjacent to the nerve as it traverses under the spinoglenoid ligament (10mls of 1% lidocaine with 40mg depo-medrone)

    Procedure: Suprascapular nerve block steroid injection

Interventions

  • ProcedureGlenohumeral joint steroid injection

    Ultrasound guided steroid injection into the glenohumeral joint (10mls of 1% lidocaine with 40mg depo-medrone)

  • ProcedureSuprascapular nerve block steroid injection

    Ultrasound guided steroid injection as a suprascapular nerve block at the spinoglenoid notch adjacent to the nerve as it traverses under the spinoglenoid ligament (10mls of 1% lidocaine with 40mg depo-medrone)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) (Scored 12-60, higher score means worse outcome)

    Patient will complete in clinic

    Time frame: 3 months post-injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oxford Shoulder Score (Scored 12-60, higher score means worse outcome)

    Patient will complete over telephone/by post

    Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post-injection

  2. Pain Numeric Rating Scale (Scored 0-10, higher score means worse outcome)

    Patient will complete over telephone/by post

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-injection

  3. Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) (Scored 0-100, higher score means worse outcome)

    Patient will complete over telephone/by post

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-injection

  4. EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L)(, First part does not have min or max values and not scored on numerical scale. EQ VAS part is scored 0-100, high score means better outcome)

    Patient will complete over telephone/by post

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-injection

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Blackpool Victoria Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Blackpool, Lancashire FY3 8NR, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be published in peer review journal on completion of the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04965376
Lead sponsor
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Charalambos Charalambous (Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2021
Start date
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 13, 2023

Study contacts

Charalambos P Charalambous
Contact
mr.charalambous@nhs.net
01253 300000
Charalambos P Charalambous
principal investigator · Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion