ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04941482Updated Sep 29, 2025Results posted

Intervention Effectiveness Towards Improving Physical and Mental Health for Post-stroke Patients.

An interventional study of Periodic health check program for post-stroke and Guiding the appropriate rehabilitation exercises in Stroke, Brain Infarction and Brain Ischemia, sponsored by Hanoi Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-29.

Primary conditionCerebral InfarctionRegistry: StrokeReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Stroke — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Cerebral Infarction
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Cerebral Infarction, a narrower term within Stroke.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Hanoi Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This was a multi-intervention randomized controlled trial that aimed to develop a management pattern for stroke survivors. The program consisted of monitoring the recovery process, early detecting the physical and mental disorders, suitably intervening for each patient to improve their quality of life. New intervention techniques were firstly applied for post-stroke patients in Vietnam such as using the portable functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) device to explore cortex frontal hemodynamic and motivational interviewing for psychological adjustment. A total of 92 stroke patients registered in Vietnam National Geriatrics Hospital were included in the study for 6 months. Included patients were randomized to an intervention group and received the long-term follow-up program or to a control group receiving standard care. The mental health and physical functioning of participants were assessed at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up. This work was funded by Vingroup Joint Stock Company and supported by the Domestic Master/Ph.D. Scholarship Programme of Vingroup Innovation Foundation (VINIF), Vingroup Big Data Institute (VINBIGDATA).

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a medical condition that occurs when a blood vessel that carries oxygen and nutrients to the brain is either blocked by a clot or bursts (or ruptures). This is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Post-stroke patients will experience sudden and intense changes in their physical and mental health during the first year. Currently, there is no official management model for improving the physical and mental health of patients after stroke in Vietnam. Furthermore, traditional neuroimaging techniques such as Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), Positron emission tomography (PET), Electroencephalogram (EEG) are not suitable for routine monitoring due to limited flexibility dynamics and costs. Hence, this study aimed to develop a management pattern that included monitoring the recovery process, early detecting the physical and mental disorders, suitably intervening for each patient to improve their quality of life. New intervention techniques were firstly applied for post-stroke patients in Vietnam such as using the portable fNIRS device to explore cortex frontal hemodynamic and motivational interviewing for psychological adjustment. This randomized controlled trial study included 92 post-stroke patients with dividing into two groups (46 control \& 46 intervention subjects), who experienced emergency by stroke within one week. A multi-intervention program was designed for stroke patients including [1] periodic health examination for assessment of physical and mental health, recurrence risks, and harmful behaviors; [2] guiding the appropriate rehabilitation exercises for improving the physical status and monitoring through daily online reports; [3] using motivational interviewing methods to improve and prevent mental disorder; [4] application of the technique of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for measurement of oxy-hemoglobin on cortex prefrontal to early detect mental disorder and stroke recurrence risks. Outcome data were collected via study questionnaires and fNIRS measuring results which were administered by researchers in the study site at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up. Simultaneously, Motivational Interviewing was carried out on post-stroke patients in the first three months (one time per week in the first month and one time per second and third month). This intervention method aimed to discover and resolve patient's conflicts by standardized communication skill to improve their mental health and change negative behaviors. The scores of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), physical and mental assessment scales and fNIRS data in both groups were used to calculate the effect estimates of intervention methods with a measure of precision (95% CI) and assess the results of the trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Brain Infarction
  • Brain Ischemia
  • Cerebral Infarction
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Mental Health
  • Physical activity
  • Cognitive therapy
  • Motivational Interviewing
  • fNIRs
  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Cerebral Infarction Reclassified

219 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Infarction; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 92 is below the median of 120 across 139 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Infarction.

Browse Cerebral Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

Hanoi Medical University is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Compared within Cerebral Infarction, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Stroke. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of stroke according to WHO's definition of stroke
  • Are managed at the National Geriatrics Hospital in Vietnam
  • Include 24 hours to 1 week after stroke
  • Provide
  • Willing to attend intervention therapies \& follow-up evaluations for half-year.
  • Have conscious, cognitive, and communication abilities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not agree to participate in the study
  • Are included in other experimental studies
  • Have mental disorders before stroke attack
  • Glasgow score ≤ 8
  • Other diseases that make it difficult to complete the intervention
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Multi-intervention program

    A multi-intervention program was designed for stroke patients, including: \[1\] periodic health examinations for assessing physical and mental health, recurrence risks, and harmful behaviors; \[2\] guiding appropriate rehabilitation exercises to improve physical status and monitoring through daily online reports; \[3\] using motivational interviewing methods to improve and prevent mental disorders; \[4\] using the technique of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure oxy-hemoglobin in the prefrontal cortex to early detect mental disorders and stroke recurrence risks.

    Behavioral: Periodic health check program for post-stroke · Behavioral: Guiding the appropriate rehabilitation exercises · Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing · Device: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy

  • Active comparator
    Standard care

    The control group received the standard health check and was measured by an fNIRS device.

    Behavioral: Periodic health check program for post-stroke · Device: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeriodic health check program for post-stroke

    The stroke survivors were assessed for their physical and mental health, recurrence risks, and harmful behaviors at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months using specific scales.

  • BehavioralGuiding the appropriate rehabilitation exercises

    The appropriate rehabilitation exercises were designed and guided for each patient, and they were followed up by the daily online report.

  • BehavioralMotivational Interviewing

    Motivational Interviewing will carry out on post-stroke patients in the first three months (one time per week in the first month and one time per the second and third month). This intervention method aims to discover and resolve patient's conflicts by a standardized communication skill to improve their mental health and change negative behaviors.

    Also known as: Cognitive therapy

  • DeviceFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy

    The fNIRS devices served as an effective monitoring and therapeutic tool, evaluating the evolution of neural activity and stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Moreover, the cortex hemodynamic measurement by fNIRS could detect various mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, schizophrenia early through cognitive tasks.

    Also known as: fNIRS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is a screening tool for post-stroke depression and assessing the changes at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. The possible range is 0-27 and the higher scores mean worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention

  2. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 9-item self-report questionnaire. Each item is rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The total score is the \*\*sum of the 9 items (range 9-63); higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity (worse outcome). The total score (9-63) was analyzed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. If ≤1 item was missing, the item was imputed per instrument guidance; otherwise the score was set to missing.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention

  3. Changes From Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    Mini-Mental State Examination is a screening tool for post-stroke cognitive impairment. Scores range from 0 to 30 points, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 month post intervention

  4. Changes From Baseline Barthel Index at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    Measure the changes of activities of daily living through assessing functional independence during half-year post-randomization. The score of the Barthel Index ranging from 0 to 100 was collected when 0 is the minimum (worst outcome) and 100 is the maximum (best outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention

  5. Changes From Baseline of Physical Domain - Stroke Impact Scale at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    The Stroke Impact Scale evaluates the post-stroke quality of life, utilizing a scoring system ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores denote improved quality of life. This scale consists of 08 domains, including (1) strength; (2) memory; (3) emotion; (4) communication; (5) activities of daily living independence; (6) mobility; (7) hand function; and (8) participation. The Physical domain was calculated from the domains by averaging the values (1+5+6+7)/4.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes From Baseline of Stroke Impact Scale at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    The Stroke Impact Scale evaluates the post-stroke quality of life, utilizing a scoring system ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores denote improved quality of life. This scale consists of 08 domains, including (1) strength; (2) memory; (3) emotion; (4) communication; (5) activities of daily living independence; (6) mobility; (7) hand function; and (8) participation

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention

07

Results

Posted Sep 29, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Our study had several limitations as follows: Firstly, the small sample size limited a thorough exploration of underlying mechanisms. Secondly, participant heterogeneity may have influenced outcomes. Future research should employ more detailed recruitment methods. Lastly, the 6-month follow-up period may not fully capture the long-term impacts of the intervention. Further investigation is needed to assess sustainability.

Participant flow

From December 2021 to March 2022, individuals participating in the study were selected from the statistical list of stroke patients diagnosed by a neurologist at the National Geriatric Hospital.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMulti-intervention ProgramStandard Care
Started4646
Completed3743
Not completed93
Withdrew: At the time of confirming dropout, the dropout patients had not experienced any saes or fatalities.93

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire at 1, 3, and 6 Months

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is a screening tool for post-stroke depression and assessing the changes at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. The possible range is 0-27 and the higher scores mean worse outcomes.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Changes From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire at 1, 3, and 6 Months
units on a scaleMulti-intervention ProgramStandard Care
Baseline10.9 ± 6.510.3 ± 5.9
After 1 month9.1 ± 1.019.7 ± 3.8
After 3 months3.1 ± 2.824.5 ± 2.8
After 6 months1.8 ± 1.925.6 ± 2.9
Statistical analysis
  • Multi-intervention Program vs Standard Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Median difference (net): 0.6 · 95% CI -1.9 to 3.2Treatment Difference = Intervention group - Control group
PrimaryFatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 9-item self-report questionnaire. Each item is rated 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The total score is the \*\*sum of the 9 items (range 9-63); higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity (worse outcome). The total score (9-63) was analyzed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. If ≤1 item was missing, the item was imputed per instrument guidance; otherwise the score was set to missing.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
units on a scaleMulti-intervention ProgramStandard Care
Baseline35.2 ± 12.937.8 ± 11.4
After 1 month28.5 ± 11.843.4 ± 8.7
After 3 months17.8 ± 5.953.9 ± 8.1
After 6 months14.4 ± 4.957.9 ± 7.6
Statistical analysis
  • Multi-intervention Program vs Standard Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -2.6 · 95% CI -7.6 to 2.5Treatment Difference = Intervention group - Control group
PrimaryChanges From Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination at 1, 3, and 6 Months

Mini-Mental State Examination is a screening tool for post-stroke cognitive impairment. Scores range from 0 to 30 points, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 month post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Changes From Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination at 1, 3, and 6 Months
units on a scaleMulti-intervention ProgramStandard Care
Baseline16.2 ± 7.018.3 ± 8.9
After 1 month13.5 ± 9.718.5 ± 8.7
After 3 months17.9 ± 10.316.2 ± 7.6
After 6 months19.5 ± 10.615.0 ± 8.3
Statistical analysis
  • Multi-intervention Program vs Standard Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -2.1 · 95% CI -5.4 to 1.3Treatment Difference = Intervention group - Control group
PrimaryChanges From Baseline Barthel Index at 1, 3, and 6 Months

Measure the changes of activities of daily living through assessing functional independence during half-year post-randomization. The score of the Barthel Index ranging from 0 to 100 was collected when 0 is the minimum (worst outcome) and 100 is the maximum (best outcome).

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Changes From Baseline Barthel Index at 1, 3, and 6 Months
units on a scaleMulti-intervention ProgramStandard Care
Baseline55.5 ± 36.255.4 ± 34.3
After 1 month58.8 ± 35.255.7 ± 33.9
After 3 months68.8 ± 28.656.2 ± 33.3
After 6 months68.8 ± 28.654.5 ± 33.0
Statistical analysis
  • Multi-intervention Program vs Standard Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (net): 0.1 · 95% CI -14.5 to 14.7Treatment Difference = Intervention group - Control group
PrimaryChanges From Baseline of Physical Domain - Stroke Impact Scale at 1, 3, and 6 Months

The Stroke Impact Scale evaluates the post-stroke quality of life, utilizing a scoring system ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores denote improved quality of life. This scale consists of 08 domains, including (1) strength; (2) memory; (3) emotion; (4) communication; (5) activities of daily living independence; (6) mobility; (7) hand function; and (8) participation. The Physical domain was calculated from the domains by averaging the values (1+5+6+7)/4.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Changes From Baseline of Physical Domain - Stroke Impact Scale at 1, 3, and 6 Months
units on a scaleMulti-intervention ProgramStandard Care
Baseline36.9 ± 24.844.4 ± 29.3
After 1 month28.4 ± 24.337.8 ± 28.0
After 3 months34.7 ± 26.738.2 ± 27.7
After 6 months38.5 ± 26.832.0 ± 27.3
Statistical analysis
  • Multi-intervention Program vs Standard Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 (The threshold for statistical significance was p \< 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -7.6 · 95% CI -18.8 to 3.7Treatment Difference = Intervention group - Control group
SecondaryChanges From Baseline of Stroke Impact Scale at 1, 3, and 6 Months

The Stroke Impact Scale evaluates the post-stroke quality of life, utilizing a scoring system ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores denote improved quality of life. This scale consists of 08 domains, including (1) strength; (2) memory; (3) emotion; (4) communication; (5) activities of daily living independence; (6) mobility; (7) hand function; and (8) participation

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Changes From Baseline of Stroke Impact Scale at 1, 3, and 6 Months
units on a scaleMulti-intervention ProgramStandard Care
Baseline45.4 ± 16.453.2 ± 19.2
After 1 month48.3 ± 15.344.7 ± 19.6
After 3 months58.5 ± 15.140.5 ± 19.2
After 6 months62.6 ± 13.837.0 ± 18.8
Statistical analysis
  • Multi-intervention Program vs Standard Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -7.8 · 95% CI -15.2 to -0.3Treatment Difference = Intervention group - Control group

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Multi-intervention Program0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)
Standard Care0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Mean74.7 ± 10.269.8 ± 12.172.2 ± 11.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Female222244
Male242448
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Count of participants——0
Marital status
Marital status(Participants)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Living with spouse242650
Single, widow/widower222042
Employment status
Employment status(Participants)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Inactive251540
Active213152
Education
Education(Participants)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Secondary school & lower201232
High school & upper263460
Body mass index (BMI)
Body mass index (BMI)(Participants)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Normal (18.5-24.9)282957
Overweight (25.0-29.9)/ Obese (≥30.0)181735
Blood pressure
Blood pressure(Participants)Multi-intervention ProgramStandard CareTotal
Normal (<140 mmHg/<90 mmHg)283462
High (≥140 mmHg and/or ≥90 mmHg)181230

8 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Geriatrics Hospital
    Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, Parmar P, Krishnamurthi R, Chugh S, Mensah GA, Norrving B, Shiue I, Ng M, Estep K, Cercy K, Murray CJL, Forouzanfar MH; Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study 2013 and Stroke Experts Writing Group. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Aug;15(9):913-924. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30073-4. Epub 2016 Jun 9. PubMed 27291521 ↗
  • Cheng D, Qu Z, Huang J, Xiao Y, Luo H, Wang J. Motivational interviewing for improving recovery after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 3;2015(6):CD011398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011398.pub2. PubMed 26037617 ↗
  • Petersen TH, Willerslev-Olsen M, Conway BA, Nielsen JB. The motor cortex drives the muscles during walking in human subjects. J Physiol. 2012 May 15;590(10):2443-52. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.227397. Epub 2012 Mar 5. PubMed 22393252 ↗
  • Miyai I, Yagura H, Hatakenaka M, Oda I, Konishi I, Kubota K. Longitudinal optical imaging study for locomotor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2003 Dec;34(12):2866-70. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000100166.81077.8A. Epub 2003 Nov 13. PubMed 14615624 ↗
  • Strangman G, Goldstein R, Rauch SL, Stein J. Near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging for investigating stroke rehabilitation: test-retest reliability and review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Dec;87(12 Suppl 2):S12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.269. PubMed 17140875 ↗
  • Mihara M, Miyai I. Review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in neurorehabilitation. Neurophotonics. 2016 Jul;3(3):031414. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031414. Epub 2016 Jul 12. PubMed 27429995 ↗
  • Nguyen TTP, Hoang HB, Vu HTT. Effectiveness of multifaceted interventions including motivational interviewing and home-based rehabilitation program for improving mental and physical health in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Oct 30;7:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100259. eCollection 2024 Dec. PubMed 39610664 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 16 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2025, 2 years 8 months after primary completion.

Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Cerebral Infarction, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 49. This study's 16 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 10, 2021
First posted
Jun 28, 2021
StartActual
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 30, 2022
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2023
Results first posted
Sep 29, 2025
Last update
Sep 29, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04941482
Lead sponsor
Hanoi Medical University
Collaborators
National Geriatric Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 28, 2021
Start date
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2022
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Results posted
Sep 29, 2025
Last update
Sep 29, 2025

Study contacts

Thao TP Nguyen, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion