CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04923334BeatPain UtahUpdated Apr 7, 2026

Nonpharmacologic Pain Management in FQHC Primary Care Clinics

A Phase 3 interventional study of Brief Pain Teleconsult and Telehealth Physical Therapy in Low Back Pain and Chronic Pain, sponsored by University of Utah. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-07.

Sponsored by University of Utah · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to improve pain management and reduce opioid reliance for patients with chronic back pain in Utah Federally-Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). The study compares the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic pain treatments using telehealth to overcome access barriers. We will use automated EHR reminders for electronic referral to teleconsult services. Our project tests adaptive treatments and uses a hybrid type I design - focused on effectiveness outcomes while gathering implementation data to inform future efforts to scale effective strategies.

Read the detailed description

This randomized clinical trial compares the effectiveness of different strategies to provide efficacious nonpharmacologic interventions to patients with back pain seeking care in FQHCs throughout the state of Utah. The strategies evaluated are designed to overcome the barriers specific to rural and low income communities served by FQHC clinics through innovative use of telehealth resources. The randomized trial will randomize individual participants to one of two interventions strategies, one providing both a brief pain teleconsult with a 10-week telehealth physical therapy, the other uses an adaptive strategy - providing the brief pain teleconsult first, followed by the 10-week telehealth physical therapy only among those non-responsive to the brief teleconsult treatment. We will also evaluate outcomes related to the efforts to implement strategies in FQHC clinics in order to provide valuable information for future efforts to scale effective strategies into other low resource health care settings. Assessments will occur at baseline and after 12-, 26- and 52-weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
  • Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • Telehealth
  • Pain Management
  • Physical Therapy
  • Health Disparities
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Utah is the lead sponsor of 969 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Of its 107 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to communicate in English or Spanish
  • Age between 18-80
  • Visit with an FQHC provider (in-person or via telehealth) in past 90 days
  • Back pain has been an ongoing problem for at least the past 3 months, and has been a problem on at least half the days in the past 6 months
  • Access to resources necessary to receive telehealth sessions (phone or 2-way video)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant
  • Currently involved in active substance use disorder treatment (other than peer support groups, AA, etc.)
  • History of spine surgery in past 6 months
  • Has a condition restricting participation in physical activity (i.e., unable to ambulate independently (with or without assistive device) for at least 5 minutes.
  • Reason for back pain is a fracture or non-musculoskeletal condition (i.e., spinal tumor, inflammatory disorder, etc.)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brief Pain Teleconsult

    Participants randomized to Brief Pain Teleconsult will receive the brief teleconsult intervention in Phase 1 (1-12 weeks) Responder status to the Phase 1 treatment will be examined at the 12 week assessment. Participants determined to be non-responders will receive the Telehealth Physical Therapy intervention. Responders receive no additional treatment.

    Behavioral: Brief Pain Teleconsult · Behavioral: Telehealth Physical Therapy

  • Experimental
    Brief Pain Teleconsult plus Telehealth Physical Therapy

    Participants randomized to Brief Pain Teleconsult plus Telehealth Physical Therapy will receive the brief teleconsult intervention in Phase 1 followed by the 10-week physical therapy intervention. No additional treatment is provided after the 12 week assessment.

    Behavioral: Brief Pain Teleconsult · Behavioral: Telehealth Physical Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralBrief Pain Teleconsult

    The Brief Pain Teleconsult intervention includes 2 sessions provided by a licensed physical therapist over about 1 week. The sessions focus on pain education from a biopsychosocial perspective that is designed to address negative pain appraisals and catastrophizing thoughts, providing advice to be active and engage in exercise and physical activity, and reassurance that activity is beneficial and safe.

  • BehavioralTelehealth Physical Therapy

    The Telehealth Physical Therapy intervention involves weekly telehealth sessions provided over 10 weeks. Telehealth Physical Therapy is provided by a licensed physical therapist. Key components of the intervention include reinforcing biopsychosocial education messages and developing an exercise and physical activity program using cognitive behavioral principles such as goal setting and positive reinforcement. Pain coping strategies including mindful breathing and progressive relaxation techniques will be included.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PEG-3

    The PEG-3 measure includes 3 items evaluating 1) pain severity, and interference of pain with 2) enjoyment and 3) general activity. Item response options range from 0-10. The PEG-3 score is expressed as the mean of all item scores with higher scores indicating greater pain impact

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Function

    The PROMIS short form 6b for physical function uses fixed items from the PROMIS physical function item bank to provide a T-score with population mean = 50 (sd=10).

    Time frame: baseline, 12-, 26- and 52-weeks

  2. Sleep Disturbance

    The PROMIS short form 6a for sleep disturbance uses fixed items from the PROMIS sleep disturbance item bank to provide a T-score with population mean = 50 (sd=10).

    Time frame: baseline, 12-, 26- and 52-weeks

  3. Pain Catastrophizing

    The PSC-6 is a short-form questionnaire evaluating an individual's negative cognitive-affective response to anticipated or actual pain

    Time frame: baseline, 12-, 26- and 52-weeks

  4. Pain Self-Efficacy

    The PSEQ-4 is a short form questionnaire evaluating an individual's confidence in performing activities despite pain

    Time frame: baseline, 12-, 26- and 52-weeks

  5. Global Impression of Change

    The single-item PGIC assesses participants' of change following treatment based on the question: "Since my treatment, my pain is…" with Likert scale response options ranging from (0) "very much worse" to (6) "very much improved".

    Time frame: baseline, 12-, 26- and 52-weeks

  6. opioid use

    Prescription opioid use across the 52-week follow-up will be examined from EHR noting number of prescriptions and days of use.

    Time frame: across 52 week follow-up

  7. PEG-3

    The PEG-3 measure includes 3 items evaluating 1) pain severity, and interference of pain with 2) enjoyment and 3) general activity. Item response options range from 0-10. The PEG-3 score is expressed as the mean of all item scores with higher scores indicating greater pain impact

    Time frame: baseline, 26- and 52-weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Association of Utah Community Health
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84106, United States
  • The University of Utah Healthcare System
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fritz JM, Del Fiol G, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Solis V, Bennett E, Thackeray A, Goode A, Lundberg K, Romero A, Ford I, Stevens L, Siaperas T, Morales J, Yack M, Greene T. BeatPain Utah: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised trial examining telehealth strategies to provide non-pharmacologic pain care for persons with chronic low back pain receiving care in federally qualified health centers. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 9;12(11):e067732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067732. PubMed 36351735 ↗
  • Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Del Fiol G, Solis V, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jan 5;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00542-z. PubMed 38183154 ↗
  • Fritz JM, Ford I, George SZ, Vinci de Vanegas L, Cope T, Burke CA, Goode AP. Telehealth delivery of physical therapist-led interventions for persons with chronic low back pain in underserved communities: lessons from pragmatic clinical trials. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 19;5:1324096. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1324096. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38706872 ↗
  • Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Fiol GD, Solis VH, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023 Sep 11:rs.3.rs-3267087. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3267087/v1. PubMed 37790359 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be shared through the HEAL initiative at NIH

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04923334
Lead sponsor
University of Utah
Collaborators
Duke University
Responsible party
Julie Fritz (Distinguished Professor, University of Utah) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2021
Start date
Nov 4, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion