ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04954820ReLUTHUpdated Jun 4, 2026

Assessment of Retreatment With Lutathera® in Patients With New Progression of Intestinal Well-differenciated NET

A Phase 2 interventional study of Lutathera in Neuroendocrine Tumors, Intestinal Well Differentiated Endocrine Tumor and Progressive Disease, sponsored by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle. Recruiting at 28 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2021; still recruiting 5 years later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In France, since the reimbursement of Lutathera®, this treatment is allowed for retreatment if patients still fulfill the criteria of its indication and 4 news cycles could be proposed. However, clinical practices are heterogeneous regarding the number of new cycles and most teams perform only two additional cycles (every 8 weeks). Therefore, the coordinator propose to evaluate the efficacy of two additional cycle of Lutathera® versus active surveillance in patients already retreated with two cycles Lutathera® for a new progression of intestinal neuroendocrine tumor and who previously received the 4 cycles of treatment with a clinical benefit.

Read the detailed description

The NETTER-1 clinical trial compared peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (Lutathera®) every eight weeks (4 doses) plus 30 mg octreotide LAR every 4 weeks with high dose (60 mg) of octreotide LAR every 4 weeks in patients with progressive and unresectable midgut neuroendocrine well differentiated (G1, G2) tumors (NETs) with somatostatin-receptor positive imaging (SSTRi+). Lutathera® improves both median progression free survival (PFS) (28.4 months vs 8.5 months) and median overall survival (OS) ("not reached" vs 27.4 months) with a follow-up of 42 months. Lutathera® also has an impact on quality of life. Therefore, this treatment was approved by the European Medicines Agency and is now reimbursed in France in that specific indication. Despite these promising results, progression will occur in most of patients within a variable time with limited treatment options left. Retreatment with additional cycles of Lutathera® may be an option. Van der Zwan et al. showed in a large retrospective cohort (the "ROTTERDAM cohort") a median PFS of 14.6 months after retreatment with two additional cycles of PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and a significant longer OS than in the non-randomized control group. Interestingly, the safety was similar in salvage group than in initial PRRT: no grade (G) 3/4 renal toxicity occurred and hematological toxicities were similar to the group of patients who received the initial treatment (4 cycles). In a smaller cohort of 15 patients, Yordanova et al. showed that 8 or more cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE were well tolerated and led to a survival improvement. In this study, each salvage therapy consisted of 2 or 3 cycles. No severe (G3, G4) renal toxicity or G4 adverse event occurred. In France, since the reimbursement of Lutathera®, this treatment is allowed for retreatment if patients still fulfill the criteria of its indication and 4 news cycles could be proposed. However, clinical practices are heterogeneous regarding the number of new cycles and most teams perform only two additional cycles (every 8 weeks). Therefore, the coordinator propose to evaluate the efficacy of two additional cycle of Lutathera® versus active surveillance in patients already retreated with two cycles Lutathera® for a new progression of intestinal neuroendocrine tumor and who previously received the 4 cycles of treatment with a clinical benefit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Intestinal Well Differentiated Endocrine Tumor
  • Progressive Disease
03

In context

Neuroendocrine Tumors

542 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors; 135 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 146 is above the median of 41 across 387 interventional studies indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Browse Neuroendocrine Tumors studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle is the lead sponsor of 142 studies on the registry; 47 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years,
  • proven intestinal G1 or G2 neuroendocrine tumors (NET),
  • Patient previously treated with 4 cycles of Lutathera® (defined as "First PRRT"),
  • Disease control after "First PRRT" ≥ 12 months,
  • Patient presenting a progression of disease (clinic, biologic and/or radiologic) after a first PRRT,
  • Decision of retreatment with Lutathera® (defined as "Second PRRT") validated by RENATEN and/or multidisciplinary tumor board and in the scope of the French reimbursement process,
  • performance status 0-2,
  • ≥ 6 months as prognosticated by the physician,
  • Somatostatin receptor imaging positive imaging (SSTRi+) disease within 4 months prior to inclusion : (may be PET imaging (68Ga-based SSTR analogues) or scintigraphy imaging: 111In-pentetreotide or 99mTc-octreotide. At least 90% of lesions must be positive for SSTRi with a significant uptake (>= liver of surrounding tissue),
  • per 1.1 (Appendix 1), on CT/MRI scans, defined as at least 1 lesion with ≥ 1 cm in longest diameter, and ≥ 2 radiological tumors lesions in total,
  • Adequate bone marrow reserve ( > 8 g/dl, neutrophils ≥ 1500/mm³ and ≥ 80 000/mm³),
  • Negative pregnancy test in women of (the β-HCG dosage must be ≤ 4 days before inclusion). Women who have no are women or women who have had permanent sterilization, eg. tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy),
  • Effective in men or women of childbearing or pre-menopausal age and up to a minimum of 6 months following the end of treatment,
  • Patient´s signed written ,
  • Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures,
  • Affiliation to the French Social Security System

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who did not respond (no CR, PR or SD) to "first PRRT".
  • Radiological progression after two cycles of "Second PRRT" according to version 1.1,
  • Grade 4 hematotoxicity and/or nephrotoxicity during the initial PRRT, or unresolved AEs categorized as Grade 2 or higher (as per (CTCAE v5.0) from previous PRRT cycles or any other therapy for NET, excluding alopecia and peripheral neuropathy,
  • Pancreatic NET,
  • NeuroEndocrine Carcinoma,
  • Prior external beam radiation therapy to more than 25% of the bone marrow,
  • Severe renal (estimated (GFR) according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) \< 40 mL/min or nephrotic syndrome) or hepatic insufficiency ( (ALT)/ aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2.5 x or ALT/AST > 5 x ULN if liver function abnormalities are due to the underlying and/or total serum > 2.5 x ULN),
  • Serum albumin \< 3.0 g/dL unless is within the normal range,
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus as defined by a fasting blood glucose above 2 ULN,
  • Uncontrolled decompensated heart failure, myocardial infarction uncontrolled, stroke, pulmonary embolism or revascularization procedure, unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, and bradycardia during the last 12 months,
  • Hypertension that cannot be controlled despite medications (≥ 160/95 mmHg despite optimal medical therapy)
  • (unless these have been treated and stabilized for at least 24 weeks, prior to enrolment in the study. Patients with a history of brain metastases must have a head CT scan with contrast or MRI to document stable disease prior to enrolment in the study),
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding,
  • Substance abuse, medical, psychological, or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results,
  • Known to any of the study drugs, study drug classes, or any constituent of the products,
  • Concomitant participation or participation within the last 30 days in another clinical trial,
  • History of other solid tumor in 5 years before the inclusion excepted of cancer in situ of the cervix and skin cancer (basal or squamous cell) treated and controlled.
  • Legal incapacity or physical, psychological or mental status interfering with the patient's ability to sign the or to terminate the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(23)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
146 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental arm

    2 additional infusions of Lutathera® according to the marketing authorization schema

    Drug: Lutathera

  • No intervention
    Control arm

    No treatment with active monitoring (clinical, biological and radiological follow-up) every 2 months.

Interventions

  • 2 additional infusions of Lutathera®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the efficacy of two additional cycles of Lutathera® (one injection every two months), compared to active surveillance during 6 months in patients already retreated with two cycles.

    defined as a change of tumoral assessment (Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease from RECIST v1.1) with an evaluation every 2 months.

    Time frame: assessement every cycle (every 8 weeks) 6 months from randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the impact of two additional cycles of Lutathera® (one injection every two months), compared to active surveillance in term of Safety

    Number and type of adverse event according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0.

    Time frame: during 6 months in patients already retreated with two cycles (each cycle is 8 weeks)

  2. Evaluate the impact of two additional cycles of Lutathera® (one injection every two months), compared to active surveillance in term of Progression free survival

    the time from randomization until documented disease progression on radiological tumor assessment (as evaluated by an independent central review by radiologists blindly of the treatment assignments according to RECIST v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first

    Time frame: the time without progression of disease during 5 years after the treatment,

  3. Evaluate the impact of two additional cycles of Lutathera® (one injection every two months), compared to active surveillance in term of Overall survival

    the time from randomization until death from any cause.

    Time frame: the time without death during 5 years after the treatment

  4. To assess quality of life of general patient

    Quality of life will be measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality-of-life questionnaire C30, no min and max values)

    Time frame: during and after treatment in both arm : every 8 wweks during the treatment, every 3 months during 1 year post treatment and every year during 4 years post treatment

  5. To assess quality of life of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor

    Quality of life will be measured by EORTC GI.NET21 questionnaire (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor, no min and max values)

    Time frame: during and after treatment in both arm : every 8 wweks during the treatment, every 3 months during 1 year post treatment and every year during 4 years post treatment

07

Study locations

27 of 28 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, Abdalla EK, Fleming JB, Vauthey JN, Rashid A, Evans DB. One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):3063-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377. PubMed 18565894 ↗
  • Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, Mittra E, Kunz PL, Kulke MH, Jacene H, Bushnell D, O'Dorisio TM, Baum RP, Kulkarni HR, Caplin M, Lebtahi R, Hobday T, Delpassand E, Van Cutsem E, Benson A, Srirajaskanthan R, Pavel M, Mora J, Berlin J, Grande E, Reed N, Seregni E, Oberg K, Lopera Sierra M, Santoro P, Thevenet T, Erion JL, Ruszniewski P, Kwekkeboom D, Krenning E; NETTER-1 Trial Investigators. Phase 3 Trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 12;376(2):125-135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607427. PubMed 28076709 ↗
  • Strosberg J, Wolin E, Chasen B, Kulke M, Bushnell D, Caplin M, Baum RP, Kunz P, Hobday T, Hendifar A, Oberg K, Sierra ML, Thevenet T, Margalet I, Ruszniewski P, Krenning E; NETTER-1 Study Group. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Progressive Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With 177Lu-Dotatate in the Phase III NETTER-1 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;36(25):2578-2584. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5865. Epub 2018 Jun 7. PubMed 29878866 ↗
  • Rudisile S, Gosewisch A, Wenter V, Unterrainer M, Boning G, Gildehaus FJ, Fendler WP, Auernhammer CJ, Spitzweg C, Bartenstein P, Todica A, Ilhan H. Salvage PRRT with 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate in extensively pretreated patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET): dosimetry, toxicity, efficacy, and survival. BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 8;19(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6000-y. PubMed 31395036 ↗
  • Vaughan E, Machta J, Walker M, Toumpanakis C, Caplin M, Navalkissoor S. Retreatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with progressing neuroendocrine tumours: efficacy and prognostic factors for response. Br J Radiol. 2018 Nov;91(1091):20180041. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180041. Epub 2018 Mar 20. PubMed 29513039 ↗
  • Yordanova A, Mayer K, Brossart P, Gonzalez-Carmona MA, Strassburg CP, Essler M, Ahmadzadehfar H. Safety of multiple repeated cycles of 177Lu-octreotate in patients with recurrent neuroendocrine tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jul;44(7):1207-1214. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3652-1. Epub 2017 Mar 1. PubMed 28246882 ↗
  • Sabet A, Haslerud T, Pape UF, Sabet A, Ahmadzadehfar H, Grunwald F, Guhlke S, Biersack HJ, Ezziddin S. Outcome and toxicity of salvage therapy with 177Lu-octreotate in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Feb;41(2):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2547-z. Epub 2013 Sep 13. PubMed 24030668 ↗
  • van Essen M, Krenning EP, Kam BL, de Herder WW, Feelders RA, Kwekkeboom DJ. Salvage therapy with (177)Lu-octreotate in patients with bronchial and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2010 Mar;51(3):383-90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.068957. Epub 2010 Feb 11. PubMed 20150247 ↗
  • Gleisner KS, Brolin G, Sundlov A, Mjekiqi E, Ostlund K, Tennvall J, Larsson E. Long-Term Retention of 177Lu/177mLu-DOTATATE in Patients Investigated by gamma-Spectrometry and gamma-Camera Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015 Jul;56(7):976-84. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.155390. Epub 2015 May 21. PubMed 25999429 ↗
  • Sundlov A, Sjogreen-Gleisner K, Svensson J, Ljungberg M, Olsson T, Bernhardt P, Tennvall J. Individualised 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment of neuroendocrine tumours based on kidney dosimetry. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(9):1480-1489. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3678-4. Epub 2017 Mar 22. PubMed 28331954 ↗
  • Del Prete M, Buteau FA, Arsenault F, Saighi N, Bouchard LO, Beaulieu A, Beauregard JM. Personalized 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours: initial results from the P-PRRT trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Mar;46(3):728-742. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4209-7. Epub 2018 Nov 30. PubMed 30506283 ↗
  • Deshayes E, Assenat E, Meignant L, Bardies M, Santoro L, Gourgou S. A prospective, randomized, phase II study to assess the schemas of retreatment with Lutathera(R) in patients with new progression of an intestinal, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (ReLUTH). BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):1346. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10443-4. PubMed 36550428 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All data will be available after publication of the results in peer-reviewed revues, and in national and international meetings. It includes all de-identified participants' data, the study protocol, the statistical analysis plan and the clinical study report. The corresponding author will provide data and datasets generated and/or analyzed during the study upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Access to study data upon written detailed request sent to ICM, from 6 months until 5 years after publication of summary data.

Access criteria: The data shared will be limit to that required for independent mandated verification of the published results, the applicant will need authorization from ICM for personal access, and data will only be transferred after signing of a data access agreement.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2033, 144 months after the start.

Of 85 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Neuroendocrine Tumors, half reached primary completion within 60 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 43 and three quarters within 83. This study's planned 144 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 98 studies reached it within 65 months; a quarter within 42 and three quarters within 88.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 11, 2021
First posted
Jul 8, 2021
StartActual
Oct 18, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2033
CompletionEst.
Oct 2033
Last update
Jun 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04954820
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 8, 2021
Start date
Oct 18, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Moussion Aurore, MD
Contact
aurore.moussion@icm.unicancer.fr
+33467612446 ext. +33
Texier Emmanuelle
Contact
emmanuelle.texier@icm.unicancer.fr
0467613102
Deshayes Emmanuel, PHD
study chair · ICM Co. Ltd.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lutetium Lu 177 dotatate

Start the discussion