CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04957472Updated Aug 23, 2024

Multicenter Study of the Safety and Performance of Fabian-PRICO for Saturation Targeting Routine Use in the NICU

An observational study in Respiratory Insufficiency in Children, sponsored by Vyaire Medical. Completed at 5 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-23.

Sponsored by Vyaire Medical · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is planned as a part of the post market clinical follow-up (PMCF) on a CE marked product. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate, in a routine clinical environment across a number of centers, that the fabian-PRICO can adequately maintain oxygen saturation, with minimal staff intervention.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized cross-over study. Subjects will be assigned to two, nominally 24-hour interventions, one with standard manual titration of FiO2 and the other with automated adjustment (PRICO). The order of these two interventions will be random.

In addition to the ventilators data, basic demographics (i.e., gestational age, birth weight, age, weight at study) of the participating infants will be recorded in the eCRF.

This study has no additional follow-up visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Insufficiency in Children
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is below the median of 100 across 545 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Vyaire Medical is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Members of the Investigational team will periodically review records to identify and maintain a pool of potential investigation candidates from the NICU. It is anticipated that this pool will be significantly larger than capacity of the team to enroll into the investigation.

The parents of potential candidates will be approached for discussion and consent prior to the desired intervention.

Inclusion criteria

  • Respiratory insufficiency of infants in the neonatal unit who require respiratory support and supplemental oxygen in one of 4 the therapeutic categories (Intubated HFO, Intubated CMV, Non-Invasive nasal mask, nasal cannula).
  • \<30 kg at study entry
  • Informed Consent Form obtained as per EC requirement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not expected to complete 48 hours of the current respiratory support therapeutic category
  • Congenital anomalies
  • Uncontrolled hemodynamics
  • Severe airflow obstruction
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Start of caffeine therapy within 12 hours
  • Attending physician does not believe participation of the patient is in their best interest.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Devicefabian HFO, fabian +nCPAP evolution and fabian Therapy evolution with PRICO function

    24 hours of automated control of FiO2

  • OtherManual Control

    24 hours of manual control of FiO2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Target Range Compliance:

    Percent-Time with SpO2 a) \<80% and b) with \>98% SpO2 with FiO2\>21%

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Avoidance of SpO2 Extremes:

    Percent-Time with SpO2 a) \<80% and b) with \>98% SpO2 with FiO2\>21%

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Amsterdam UMC
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Szpital Położniczo - Ginekologiczny Ujastek
    Kraków, Poland
  • Ginekologiczno-Położniczy Szpital Kliniczny Uniwersytetu Medycznego im. K. Marcinkowskiego
    Poznań, Poland
  • SPSK 2 Pomeranian Medical University
    Szczecin, Poland
  • Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, SPSK im prof.W.Orłowskiego Warsaw
    Warsaw, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wilinska M, Bachman T, Szczapa T, Wroblewska-Seniuk K, Chojnacka K, Loniewska B, Olszanska K, Rzepecka Weglarz B, Janusz K, Piwowarczyk P, Onland W, Hutten GJ, van Leuteren RW, van Kaam AH. Performance and safety of the PRICO closed-loop oxygen saturation targeting system in neonates: pragmatic multicentre cross-over study (TarOx Study). BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jul 16;8(1):e002583. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002583. PubMed 39019542 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04957472
Lead sponsor
Vyaire Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2021
Start date
Jan 14, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 28, 2022
Completion
Oct 28, 2022
Last update
Aug 23, 2024

Study contacts

Maria Wilińska, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, SPSK im prof.W.Orłowskiego Warsaw
Anton HLC van Kaam, Prof. MD PhD
principal investigator · University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion