ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05023772Updated Jun 3, 2026

Laser Interstitial Thermal Ablation and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Spine Metastases

An interventional study of Stereotactic Laser Ablation and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Neoplasm Metastasis, Spinal Cord Diseases and Spinal Cord Compression, sponsored by Henry Ford Health System. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-03.

Sponsored by Henry Ford Health System · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to combine two complementary modes of treatment, spinal interstitial laser ablation and stereotactic spine radiosurgery (SSRS) for the treatment for spinal tumors near the spinal cord with an objective to improve tumor control, improve pain control, preserve function, and improve quality of life. We will also assess how effective these combined modes of treatment are in patients with spinal metastasis with an epidural component.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objectives:

  1. Documenting rate of local control in patients who have received this combined treatment and
  2. Documenting safety of MRI compatible hardware for MRI based image guidance
  3. Determining the accuracy of the MRI-based image guidance

Secondary Objectives:

  1. To determine local control at 1, 3, 6, 9, 18, and 24 months, and to compare to a historical control where patients received only SSRS at these time points and at 12 months.
  2. To document the extent of epidural tumor regression at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months

    • Calculate decrease in epidural tumor volume (by volumetric measurements using Brain Lab Elements software)
    • Calculate increase in thecal sac patency (by volumetric measurements using Brain Lab Elements software and according to Bilsky method
  3. To determine overall survival at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
  4. To assess changes in muscle strength, location and severity of spinal-related pain, sensory function, ability to ambulate, and neurological grading at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months compared with pretreatment baselines.
  5. To assess the effect of treatment on quality of life, measured at 1 month and every 3 months after with validated outcome measure tools
  6. To describe adverse side effects after treatment and to descriptively correlate those effects with radiographic findings, pain control, and quality of life.
02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Spinal Cord Diseases
  • Spinal Cord Compression
  • Spinal Cord Tumor
  • Spine Metastases

Keywords

  • Laser Ablation
  • Spinal Cord
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure
  • Stereotactic Radiosurgery
  • Pain Control
  • Metastasis
  • Epidural Tumor
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

4,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 886 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 3,268 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Henry Ford Health System is the lead sponsor of 303 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 26 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years old. (The indication for this technique is controversial in skeletally immature patients.)
  • Histologic diagnosis of solid malignant tumor (not one of the more radiosensitive histologic subtypes, see Exclusion Criteria), including but not limited to non-small cell lung cancer, breast, prostate, renal cell, melanoma, gastrointestinal, sarcoma, thyroid, head and neck primary, and unknown primary tumors.
  • Quantification of the degree of epidural spinal cord compression as grade 1C, 2, or 3 by MRI, with and without contrast sequences. Axial T2 sequence is encouraged but not required.
  • The vertebral body site to be treated must be located from T2 to L1
  • No more than 3 contiguous or dis-contiguous vertebral levels involved with in the spine to be irradiated in a single session or 3 sessions.
  • Motor strength ≥4 out of 5 in extremity or extremities affected by the level of the spinal cord compression (see section 4 for grading method).
  • performance status \<2 or performance status (KPS) >50
  • >3 months.
  • Inoperable disease because of patient refusal, neurosurgical evaluation, or any other medical reasons.
  • Women of and men must agree to use adequate (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) before study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Prior conventional radiation to the same site is allowed as long as there is a greater than 3 months interval.
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requires open spinal procedure or a percutaneous procedure without the use of image guidance.
  • Primary tumors of radiosensitive histology (lymphoma, multiple myeloma, small cell carcinoma, germ cell tumors), as conventional radiation is likely to be effective in such cases.
  • Unable to tolerate general anesthesia and prone position.
  • Unable to undergo MRI scan of the spine.
  • Inability to lie flat on a treatment table for >60 minutes.
  • Pregnant. (Urine testing must be done no more than 10 days prior to surgery.)
  • Prior conventional irradiation of the spine site and level to be treated with an interval shorter than 3 months.
  • Frank cord compression or cord compression from bone components or configuration and acute neurological deficits (defined as motor strength \<4/5 in extremity or extremities affected by the level of the spinal cord compression)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Treatment of Laser Interstitial Thermal Ablation Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery

    Patients will undergo laser interstitial thermal ablation and CT guided stereotactic radiosurgery via intensity-modulated radiation therapy on different dates within a one to fourteen day window. The order of treatment is at the treating physicians discretion.

    Procedure: Stereotactic Laser Ablation · Radiation: Stereotactic Radiosurgery · Diagnostic Test: MRI guided laser ablation

Interventions

  • ProcedureStereotactic Laser Ablation

    MR Guided laser ablation therapy

    Also known as: Thermal laser ablation therapy, Visualase laser ablation therapy

  • RadiationStereotactic Radiosurgery

    Precise delivery of radiation to spinal tumor

    Also known as: CT guided stereotactic radiosurgery, Stereotactic external beam radiation therapy

  • Diagnostic testMRI guided laser ablation

    Surgery will take place in intraoperative suite to include operating room and MRI scanner

    Also known as: Intraoperative MRI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Local Tumor Control Rate

    Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Local Tumor Control

    Time to local failure will be monitored continuously using Bayesian method.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

  2. Postoperative response to treatment assessed by MRI

    Routine MRI of the spine with and without contrast will be obtained at each follow-up visit. These post-treatment scans will be analyzed and compared to baseline scans for assessment of treatment response and local control. Bilsky grading system will be used.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

  3. Adverse Events

    To describe adverse side effects after treatment and descriptively correlate those effects with radiographic findings, pain control, and quality of life.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  4. Overall Survival

    Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  5. Changes in symptoms assessed by physical examination

    The Physical Exam includes a general exam:(HEENT) Head, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat evaluation, chest, heart, abdomen and extremities exam. Changes will be compared to baseline measurements. Negative changes will be evaluated by the neurosurgeon and radiation oncologist to determine if the change is related to a local failure or progression of systemic disease. Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months and annually thereafter

  6. Changes in symptoms assessed by neurological examination

    The neurological examination includes: mental status (tested through history taking), cranial nerves (observation of eyes, face, voice, and coordination during history taking and as patient moves about the exam room), motor system (visual inspection, tone, muscle strength and endurance, assigned score of 0-5 for each muscle, a score of 0 would mean no muscular contraction, and a score of 5 would mean movement against full resistance, normal strength), reflexes, sensory system (vibration in toes; pinprick in feet); coordination (truncal stability, fine finger movement, toe tapping, finger-nose-finger, heel-knee-shin), and station and gait (gait including arising from chair without hands, walking on toes, heels, and heel to toe). Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Measuring Quality of life (QOL) assessed by Spine Tumor Survey (MDASI-SP)

    We are measuring quality of life with the Spine Tumor Survey that will be assessed during each follow up Clinic visit. The patient survey will be assessed to measure postoperative response to treatment.

    Time frame: baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

  2. Measuring Quality of life (QOL) assessed by Health Survey (SF-36)

    We are measuring quality of life with the Health Survey that will be assessed during each follow up Clinic visit. The participants are asked questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include: General health, Physical Functioning, Role Physical, and Body Pain. Mental health-related scales include Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health. A 3 and 5 point Likert scale is used in the survey. Two summary scores of the physical and mental health using weighted means of the eight domains. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize pain relief and quality of life at each follow up visit, which will be the changes in scores from baseline to each assessment visit. Time to maximum pain relief will be the time from the day of thermal ablation until the lowest pain score for average pain after radiotherapy.

    Time frame: baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

  3. Measuring Quality of life (QOL) assessed by Brief Pain Inventory Survey (BPI)

    We are measuring quality of life with the Brief Pain Inventory Survey that will be assessed during each follow up Clinic visit. The patient survey will be assessed to measure postoperative response to treatment. Participants are asked to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. Severity of pain, including the pain location, worst pain in the last 24 hours, least pain in the last 24 hours, pain on average and pain right now. Range 0-10: a score of 0 would mean no pain and a score of 10 means the pain is as bad as you can imagine. Pain medications, amount of pain relief in the past 24 hours, and impact of pain on daily function, including general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life, and range 0-10.

    Time frame: baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Henry Ford Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    Recruiting
    • RAMONA DAVIS · ContactRDavis18@hfhs.org · 3132821753
    • REHNUMA NEWAZ · ContactRNewaz1@hfhs.org · 3139164123
    • IAN LEE, MD, FAANS · Principal investigator
    • ADAM ROBIN, MD · Sub investigator
    • MIRA SHAH, MD · Sub investigator
    • SALIM SIDDIQUI, MD,PHD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 71 months after the start.

Of 291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasm Metastasis, half reached primary completion within 58 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 93. This study's planned 71 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 316 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 91.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 2, 2021
First posted
Aug 27, 2021
StartActual
Sep 2, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 20, 2028
Last update
Jun 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05023772
Collaborators
Medtronic
Responsible party
Ian Lee, MD (Co-Director of the Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2021
Start date
Sep 2, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 20, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 3, 2026

Study contacts

RAMONA DAVIS
Contact
RDavis18@hfhs.org
3132821753
REHNUMA NEWAZ
Contact
RNewaz1@hfhs.org
3139164123
Ian Lee, MD
principal investigator · Henry Ford Health Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion