CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04928833Updated Jun 16, 2021

Investigation of the Effects of Pilates Training in Parkinson Patients

An interventional study of Pilates Training and Control group in Parkinson Disease, Pilates and Core Stability, sponsored by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-16.

Sponsored by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2019, registered Apr 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was planned to examine the effects of Pilates training in Parkinson's Patients. The study included 34 Parkinson's patients between Hoehn \& Yahr Stage 1-2.5. Pilates training was applied to the Pilates group for 8 weeks, 3 days per week. To the control group; Breathing exercises, active range of motion exercises and relaxation exercises were given as a home program 3 days per week for 8 weeks. It was concluded that Pilates training performed to Parkinson's patients 3 times a week for 8 weeks was effective on "core" stability, thickness of "core" muscles, functional exercise capacity, motor functions, freezing, fatigue and QOL.

Read the detailed description

This study was planned to examine the effects of Pilates training, which is a "core" stability based exercise method that improves body alignment, postural control and balance, on "core" stability, the thickness of the "core" muscles, functional exercise capacity, motor functions, freezing, fatigue and daily life activities (ADLs) in Parkinson's Patients. The study included 34 Parkinson's patients between Hoehn \& Yahr Stage 1-2.5. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as as Pilates (n: 17) and control (n: 17). Pilates training was applied to the Pilates group for 8 weeks, 3 days per week. To the control group; Breathing exercises, active range of motion exercises and relaxation exercises were given as a home program 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The "core" power with the "sit-ups" and the modified "push-ups" tests, the "core" endurans with lateral bridge, trunk flexor endurance and "prone bridge" tests, the thickness of the "core" muscles by ultrasonography, functional strength of the lower limbs with 5 Times Sit Up Test (5TSST), balance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), functional mobility; with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), functional exercise capacity and walking with the 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), motor impairment with the United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III, freezing with Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ), fatigue with Parkinson's Fatigue Scale (PFS-16), ADLs with UPDRS-II, quality of life (QOL) with Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) were evaluated before and after treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Pilates
  • Core Stability
  • Balance
  • Quality of Life

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Pilates
  • Core Stability
  • Balance
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 85 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • After providing information about the research, agreeing to participate in the research
  • Being 40 years or older
  • Being diagnosed with '' Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease '' by a specialist
  • To be between 1-2.5 values according to Hoehn and Yahr (H\&Y) Scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Standardized Mini Mental Test score is less than 24
  • Presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, orthopedic or other medical conditions that limit participation in Pilates training
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pilates Group

    Pilates training was carried out as group exercises for about 1 hour, 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

    Other: Pilates Training

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Breathing exercises, active range of motion exercises and relaxation exercises were given to the control group as a home program. They were asked to do the exercises 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

    Other: Control group

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of 'Core' Stability

    "Core" stability was evaluated with two important dimensions, "core" strength and endurance tests.

  • No intervention
    Ultrasound Examination of M. Transversus Abdominus and M. Multifidus

    M. transversus abdominus (TrA) and m. multifidus (MF) muscles were visualized by ultrasonography and the evaluations were performed by an experienced radiologist who was blind to the case groups.

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of Lower Extremity Functional Strength

    Lower extremity functional strength was evaluated with the 5-Times Sit-and-Stand Test.

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of Balance

    Balance was evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS).

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of Functional Mobility

    Functional mobility was evaluated using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG).

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of Functional Exercise Capacity

    Functional exercise capacity was evaluated using the 6 Minute Walking Test (6-MWT).

  • No intervention
    Activities of Daily Living and Evaluation of Motor Impairment

    Activities of daily living and motor impairment were evaluated with activities of daily living (II) and motor impairment (III) sub-dimensions of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of Freezing

    The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ) was used to identify and evaluate the subjective perception of Parkinson's patients regarding the severity and effect of freezing on gait performance.

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of Fatigue

    Fatigue, one of the non-motor findings associated with Parkinson's, was evaluated with the Parkinson's Fatigue Scale-16 (PFS-16).

  • No intervention
    Evaluation of Quality of Life

    Quality of Life was evaluated with Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39).

Interventions

  • OtherPilates Training

    Pilates training was carried out as group exercises for about 1 hour, 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Before starting the exercise training, all subjects were taught the key elements of Pilates in 1 session. Pilates training started with standing exercises for warming up and centering in the supine position. Training continued with upper and lower extremity movements. The intensity of the exercises was increased using different positions and elastic bands. Stretching exercises and posture exercises were used during the cooling period. All exercises were started with 10 repetitions and then increased to 20. In order for the patients to perform the movements correctly, each movement was first demonstrated by the physiotherapist. The movements that the patients could not do were applied by modifying them in a suitable way.

  • OtherControl group

    Breathing exercises, active range of motion exercises and relaxation exercises were given to the control group as a home program. They were asked to do the exercises 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the Strength of "Core" Muscles

    The strength of the trunk muscles was evaluated with 'sit-up' and modified 'push-up' tests. The number of times the subjects could perform each test for 30 seconds was recorded. Each measurement was made twice and the best measurement was used in statistical analysis.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Evaluation of the Endurance of "Core" Muscles

    Static endurance of the "core" muscles was evaluated using the lateral bridge test defined by McGill, the trunk flexor endurance test and the "prone bridge" test. The time in which the subjects could maintain the test position was recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. Each measurement was made twice and the best measurement was used in statistical analysis. The test was terminated if it disturbed the test position.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Ultrasound Examination of M. Transversus Abdominus and M. Multifidus

    M. transversus abdominus (TrA) and m. multifidus (MF) muscles were visualized by ultrasonography and the evaluations were performed by an experienced radiologist who was blind to the case groups. Ultrasound recordings were made using B-mode ultrasound. Each measurement was taken 3 times and the average value of 3 measurements was recorded in mm for statistical analysis.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Evaluation of Lower Extremity Functional Strength

    Lower extremity functional strength was evaluated with the 5-Times Sit-and-Stand Test. The test was performed twice, one trial, and the last measurement was used in statistical analysis.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Evaluation of Balance

    Balance was evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). BBS tests were performed using the materials specified in the directive and in accordance with the instructions. The total score ranges from 0-56, with higher scores indicating better balance.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Evaluation of Functional Mobility

    Functional mobility was evaluated using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). This test; The duration was recorded and applied during the single-task and dual-task (motor and cognitive). Testing for single task was carried out in accordance with the instruction. In dual-motor duty, while holding an empty tray from the case with both hands; In the dual-cognitive task, he was asked to stand up and walk, turn around and come back and sit on the chair, counting 1 each backwards from a certain number (any number from 20 to 100). The time was recorded with a stopwatch. The test was performed twice, one trial, and the last measurement was used in statistical analysis.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  7. Evaluation of Functional Exercise Capacity

    Functional exercise capacity was evaluated using the 6 Minute Walking Test (6-MWT). The test was performed in accordance with the American Thoracic Society criteria. Normal values of 6-MWT are calculated approximately according to age, gender, height and weight in healthy adults. In this study, using reference suggested by Gibbons et al. "Estimated 6-MWT distance" and the rate of reaching the maximal heart rate at the end of 6-MWT were calculated.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  8. Activities of Daily Living and Evaluation of Motor Impairment

    Activities of daily living and motor impairment were evaluated with activities of daily living (II) and motor impairment (III) sub-dimensions of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The total score ranges from 0-108, with a higher score indicating a more serious disorder.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  9. Evaluation of Freezing

    The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ) was used to identify and evaluate the subjective perception of Parkinson's patients regarding the severity and effect of freezing on gait performance. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher score meaning that a person's walking performance is more affected by freezing.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  10. Evaluation of Fatigue

    Fatigue, one of the non-motor findings associated with Parkinson's, was evaluated with the Parkinson's Fatigue Scale-16 (PFS-16). The total score ranged from 16 to 80, and a total of 8 points or more was considered tired.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  11. Evaluation of Quality of Life

    Quality of Life was evaluated with Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). This questionnaire is the most frequently used specific health status measure in PD patients. The total score ranges from 0-100, and lower scores better reflect perceived quality of life.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
    Güneysu, Ri̇ze 53390, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04928833
Lead sponsor
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Derya Çağlar (Research Assistant, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 16, 2021
Start date
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2020
Completion
May 1, 2020
Last update
Jun 16, 2021

Study contacts

DERYA CAGLAR, MSc
study director · Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Vocational School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion