ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04925882MERLIBERTIONUpdated Nov 26, 2025

Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Release Surgery

An interventional study of Erector spinae plane block and Erector spinae plane block in Hernia Lumbar, Lumbar Canal Stenosis and Spinal Cord Compression, sponsored by Clinique Saint Jean, France. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by Clinique Saint Jean, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to observe or not a reduction in the consumption of morphine within 72 hours of the realization of an erector spinae plane block when preparing for a non-instrumented spine surgery.

Read the detailed description

Posterior lumbar spine surgery is surgery described by patients as painful. While fusion surgery seems more painful than simple release surgery, release surgery remains a painful surgery for patients. The management of post-operative pain is therefore a priority for anesthesiological-surgical teams.

Multimodal analgesia, already recognized for other surgeries, is one of the keys to success, combining oral analgesics and regional local anesthetics.

The recourse to the realization of a block of the erector muscles of the spine was described for the first time in 2016, it is described there in the literature as not presenting any particular risk, simple to apply and having a satisfactory analgesia action. However, this process is little described in the context of spine surgery and even less in the context of randomized controlled trials.

The investigator therefore hypothesize that the realization of a block of the erector muscles of the spine, because of its satisfactory analgesia action mentioned above, will decrease the consumption of postoperative morphine and at the same time reduce the side effects due to the latter.

On the other hand, no study has evaluated the effectiveness of spinal block as part of an Enhanced Rehabilitation After Surgery (RAAC) program. Indeed, the effectiveness of this practice has already been proven in a context of conventional care, but to date no studies have been carried out in the context of care involving the original elements of the RAAC, such as rapid mobilization and multimodal oral analgesia, which could impact the effectiveness of the erector muscle blocks of the spine.

At the Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, the management of spine surgeries is part of this Improved Rehabilitation After Surgery (RAAC) process, which is why it seemed relevant to the investigator to carry out a randomized, controlled study. , double-blind to assess the consumption of postoperative morphine during the 72 hours following a lumbar arthrodesis in this context of care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia Lumbar
  • Lumbar Canal Stenosis
  • Spinal Cord Compression

Keywords

  • Erector spinae plane block
  • Consumption of morphine
03

In context

Spinal Cord Compression

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Compression; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 43 across 35 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Compression.

Browse Spinal Cord Compression studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinique Saint Jean, France is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with medical insurance.
  • Patient twho received information about study and signes a consent to participate in the study.
  • Major patient to be operated on for lumbar release surgery without arthrodesis or osteosynthesis posterior (herniated disc repair, one or two level recalibration, laminectomy) +/- implant interlaminar.
  • Patient with an of 1, 2 or 3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor patient.
  • Patient with morphine intolerance
  • Patient with allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Patient consuming morphine for more than 3 months.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient.
  • Patient scheduled for cancer surgery or trauma surgery.
  • Patient participating in another interventional study.
  • Patient with a history of lumbar arthrodesis.
  • Patient requiring lumbar surgery with arthrodesis.
  • Patient refusing to sign the consent form.
  • Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information.
  • Patient under the protection of justice, under curatorship or under tutorship.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Block

    The "Block" group will be made up of patients who will benefit from an injection of levopubivacaïne for the realization of the erector spinae plane block.

    Procedure: Erector spinae plane block

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The "Placebo" group corresponds to the reference group, that is to say that it will consist of patients who benefit from an injection of physiological serum for the realization of the erector spinae plane block.

    Procedure: Erector spinae plane block

Interventions

  • ProcedureErector spinae plane block

    After installing the sleeping patient and identifying the surgical level by the surgeon, the anesthetist will perform the erector spinae plane block. The anesthetist performs an ultrasound to view the spine and erector muscles and identifies the transverse processes of the vertebra involved in the surgery. Once the location has been made, the anesthetist injects the anesthetic product under ultrasound control between the erector muscle of the spine and its anterior fascia, the trajectory of the needle being thus visualized throughout the procedure. The anesthetist bilaterally injects 3ml/kg of solution with a maximum of 30ml injected. Drug : Levobupivacaïne 2,5mg/ml.

  • ProcedureErector spinae plane block

    After installing the sleeping patient and identifying the surgical level by the surgeon, the anesthetist will perform the erector spinae plane block. The anesthetist performs an ultrasound to view the spine and erector muscles and identifies the transverse processes of the vertebra involved in the surgery. Once the location has been made, the anesthetist injects the anesthetic product under ultrasound control between the erector muscle of the spine and its anterior fascia, the trajectory of the needle being thus visualized throughout the procedure. The anesthetist bilaterally injects 3ml/kg of solution with a maximum of 30ml injected. Drug : NaCL 0,9%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Consumption of postoperative morphine within 72 hours of the operation

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Digital visual scale to assess pain of patient within 72 hours of the operation.

    Numeric scale numbered from 0 to 10. 0 : no pain, 10 : worst pain possible.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  2. Onset of nausea and vomiting within 72 hours of the operation.

    Onset of nausea/vomiting or taking an anti-vomiting treatment within 72 hours of the operation.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  3. Onset of complication within 30 days of the operation.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Walking perimeter measurement by the physiotherapist during the 72 hours following the intervention.

    Measurement of the maximum distance traveled without stopping in meter with or without assistance.

    Time frame: 72 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinique Saint Jean
    Saint-Jean-de-Védas, 34430, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen K, Wang L, Ning M, Dou L, Li W, Li Y. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided lateral thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine fusion surgery: a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. PeerJ. 2019 Oct 28;7:e7967. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7967. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31681518 ↗
  • Ren Z, Li Z, Li S, Sheng L, Xu D, Chen X, Wu WKK, Chan MTV, Ho J. Local infiltration with cocktail analgesics during 2 level lumbar spinal fusion surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15526. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015526. PubMed 31083198 ↗
  • Breebaart MB, Van Aken D, De Fre O, Sermeus L, Kamerling N, de Jong L, Michielsen J, Roelant E, Saldien V, Versyck B. A prospective randomized double-blind trial of the efficacy of a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block on the 24h morphine consumption after posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery. Trials. 2019 Jul 17;20(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3541-y. PubMed 31315670 ↗
  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. PubMed 27501016 ↗
  • Qiu Y, Zhang TJ, Hua Z. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 1;13:1611-1619. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256205. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32669870 ↗
  • Ince I, Atalay C, Ozmen O, Ozturk V, Hassan M, Aksoy M, Calikoglu C. Comparison of ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia after single-level discectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Sep;56:113-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Feb 8. No abstract available. PubMed 30743153 ↗
  • Cesur S, Yayik AM, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A. Ultrasound-guided Low Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Effective Postoperative Analgesia after Lumbar Surgery: Report of Five Cases. Cureus. 2018 Nov 16;10(11):e3603. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3603. PubMed 30680264 ↗
  • Mathiesen O, Dahl B, Thomsen BA, Kitter B, Sonne N, Dahl JB, Kehlet H. A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2089-96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2826-1. Epub 2013 May 17. PubMed 23681498 ↗
  • Davies AF, Segar EP, Murdoch J, Wright DE, Wilson IH. Epidural infusion or combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks as perioperative analgesia for knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Sep;93(3):368-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh224. Epub 2004 Jul 9. PubMed 15247111 ↗
  • Benyahia NM, Verster A, Saldien V, Breebaart M, Sermeus L, Vercauteren M. Regional anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia techniques for spine surgery - a review. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Apr;22(1):25-33. PubMed 28913452 ↗
  • Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3. PubMed 30292068 ↗
  • Kendall MC, Alves L, Traill LL, De Oliveira GS. The effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postsurgical pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 1;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01016-8. PubMed 32357842 ↗
  • Nielsen RV, Fomsgaard JS, Dahl JB, Mathiesen O. Insufficient pain management after spine surgery. Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):A4835. PubMed 24814741 ↗
  • Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3. PubMed 23392233 ↗
  • Lonjon G, Ross N, Dhenin A, Vassal M, Gourari A, Bouic N, Bonnal A. Non-efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesia of non-instrumented spine surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Brain Spine. 2025 Aug 6;5:104379. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104379. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40822262 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2022 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 11 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 8, 2021
First posted
Jun 14, 2021
StartActual
Jan 3, 2022
Primary completionActual
Dec 19, 2022
CompletionActual
Dec 19, 2022
Last update
Nov 26, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04925882
Lead sponsor
Clinique Saint Jean, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 14, 2021
Start date
Jan 3, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 19, 2022
Completion
Dec 19, 2022
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Study contacts

Guillaume LONJON, MD
principal investigator · Clinique Saint Jean, Saint Jean de Védas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion