ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04927897DETECTUpdated Oct 9, 2026

DETECT: Target Volume for Rectal Endoluminal Radiation Boosting

An observational study in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by Maastricht Radiation Oncology. Recruiting at 3 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Maastricht Radiation Oncology · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to provide prospective data regarding microscopic tumor spread in all directions from the macroscopic tumor in pathology specimens, as seen by eye, and on imaging to define the target volume for endoluminal radiation boosting in rectal cancer patients.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective multicentre cohort trial in ≥50 patients with a residual ycT1-3N0 tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma at least 6 weeks after the neoadjuvant treatment.

In addition to standard workup and treatment (e.g. a flexible endoscopy and an MRI scan at 6-8 weeks post-neoadjuvant therapy), patients will undergo pre-operatively, after induction of general anaesthesia, an endorectal ultrasound and rigid rectoscopy as study procedures if these procedures are not already part of standard workup. Furthermore, the pathological specimens of some patients will be scanned using MR imaging during certain parts of the pathological process.

Objectives include determining the maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread per patient in all directions, creating a tissue deformation model to account for changes due to e.g. fixation and pathological processing, using this tissue deformation model to translate the microscopic tumor spread back to the in vivo situation (e.g. back to in vivo MRI scans, 3D endo-ultrasounds), and evaluating/determining risk factors for the presence and/or extent of microscopic tumor spread.

This data will be used for target volume definition in rectal endoluminal radiation boosting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rectal Cancer
  • Microscopic Tumor Spread
  • Target Volume Definition
  • Endoluminal Radiation Boosting
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 161 across 498 observational studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Maastricht Radiation Oncology is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with a limited (ycT1-3N0) residual tumor after neoadjuvant radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years of age and capable of giving .
  • ycT1-3N0(*) residual(**) histology confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma after radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy for which patients will undergo TME surgery.
  • Minimal interval between end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy: 6 weeks.

(*)= as determined by clinical assessment (digital rectal examination, endoscopy with or without ) and/or MRI. Biopsy/histology around the time of diagnosis is adequate; no biopsy/histology is needed after neoadjuvant therapy.

(**)= including tumor regrowths/local recurrence after an initial clinical complete response and a "watch and wait" approach. These patients will also be included after the local recurrence has been determined using endoscopy and/or MRI.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has received brachytherapy as part of treatment.
  • \<18 years of age or incapable of giving .
  • Patient has not been treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy.
  • Patient will not undergo TME surgery for a ycT1-3N0 residual histology confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma.
  • Interval between end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery is \<6 weeks.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Observational

    In addition to standard workup and treatment, patients will undergo pre-operatively, after induction of general anaesthesia, an endorectal ultrasound and rigid rectoscopy as study procedures if these are not part of standard workup yet.

    Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Rectoscopy · Other: Scan, e.g. CT (resection specimen)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testUltrasound

    3D endorectal ultrasound.

  • Diagnostic testRectoscopy

    Rigid rectoscopy.

  • OtherScan, e.g. CT (resection specimen)

    For some patients, images of the resection specimen (note: NOT of the patients) during the pathological process will be acquired.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread per patient in all directions from the macroscopic tumor remnant in the pathology specimen

    The maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread in all directions from the macroscopic remnant in the specimen will be measured per patient in millimeters by the pathology department in the pathologic resection specimens.

    Time frame: During post-resection pathological analysis (i.e. approximately 14 days post-resection)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread per patient from the macroscopic tumor remnant in the pathology specimen, reported separately for MTS perpendicular to the bowel wall and for MTS parallel to the bowel wall

    Measured per patient in millimeters by the pathology department in the pathologic resection specimens. Microscopic tumor spread perpendicular to the bowel wall and parallel to the bowel wall will be reported separately.

    Time frame: During post-resection pathological analysis (i.e. approximately 14 days post-resection)

  2. Maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread per patient in all directions from the macroscopic tumor remnant in the pathology specimen excluding ypT0 patients

    Measured per patient in millimeters by the pathology department in the pathologic resection specimens. For this secondary outcome, this will be reported excluding all ypT0 patients.

    Time frame: During post-resection pathological analysis (i.e. approximately 14 days post-resection)

  3. Maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread per patient in all directions from the macroscopic tumor remnant in the pathology specimen only including patients with microscopic tumor spread

    Measured per patient in millimeters by the pathology department in the pathologic resection specimens. For this secondary outcome, this will be reported only for patients with microscopic tumor spread.

    Time frame: During post-resection pathological analysis (i.e. approximately 14 days post-resection)

  4. Maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread per patient in all directions from the macroscopic tumor remnant in the pathology specimen only for patients with regrowths

    Measured per patient in millimeters by the pathology department in the pathologic resection specimens. For this secondary outcome, this will be reported only for patients with regrowths.

    Time frame: During post-resection pathological analysis (i.e. approximately 14 days post-resection)

  5. Tissue deformation factor/model to compensate for tissue deformation due to removal of the specimen from the body, formalin fixation and tissue processing at the pathology department

    The deidentified images of the flexible endoscopy and in vivo MRI scan will be collected for the study. During the certain parts of the pathologic process, e.g. before and after fixation, MRIs of the pathological specimens of some of the patients will be made. These deidentified images of the specimens, together with e.g. the deidentified endoscopic, rectoscopic, ultrasound and in vivo MR images and possibly with optical images taken during pathological analysis, will be used to develop the deformation model. The flexible endoscopy and in vivo MRI scan are both taken approximately 6-8 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment. The images of the rigid rectoscopy and 3D endorectal ultrasound are taken directly before TME surgery.

    Time frame: The tissue deformation model will be created once all required data (e.g. MRI scans, rectoscopy images, endorectal ultrasound images) is available (approximately 14 days post-surgery for the final included patient).

  6. Maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread per patient in all directions from the macroscopic tumor remnant as seen by eye and/or on imaging

    The tissue deformation factor/model and the location of the microscopic tumor spread in relation to the macroscopic remnant determined during pathological analysis, will be used to determine the maximum distance of microscopic tumor spread in relation to the macroscopic tumor as seen by eye (rectoscopically/endoscopically) and/or on imaging (endo-ultrasound, MRI) per patient in all directions. The flexible endoscopy and in vivo MRI scan are both taken approximately 6-8 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment. The images of the rigid rectoscopy and 3D endorectal ultrasound are taken directly before TME surgery.

    Time frame: When the tissue deformation model is finished (approximately 3 months after all data for every patient is available). For the imaging time frames: please refer to the description.

  7. Treatment margin (in the various directions) relative to the macroscopic tumor to cover 90% and 95% of all microscopic tumor spread

    Distance that covers the microscopic tumor spread in all directions in millimeters for 90 and 95% of patients, including 95% confidence intervals, both reported including and excluding ypT0 patients. Reported both by eye and on imaging, for which among others the tissue deformation model will be used.

    Time frame: Once the microscopic tumor spread is determined for all patients (approximately 14 days post-surgery for the final included patient), the treatment margins will be calculated.

  8. Evaluation of risk factors for the presence and/or the extent of microscopic tumor spread identified by the meta-analysis we performed

    These risk factors include pathological T stage after chemoradiation (ypT stage) and time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery.

    Time frame: ypT stage is determined during post-resection pathological analysis (i.e. approximately 14 days post-resection). The time interval is determined at the day of surgery.

Other outcomes

  1. Identification of potential risk factors for the presence and the extent of microscopic tumor spread not yet identified by our meta-analysis

    Potential risk factors include among others ycT stage, regrowths/local recurrence, diameter, predominant histologic grade, tumor regression score/grade (pathologically), vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, microsatellite instability (MSI) and parameters related to in vivo MR imaging.

    Time frame: Most are determined during post-resection path. analysis (approx. 14 days post-resection). ycT stage is determined approx. 6-10 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment (multidisciplinary team), in vivo imaging is done approx 6-8 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment

  2. Analysis of (re)biopsy material

    This includes the biopsy material at time of diagnosis, and also the rebiopsy material for patients with tumor regrowths/local recurrence after an initial clinical complete response and a "watch and wait" approach. These (re)biopsies are a part of the standard diagnostic work-up. Part of this analysis will be performed during this study by reassessment of the histology of the biopsy material and/or if applicable the rebiopsy material.

    Time frame: Biopsy material is obtained at time of diagnosis.

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Maastro
    Maastricht, Limburg 6229 ET, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Maaike Berbée, MD, PhD · Contact0031884455600
    • Evert Van Limbergen, MD, PhD · Contact0031884455600
    • Maaike Berbée, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Evert Van Limbergen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
    Maastricht, Limburg 6229 HX, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Maaike Berbée, MD, PhD · Contact0031884455600
    • Jarno Melenhorst, MD, PhD · Contact0031433874900
  • Catharina Hospital
    Eindhoven, North Brabant 5623 EJ, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • An-Sofie Verrijssen, MD · Contact0031402396400
    • Pim Burger, MD, PhD · Contact0031402396600
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EM, Putter H, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJ; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(6):575-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70097-3. Epub 2011 May 17. PubMed 21596621 ↗
  • Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Quirke P, Couture J, de Metz C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Griffiths G, Thompson LC, Parmar M. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0. PubMed 19269519 ↗
  • Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EK, Putter H, Wiggers T, Rutten H, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Leer JW, van de Velde CJ; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):693-701. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000257358.56863.ce. PubMed 17968156 ↗
  • Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Lammering G, Nelemans PJ, Engelen SM, van Dam RM, Jansen RL, Sosef M, Leijtens JW, Hulsewe KW, Buijsen J, Beets GL. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 10;29(35):4633-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7176. Epub 2011 Nov 7. PubMed 22067400 ↗
  • Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Das P, Rodel C, Kuo LJ, Calvo FA, Garcia-Aguilar J, Glynne-Jones R, Haustermans K, Mohiuddin M, Pucciarelli S, Small W Jr, Suarez J, Theodoropoulos G, Biondo S, Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):835-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70172-8. Epub 2010 Aug 6. PubMed 20692872 ↗
  • Rijkmans EC, Cats A, Nout RA, van den Bongard DHJG, Ketelaars M, Buijsen J, Rozema T, Franssen JH, Velema LA, van Triest B, Marijnen CAM. Endorectal Brachytherapy Boost After External Beam Radiation Therapy in Elderly or Medically Inoperable Patients With Rectal Cancer: Primary Outcomes of the Phase 1 HERBERT Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 15;98(4):908-917. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Jan 20. PubMed 28366579 ↗
  • Sun Myint A, Smith FM, Gollins S, Wong H, Rao C, Whitmarsh K, Sripadam R, Rooney P, Hershman M, Pritchard DM. Dose Escalation Using Contact X-ray Brachytherapy After External Beam Radiotherapy as Nonsurgical Treatment Option for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Mar 1;100(3):565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Oct 20. PubMed 29229327 ↗
  • Appelt AL, Ploen J, Harling H, Jensen FS, Jensen LH, Jorgensen JC, Lindebjerg J, Rafaelsen SR, Jakobsen A. High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):919-27. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00120-5. Epub 2015 Jul 5. PubMed 26156652 ↗
  • Garant A, Magnan S, Devic S, Martin AG, Boutros M, Vasilevsky CA, Ferland S, Bujold A, DesGroseilliers S, Sebajang H, Richard C, Vuong T. Image Guided Adaptive Endorectal Brachytherapy in the Nonoperative Management of Patients With Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Dec 1;105(5):1005-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.042. Epub 2019 Aug 30. PubMed 31476417 ↗
  • Verrijssen AS, Opbroek T, Bellezzo M, Fonseca GP, Verhaegen F, Gerard JP, Sun Myint A, Van Limbergen EJ, Berbee M. A systematic review comparing radiation toxicity after various endorectal techniques. Brachytherapy. 2019 Jan-Feb;18(1):71-86.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Nov 3. PubMed 30396854 ↗
  • Smith FM, Rao C, Oliva Perez R, Bujko K, Athanasiou T, Habr-Gama A, Faiz O. Avoiding radical surgery improves early survival in elderly patients with rectal cancer, demonstrating complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy: results of a decision-analytic model. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):159-71. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000281. PubMed 25585073 ↗
  • Verrijssen AS, Guillem J, Perez R, Bujko K, Guedj N, Habr-Gama A, Houben R, Goudkade D, Melenhorst J, Buijsen J, Vanneste B, Grabsch HI, Bellezzo M, Paiva Fonseca G, Verhaegen F, Berbee M, Van Limbergen EJ. Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Mar;144:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Nov 9. PubMed 31710942 ↗
  • Maas M, Lambregts DM, Nelemans PJ, Heijnen LA, Martens MH, Leijtens JW, Sosef M, Hulsewe KW, Hoff C, Breukink SO, Stassen L, Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL. Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3873-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4687-9. Epub 2015 Jul 22. PubMed 26198074 ↗
  • Nuernberg D, Saftoiu A, Barreiros AP, Burmester E, Ivan ET, Clevert DA, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Lorentzen T, Maconi G, Mihmanli I, Nolsoe CP, Pfeffer F, Rafaelsen SR, Sparchez Z, Vilmann P, Waage JER. EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound. Ultrasound Int Open. 2019 Jan;5(1):E34-E51. doi: 10.1055/a-0825-6708. Epub 2019 Feb 5. PubMed 30729231 ↗
  • Martens MH, Maas M, Heijnen LA, Lambregts DM, Leijtens JW, Stassen LP, Breukink SO, Hoff C, Belgers EJ, Melenhorst J, Jansen R, Buijsen J, Hoofwijk TG, Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL. Long-term Outcome of an Organ Preservation Program After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Aug 10;108(12):djw171. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw171. Print 2016 Dec. PubMed 27509881 ↗
  • Simpson G, Hopley P, Wilson J, Day N, Haworth A, Montazeri A, Smith D, Titu L, Anderson J, Agbamu D, Walsh C. Long-term outcomes of real world 'watch and wait' data for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;22(11):1568-1576. doi: 10.1111/codi.15177. Epub 2020 Jul 20. PubMed 32686268 ↗
  • Lam D, Kaneko Y, Scarlett A, D'Souza B, Norris R, Woods R. The Effect of Formalin Fixation on Resection Margins in Colorectal Cancer. Int J Surg Pathol. 2019 Oct;27(7):700-705. doi: 10.1177/1066896919854159. Epub 2019 Jun 14. PubMed 31195869 ↗
  • Kapali AS, Chandramohan K, Jayasudha AV. A Prospective Study of Distal Microscopic Spread in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Pinned and Unpinned Specimen. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;8(4):469-473. doi: 10.1007/s13193-017-0637-2. Epub 2017 Mar 18. PubMed 29203975 ↗
  • Park HS, Lee S, Haam S, Lee GD. Effect of formalin fixation and tumour size in small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective, single-centre study. Histopathology. 2017 Sep;71(3):437-445. doi: 10.1111/his.13237. Epub 2017 Jun 16. PubMed 28407385 ↗
  • Goldstein NS, Soman A, Sacksner J. Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999 Mar;111(3):349-51. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/111.3.349. PubMed 10078110 ↗
  • Tran T, Sundaram CP, Bahler CD, Eble JN, Grignon DJ, Monn MF, Simper NB, Cheng L. Correcting the Shrinkage Effects of Formalin Fixation and Tissue Processing for Renal Tumors: toward Standardization of Pathological Reporting of Tumor Size. J Cancer. 2015 Jul 2;6(8):759-66. doi: 10.7150/jca.12094. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26185538 ↗
  • Dayde D, Tanaka I, Jain R, Tai MC, Taguchi A. Predictive and Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Mar 7;18(3):573. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030573. PubMed 28272347 ↗
  • Thies S, Langer R. Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal carcinomas after neoadjuvant treatment. Front Oncol. 2013 Oct 7;3:262. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00262. PubMed 24109590 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data will not be shared with other researchers, however the following applies if patients have given specific, additional consent: If patients have consented to the use of leftover body material and/or data in further studies, the deidentified images (endoscopy, rectoscopy, ultrasound, in vivo MRIs and specimen MRIs) and pathological specimens/samples including (re)biopsies, and the accompanying data can be used for further scientific research related to rectal cancer by the investigators, including investigators from collaborating institutions, without requiring additional informed consent.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 57 months after the start.

Of 213 non-industry observational studies under Rectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 116. This study's planned 57 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 228 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 116.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2021
First posted
Jun 16, 2021
StartActual
Aug 16, 2022
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date and oversight details
1 update, last Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04927897
Collaborators
Maastricht University Medical Center, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 16, 2021
Start date
Aug 16, 2022
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Maaike Berbée, MD, PhD
Contact
maaike.berbee@maastro.nl
0031884455600
Evert Van Limbergen, MD, PhD
Contact
evert.vanlimbergen@maastro.nl
0031884455600
Maaike Berbée, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maastro
Evert Van Limbergen, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maastro

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion