CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03757234Updated Jul 7, 2020Results posted

IV or IV/PO Omadacycline vs. IV/PO Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Pyelonephritis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Omadacycline and Levofloxacin in Acute Pyelonephritis, sponsored by Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc. Completed at 31 sites in 4 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-07.

Sponsored by Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
201
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (iv) or iv/per oral (po) omadacycline as compared to iv or iv/po levofloxacin in the treatment of female adults with acute pyelonephritis.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized (1:1:1:1:1), double-blind, double-dummy, adaptive designed, Phase 2 study. Based on review of the efficacy and microbiology data, the DMC modified the randomization algorithm, and no further participants were enrolled in the following treatment arms after May 2019: the omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv, omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv, and omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv arms. After this change, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv or levofloxacin arms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Pyelonephritis

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants, age 18-65 years who have signed the informed consent form
  • Must have a qualifying acute pyelonephritis
  • Participants must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug
  • Must be able to comply with all of the requirements of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • Symptoms of acute pyelonephritis present for longer 7 days prior to randomization
  • Infections that require antibacterial treatment for greater than 14 days
  • Evidence of suspected non-renal source of infections, vaginitis, or sexually transmitted infection
  • Evidence of significant immunological disease
  • Evidence of liver impairment or disease
  • Evidence of unstable cardiac disease
  • Severe renal disease or requirement for dialysis
  • Evidence of septic shock
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to levofloxacin
  • Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days
  • Participants who are pregnant or nursing
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
201 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv

    On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams intravenously (iv). On Days 2 through 7, participants continued to receive omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes.

    Drug: Omadacycline

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv

    On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes.

    Drug: Omadacycline

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv

    On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv or omadacycline 300 milligrams per oral (po). All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.

    Drug: Omadacycline

  • Experimental
    Omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv

    On Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv or omadacycline 450 milligrams po. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.

    Drug: Omadacycline

  • Active comparator
    Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv

    On Day 1, participants received levofloxacin 750 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received levofloxacin 750 milligrams iv or levofloxacin 750 milligrams po. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.

    Drug: Levofloxacin

Interventions

  • DrugOmadacycline

    po tablets

    Also known as: Nuzyra

  • DrugLevofloxacin

    iv solution/po tablets

    Also known as: Levaquin

  • DrugOmadacycline

    iv solution

    Also known as: Nuzyra

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)

    Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline AP signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional antimicrobial therapy is required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required or death at or before the PTE visit. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.

    Time frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).

  2. Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

    Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of 'Success', 'Failure', or 'Indeterminate'. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Success' if the outcomes of each baseline pathogens were eradication at the PTE visit. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Failure' if the outcome for any pathogen was persistence. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Indeterminate', if the outcome of at least 1 baseline pathogen was indeterminate and there was no outcome of persistence for any baseline pathogen.

    Time frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).

  3. Number of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

    Participants recorded their assessments using the Modified Patient Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (mPSAQ), a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).

  4. Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

    Participants recorded their assessments using the mPSAQ, a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of AP signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline.

    Time frame: Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    An adverse event is any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given a study drug or in a clinical study. A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as any adverse event that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity on or after the initiation of the study drug.

    Time frame: up to approximately 28 days

06

Results

Posted Jul 7, 2020
Limitations and caveats
In May 2019, the DMC modified the randomization algorithm based on their review of the data. After this change, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv or levofloxacin arms.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
Started7518171774
Completed pte visit7216171671
Completed7216171670
Not completed32014
Withdrew: Adverse event00001
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11012
Withdrew: Other11000

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)

Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline AP signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional antimicrobial therapy is required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required or death at or before the PTE visit. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.

Time frame:
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
Clinical Success6815151669
Clinical Failure51201
Indeterminate22014
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: -2.6 · 95% CI -12.4 to 6.9Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: -9.9 · 95% CI -34.8 to 5.3Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: -5.0 · 95% CI -30.6 to 8.2Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: 0.9 · 95% CI -22.4 to 11.8Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)

Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of 'Success', 'Failure', or 'Indeterminate'. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Success' if the outcomes of each baseline pathogens were eradication at the PTE visit. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Failure' if the outcome for any pathogen was persistence. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Indeterminate', if the outcome of at least 1 baseline pathogen was indeterminate and there was no outcome of persistence for any baseline pathogen.

Time frame:
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
Clinical Success3239539
Clinical Failure1375711
Indeterminate11012
Statistical analysis
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: -5.4 · 95% CI -23.6 to 12.7Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: -47.7 · 95% CI -71.3 to -6.0Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: -10.7 · 95% CI -40.8 to 15.1Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
  • Omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv vs Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv · Treatment difference: -36.5 · 95% CI -62.6 to -1.1Point estimate and exact 95% confidence intervals for difference from levofloxacin (omadacycline minus levofloxacin) in clinical success rate was estimated.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

Participants recorded their assessments using the Modified Patient Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (mPSAQ), a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms.

Time frame:
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
Number of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)5115141354
PrimaryNumber of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)

Participants recorded their assessments using the mPSAQ, a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of AP signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline.

Time frame:
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
ParticipantsOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)6216161565
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given a study drug or in a clinical study. A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as any adverse event that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity on or after the initiation of the study drug.

Time frame:
up to approximately 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events2369824
Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events00222

Adverse events

Collected over Up to approximately 28 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)21/75 (28%)
Omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)6/18 (33.3%)
Omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv0/17 (0%)2/17 (11.8%)7/17 (41.2%)
Omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv0/17 (0%)2/17 (11.8%)8/17 (47.1%)
Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv0/74 (0%)2/74 (2.7%)16/74 (21.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
Renal abscessInfections and infestations0/750/181/170/170/74
Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations0/750/181/170/170/74
Duodenal ulcer haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/750/180/171/170/74
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/750/180/171/171/74
Escherichia bacteraemiaInfections and infestations0/750/180/171/170/74
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/750/180/170/171/74
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent other events
EventOmadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/750/180/174/175/74
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/750/182/173/175/74
Asymptomatic bacteriuriaInfections and infestations3/752/182/171/171/74
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/750/182/170/170/74
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/751/180/171/175/74
TachycardiaCardiac disorders0/750/180/171/170/74
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/750/180/171/171/74
Oral herpesInfections and infestations0/750/181/170/170/74
Viral rhinitisInfections and infestations0/750/181/170/170/74
Vulvovaginal candidiasisInfections and infestations0/750/181/170/170/74

Baseline characteristics

The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Omadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or ivTotal
Mean38.2 ± 14.9733.9 ± 14.4837.1 ± 15.9738.2 ± 17.6638.8 ± 14.7437.9 ± 15.07
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Omadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or ivTotal
Female7518171774201
Male000000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Omadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or ivTotal
Hispanic or Latino100001
Not Hispanic or Latino7418171774200
Unknown or Not Reported000000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Omadacycline 200 iv/200 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 ivOmadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 ivLevofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or ivTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000000
Asian100001
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000000
Black or African American000000
White7418171774200
More than one race000000
Unknown or Not Reported000000
07

Study locations

31 sites
  • Site 201
    Tbilisi, Georgia
  • Site 202
    Tbilisi, Georgia
  • Site 203
    Tbilisi, Georgia
  • Site 204
    Tbilisi, Georgia
  • Site 301
    Daugavpils, Latvia
  • Site 304
    Liepāja, LV-3414, Latvia
  • Site 302
    Riga, Latvia
  • Site 305
    Rēzekne, Latvia
  • Site 303
    Valmiera, Latvia
  • Site 409
    Krasnoyarsk, 660062, Russian Federation
  • Site 408
    Moscow, 141435, Russian Federation
  • Site 410
    Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Site 415
    Penza, 440026, Russian Federation
  • Site 407
    Rostov-on-Don, 344022, Russian Federation
  • Site 405
    Rostov-on-Don, 344037, Russian Federation
  • Site 411
    Saint Petersburg, 194291, Russian Federation
  • Site 406
    Saint Petersburg, 195067, Russian Federation
  • Site 402
    Saint Petersburg, 196247, Russian Federation
  • Site 412
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation
  • Site 403
    Saint Petersburg, 197374, Russian Federation
  • Site 414
    Saint Petersburg, 198205, Russian Federation
  • Site 401
    Saint Petersburg, 198412, Russian Federation
  • Site 404
    Saint Petersburg, 199106, Russian Federation
  • Site 413
    Smolensk, 214018, Russian Federation
  • Site 502
    Chernivtsi, 58001, Ukraine
  • Site 506
    Dnipro, 49005, Ukraine
  • Site 505
    Kharkiv, 61037, Ukraine
  • Site 504
    Kyiv, 2660, Ukraine
  • Site 503
    Kyiv, 4053, Ukraine
  • Site 501
    Lviv, 79059, Ukraine
  • Site 507
    Zaporizhzhia, 69600, Ukraine
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 26, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 4, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03757234
Lead sponsor
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 28, 2018
Start date
Nov 19, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2019
Completion
Jul 24, 2019
Results posted
Jul 7, 2020
Last update
Jul 7, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion